473,323 Members | 1,551 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,323 software developers and data experts.

AJAX libraries

Peter Bromberg has an interesting article eggheadcafe discussing AJAX
libraries. He prefers ANTHEM.NET over AJAX.NET because it doesn't break the
stateful page model. Our developers are currently using AJAX.NET after
extensive research because ATLAS is currently not ready for prime-time and
much more verbose than AJAX.NET.

I was looking at some "Hello World" status on various libraies and ATLAS
does, indeed, result in much more traffic.

The total traffic in bytes was:

ASP.NET 2.0 without AJAX -- 3,470
AJAX.NET Pro -- 15,536
ATLAS -- 181,850
ANTHEM.NET -- 15,618

It appears that ANTHEM is competitive with AJAX.NET and likewise has the
advantage of not breaking the stateful Page model.

I am wondering what others think about this? Should we continue with
AJAX.NET, switch to ANTHEM.NET... or wait for ATLAS?
Apr 9 '06 #1
7 1478
Atlas is planned to be part of the next version of Visual Studio.
Therefore, if you learn another AJAX framework, you're probably just going
to need to learn Atlas anyway when the next version of Visual Studio comes
out.

--
I hope this helps,
Steve C. Orr, MCSD, MVP
http://SteveOrr.net
"Thirsty Traveler" <nf*@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:uF*************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
Peter Bromberg has an interesting article eggheadcafe discussing AJAX
libraries. He prefers ANTHEM.NET over AJAX.NET because it doesn't break
the stateful page model. Our developers are currently using AJAX.NET after
extensive research because ATLAS is currently not ready for prime-time and
much more verbose than AJAX.NET.

I was looking at some "Hello World" status on various libraies and ATLAS
does, indeed, result in much more traffic.

The total traffic in bytes was:

ASP.NET 2.0 without AJAX -- 3,470
AJAX.NET Pro -- 15,536
ATLAS -- 181,850
ANTHEM.NET -- 15,618

It appears that ANTHEM is competitive with AJAX.NET and likewise has the
advantage of not breaking the stateful Page model.

I am wondering what others think about this? Should we continue with
AJAX.NET, switch to ANTHEM.NET... or wait for ATLAS?

Apr 10 '06 #2
I've used AJAX.NET and then switched to ANTHEM.

My opinion, Anthem is a lot better as object model and asp.net integration.
It seems either stable and.. it works. With Ajax.net I had many problem on
production environment. And Anthem is open source.

Atlas I think is too young.

Your test is good, however I think it can be better a test with a "real
page". A page with a large html source, so we can see how using AJAX can
reduce network traffic. I hope that in this scenario ASP.NET without AJAX
requires more bytes that an AJAX solution for a round trip to server..
"Thirsty Traveler" <nf*@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:uF*************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
Peter Bromberg has an interesting article eggheadcafe discussing AJAX
libraries. He prefers ANTHEM.NET over AJAX.NET because it doesn't break
the stateful page model. Our developers are currently using AJAX.NET after
extensive research because ATLAS is currently not ready for prime-time and
much more verbose than AJAX.NET.

I was looking at some "Hello World" status on various libraies and ATLAS
does, indeed, result in much more traffic.

The total traffic in bytes was:

ASP.NET 2.0 without AJAX -- 3,470
AJAX.NET Pro -- 15,536
ATLAS -- 181,850
ANTHEM.NET -- 15,618

It appears that ANTHEM is competitive with AJAX.NET and likewise has the
advantage of not breaking the stateful Page model.

I am wondering what others think about this? Should we continue with
AJAX.NET, switch to ANTHEM.NET... or wait for ATLAS?

Apr 10 '06 #3
Thing is though, with anthem, you don't realy have to learn anything. Sure
there are a few more properties and stuff with the anthem controls, but they
are just ASP.net controls with a few extra properties and methods. You can
pretty much start using them straight away.

"Steve C. Orr [MVP, MCSD]" wrote:
Atlas is planned to be part of the next version of Visual Studio.
Therefore, if you learn another AJAX framework, you're probably just going
to need to learn Atlas anyway when the next version of Visual Studio comes
out.

--
I hope this helps,
Steve C. Orr, MCSD, MVP
http://SteveOrr.net
"Thirsty Traveler" <nf*@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:uF*************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
Peter Bromberg has an interesting article eggheadcafe discussing AJAX
libraries. He prefers ANTHEM.NET over AJAX.NET because it doesn't break
the stateful page model. Our developers are currently using AJAX.NET after
extensive research because ATLAS is currently not ready for prime-time and
much more verbose than AJAX.NET.

I was looking at some "Hello World" status on various libraies and ATLAS
does, indeed, result in much more traffic.

The total traffic in bytes was:

ASP.NET 2.0 without AJAX -- 3,470
AJAX.NET Pro -- 15,536
ATLAS -- 181,850
ANTHEM.NET -- 15,618

It appears that ANTHEM is competitive with AJAX.NET and likewise has the
advantage of not breaking the stateful Page model.

I am wondering what others think about this? Should we continue with
AJAX.NET, switch to ANTHEM.NET... or wait for ATLAS?


Apr 10 '06 #4
http://www.daniel-zeiss.de/AJAXComparison/Results.htm
This is the comparison.
Just wanted to point out that the 99% of traffic for Atlas are static
scripts that loaded only once for the client. All other traffic less or on
the same level as ANTHEM.NET or AJAX.NET. See the charts on the bottom of
the article.
Thanks.

"Thirsty Traveler" <nf*@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:uF*************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
Peter Bromberg has an interesting article eggheadcafe discussing AJAX
libraries. He prefers ANTHEM.NET over AJAX.NET because it doesn't break
the stateful page model. Our developers are currently using AJAX.NET after
extensive research because ATLAS is currently not ready for prime-time and
much more verbose than AJAX.NET.

I was looking at some "Hello World" status on various libraies and ATLAS
does, indeed, result in much more traffic.

The total traffic in bytes was:

ASP.NET 2.0 without AJAX -- 3,470
AJAX.NET Pro -- 15,536
ATLAS -- 181,850
ANTHEM.NET -- 15,618

It appears that ANTHEM is competitive with AJAX.NET and likewise has the
advantage of not breaking the stateful Page model.

I am wondering what others think about this? Should we continue with
AJAX.NET, switch to ANTHEM.NET... or wait for ATLAS?

Apr 10 '06 #5
Thus wrote Trapulo,
I've used AJAX.NET and then switched to ANTHEM.

My opinion, Anthem is a lot better as object model and asp.net
integration. It seems either stable and.. it works. With Ajax.net I
had many problem on production environment. And Anthem is open source.

Atlas I think is too young.


Well, it's old enough to come with a go-live license ;-)
--
Joerg Jooss
ne********@joergjooss.de
Apr 10 '06 #6
DWS
Well it looks like you broke the bench mark agreements on everything. Can't
you read or don't you care.

"Thirsty Traveler" wrote:
Peter Bromberg has an interesting article eggheadcafe discussing AJAX
libraries. He prefers ANTHEM.NET over AJAX.NET because it doesn't break the
stateful page model. Our developers are currently using AJAX.NET after
extensive research because ATLAS is currently not ready for prime-time and
much more verbose than AJAX.NET.

I was looking at some "Hello World" status on various libraies and ATLAS
does, indeed, result in much more traffic.

The total traffic in bytes was:

ASP.NET 2.0 without AJAX -- 3,470
AJAX.NET Pro -- 15,536
ATLAS -- 181,850
ANTHEM.NET -- 15,618

It appears that ANTHEM is competitive with AJAX.NET and likewise has the
advantage of not breaking the stateful Page model.

I am wondering what others think about this? Should we continue with
AJAX.NET, switch to ANTHEM.NET... or wait for ATLAS?

Apr 11 '06 #7
Have a nice day.

"DWS" <DW*@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:06**********************************@microsof t.com...
Well it looks like you broke the bench mark agreements on everything.
Can't
you read or don't you care.

"Thirsty Traveler" wrote:
Peter Bromberg has an interesting article eggheadcafe discussing AJAX
libraries. He prefers ANTHEM.NET over AJAX.NET because it doesn't break
the
stateful page model. Our developers are currently using AJAX.NET after
extensive research because ATLAS is currently not ready for prime-time
and
much more verbose than AJAX.NET.

I was looking at some "Hello World" status on various libraies and ATLAS
does, indeed, result in much more traffic.

The total traffic in bytes was:

ASP.NET 2.0 without AJAX -- 3,470
AJAX.NET Pro -- 15,536
ATLAS -- 181,850
ANTHEM.NET -- 15,618

It appears that ANTHEM is competitive with AJAX.NET and likewise has the
advantage of not breaking the stateful Page model.

I am wondering what others think about this? Should we continue with
AJAX.NET, switch to ANTHEM.NET... or wait for ATLAS?

Apr 11 '06 #8

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

6
by: Peter Rilling | last post by:
I would like the opinions of those who actually use Ajax libraries and maybe tried various APIs before settling on the one you currently use. I would like to know what libraries (that are free)...
5
by: darrel | last post by:
I've been playing with prototype.js and scriptaculous to create some nice drag-and-drop interaction on my applications GUI. That's working well. Now I want to take the next step and start passing...
31
by: Tony | last post by:
I just noticed that prototype.js is one of the files in the Ajax.NET distribution - I'm pretty concerned about this. Does anyone know if this is the same "prototype.js" that is not well-liked...
5
by: geekboy0001 | last post by:
Just trying to get some opinions out there... There are tons of Ajax libraries out there... Ajax.NET Professional, ComfortASP.NET, ZumiPage, etc. etc... Microsoft has their own too, Atlas. I've...
3
by: caston | last post by:
Well, everybody can now agree with the fact that the Ajax hype is over. Still multiple Ajax Frameworks are flourishing, aren't they? So, last night I questioned myself with the following: "When...
14
by: paladin.rithe | last post by:
I was looking at libraries for my project, and was thinking about using Prototype, but I was seeing that people have reservations about it. All I really need is some basic Ajax stuff, the basic...
5
by: PythonistL | last post by:
Can you please recommend a good books about Ajax ? Thank you L
3
by: George | last post by:
I am doing an AJAX call using JQuery on my page to which returns JSON objects and everything works fine. Now I decided to use ashx handler instead of and simply write JSON out. Then my problems...
0
by: DolphinDB | last post by:
Tired of spending countless mintues downsampling your data? Look no further! In this article, you’ll learn how to efficiently downsample 6.48 billion high-frequency records to 61 million...
1
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
0
by: Vimpel783 | last post by:
Hello! Guys, I found this code on the Internet, but I need to modify it a little. It works well, the problem is this: Data is sent from only one cell, in this case B5, but it is necessary that data...
0
by: jfyes | last post by:
As a hardware engineer, after seeing that CEIWEI recently released a new tool for Modbus RTU Over TCP/UDP filtering and monitoring, I actively went to its official website to take a look. It turned...
0
by: ArrayDB | last post by:
The error message I've encountered is; ERROR:root:Error generating model response: exception: access violation writing 0x0000000000005140, which seems to be indicative of an access violation...
1
by: Shællîpôpï 09 | last post by:
If u are using a keypad phone, how do u turn on JavaScript, to access features like WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram....
0
by: af34tf | last post by:
Hi Guys, I have a domain whose name is BytesLimited.com, and I want to sell it. Does anyone know about platforms that allow me to list my domain in auction for free. Thank you
0
by: Faith0G | last post by:
I am starting a new it consulting business and it's been a while since I setup a new website. Is wordpress still the best web based software for hosting a 5 page website? The webpages will be...
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 3 Apr 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome former...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.