Cant seem to find a solution to this problemed (found many similar).
Using WinXP Prof with SP2 (.NET 1.0 and 1.1 - and IIS 5.1)
The ASP.NET service didnt work and the ASP.NET tab in IIIs was
missing, so I did aspnet_regiis -i under 1.1 .NET folder which seems
to have fixed the webservice but the ASP.NET tab is still missing.
Tryed the ASPNETVersionSwitcher but didnt help. Also the computer had
none of the reg entries mentioned here ; http://www.eggheadcafe.com/forumpost...umpostid=20592
Appreciate any input. 24  2019 
On Mar 23, 12:08 pm, "RedLars" <Liverpool1...@gmail.comwrote:
Cant seem to find a solution to this problemed (found many similar).
Using WinXP Prof with SP2 (.NET 1.0 and 1.1 - and IIS 5.1)
The ASP.NET service didnt work and the ASP.NET tab in IIIs was
missing, so I did aspnet_regiis -i under 1.1 .NET folder which seems
to have fixed the webservice but the ASP.NET tab is still missing.
Tryed the ASPNETVersionSwitcher but didnt help. Also the computer had
none of the reg entries mentioned here ;http://www.eggheadcafe.com/forumpost...umpostid=20592
Appreciate any input.
ASP.NET Tab will appear in IIS with .NET 2
You don't get the ASP.NET tab for 1.0 and 1.1.
You only get them for ASP.NET 1.1 and 2.0.
If you install the .Net Framework 2.0, you'll get the tab.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"RedLars" <Li***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@b75g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
Cant seem to find a solution to this problemed (found many similar).
Using WinXP Prof with SP2 (.NET 1.0 and 1.1 - and IIS 5.1)
The ASP.NET service didnt work and the ASP.NET tab in IIIs was
missing, so I did aspnet_regiis -i under 1.1 .NET folder which seems
to have fixed the webservice but the ASP.NET tab is still missing.
Tryed the ASPNETVersionSwitcher but didnt help. Also the computer had
none of the reg entries mentioned here ;
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/forumpost...umpostid=20592
Appreciate any input.
On 23 Mar, 15:16, "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.comwrote:
You don't get the ASP.NET tab for 1.0 and 1.1.
You only get them for ASP.NET 1.1 and 2.0.
If you install the .Net Framework 2.0, you'll get the tab.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq :http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español :http://asp.net.do/foros/
==================================="RedLars" <Liverpool1...@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@b75g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
Cant seem to find a solution to this problemed (found many similar).
Using WinXP Prof with SP2 (.NET 1.0 and 1.1 - and IIS 5.1)
The ASP.NET service didnt work and the ASP.NET tab in IIIs was
missing, so I did aspnet_regiis -i under 1.1 .NET folder which seems
to have fixed the webservice but the ASP.NET tab is still missing.
Tryed the ASPNETVersionSwitcher but didnt help. Also the computer had
none of the reg entries mentioned here ;
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/forumpost...umpostid=20592
Appreciate any input.- Skjul sitert tekst -
- Vis sitert tekst -
Thanks for the feedback.
Installing .NET 2.0 is not an option at the moment.
Another question, is there a 'correct' sequence of installing IIS
and .NET (1.0, 1.1 and 2.0) ? I've read somewhere that IIS should be
installed first and then each .NET package in succession but have not
found any microsoft document confirming this. Can anyone help me out?
On Mar 23, 3:16 pm, "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.com>
wrote:
You don't get the ASP.NET tab for 1.0 and 1.1.
You only get them for ASP.NET 1.1 and 2.0.
Once .NET 2 is installed, ASP.NET Tab will have all available versions
to select.
I have 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0
On Mar 23, 3:45 pm, "RedLars" <Liverpool1...@gmail.comwrote:
>
Another question, is there a 'correct' sequence of installing IIS
and .NET (1.0, 1.1 and 2.0) ? I've read somewhere that IIS should be
installed first and then each .NET package in succession but have not
found any microsoft document confirming this. Can anyone help me out?- Hide quoted text -
As far as I know it can be installed in any order. If IIS is installed
after the framework, you should register ASP.NET by using
aspnet_regiis.exe
Can be found at C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\{ver.}\
re:
!Another question, is there a 'correct' sequence of installing IIS
!and .NET (1.0, 1.1 and 2.0) ? I've read somewhere that IIS should be
!installed first and then each .NET package in succession
That is exactly right.
..Net 1.0 is obsolete now, though.
Installing it now is only installing dead weight.
Start by installing IIS and then the .Net Frameworks 1.1 and 2.0, in that order.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"RedLars" <Li***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@d57g2000hsg.googlegr oups.com...
On 23 Mar, 15:16, "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.comwrote:
You don't get the ASP.NET tab for 1.0 and 1.1.
You only get them for ASP.NET 1.1 and 2.0.
If you install the .Net Framework 2.0, you'll get the tab.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq :http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español :http://asp.net.do/foros/
==================================="RedLars" <Liverpool1...@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@b75g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
Cant seem to find a solution to this problemed (found many similar).
Using WinXP Prof with SP2 (.NET 1.0 and 1.1 - and IIS 5.1)
The ASP.NET service didnt work and the ASP.NET tab in IIIs was
missing, so I did aspnet_regiis -i under 1.1 .NET folder which seems
to have fixed the webservice but the ASP.NET tab is still missing.
Tryed the ASPNETVersionSwitcher but didnt help. Also the computer had
none of the reg entries mentioned here ;
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/forumpost...umpostid=20592
Appreciate any input.- Skjul sitert tekst -
- Vis sitert tekst -
Thanks for the feedback.
Installing .NET 2.0 is not an option at the moment.
Another question, is there a 'correct' sequence of installing IIS
and .NET (1.0, 1.1 and 2.0) ? I've read somewhere that IIS should be
installed first and then each .NET package in succession but have not
found any microsoft document confirming this. Can anyone help me out?
re:
I have 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0
Yes, for Windows XP that's a possibility, albeit a useless one.
Sometimes I forget that not everybody is running a recent server.
W2K3 shipped with the .Net Framework 1.1 out of the box, no 1.0.
You can't even install the .Net Framework 1.0 on W2K3.
Do you do anything at all with the .Net Framework 1.0 ?
If not, you might as well uninstall it. It's dead weight.
Why run an obsolete/inefficient framework?
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Alexey Smirnov" <al************@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@e1g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
On Mar 23, 3:16 pm, "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.com>
wrote:
>You don't get the ASP.NET tab for 1.0 and 1.1.
You only get them for ASP.NET 1.1 and 2.0.
Once .NET 2 is installed, ASP.NET Tab will have all available versions to select.
I have 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0
re:
As far as I know it can be installed in any order.
You might get by that way, but you might as well install them in numerical sequence.
It'll be good practice, so you don't install VS 2005 first and then VS 2003.
If you do that, the MSDN documentation gets screwed up.
Also, if you have several websites done in .Net 2.0, and install 1.1,
you need to be careful that sites aren't reset to use the 1.1 Framework.
I remember a few bug reports about that.
2.0 doesn't appropiate all websites.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Alexey Smirnov" <al************@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@o5g2000hsb.googlegro ups.com...
On Mar 23, 3:45 pm, "RedLars" <Liverpool1...@gmail.comwrote:
>>
Another question, is there a 'correct' sequence of installing IIS
and .NET (1.0, 1.1 and 2.0) ? I've read somewhere that IIS should be
installed first and then each .NET package in succession but have not
found any microsoft document confirming this. Can anyone help me out?- Hide quoted text -
As far as I know it can be installed in any order. If IIS is installed
after the framework, you should register ASP.NET by using
aspnet_regiis.exe
Can be found at C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\{ver.}\
On Mar 23, 4:25 pm, "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.com>
wrote:
Why run an obsolete/inefficient framework?
For example, because of owning VS.NET 2002
re:
!For example, because of owning VS.NET 2002
I still own DOS 3.1 and Windows 3.11 for Workgroups.
Should I be developing websites in them ?
Upgrading your VS 2002 platform is a must.
Hanging on to it, just because you own it, is a mistake which will cost you dearly.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Alexey Smirnov" <al************@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@e1g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
On Mar 23, 4:25 pm, "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.com>
wrote:
>Why run an obsolete/inefficient framework?
For example, because of owning VS.NET 2002
On Mar 23, 6:16 pm, "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.com>
wrote:
re:
!For example, because of owning VS.NET 2002
I still own DOS 3.1 and Windows 3.11 for Workgroups.
Should I be developing websites in them ?
Upgrading your VS 2002 platform is a must.
Hanging on to it, just because you own it, is a mistake which will cost you dearly.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
Juan, there must be a reason.
I agree that the development using the VS.NET 2002 for Win 2000 Server
and SQL 2000 looks obsolete today, in 2007. At the same time, there
are still many users/organizations that use this software because the
cost to change is much higher than the cost to leave and for other
reasons. I said, I have the VS 2002. This is because I have a big
project written on .NET 1.0 and it's not updated to .NET 2.0 because
it doesn't bring anything new to the user in terms of functionality.
To the end of the year this project will be replaced by a new software
(.NET2/Win2003), but for a while I have to keep the .NET 1 installed
to be able to do a change if it will be necessary. Another example:
I'm using a special business-critical add-on for VS 2003, which
still(!) has no version for VS 2005, and because of this I have to
keep the .NET 1.1 installed. Okay, the new projects I do on .NET2, no
doubt, I have it too, and recently I've started to work with new MOSS
and WWF and I installed the .NET 3. Do you mean I'm running a not-
recent box? :-)
Just because it's new doesn't mean "a must".
re:
Just because it's new doesn't mean "a must".
The released version of VS 2005 is already almost 1.5 years old and,
if you count the Beta period, it's almost 3 years old. :-)
If VS 2005's cost is a problem, you can use VWD to upgrade your app to 2.0.
It's free.
re:
>Do you mean I'm running a not-recent box? :-)
Not at all, but it's clear you're running your app on a not-recent platform. :-)
The .Net Framework 2.0 dances circles around the 1.0 version.
If you, at all, can upgrade your app...I strongly suggest you do.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Alexey Smirnov" <al************@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@e1g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
On Mar 23, 6:16 pm, "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.com>
wrote:
>re:
!For example, because of owning VS.NET 2002
I still own DOS 3.1 and Windows 3.11 for Workgroups.
Should I be developing websites in them ?
Upgrading your VS 2002 platform is a must.
Hanging on to it, just because you own it, is a mistake which will cost you dearly.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
Juan, there must be a reason.
I agree that the development using the VS.NET 2002 for Win 2000 Server
and SQL 2000 looks obsolete today, in 2007. At the same time, there
are still many users/organizations that use this software because the
cost to change is much higher than the cost to leave and for other
reasons. I said, I have the VS 2002. This is because I have a big
project written on .NET 1.0 and it's not updated to .NET 2.0 because
it doesn't bring anything new to the user in terms of functionality.
To the end of the year this project will be replaced by a new software
(.NET2/Win2003), but for a while I have to keep the .NET 1 installed
to be able to do a change if it will be necessary. Another example:
I'm using a special business-critical add-on for VS 2003, which
still(!) has no version for VS 2005, and because of this I have to
keep the .NET 1.1 installed. Okay, the new projects I do on .NET2, no
doubt, I have it too, and recently I've started to work with new MOSS
and WWF and I installed the .NET 3. Do you mean I'm running a not-
recent box? :-)
Just because it's new doesn't mean "a must".
Thanks for the feedback.
Is there any microsoft web article that highlights the need to install
IIS and .NET in the right order or using aspnet_regiis -i afterwards?
Needs this confirmed by something more 'official' than a news-group
that I can show my boss, no offence.
Thanks
On 23 Mar, 17:19, "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.comwrote:
re:
!Another question, is there a 'correct' sequence of installing IIS
!and .NET (1.0, 1.1 and 2.0) ? I've read somewhere that IIS should be
!installed first and then each .NET package in succession
That is exactly right.
.Net 1.0 is obsolete now, though.
Installing it now is only installing dead weight.
Start by installing IIS and then the .Net Frameworks 1.1 and 2.0, in that order.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq :http://asp.net.do/faq/
On Mar 25, 12:22 pm, "RedLars" <Liverpool1...@gmail.comwrote:
Is there any microsoft web article that highlights the need to install
IIS and .NET in the right order or using aspnet_regiis -i afterwards?
Needs this confirmed by something more 'official' than a news-group
that I can show my boss, no offence.
This newsgroup is official Microsoft newsgroup :-)
ASP.NET Development Requirements
Quote: "If you install IIS after the .NET .NET Framework is already
installed, you must use the Aspnet_regiis.exe utility to register
ASP.NET with IIS." http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms228041.aspx
Frequently Asked Questions
Quote: "If you install IIS after you install the .NET Framework, you
must also register the ASP.NET extensions with IIS. You can do this by
running the aspnet_regiis executable from: %windows root directory%
\Microsoft.NET\Framework\%version of the .NET Framework%\aspnet_regiis
-r where %windows root directory% is the directory Windows is
installed to (typically c:\windows or c:\winnt) and %version of
the .NET Framework% is the version of the .NET Framework you have
installed. The directory for .NET 1.0 is v1.0.3705, for 1.1 is
v1.1.4322, and for 2.0 is v2.0.50727." http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/asp.net/aa336670.aspx
"Alexey Smirnov" <al************@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@p77g2000hsh.googlegro ups.com...
>Is there any microsoft web article that highlights the need to install
IIS and .NET in the right order or using aspnet_regiis -i afterwards?
Needs this confirmed by something more 'official' than a news-group
that I can show my boss, no offence.
This newsgroup is official Microsoft newsgroup :-)
This newsgroup, like all other newsgroups on msnews.microsoft.com, is
unmoderated and open to anyone and everyone - anyone can post anything they
like...
Some people like Juan et al are known as MVPs ("most valuable
professionals"), which is an acknowledgement given at Microsoft's discretion
in recognition (among other things) for their contribution to the newsgroup
and, as such, is Microsoft's way of saying that it is highly likely that
these people know what they are talking about... So, if Juan or Peter or
John or Eliyahu or any other MVP posts in here, you can be more than
reasonably confident that what they're saying is correct...
But that in no way makes it "official"... MVPs are not Microsoft employees,
and receive no monetary reward for their efforts... In fact, if an MVP
subsequently becomes a Microsoft employee, it is my understanding that they
can no longer be an MVP...
On Mar 25, 1:13 pm, "Mark Rae" <m...@markNOSPAMrae.comwrote:
This newsgroup is official Microsoft newsgroup :-)
Mark, I'm just kidding
"Alexey Smirnov" <al************@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@n59g2000hsh.googlegro ups.com...
On Mar 25, 1:13 pm, "Mark Rae" <m...@markNOSPAMrae.comwrote:
This newsgroup is official Microsoft newsgroup :-)
Mark, I'm just kidding
I know that, but I thought the OP probably wouldn't...
re:
!Is there any microsoft web article that highlights the need to install
!IIS and .NET in the right order
See : http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
That's the .Net Framework 2.0 system requirements / download page.
Scoot down to "Additional Information"...
----------------------------------------------------------
Server Installation Requirements:
"If you have been directed to do a server installation, you must have the following
software installed in addition to the typical installation requirements:
Microsoft Data Access Components 2.8 or later is recommended.
Internet Information Services (IIS) version 5.0 or later.
To access the features of ASP.NET, IIS with the latest security updates
must be installed prior to installing the .NET Framework."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You can show that to your boss.
The principal problem encountered when the .Net Framework is installed before IIS
is that users need to manually register the framework with IIS ( it's impossible to
register the .net framework with IIS if IIS isn't installed... )
There's other problems which crop up, like inability to use the VS debugger,
security problems for the ASP.NET account, problems with the ASP.NET
version selector, etc., if you install Visual Studio before installing IIS.
The order of installation is very important.
To prevent problems, install in this order :
OS ( if you can select/install IIS, install it when you install the OS )
....otherwise install IIS immediately afterwards
Install the .Net Framework
Install your database tool of choice
Install Visual Studio
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"RedLars" <Li***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@e65g2000hsc.googlegr oups.com...
Thanks for the feedback.
Is there any microsoft web article that highlights the need to install
IIS and .NET in the right order or using aspnet_regiis -i afterwards?
Needs this confirmed by something more 'official' than a news-group
that I can show my boss, no offence.
Thanks
On 23 Mar, 17:19, "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.comwrote:
>re:
!Another question, is there a 'correct' sequence of installing IIS
!and .NET (1.0, 1.1 and 2.0) ? I've read somewhere that IIS should be
!installed first and then each .NET package in succession
That is exactly right.
.Net 1.0 is obsolete now, though.
Installing it now is only installing dead weight.
Start by installing IIS and then the .Net Frameworks 1.1 and 2.0, in that order.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq :http://asp.net.do/faq/
"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@nowhere.comwrote in message
news:uW**************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
Install your database tool of choice
Install Visual Studio
Does that still apply if your database was released a fair bit later than
Visual Studio.NET e.g. if you were using SQL Server 2005 but still using
Visual Studio.NET 2003...?
The order is unimportant, overall, except for assuring that
the right version of MDAC is installed ( 2.8, at least ).
I prefer SQL first, as I can get start programming as soon as the
VS install is done, but it is not critical either way, except for MDAC.
As regards SQL Server Express 2005 and VS 2005, VS 2005
will install it for you *before* it installs itself, so there's a tip.
If you want to install SQL Server 2005 but not Express, install VS.NET using
the "Personalized" option, and then you can de-select SQL Server Express 2005
so that VS.NET doesn't install it, if you only want to work with SQL Server 2005.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Mark Rae" <ma**@markNOSPAMrae.comwrote in message news:OS**************@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@nowhere.comwrote in message
news:uW**************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>Install your database tool of choice
Install Visual Studio
Does that still apply if your database was released a fair bit later than Visual Studio.NET e.g.
if you were using SQL Server 2005 but still using Visual Studio.NET 2003...?
"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@nowhere.comwrote in message
news:OR**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
The order is unimportant, overall, except for assuring that
the right version of MDAC is installed ( 2.8, at least ).
Fair enough - there's a school of thought which says that it's best to
install software in the order it was released, hence the question...
On Mar 25, 2:58 pm, "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.com>
wrote:
re:
!Is there any microsoft web article that highlights the need to install
!IIS and .NET in the right order
See :http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...d=0856eacb-436...
That's the .Net Framework 2.0 system requirements / download page.
Scoot down to "Additional Information"...
----------------------------------------------------------
Server Installation Requirements:
"If you have been directed to do a server installation, you must have thefollowing
software installed in addition to the typical installation requirements:
Microsoft Data Access Components 2.8 or later is recommended.
Internet Information Services (IIS) version 5.0 or later.
To access the features of ASP.NET, IIS with the latest security updates
must be installed prior to installing the .NET Framework."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*-----
You can show that to your boss.
The principal problem encountered when the .Net Framework is installed before IIS
is that users need to manually register the framework with IIS ( it's impossible to
register the .net framework with IIS if IIS isn't installed... )
There's other problems which crop up, like inability to use the VS debugger,
security problems for the ASP.NET account, problems with the ASP.NET
version selector, etc., if you install Visual Studio before installing IIS.
The order of installation is very important.
To prevent problems, install in this order :
OS ( if you can select/install IIS, install it when you install the OS )
...otherwise install IIS immediately afterwards
Install the .Net Framework
Install your database tool of choice
Install Visual Studio
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq :http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español :http://asp.net.do/foros/
==================================="RedLars" <Liverpool1...@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@e65g2000hsc.googlegr oups.com...
Thanks for the feedback.
Is there any microsoft web article that highlights the need to install
IIS and .NET in the right order or using aspnet_regiis -i afterwards?
Needs this confirmed by something more 'official' than a news-group
that I can show my boss, no offence.
Thanks
On 23 Mar, 17:19, "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.comwrote:
re:
!Another question, is there a 'correct' sequence of installing IIS
!and .NET (1.0, 1.1 and 2.0) ? I've read somewhere that IIS should be
!installed first and then each .NET package in succession
That is exactly right.
.Net 1.0 is obsolete now, though.
Installing it now is only installing dead weight.
Start by installing IIS and then the .Net Frameworks 1.1 and 2.0, in that order.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq :http://asp.net.do/faq/- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Quote: "If you installed IIS after installing Visual Studio .NET
Prerequisites or Visual Studio .NET, you must repair .NET Framework
before you can successfully create Web applications and XML Web
services." http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/lib...xk(vs.71).aspx
I think this can be a final message to the OP. The order is really
unimportant, and in case you don't want to deal with aspnet_regiis you
can always "repair" the .NET
Hi
The reason I'm asking is that we're building a basic image (WinXP,
IIS, dotnet etc) used by many of our engineers. In some cases these
computer will be using IIS and ASP, it's easier for us to install
everything in the right order rather than educating people in the
usage of aspnet_regiis. So in this case I believe order is somewhat
important.
Anyway, thanks for the help.
>
I think this can be a final message to the OP. The order is really
unimportant, and in case you don't want to deal with aspnet_regiis you
can always "repair" the .NET-
re:
!The order is really unimportant
Unless you enjoy manually registering the .Net Framework with IIS, what's the point ?
The order *is* important, if you want to save your efforts for more worthwhile endeavors.
re:
!in case you don't want to deal with aspnet_regiis you can always "repair" the .NET
It's wasted effort.
I *really* don't see the need for doing manually what doesn't
need to be done at all...if the correct installation order is used.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Alexey Smirnov" <al************@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@l77g2000hsb.googlegro ups.com...
On Mar 25, 2:58 pm, "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.com>
wrote:
re:
!Is there any microsoft web article that highlights the need to install
!IIS and .NET in the right order
See :http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...d=0856eacb-436...
That's the .Net Framework 2.0 system requirements / download page.
Scoot down to "Additional Information"...
----------------------------------------------------------
Server Installation Requirements:
"If you have been directed to do a server installation, you must have the following
software installed in addition to the typical installation requirements:
Microsoft Data Access Components 2.8 or later is recommended.
Internet Information Services (IIS) version 5.0 or later.
To access the features of ASP.NET, IIS with the latest security updates
must be installed prior to installing the .NET Framework."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*-----
You can show that to your boss.
The principal problem encountered when the .Net Framework is installed before IIS
is that users need to manually register the framework with IIS ( it's impossible to
register the .net framework with IIS if IIS isn't installed... )
There's other problems which crop up, like inability to use the VS debugger,
security problems for the ASP.NET account, problems with the ASP.NET
version selector, etc., if you install Visual Studio before installing IIS.
The order of installation is very important.
To prevent problems, install in this order :
OS ( if you can select/install IIS, install it when you install the OS )
...otherwise install IIS immediately afterwards
Install the .Net Framework
Install your database tool of choice
Install Visual Studio
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq :http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español :http://asp.net.do/foros/
==================================="RedLars" <Liverpool1...@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@e65g2000hsc.googlegr oups.com...
Thanks for the feedback.
Is there any microsoft web article that highlights the need to install
IIS and .NET in the right order or using aspnet_regiis -i afterwards?
Needs this confirmed by something more 'official' than a news-group
that I can show my boss, no offence.
Thanks
On 23 Mar, 17:19, "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.comwrote:
re:
!Another question, is there a 'correct' sequence of installing IIS
!and .NET (1.0, 1.1 and 2.0) ? I've read somewhere that IIS should be
!installed first and then each .NET package in succession
That is exactly right.
.Net 1.0 is obsolete now, though.
Installing it now is only installing dead weight.
Start by installing IIS and then the .Net Frameworks 1.1 and 2.0, in that order.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq :http://asp.net.do/faq/- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Quote: "If you installed IIS after installing Visual Studio .NET
Prerequisites or Visual Studio .NET, you must repair .NET Framework
before you can successfully create Web applications and XML Web
services." http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/lib...xk(vs.71).aspx
I think this can be a final message to the OP. The order is really
unimportant, and in case you don't want to deal with aspnet_regiis you
can always "repair" the .NET This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: William C. White |
last post by:
Does anyone know of a way to use PHP /w Authorize.net AIM without using
cURL? Our website is hosted on a shared drive and the webhost company
doesn't installed additional software (such as cURL)...
|
by: Albert Ahtenberg |
last post by:
Hello,
I don't know if it is only me but I was sure that header("Location:url")
redirects the browser instantly to URL, or at least stops the execution of
the code. But appearantely it continues...
|
by: James |
last post by:
Hi,
I have a form with 2 fields.
'A'
'B'
The user completes one of the fields and the form is submitted.
On the results page I want to run a query, but this will change
subject to which...
|
by: Ollivier Robert |
last post by:
Hello,
I'm trying to link PHP with Oracle 9.2.0/OCI8 with gcc 3.2.3 on a Solaris9
system. The link succeeds but everytime I try to run php, I get a SEGV from
inside the libcnltsh.so library.
...
|
by: Richard Galli |
last post by:
I want viewers to compare state laws on a single subject.
Imagine a three-column table with a drop-down box on the top. A viewer
selects a state from the list, and that state's text fills the...
|
by: Albert Ahtenberg |
last post by:
Hello,
I have two questions.
1. When the user presses the back button and returns to a form he filled
the form is reseted. How do I leave there the values he inserted?
2. When the...
|
by: inderjit S Gabrie |
last post by:
Hi all
Here is the scenerio ...is it possibly to do this...
i am getting valid course dates output on to a web which i have designed
....all is okay so far , look at the following web url
...
|
by: Jack |
last post by:
Hi All,
What is the PHP equivilent of Oracle bind variables in a SQL statement, e.g.
select x from y where z=:parameter
Which in asp/jsp would be followed by some statements to bind a value...
|
by: Sandwick |
last post by:
I am trying to change the size of a drawing so they are all 3x3.
the script below is what i was trying to use to cut it in half ... I
get errors.
I can display the normal picture but not the...
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: nemocccc |
last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
| |
