Thanks David. Since I know the exact number of records and the data will not
be changed in anyway, first priority is fast loading and look up.
There are only 2 columns of data, the first will be the key, the second the
data. Would using an array be slower?
Also I'm not sure how to look up a known key in a hashtable and produce it's
corresponding value. Any ideas?
Thanks again for the link.
Steve
"David Jessee" <Da*********@discussions.microsoft.comwrote in message
news:C1**********************************@microsof t.com...
A-yup, its totally possible.
check this out, though:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/4yh14awz.aspx
"Steve" wrote:
Is it possible and feasible to load 40,000 records to a hashtable. If
this
happened on a page load event would there be performance issues?
What are other alternatives?
Thanks
Steve