I am new to web development - but I am confused with the 2 (largely
incompatable) development choices available.
I dont really want to invest time learning one, only to have iit
abandoned by MS further down the line, or to discover later that it was
the "poorer cousin". Which platform should I invest my time in learning
and why ?
16  1586 
re:
largely incompatable
I don't know what gives you that idea.
Visual Web Developer is embedded in Visual Studio,
and is the identical same program, standalone or embedded.
The differences are that Visual Studio has quite a few features which VWD doesn't have,
that Visual Studio can be used to develop Windows programs and not just web apps,
and that add-ins don't work with VWD.
There's a list of features for each VS version at : http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa700921.aspx
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Bit Byte" <ro**@yourbox.comwrote in message news:9O*********************@bt.com...
>I am new to web development - but I am confused with the 2 (largely incompatable) development
choices available.
I dont really want to invest time learning one, only to have iit abandoned by MS further down the
line, or to discover later that it was the "poorer cousin". Which platform should I invest my time
in learning and why ?
Correction:
I need to clarify myself. I'm talking aout the incompatabilities between
Web Application Project Model and Web Site Projects - which model is the
most widely supported (I know they both have pros and cons) - but I
don't really want to invest time with one only to find I picked the
"wrong horse"
Juan T. Llibre wrote:
re:
>>largely incompatable
I don't know what gives you that idea.
Visual Web Developer is embedded in Visual Studio,
and is the identical same program, standalone or embedded.
The differences are that Visual Studio has quite a few features which VWD doesn't have,
that Visual Studio can be used to develop Windows programs and not just web apps,
and that add-ins don't work with VWD.
There's a list of features for each VS version at :
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa700921.aspx
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Bit Byte" <ro**@yourbox.comwrote in message news:9O*********************@bt.com...
>>I am new to web development - but I am confused with the 2 (largely incompatable) development
choices available.
>>I dont really want to invest time learning one, only to have iit abandoned by MS further down the
line, or to discover later that it was the "poorer cousin". Which platform should I invest my time
in learning and why ?
"Bit Byte" <ro**@yourbox.comwrote in message
news:9O*********************@bt.com...
>I am new to web development - but I am confused with the 2 (largely
incompatable) development choices available.
Obviously, when you say "largely incompatible", you actually mean "very
similar"...
VWD is merely a free cut-down version of Visual Studio.NET. If you take all
of the "Express" editions of the development suite and add them together,
you (more or less) arrive at the full-blown Visual Studio.NET 2005.
re:
Web Application Project Model and Web Site Projects
The VS 2005 WAP model is geared more towards large-scale,
multi-developer, commercial web development.
Web site projects (the VWD model) is suited for small websites/standalone development.
You would not want to attempt to perform large scale
or distributed type development with VWD, anyway.
Your choice, depending on your needs and budget.
If you can afford the cost for VS 2005, buy it.
If your budget is limited, take the free VWD IDE.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Bit Byte" <ro**@yourbox.comwrote in message news:AI******************************@bt.com...
Correction:
I need to clarify myself. I'm talking aout the incompatabilities between Web Application Project
Model and Web Site Projects - which model is the most widely supported (I know they both have pros
and cons) - but I don't really want to invest time with one only to find I picked the "wrong
horse"
Juan T. Llibre wrote:
>re:
>>>largely incompatable
I don't know what gives you that idea.
Visual Web Developer is embedded in Visual Studio,
and is the identical same program, standalone or embedded.
The differences are that Visual Studio has quite a few features which VWD doesn't have,
that Visual Studio can be used to develop Windows programs and not just web apps,
and that add-ins don't work with VWD.
There's a list of features for each VS version at :
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa700921.aspx
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Bit Byte" <ro**@yourbox.comwrote in message news:9O*********************@bt.com...
>>>I am new to web development - but I am confused with the 2 (largely incompatable) development
choices available.
>>>I dont really want to invest time learning one, only to have iit abandoned by MS further down the
line, or to discover later that it was the "poorer cousin". Which platform should I invest my
time in learning and why ?
WAP and WSP has nothing to do with the version of VS, other than I guess you
can not run WAP from VS Express versions.
WSP is the "original" VS 2005 model, and is the only model available in a
clean VS 2005 installation - so for that reason it will be the most widely
supported. But that said there is no more "supported" cons, sins VS 2005 SP1
adds support for WSP.
Are you comming from classic ASP webdevelopment, you would most likely
prefer the WSP, sins it would be very much like you are used too. But are you
coming from VB or are you planing to make large scale websolutions you would
likely prefer the WAP model. Sinse it gives you better control over your web
project, and better options for structuring your projekt in seperated
assemblies - which you can not do i the WSP model.
And here is the link to "Comparing Web Site Projects and Web Application
Projects": http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/lib...px#wapp_topic5
Hope it helps you!
Best regards
Casper Stendal www.ecreo.dk
"Bit Byte" wrote:
Correction:
I need to clarify myself. I'm talking aout the incompatabilities between
Web Application Project Model and Web Site Projects - which model is the
most widely supported (I know they both have pros and cons) - but I
don't really want to invest time with one only to find I picked the
"wrong horse"
Clearest delineation thus far. Many thanks once again
Juan T. Llibre wrote:
re:
>>Web Application Project Model and Web Site Projects
The VS 2005 WAP model is geared more towards large-scale,
multi-developer, commercial web development.
Web site projects (the VWD model) is suited for small websites/standalone development.
You would not want to attempt to perform large scale
or distributed type development with VWD, anyway.
Your choice, depending on your needs and budget.
If you can afford the cost for VS 2005, buy it.
If your budget is limited, take the free VWD IDE.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Bit Byte" <ro**@yourbox.comwrote in message news:AI******************************@bt.com...
>>Correction:
I need to clarify myself. I'm talking aout the incompatabilities between Web Application Project
Model and Web Site Projects - which model is the most widely supported (I know they both have pros
and cons) - but I don't really want to invest time with one only to find I picked the "wrong
horse"
Juan T. Llibre wrote:
>>>re:
largely incompatable
I don't know what gives you that idea.
Visual Web Developer is embedded in Visual Studio,
and is the identical same program, standalone or embedded.
The differences are that Visual Studio has quite a few features which VWD doesn't have,
that Visual Studio can be used to develop Windows programs and not just web apps,
and that add-ins don't work with VWD.
There's a list of features for each VS version at :
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa700921.aspx
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Bit Byte" <ro**@yourbox.comwrote in message news:9O*********************@bt.com...
I am new to web development - but I am confused with the 2 (largely incompatable) development
choices available.
I dont really want to invest time learning one, only to have iit abandoned by MS further down the
line, or to discover later that it was the "poorer cousin". Which platform should I invest my
time in learning and why ?
On Feb 4, 12:34 pm, Bit Byte <r...@yourbox.comwrote:
I am new to web development - but I am confused with the 2 (largely
incompatable) development choices available.
I dont really want to invest time learning one, only to have iit
abandoned by MS further down the line, or to discover later that it was
the "poorer cousin". Which platform should I invest my time in learning
and why ?
They're the exact same "platforms"...
If you now one you now the other!
If you have one application written in any one that applcation will be
100% compatible with the other one...
(At least FROM Visual Web TO Visual Studio)
When that's said, buy an MSDN Universal subscription and get
EVERYTHING microsoft ever has created for free... :)
That will definitively be the cheapest long term solution if you're
serious about .Net development!!
..t
-- http://ajaxwidgets.com
Free ASP.NET Ajax Widgets NOW!
"Thomas Hansen" <po*******@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@a75g2000cwd.googlegro ups.com...
buy an MSDN Universal subscription
No longer exists: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa718657.aspx
and get EVERYTHING microsoft ever has created for free... :)
Everything...? Hardly...
there's another factor to consider....
Visual Web developer is free, but PIG SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW !
You will waste much time using VWD because of its "click wait", "click wait" response time
If time is money for you, then free is not such a good deal...
"Bit Byte" <ro**@yourbox.comwrote in message news:9O*********************@bt.com...
>I am new to web development - but I am confused with the 2 (largely incompatable) development choices available.
I dont really want to invest time learning one, only to have iit abandoned by MS further down the line, or to discover later that
it was the "poorer cousin". Which platform should I invest my time in learning and why ?
re:
Visual Web developer is free, but PIG SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW !
Compared to what ?
I've found that in systems with at least 512MB RAM and decent processor speed, it works fine.
If you have 1GB RAM, it works very fast.
Do you have any test data that shows otherwise ?
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Jon Paal" <Jon[ nospam ]Paal @ everywhere dot comwrote in message
news:OR**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
there's another factor to consider....
Visual Web developer is free, but PIG SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW !
You will waste much time using VWD because of its "click wait", "click wait" response time
If time is money for you, then free is not such a good deal...
"Bit Byte" <ro**@yourbox.comwrote in message news:9O*********************@bt.com...
>>I am new to web development - but I am confused with the 2 (largely incompatable) development
choices available.
I dont really want to invest time learning one, only to have iit abandoned by MS further down the
line, or to discover later that it was the "poorer cousin". Which platform should I invest my
time in learning and why ?
compared to every other application I use.
personal experience -- search the forums, similar reports abound...
"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@nowhere.comwrote in message news:eU**************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
re:
>Visual Web developer is free, but PIG SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW !
Compared to what ?
I've found that in systems with at least 512MB RAM and decent processor speed, it works fine.
If you have 1GB RAM, it works very fast.
Do you have any test data that shows otherwise ?
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Jon Paal" <Jon[ nospam ]Paal @ everywhere dot comwrote in message news:OR**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>there's another factor to consider....
Visual Web developer is free, but PIG SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW !
You will waste much time using VWD because of its "click wait", "click wait" response time
If time is money for you, then free is not such a good deal...
"Bit Byte" <ro**@yourbox.comwrote in message news:9O*********************@bt.com...
>>>I am new to web development - but I am confused with the 2 (largely incompatable) development choices available.
I dont really want to invest time learning one, only to have iit abandoned by MS further down the line, or to discover later
that it was the "poorer cousin". Which platform should I invest my time in learning and why ?
re:
personal experience -- search the forums, similar reports abound...
I've seen a couple of reports like :
"takes a few minutes to open on my work laptop"
....which I consider worthless, since on a test box I have with only
twin PIII 800Mhz processors and 512MB RAM its performance is adequate.
Are you referring to its loading time ( and not to its performance ) ?
VWD SP1 resolves a lot of problems: http://blogs.msdn.com/mikhailarkhipo...ce-pack-1.aspx
Have you installed it ?
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Jon Paal" <Jon[ nospam ]Paal @ everywhere dot comwrote in message
news:Op**************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
compared to every other application I use.
personal experience -- search the forums, similar reports abound...
"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@nowhere.comwrote in message
news:eU**************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>re:
>>Visual Web developer is free, but PIG SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW !
Compared to what ?
I've found that in systems with at least 512MB RAM and decent processor speed, it works fine.
If you have 1GB RAM, it works very fast.
Do you have any test data that shows otherwise ?
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Jon Paal" <Jon[ nospam ]Paal @ everywhere dot comwrote in message
news:OR**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>there's another factor to consider....
Visual Web developer is free, but PIG SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW !
You will waste much time using VWD because of its "click wait", "click wait" response time
If time is money for you, then free is not such a good deal...
"Bit Byte" <ro**@yourbox.comwrote in message news:9O*********************@bt.com...
I am new to web development - but I am confused with the 2 (largely incompatable) development
choices available.
I dont really want to invest time learning one, only to have iit abandoned by MS further down
the line, or to discover later that it was the "poorer cousin". Which platform should I invest
my time in learning and why ?
I would guess we simply guage performance differently.
I have sp1 and it is still PIG SLOOOOOOOOW. Loading and performance wise, screen switching, view opening and closing, etc.
click ...wait 20 seconds, click...wait 10 seconds , yawn ... go get coffee... lunch... nap..., wait, wait, wait....
In any case , fair warning provided, and the original poster can judge for themselves....
"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@nowhere.comwrote in message news:eX**************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
re:
>personal experience -- search the forums, similar reports abound...
I've seen a couple of reports like :
"takes a few minutes to open on my work laptop"
...which I consider worthless, since on a test box I have with only
twin PIII 800Mhz processors and 512MB RAM its performance is adequate.
Are you referring to its loading time ( and not to its performance ) ?
VWD SP1 resolves a lot of problems:
http://blogs.msdn.com/mikhailarkhipo...ce-pack-1.aspx
Have you installed it ?
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Jon Paal" <Jon[ nospam ]Paal @ everywhere dot comwrote in message news:Op**************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>compared to every other application I use.
personal experience -- search the forums, similar reports abound...
>"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@nowhere.comwrote in message news:eU**************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>re:
Visual Web developer is free, but PIG SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW !
Compared to what ?
I've found that in systems with at least 512MB RAM and decent processor speed, it works fine.
If you have 1GB RAM, it works very fast.
Do you have any test data that shows otherwise ?
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Jon Paal" <Jon[ nospam ]Paal @ everywhere dot comwrote in message news:OR**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
there's another factor to consider....
Visual Web developer is free, but PIG SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW !
You will waste much time using VWD because of its "click wait", "click wait" response time
If time is money for you, then free is not such a good deal...
"Bit Byte" <ro**@yourbox.comwrote in message news:9O*********************@bt.com...
>I am new to web development - but I am confused with the 2 (largely incompatable) development choices available.
>
I dont really want to invest time learning one, only to have iit abandoned by MS further down the line, or to discover later
that it was the "poorer cousin". Which platform should I invest my time in learning and why ?
re:
In any case , fair warning provided, and the original poster can judge for themselves....
For sure, I'd welcome other opinions.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Jon Paal" <Jon[ nospam ]Paal @ everywhere dot comwrote in message
news:uI**************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>I would guess we simply guage performance differently.
I have sp1 and it is still PIG SLOOOOOOOOW. Loading and performance wise, screen switching, view
opening and closing, etc.
click ...wait 20 seconds, click...wait 10 seconds , yawn ... go get coffee... lunch... nap...,
wait, wait, wait....
In any case , fair warning provided, and the original poster can judge for themselves....
"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@nowhere.comwrote in message
news:eX**************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>re:
>>personal experience -- search the forums, similar reports abound...
I've seen a couple of reports like :
"takes a few minutes to open on my work laptop"
...which I consider worthless, since on a test box I have with only
twin PIII 800Mhz processors and 512MB RAM its performance is adequate.
Are you referring to its loading time ( and not to its performance ) ?
VWD SP1 resolves a lot of problems:
http://blogs.msdn.com/mikhailarkhipo...ce-pack-1.aspx
Have you installed it ?
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Jon Paal" <Jon[ nospam ]Paal @ everywhere dot comwrote in message
news:Op**************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>compared to every other application I use.
personal experience -- search the forums, similar reports abound...
>>"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@nowhere.comwrote in message
news:eU**************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
re:
Visual Web developer is free, but PIG SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW !
Compared to what ?
I've found that in systems with at least 512MB RAM and decent processor speed, it works fine.
If you have 1GB RAM, it works very fast.
Do you have any test data that shows otherwise ?
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Jon Paal" <Jon[ nospam ]Paal @ everywhere dot comwrote in message
news:OR**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
there's another factor to consider....
>
Visual Web developer is free, but PIG SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW !
>
You will waste much time using VWD because of its "click wait", "click wait" response time
>
If time is money for you, then free is not such a good deal...
>
>
>
"Bit Byte" <ro**@yourbox.comwrote in message news:9O*********************@bt.com...
>>I am new to web development - but I am confused with the 2 (largely incompatable) development
>>choices available.
>>
>I dont really want to invest time learning one, only to have iit abandoned by MS further down
>the line, or to discover later that it was the "poorer cousin". Which platform should I
>invest my time in learning and why ?
>
>
On Feb 4, 5:43 am, "Juan T. Llibre" <nomailrepl...@nowhere.comwrote:
re:
largely incompatable
I don't know what gives you that idea.
Visual Web Developer is embedded in Visual Studio,
and is the identical same program, standalone or embedded.
The differences are that Visual Studio has quite a few features which VWDdoesn't have,
that Visual Studio can be used to develop Windows programs and not just web apps,
and that add-ins don't work with VWD.
Yes, this is my understanding, too. Does Reporting Model of the
Reporting Services work with VWD? I have not had good luck finding
reporting model in VWD after I installed the Reporting Services Add-in
for VWD.
>
There's a list of features for each VS version at :http://msdn2.microsoft..com/en-us/vstudio/aa700921.aspx
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq :http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español :http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Bit Byte" <r...@yourbox.comwrote in messagenews:9O*********************@bt.com...
I am new to web development - but I am confused with the 2 (largely incompatable) development
choices available.
I dont really want to invest time learning one, only to have iit abandoned by MS further down the
line, or to discover later that it was the "poorer cousin". Which platform should I invest my time
in learning and why ?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
That's right -- the big cheat is going on -- paying for MSDN Subscriptions
does not include Expression Web which is the software replacing FrontPage
but the rumor is Expression Web will be built into the next release of
Visual Studio. So if he rumor is true until the next release of Visual
Studio those paying for subscriptions are getting cheated and have to pay
extra for webpage layout.
<%= Clinton Gallagher
NET csgallagher AT metromilwaukee.com
URL http://clintongallagher.metromilwaukee.com/
MAP http://wikimapia.org/#y=43038073&x=-...8&z=17&l=0&m=h
"Mark Rae" <ma**@markNOSPAMrae.comwrote in message
news:e5**************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
"Thomas Hansen" <po*******@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@a75g2000cwd.googlegro ups.com...
>buy an MSDN Universal subscription
No longer exists: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa718657.aspx
>and get EVERYTHING microsoft ever has created for free... :)
Everything...? Hardly...
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Steve Richter |
last post by:
I have discovered that my web appl developed using the visual web
developer 2005 freebie will not work on my godaddy.com web hoster. So
I am using Visual Studio .Net 2003 Enterprise Architect...
|
by: William LaMartin |
last post by:
I just received my Visual Studio upgrade to 2005 and tried to create a new
web site via File | New Web Site with location http. Unfortunately I
received the following error:
"Visual Web...
|
by: fiona |
last post by:
Innovasys Ltd., a leader in help authoring and documentation tools,
today announced the inclusion of a tailored version of the Innovasys
HelpStudio help authoring product, HelpStudio Lite, in the...
|
by: Hansen |
last post by:
I hope that there is someone here that can help me. It's not directly
related to this group but maybe someone here can help me. I wanted to
deploy my Access database to another pc using the Access...
|
by: WT |
last post by:
Is it normal that Visual Studio sets the PreInit handler for a Page from the
OnInit code ?
No chance to fire it as OnPreInit is run befor OnInit.
???
CS
|
by: Edwin Smith |
last post by:
I have a 2 form project in VS2005 that now hangs whenever I try to do
anything with the second form. This seems to have started when I added some
SQL tables from a Pervasive v.9 database using the...
|
by: cj |
last post by:
I'm getting started writing WEB program in VB2005. I'm been doing
windows apps to date. A friend told me to get Visual Web Developer
Express Edition. But I have Visual Studio Pro 2005 and it...
|
by: Dr T |
last post by:
Hi!
I downloaded MS Visual Web Developer 2005 Express Edition, MS .NET
Framework SDK v2.0, and MS SQL Server 2005. Subsequently, I bought MS
Visual Studio 2005 Professional Edition.
1) Are...
|
by: cnixuser |
last post by:
Hello, I am having a problem that I believe is related to the way a stream reader object looks for a text file by default. What I am doing is using a StreamReader object to read the text of a text...
|
by: =?Utf-8?B?YzY3NjIyOA==?= |
last post by:
Hi all,
I must be out of my mind.
I used visual studio .net 2003 before and I installed 2005 a while back, but
seldom to use it. Recently I was required to start to learn C# asp.net.
So I tried...
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
| |
