It is production, so I wondered why more people aren't using it. Is
there any advantage to 2.0 developers to use 3.0?
20  1506 
..net 3.0 is just the work flow components added to 2.0. while you can
host a wf component in an asp.net application, deciding how manage its
event model with disconnected browsers will be a fun. if you need a
workflow rules engine look at 3.0.
note: 3.0 is not the new version of the clr with the new compilers, linq
and llamda functions.
-- bruce (sqlwork.com)
jm wrote:
It is production, so I wondered why more people aren't using it. Is
there any advantage to 2.0 developers to use 3.0?
"jm" <ne***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@38g2000cwa.googlegrou ps.com...
It is production, so I wondered why more people aren't using it. Is
there any advantage to 2.0 developers to use 3.0?
None of any appreciable benefit to ASP.NET...
Maybe I don't get what .Net 3.0 make available for web developers.
Can you explain a bit what .Net 3.0 offers for web developers ?
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"jm" <ne***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@38g2000cwa.googlegrou ps.com...
It is production, so I wondered why more people aren't using it. Is
there any advantage to 2.0 developers to use 3.0?
..Net 3.0 probably would have been better called.
..Net 2.1 or 2.x or something. Because its not teh same jump as 1.0 to 1.1
or 1.1 to 2.0.
The WFC are one of the biggest "add ins".
"jm" <ne***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@38g2000cwa.googlegrou ps.com...
It is production, so I wondered why more people aren't using it. Is
there any advantage to 2.0 developers to use 3.0?
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:21:28 -0400, "Juan T. Llibre"
<no***********@nowhere.comwrote:
>Maybe I don't get what .Net 3.0 make available for web developers.
Can you explain a bit what .Net 3.0 offers for web developers ?
I believe:
There are four components. Windows Presentation Foundation is neat,
but is for desktop apps. Windows Communication Foundation seems like
Biztalk. Windows Workflow Foundation - looks like a good idea but I
don't even know if it's for asp or desktop, maybe both?
Cardspace is the fourth part and is sort of a single place to register
your identity so websites can authenticate you with a token instead of
all the logon stuff. I don't know how that works either but doesn't
appear to be proprietary to MS.
It isn't like it extended the languages or anything. More in the way
of new project types.
Not even that, given that it introduces zilch for web applications.
It should have been named something else, not .Net-something.
Maybe Windows FX, or something similar.
re:
The WFC are one of the biggest "add ins".
Which does zilch for web applications.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"sloan" <sl***@ipass.netwrote in message news:ul****************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>
.Net 3.0 probably would have been better called.
.Net 2.1 or 2.x or something. Because its not teh same jump as 1.0 to 1.1
or 1.1 to 2.0.
The WFC are one of the biggest "add ins".
"jm" <ne***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@38g2000cwa.googlegrou ps.com...
>It is production, so I wondered why more people aren't using it. Is
there any advantage to 2.0 developers to use 3.0?
"sloan" <sl***@ipass.netwrote in message
news:ul****************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
.Net 3.0 probably would have been better called.
.Net 2.1 or 2.x or something. Because its not teh same jump as 1.0 to 1.1
or 1.1 to 2.0.
The WFC are one of the biggest "add ins".
But of no use to ASP.NET...
Mark Rae wrote:
"sloan" <sl***@ipass.netwrote in message
news:ul****************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
.Net 3.0 probably would have been better called.
.Net 2.1 or 2.x or something. Because its not teh same jump as 1.0 to 1.1
or 1.1 to 2.0.
The WFC are one of the biggest "add ins".
But of no use to ASP.NET...
what about xaml and all that "stuff." Doesn't that affect designing at
least the presentation layer of asp.net applications? I'm asking
because I have a projects that I thought might be ideal to start
learning 3.0 with. They're small, but useful, but if 3.0 isn't linq
and all the other items I keep reading about, then perhaps I should
wait. I'd like to use xaml and the "flash killer," but I'm not sure
it's all ready for prime time.
"jm" <ne***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@38g2000cwa.googlegrou ps.com...
3.0 isn't linq and all the other items I keep reading about
It isn't...
If you want to investigate the next "true" version of the .NET Framework and
Visual Studio.NET, then you need to download Orcas from Microsoft: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
Mark Rae wrote:
"jm" <ne***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@38g2000cwa.googlegrou ps.com...
3.0 isn't linq and all the other items I keep reading about
It isn't...
If you want to investigate the next "true" version of the .NET Framework and
Visual Studio.NET, then you need to download Orcas from Microsoft:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
It's besides the point, but they shouldn't have renamed it then, IMHO.
It's confusing. They should have just released new components for 2.0.
re:
what about xaml and all that "stuff."
Anything that is created or implemented in XAML can be expressed
using a more traditional .net language, such as C# or Visual Basic .NET.
Maybe this site can clear up some of the doubts about xaml: http://www.xaml.net/
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"jm" <ne***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@38g2000cwa.googlegrou ps.com...
>
Mark Rae wrote:
>"sloan" <sl***@ipass.netwrote in message
news:ul****************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
.Net 3.0 probably would have been better called.
.Net 2.1 or 2.x or something. Because its not teh same jump as 1.0 to 1.1
or 1.1 to 2.0.
The WFC are one of the biggest "add ins".
But of no use to ASP.NET...
what about xaml and all that "stuff." Doesn't that affect designing at
least the presentation layer of asp.net applications? I'm asking
because I have a projects that I thought might be ideal to start
learning 3.0 with. They're small, but useful, but if 3.0 isn't linq
and all the other items I keep reading about, then perhaps I should
wait. I'd like to use xaml and the "flash killer," but I'm not sure
it's all ready for prime time.
Hi,
I believe:
There are four components. Windows Presentation Foundation is neat,
but is for desktop apps.
<snip>
Don't forget XBAPs. They are interesting because they are somewhere in
between web applications and desktop applications. It's not really a RIA
either, since it's hosted in IE and deployed dynamically. I find XBAPs a
very interesting concept, actually, and they may be of interest for web
developers too.
HTH,
Laurent
--
Laurent Bugnion [MVP ASP.NET]
Software engineering: http://www.galasoft-LB.ch
PhotoAlbum: http://www.galasoft-LB.ch/pictures
Support children in Calcutta: http://www.calcutta-espoir.ch
"jm" <ne***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@l53g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
It's besides the point, but they shouldn't have renamed it then, IMHO.
It's confusing. They should have just released new components for 2.0.
I don't think you'll find any argument about that round here... :-)
re:
I don't think you'll find any argument about that round here... :-)
<chuckle>
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Mark Rae" <ma**@markNOSPAMrae.comwrote in message news:e9*************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
"jm" <ne***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@l53g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
>It's besides the point, but they shouldn't have renamed it then, IMHO.
It's confusing. They should have just released new components for 2.0.
I don't think you'll find any argument about that round here... :-)
Thus wrote Bruce,
.net 3.0 is just the work flow components added to 2.0. while you can
host a wf component in an asp.net application, deciding how manage its
event model with disconnected browsers will be a fun. if you need a
workflow rules engine look at 3.0.
..NET 3.0 includes not only WF, but WCF, WPF, and CardSpace.
Cheers,
--
Joerg Jooss ne********@joergjooss.de
Thus wrote Juan,
Maybe I don't get what .Net 3.0 make available for web developers. Can
you explain a bit what .Net 3.0 offers for web developers ?
While none of these technologies apply to each and every web app, in general
all of the .NET 3.0 frameworks are relevant for web development: WF can be
used to orchestrate your page flow (see the Web Client Software Factory for
an implementation) or business logic. WCF can be used to access or provide
remote or local services for distributed applications or integration scenarios.
CardSpace is the Windows solution to manage digital identities for web applications.
And WPF(/E) adds new capabilities to your user experience toolbox.
Also note that WCF is way more powerful than ASP.NET Web Services.
Cheers,
--
Joerg Jooss ne********@joergjooss.de
I agree on CardSpace, but reserve my judgment regarding
the usability on the web of the other .Net 3.0 technologies.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"Joerg Jooss" <ne********@joergjooss.dewrote in message
news:94**************************@msnews.microsoft .com...
Thus wrote Juan,
>Maybe I don't get what .Net 3.0 make available for web developers. Can
you explain a bit what .Net 3.0 offers for web developers ?
While none of these technologies apply to each and every web app, in general all of the .NET 3.0
frameworks are relevant for web development: WF can be used to orchestrate your page flow (see the
Web Client Software Factory for an implementation) or business logic. WCF can be used to access or
provide remote or local services for distributed applications or integration scenarios. CardSpace
is the Windows solution to manage digital identities for web applications. And WPF(/E) adds new
capabilities to your user experience toolbox.
Also note that WCF is way more powerful than ASP.NET Web Services.
Cheers,
--
Joerg Jooss
ne********@joergjooss.de
In case anybody is interested, there's 3 free .Net 3.0 eLearning courses:
Collection 5134 : Developing Rich Experiences with Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 and Visual Studio
2005 https://www.microsoftelearning.com/e...PriceId=109340
This collection of 3 2-hour premium clinics teaches about the new capabilities provided by the
..NET Framework 3.0. These clinics are for experienced Developers and Software Architects
who are looking to adopt Microsoft's next generation technology within their solutions.
Topics covered within the collection include:
* Windows Presentation Foundation
* Windows Workflow Foundation
* Windows Communication Foundation
Requirements:
a. Experience (2 years) as a full time developer using Visual Studio 2005 / Visual Studio 2003
b. Experience developing one or more of the following:
a. Web Applications
b. Windows Forms Applications
c. Server Components
d. XML Web Services
This offer includes the following:
E-Learning
Clinic 5135: Introduction to Developing with Windows Presentation Foundation and Visual Studio 2005
Clinic 5136: Introduction to Developing with Windows Workflow Foundation and Visual Studio 2005
Clinic 5137: Introduction to Developing with Windows Communication Foundation and Visual Studio 2005
Enjoy!
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"jm" <ne***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@38g2000cwa.googlegrou ps.com...
It is production, so I wondered why more people aren't using it. Is
there any advantage to 2.0 developers to use 3.0?
Thus wrote Juan,
I agree on CardSpace, but reserve my judgment regarding the usability
on the web of the other .Net 3.0 technologies.
Sure, neither WF nor WCF affect ASP.NET UI development, but once we talk
about implementing or reusing existing business logic (that probably already
runs on some other server), it starts to get interesting.
Cheers,
--
Joerg Jooss ne********@joergjooss.de
I actually saw the first course several months ago, which is why I
wrote my original post. I wondered why more folks were doing THAT
(like the video in the class.)
Juan T. Llibre wrote:
In case anybody is interested, there's 3 free .Net 3.0 eLearning courses:
Collection 5134 : Developing Rich Experiences with Microsoft .NET Framework 3.0 and Visual Studio
2005
https://www.microsoftelearning.com/e...PriceId=109340
This collection of 3 2-hour premium clinics teaches about the new capabilities provided by the
.NET Framework 3.0. These clinics are for experienced Developers and Software Architects
who are looking to adopt Microsoft's next generation technology within their solutions.
Topics covered within the collection include:
* Windows Presentation Foundation
* Windows Workflow Foundation
* Windows Communication Foundation
Requirements:
a. Experience (2 years) as a full time developer using Visual Studio 2005/ Visual Studio 2003
b. Experience developing one or more of the following:
a. Web Applications
b. Windows Forms Applications
c. Server Components
d. XML Web Services
This offer includes the following:
E-Learning
Clinic 5135: Introduction to Developing with Windows Presentation Foundation and Visual Studio 2005
Clinic 5136: Introduction to Developing with Windows Workflow Foundation and Visual Studio 2005
Clinic 5137: Introduction to Developing with Windows Communication Foundation and Visual Studio 2005
Enjoy!
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
===================================
"jm" <ne***********@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@38g2000cwa.googlegrou ps.com...
It is production, so I wondered why more people aren't using it. Is
there any advantage to 2.0 developers to use 3.0?
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Mr Mint |
last post by:
Hi all,
I have a page named register.php, which is a form for collecting user data.
As an example:
- I have the fields Name, Surname, email.
- In the <form> tag I have action =""
- The page...
|
by: Dave Rathnow |
last post by:
We are looking at using J2ME in a embedded device that will
be deployed in an industrial application and I've been doing some
research to see how practical J2ME would be for our application.
Most...
|
by: Alistair |
last post by:
is anyone using the above script?
I've been testing it and configuring it for a few weeks now and finally got
everything working, yet when I upload it to my server, it fails to show any...
|
by: Ed |
last post by:
I've search around endlessly for a solution to this problem but have
not found anything yet.
I'm using Crystal 9 with .NET. I am not using a DSR to create the
report. Instead I am creating a...
|
by: Danny Lesandrini |
last post by:
I'm using an Access database to drive a web site and the
colors of various table backgrounds are stored in Access.
I want users of the Access database to be able to select
colors for the site, but...
|
by: Hai Nguyen |
last post by:
I'm learning C sharp and do not like vb much. I'm creatiing a wepage using
panel to test myself. I tried to use these code below, which is written in
VB, and to transform them to c sharp but I got...
|
by: Dgates |
last post by:
Has anyone typed up an index for the O'Reilly book "C# and VB.NET
Conversion?"
I'm just learning C#, and often using this little book to see which
VB.NET terms translate directly to some term in...
|
by: JohnQ |
last post by:
(The "C++ Grammer" thread in comp.lang.c++.moderated prompted this post).
It would be more than a little bit nice if C++ was much "cleaner" (less
complex) so that it wasn't a major world wide...
|
by: Ken Fine |
last post by:
I am using VS.NET 2008 and like it a lot. One of the very few things I don't
like is a bug that seems to spawn literally thousands of strings, one
after the other, on design view changes....
|
by: darrel |
last post by:
I'm still struggling to find a javascript/ajax library that I want to stick
with for a while.
JQuery is looking great these days...refined, LOTS of plug-ins, and an
active community.
Is...
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: nemocccc |
last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
| |
