"Scott Allen" <sc***@nospam.odetocode.com> wrote in message
news:lp********************************@4ax.com...
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006 05:02:01 -0000, "Kunle Odutola"
<ku***********@REMOVETHISokocha.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
WebForms used to be a Page controller architecture (in .NET 1.x) which
severely limited (prevented?) true MVC designs with WebForms. Any ideas?
If you think 1.x prevented an MVC design, then I'm sure you'll find
2.0 also prevents an MVC design.
I merely stated a fact - ASP.NET 1.x's page controller architecture meant
one had to dump WebForms and build MVC frameworks from scratch as it were
(e.g. the web MVC portions of Maverick.NET, MonoRail, Struts.NET,
Spring.NET).
I was wondering if ASP.NET 2.0 still has the same basic limitation (i.e page
controller architecure for webforms). There was an MS statement that Whidbey
would sport a front controller but, I haven't been able to get a clear and
definitive answer as to whether .NET 2.0 does from my usual sources so far.
Kunle