You get a better IDE, overall. There are some instances where I believe
functionality has overriden stability, but overall, Visual Studio 2005 is
stronger and has more features.
You get support for types in collections, through generics. In C#, you get
refactoring. In all langauges, you get snippets. In ASP.NET, you get login
controls, membership/profile/role providers and you have a more extensible
model.
If none of this is important to you, then there is no reason to learn 1.1,
except that more and more companies will be switching and your job prospects
will be reduced. But, that might not matter either.
What I am getting to is only you can determine if the benefits outweight the
time you would have to spend.
--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA
http://gregorybeamer.spaces.live.com/
*************************************************
Think Outside the Box!
*************************************************
"RAB" <ra*********@yahoo.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@e3g2000cwe.googlegrou ps.com...
Why would I want to learn asp.net 2.0? I still haven't mastered all
the functionality in asp.net 1.1. I can buy asp.net 1.1 books for
pennies on the dollar (a lot of them are only 2 years old). I would
have update my visual studio to the most current version...how much
would that cost? What would I truely get from asp.net 2.0 that I can't
already do with asp.net 1.1?
Thanks,
RABMissouri2006