Hi:
We developed a set of ASP.NET Web Applications that never runs in
stand-alone mode, but always inside a portal (Rainbow Portal). All modules
are copied on that portal.
My question is: load time takes, sometimes, three or four of minutes in
a medium-level machine (a PIII 1.5 Ghz), when the binary contents are
changed, or if the time of last modification of the web.config file is
changed.
An application that runs in "stand-alone" mode take no more than a few
seconds to be loaded after this kind of change.
What determines how much time will be spended on the process of loading
a page after some change? The number of DLL's in the bin folder, the
complexity of web.config file?
Is there some possible configuration in machine.config (or even
web.config) that can increase or decrease load time?
I suppose that a DLL compiled in DEBUG mode takes more time to load than
a DLL that was compiled in release mode. But this time is not the double or
the triple of the time spended in a release DLL, is it?
Thanks for your support. I am looking at google too, but I can't find
the right words to perform the search...
--
Ravi Wallau no****@nospam.org 4 2189
I am not an expert on calculating these things, but here are a few points to
keep in mind:
1. When the application uses multiple dll's, the server has more work to do,
therefore slightly increasing the time required
2. The server does cache some pieces of information, sometimes more
depending on the application. Therefore, this cache must be recreated if any
dll's or the web.config file is modified, increasing the time when the
application is run the first time.
3. The speed can also be affected by how much stuff is in viewstate. And
take note that if you have viewstate enabled for a large number of objects,
viewstate can become quite large after a couple postbacks of the same page.
Therefore, it is a good idea to remember to set viewstate to False for
anything reasonable, since it is set to True by default. Many controls such
as Labels or Controls who have their value set in the Load event have no
need for viewstate, when I saw the difference between my pages when I
started remembering to do this it was a big difference in efficiency.
4. Sometimes it is better not to use ASP.NET Controls. For example, if you
have an image that is "just there" and is always the same, just use a plain
HTML img tag for it, this is less code because it does not get declared as a
Control (even if you never reference a Control, Visual Studio .NET
automatically adds the declaration for WebControls, but it does not
automatically add declarations for HtmlControls), therefore creating less
work for the server.
5. Anywhere possible, use subprocedures and/or functions. Even if the
subprocedure/function is only used 2 or 3 times, it is less compiled code
because the compiler only needs to compile it once.
There may be other things you can do, but I am not sure what they might be.
Please don't be offended if I mentioned anything that sounds "common sense",
I remember how much I knew when I first started ASP.NET, and sometimes
simple things aren't simple until someone has told you about them. There are
things that I spent almost a year doing the hard way because I didn't know
there was a better way. Good Luck!
--
Nathan Sokalski nj********@hotmail.com http://www.nathansokalski.com/
"Ravi Ambros Wallau" <no****@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:eI**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... Hi: We developed a set of ASP.NET Web Applications that never runs in stand-alone mode, but always inside a portal (Rainbow Portal). All modules are copied on that portal. My question is: load time takes, sometimes, three or four of minutes in a medium-level machine (a PIII 1.5 Ghz), when the binary contents are changed, or if the time of last modification of the web.config file is changed. An application that runs in "stand-alone" mode take no more than a few seconds to be loaded after this kind of change.
What determines how much time will be spended on the process of loading a page after some change? The number of DLL's in the bin folder, the complexity of web.config file? Is there some possible configuration in machine.config (or even web.config) that can increase or decrease load time? I suppose that a DLL compiled in DEBUG mode takes more time to load than a DLL that was compiled in release mode. But this time is not the double or the triple of the time spended in a release DLL, is it?
Thanks for your support. I am looking at google too, but I can't find the right words to perform the search...
-- Ravi Wallau no****@nospam.org
Nathan:
Thanks for your response.
I believe that's the problem is the large number of DLL's that I have on
my bin folder...
There's nothing else that I can do... Probally .Net indexes all DLL's
before loading the application. Tks
"Nathan Sokalski" <nj********@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ea**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... I am not an expert on calculating these things, but here are a few points to keep in mind:
1. When the application uses multiple dll's, the server has more work to do, therefore slightly increasing the time required 2. The server does cache some pieces of information, sometimes more depending on the application. Therefore, this cache must be recreated if any dll's or the web.config file is modified, increasing the time when the application is run the first time. 3. The speed can also be affected by how much stuff is in viewstate. And take note that if you have viewstate enabled for a large number of objects, viewstate can become quite large after a couple postbacks of the same page. Therefore, it is a good idea to remember to set viewstate to False for anything reasonable, since it is set to True by default. Many controls such as Labels or Controls who have their value set in the Load event have no need for viewstate, when I saw the difference between my pages when I started remembering to do this it was a big difference in efficiency. 4. Sometimes it is better not to use ASP.NET Controls. For example, if you have an image that is "just there" and is always the same, just use a plain HTML img tag for it, this is less code because it does not get declared as a Control (even if you never reference a Control, Visual Studio .NET automatically adds the declaration for WebControls, but it does not automatically add declarations for HtmlControls), therefore creating less work for the server. 5. Anywhere possible, use subprocedures and/or functions. Even if the subprocedure/function is only used 2 or 3 times, it is less compiled code because the compiler only needs to compile it once.
There may be other things you can do, but I am not sure what they might be. Please don't be offended if I mentioned anything that sounds "common sense", I remember how much I knew when I first started ASP.NET, and sometimes simple things aren't simple until someone has told you about them. There are things that I spent almost a year doing the hard way because I didn't know there was a better way. Good Luck! -- Nathan Sokalski nj********@hotmail.com http://www.nathansokalski.com/
"Ravi Ambros Wallau" <no****@nospam.com> wrote in message news:eI**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... Hi: We developed a set of ASP.NET Web Applications that never runs in stand-alone mode, but always inside a portal (Rainbow Portal). All modules are copied on that portal. My question is: load time takes, sometimes, three or four of minutes in a medium-level machine (a PIII 1.5 Ghz), when the binary contents are changed, or if the time of last modification of the web.config file is changed. An application that runs in "stand-alone" mode take no more than a few seconds to be loaded after this kind of change.
What determines how much time will be spended on the process of loading a page after some change? The number of DLL's in the bin folder, the complexity of web.config file? Is there some possible configuration in machine.config (or even web.config) that can increase or decrease load time? I suppose that a DLL compiled in DEBUG mode takes more time to load than a DLL that was compiled in release mode. But this time is not the double or the triple of the time spended in a release DLL, is it?
Thanks for your support. I am looking at google too, but I can't find the right words to perform the search...
-- Ravi Wallau no****@nospam.org
I am not sure if it will actually speed up your application, but if you have
*.dll's that you rarely or never modify/replace (perhaps dll's from
third-parties, such as Oracle's database dll), you can try out a utility
called ILMerge. This utility combines multiple .NET dll's into one dll file.
I have never actually used it, because I have never had the opportunity to
write an application that uses more than one dll, but it sounds nice and for
some people quite useful. Here is the URL to download it: http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
I think I mentioned all my other ideas, so if your application really seems
too slow and your server is working correctly, you may want to try to work
on improving code efficiency (please don't take that as an insult, almost
any code can be improved in some way or another, even that written by the
best). Anyway, Good Luck!
--
Nathan Sokalski nj********@hotmail.com http://www.nathansokalski.com/
"Ravi Ambros Wallau" <no****@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:es**************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... Nathan: Thanks for your response. I believe that's the problem is the large number of DLL's that I have on my bin folder... There's nothing else that I can do... Probally .Net indexes all DLL's before loading the application. Tks
"Nathan Sokalski" <nj********@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ea**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...I am not an expert on calculating these things, but here are a few points to keep in mind:
1. When the application uses multiple dll's, the server has more work to do, therefore slightly increasing the time required 2. The server does cache some pieces of information, sometimes more depending on the application. Therefore, this cache must be recreated if any dll's or the web.config file is modified, increasing the time when the application is run the first time. 3. The speed can also be affected by how much stuff is in viewstate. And take note that if you have viewstate enabled for a large number of objects, viewstate can become quite large after a couple postbacks of the same page. Therefore, it is a good idea to remember to set viewstate to False for anything reasonable, since it is set to True by default. Many controls such as Labels or Controls who have their value set in the Load event have no need for viewstate, when I saw the difference between my pages when I started remembering to do this it was a big difference in efficiency. 4. Sometimes it is better not to use ASP.NET Controls. For example, if you have an image that is "just there" and is always the same, just use a plain HTML img tag for it, this is less code because it does not get declared as a Control (even if you never reference a Control, Visual Studio .NET automatically adds the declaration for WebControls, but it does not automatically add declarations for HtmlControls), therefore creating less work for the server. 5. Anywhere possible, use subprocedures and/or functions. Even if the subprocedure/function is only used 2 or 3 times, it is less compiled code because the compiler only needs to compile it once.
There may be other things you can do, but I am not sure what they might be. Please don't be offended if I mentioned anything that sounds "common sense", I remember how much I knew when I first started ASP.NET, and sometimes simple things aren't simple until someone has told you about them. There are things that I spent almost a year doing the hard way because I didn't know there was a better way. Good Luck! -- Nathan Sokalski nj********@hotmail.com http://www.nathansokalski.com/
"Ravi Ambros Wallau" <no****@nospam.com> wrote in message news:eI**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... Hi: We developed a set of ASP.NET Web Applications that never runs in stand-alone mode, but always inside a portal (Rainbow Portal). All modules are copied on that portal. My question is: load time takes, sometimes, three or four of minutes in a medium-level machine (a PIII 1.5 Ghz), when the binary contents are changed, or if the time of last modification of the web.config file is changed. An application that runs in "stand-alone" mode take no more than a few seconds to be loaded after this kind of change.
What determines how much time will be spended on the process of loading a page after some change? The number of DLL's in the bin folder, the complexity of web.config file? Is there some possible configuration in machine.config (or even web.config) that can increase or decrease load time? I suppose that a DLL compiled in DEBUG mode takes more time to load than a DLL that was compiled in release mode. But this time is not the double or the triple of the time spended in a release DLL, is it?
Thanks for your support. I am looking at google too, but I can't find the right words to perform the search...
-- Ravi Wallau no****@nospam.org
Thanks for your support, and I'm not offended... As an experienced
programmer, I know exactly what you are talking about...
I've made some testes and have some interesting results:
- After modifying web.config file, load time of first page takes about 15
seconds...
- If I only run iisreset.exe, load time is about 4 or 5 seconds...
- If I run iisreset.exe _and_ delete the contents of Temporary ASP.NET
Files, load time is about 16 seconds...
But what took my atention is that ASP.NET makes a copy of all DLL's in a
folder 770de4ce\9a480d92\assembly\dll2, each DLL with it's own directory
(and a AssemblyInfo.ini file)...
I don't know why this happens... It's not a good behavior for me, but I
think it's related with some "never stop the server" feature...
I think that create 370 directories and copy 370 files (and create 370
ini's) is a heavy thing to do...
I'll use ILMerge and test to see what happens...
Thanks!
I've note
"Nathan Sokalski" <nj********@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... I am not sure if it will actually speed up your application, but if you have *.dll's that you rarely or never modify/replace (perhaps dll's from third-parties, such as Oracle's database dll), you can try out a utility called ILMerge. This utility combines multiple .NET dll's into one dll file. I have never actually used it, because I have never had the opportunity to write an application that uses more than one dll, but it sounds nice and for some people quite useful. Here is the URL to download it:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
I think I mentioned all my other ideas, so if your application really seems too slow and your server is working correctly, you may want to try to work on improving code efficiency (please don't take that as an insult, almost any code can be improved in some way or another, even that written by the best). Anyway, Good Luck! -- Nathan Sokalski nj********@hotmail.com http://www.nathansokalski.com/
"Ravi Ambros Wallau" <no****@nospam.com> wrote in message news:es**************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... Nathan: Thanks for your response. I believe that's the problem is the large number of DLL's that I have on my bin folder... There's nothing else that I can do... Probally .Net indexes all DLL's before loading the application. Tks
"Nathan Sokalski" <nj********@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ea**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...I am not an expert on calculating these things, but here are a few points to keep in mind:
1. When the application uses multiple dll's, the server has more work to do, therefore slightly increasing the time required 2. The server does cache some pieces of information, sometimes more depending on the application. Therefore, this cache must be recreated if any dll's or the web.config file is modified, increasing the time when the application is run the first time. 3. The speed can also be affected by how much stuff is in viewstate. And take note that if you have viewstate enabled for a large number of objects, viewstate can become quite large after a couple postbacks of the same page. Therefore, it is a good idea to remember to set viewstate to False for anything reasonable, since it is set to True by default. Many controls such as Labels or Controls who have their value set in the Load event have no need for viewstate, when I saw the difference between my pages when I started remembering to do this it was a big difference in efficiency. 4. Sometimes it is better not to use ASP.NET Controls. For example, if you have an image that is "just there" and is always the same, just use a plain HTML img tag for it, this is less code because it does not get declared as a Control (even if you never reference a Control, Visual Studio .NET automatically adds the declaration for WebControls, but it does not automatically add declarations for HtmlControls), therefore creating less work for the server. 5. Anywhere possible, use subprocedures and/or functions. Even if the subprocedure/function is only used 2 or 3 times, it is less compiled code because the compiler only needs to compile it once.
There may be other things you can do, but I am not sure what they might be. Please don't be offended if I mentioned anything that sounds "common sense", I remember how much I knew when I first started ASP.NET, and sometimes simple things aren't simple until someone has told you about them. There are things that I spent almost a year doing the hard way because I didn't know there was a better way. Good Luck! -- Nathan Sokalski nj********@hotmail.com http://www.nathansokalski.com/
"Ravi Ambros Wallau" <no****@nospam.com> wrote in message news:eI**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... Hi: We developed a set of ASP.NET Web Applications that never runs in stand-alone mode, but always inside a portal (Rainbow Portal). All modules are copied on that portal. My question is: load time takes, sometimes, three or four of minutes in a medium-level machine (a PIII 1.5 Ghz), when the binary contents are changed, or if the time of last modification of the web.config file is changed. An application that runs in "stand-alone" mode take no more than a few seconds to be loaded after this kind of change.
What determines how much time will be spended on the process of loading a page after some change? The number of DLL's in the bin folder, the complexity of web.config file? Is there some possible configuration in machine.config (or even web.config) that can increase or decrease load time? I suppose that a DLL compiled in DEBUG mode takes more time to load than a DLL that was compiled in release mode. But this time is not the double or the triple of the time spended in a release DLL, is it?
Thanks for your support. I am looking at google too, but I can't find the right words to perform the search...
-- Ravi Wallau no****@nospam.org
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Sivakumar Shanmugam |
last post by:
Group.. We are running on db2 UDF V8 on Sun solaris platform. I
created an UDF which calles a C-routine(SQL_API_FN). This C-routine in
turn calls an external C-function. The C-function is provided...
|
by: John Tyce |
last post by:
The problem that I am now having, involves refreshing controls. I have allot of text boxes, several combo boxes and grids. These controls are showing live data from an Oracle database. I have dates...
|
by: Keith |
last post by:
All,
I have been told this is an ASP.NET issue and not an IIS
issue, so I am posting this here.
I have a problem with ASP.NET returning an HTTP 500 error
when trying to run ASPX pages on...
|
by: Loane Sharp |
last post by:
Hi there
I've got a hang of a problem ...
I'm running the .NET framework (2.0.40903), SQL Server 2000 and SQL Express
2005 on Windows XP Pro on a pretty good and new IBM Thinkpad X41.
Some...
|
by: Jason |
last post by:
Hi
I have a "problem"
i have got a ASP.NET application. in this application i have included
logging. in the logging i have logged how many seconds it takes for this
application to fully load....
|
by: ddd |
last post by:
Hi,
I am having problems with using the DrawToDC of the
MSHTML.iHTMLElementRender in a VB.net application. For some reason I am
getting a "catastrophic error". I am basing the code on c#...
|
by: Ravi Ambros Wallau |
last post by:
Dear friends:
This is my third question on this news in three days... Sorry for this
spam behavior :-)
I've a lot of problems on "first page load" after some change on
web.config or even in the...
|
by: jphelan |
last post by:
Ever since I successfully applied some techniques for increasing the
speed of my 17 meg. Application; it has only made me hunger for more.
First, let me list what I have done so far:
1. Split...
|
by: Don |
last post by:
I have a WPF application in VB in VSTS 2008 RTM. I am trying to
"blink" (momentarily clear) a field of data if the data is reloaded
from the database to give the user some visual indication of the...
|
by: DolphinDB |
last post by:
Tired of spending countless mintues downsampling your data? Look no further!
In this article, you’ll learn how to efficiently downsample 6.48 billion high-frequency records to 61 million...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
ExcelToDatabase: batch import excel into database automatically...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM).
In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM).
In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
|
by: Vimpel783 |
last post by:
Hello!
Guys, I found this code on the Internet, but I need to modify it a little. It works well, the problem is this: Data is sent from only one cell, in this case B5, but it is necessary that data...
|
by: PapaRatzi |
last post by:
Hello,
I am teaching myself MS Access forms design and Visual Basic. I've created a table to capture a list of Top 30 singles and forms to capture new entries. The final step is a form (unbound)...
|
by: Defcon1945 |
last post by:
I'm trying to learn Python using Pycharm but import shutil doesn't work
|
by: Shællîpôpï 09 |
last post by:
If u are using a keypad phone, how do u turn on JavaScript, to access features like WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram....
|
by: af34tf |
last post by:
Hi Guys, I have a domain whose name is BytesLimited.com, and I want to sell it. Does anyone know about platforms that allow me to list my domain in auction for free. Thank you
| |