Storing resources in DB

[YC]

Hi,
We are considering storing our resources in a DB table.
My question is whether using a custom provider with the resources stored in
DB can downgrade the application performance? I understand that the .net
framework use the resource as assembliles and store them in cache.
My custom provider should get the resources and store them in cache also.
Is there a diffrence on how the framework treats the resource assemblies
with the default provider in terms of caching?

Thanks

[Karl Seguin [MVP]]

Unless you are seeing actual performance issues, I wouldn't worry about
micro optimizations. If you cache your resources in memory coming from your
DB, you are going to get optimal performance.

Karl

--
http://www.openmymind.net/
http://www.fuelindustries.com/
"YC" <[e-mail]> wrote in message
news:64**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hi,
We are considering storing our resources in a DB table.
My question is whether using a custom provider with the resources stored
in
DB can downgrade the application performance? I understand that the .net
framework use the resource as assembliles and store them in cache.
My custom provider should get the resources and store them in cache also.
Is there a diffrence on how the framework treats the resource assemblies
with the default provider in terms of caching?

Thanks

[YC]

Hi Karl,
Thanks for your reply.
Does the default provider of localization with asp.net 2.0 cache the
resource in the way?

Thanks

Yoav

"Karl Seguin [MVP]" wrote:

Unless you are seeing actual performance issues, I wouldn't worry about
micro optimizations. If you cache your resources in memory coming from your
DB, you are going to get optimal performance.

Karl

--
http://www.openmymind.net/
http://www.fuelindustries.com/
"YC" <[e-mail]> wrote in message
news:64**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hi,
We are considering storing our resources in a DB table.
My question is whether using a custom provider with the resources stored
in
DB can downgrade the application performance? I understand that the .net
framework use the resource as assembliles and store them in cache.
My custom provider should get the resources and store them in cache also.
Is there a diffrence on how the framework treats the resource assemblies
with the default provider in terms of caching?

Thanks

[Karl Seguin [MVP]]

Yes, I believe it does.

Karl

--
http://www.openmymind.net/
http://www.fuelindustries.com/
"YC" <[e-mail]> wrote in message
news:F4**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hi Karl,
Thanks for your reply.
Does the default provider of localization with asp.net 2.0 cache the
resource in the way?

Thanks

Yoav

"Karl Seguin [MVP]" wrote:

Unless you are seeing actual performance issues, I wouldn't worry about
micro optimizations. If you cache your resources in memory coming from
your
DB, you are going to get optimal performance.

Karl

--
http://www.openmymind.net/
http://www.fuelindustries.com/
"YC" <[e-mail]> wrote in message
news:64**********************************@microsof t.com...

> Hi,
> We are considering storing our resources in a DB table.
> My question is whether using a custom provider with the resources
> stored
> in
> DB can downgrade the application performance? I understand that the
> .net
> framework use the resource as assembliles and store them in cache.
> My custom provider should get the resources and store them in cache
> also.
> Is there a diffrence on how the framework treats the resource
> assemblies
> with the default provider in terms of caching?
>
> Thanks

[YC]

Thanks for your reply.

Yoav

"Karl Seguin [MVP]" wrote:

Yes, I believe it does.

Karl

--
http://www.openmymind.net/
http://www.fuelindustries.com/
"YC" <[e-mail]> wrote in message
news:F4**********************************@microsof t.com...

Hi Karl,
Thanks for your reply.
Does the default provider of localization with asp.net 2.0 cache the
resource in the way?

Thanks

Yoav

"Karl Seguin [MVP]" wrote:

Unless you are seeing actual performance issues, I wouldn't worry about
micro optimizations. If you cache your resources in memory coming from
your
DB, you are going to get optimal performance.

Karl

--
http://www.openmymind.net/
http://www.fuelindustries.com/
"YC" <[e-mail]> wrote in message
news:64**********************************@microsof t.com...
> Hi,
> We are considering storing our resources in a DB table.
> My question is whether using a custom provider with the resources
> stored
> in
> DB can downgrade the application performance? I understand that the
> .net
> framework use the resource as assembliles and store them in cache.
> My custom provider should get the resources and store them in cache
> also.
> Is there a diffrence on how the framework treats the resource
> assemblies
> with the default provider in terms of caching?
>
> Thanks