Well I believe you that it works, but it sounds like it would be a rather
high maintenance approach, especially if any other developer had to fill in
for you because it's definitely a nonstandard way of doing things in
ASP.NET. I'm not necessarily saying that your approach is wrong, but it
sure doesn't sound like you're taking advantage of ASP.NET's strengths. It
sounds more like you've written your own version of ASP.NET.
--
I hope this helps,
Steve C. Orr, MCSD, MVP
http://SteveOrr.net
"Ryan" <ry***@ungerboeck.com> wrote in message
news:11*********************@i40g2000cwc.googlegro ups.com...
It occurs
(a) when there is more programming than html
(i) it is in no way error prone... never had a problem... I
use stringbuilders to build the html and the function is limited ...
its not like all the html is build in the back end...
(ii) xhtml? simply update the method...
(c) when a certian group of code needs to be shared to many pages a
method works the best for me
(i) I have found user controls to be a mess to work with..