I am porting a website to ASP.net 2.0. Temporarily I compile with Visual
Studio 2003 and deploying to ASP.net 2.0. How do I compile my website under
ASP.Net 2.0? I know it can compile each page as I touch it.
During the beta there used to be something like mywebsite.com/compile.???
that you could run. Does it still exist?
7  1663 
ASP.NET 1.x app shouldn't need to be recompiled -- in theory it should run
fine under a 2.0 configuration. If you need/want to recompile and you use
VS.NET, then open your VS.NET 2003 project with VS.NET 2005 and it should
convert the project. Once you've done that (and sorted any problems) then
you can precompile with aspnet_compiler.exe or the Build->Publish menu pick
in VS.NET. If your ASP.NET 1.x app didn't use VS.NET to compile, then you
can just deploy it as-is and let the demand compile take care of things,
or again run aspnet_compiler.exe to precompile.
-Brock
DevelopMentor http://staff.develop.com/ballen I am porting a website to ASP.net 2.0. Temporarily I compile with
Visual Studio 2003 and deploying to ASP.net 2.0. How do I compile my
website under ASP.Net 2.0? I know it can compile each page as I touch
it. During the beta there used to be something like
mywebsite.com/compile.??? that you could run. Does it still exist?
Brock Allen,
No I don't want to convert my project to VS 2005 this week. That will come
later. First I would like to know if I have any issues with ASP.Net 2.0. I
have issues with user controls. The name and ID that ASP.Net returns to the
browser has changed from 1.1 to 2.0. Sometimes I need to access these names
directly with javascript and sometimes I need these name at the server.
Arne
"Brock Allen" wrote: ASP.NET 1.x app shouldn't need to be recompiled -- in theory it should run
fine under a 2.0 configuration. If you need/want to recompile and you use
VS.NET, then open your VS.NET 2003 project with VS.NET 2005 and it should
convert the project. Once you've done that (and sorted any problems) then
you can precompile with aspnet_compiler.exe or the Build->Publish menu pick
in VS.NET. If your ASP.NET 1.x app didn't use VS.NET to compile, then you
can just deploy it as-is and let the demand compile take care of things,
or again run aspnet_compiler.exe to precompile.
-Brock
DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/ballen
I am porting a website to ASP.net 2.0. Temporarily I compile with
Visual Studio 2003 and deploying to ASP.net 2.0. How do I compile my
website under ASP.Net 2.0? I know it can compile each page as I touch
it. During the beta there used to be something like
mywebsite.com/compile.??? that you could run. Does it still exist?
So if you don't want to do a conversion at the source code level, then I'd
suggest just moving the code to a ASP.NET 2.0 app and let it run (so no recompile).
ASP.NET 2.0 is supposed to be 100% backwards compat with ASP.NET 1.x, but
the problems you might run into is if you're using a framework API that's
specifically not backwards compatible in 2.0. These APIs are covered in the
list of breaking changes from .NET 1.1 to 2.0.
As for the IDs and how they are generated in the client, as long as you don't
hard code the IDs in your client side javascript you're ok. You shouldn't
have done that in 1.x anyway... the ClientID property was there in 1.x for
that purpose.
-Brock
DevelopMentor http://staff.develop.com/ballen Brock Allen,
No I don't want to convert my project to VS 2005 this week. That will
come
later. First I would like to know if I have any issues with ASP.Net
2.0. I
have issues with user controls. The name and ID that ASP.Net returns
to the
browser has changed from 1.1 to 2.0. Sometimes I need to access these
names
directly with javascript and sometimes I need these name at the
server.
Arne
"Brock Allen" wrote:
ASP.NET 1.x app shouldn't need to be recompiled -- in theory it
should run fine under a 2.0 configuration. If you need/want to
recompile and you use VS.NET, then open your VS.NET 2003 project with
VS.NET 2005 and it should convert the project. Once you've done that
(and sorted any problems) then you can precompile with
aspnet_compiler.exe or the Build->Publish menu pick in VS.NET. If
your ASP.NET 1.x app didn't use VS.NET to compile, then you can just
deploy it as-is and let the demand compile take care of things, or
again run aspnet_compiler.exe to precompile.
-Brock
DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/ballen I am porting a website to ASP.net 2.0. Temporarily I compile with
Visual Studio 2003 and deploying to ASP.net 2.0. How do I compile my
website under ASP.Net 2.0? I know it can compile each page as I
touch it. During the beta there used to be something like
mywebsite.com/compile.??? that you could run. Does it still exist?
Brock,
The autopost back feature in ASP.Net 1.1 doesn't seem to be compatible with
Firefox. The problem seems to arise when you have a user control: http://www.hardwarehank.com/search/default.aspx?t=cat
I had to implement my own autopostback in order to support Firefox
Arne
"Brock Allen" wrote: So if you don't want to do a conversion at the source code level, then I'd
suggest just moving the code to a ASP.NET 2.0 app and let it run (so no recompile).
ASP.NET 2.0 is supposed to be 100% backwards compat with ASP.NET 1.x, but
the problems you might run into is if you're using a framework API that's
specifically not backwards compatible in 2.0. These APIs are covered in the
list of breaking changes from .NET 1.1 to 2.0.
As for the IDs and how they are generated in the client, as long as you don't
hard code the IDs in your client side javascript you're ok. You shouldn't
have done that in 1.x anyway... the ClientID property was there in 1.x for
that purpose.
-Brock
DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/ballen
Brock Allen,
No I don't want to convert my project to VS 2005 this week. That will
come
later. First I would like to know if I have any issues with ASP.Net
2.0. I
have issues with user controls. The name and ID that ASP.Net returns
to the
browser has changed from 1.1 to 2.0. Sometimes I need to access these
names
directly with javascript and sometimes I need these name at the
server.
Arne
"Brock Allen" wrote:
ASP.NET 1.x app shouldn't need to be recompiled -- in theory it
should run fine under a 2.0 configuration. If you need/want to
recompile and you use VS.NET, then open your VS.NET 2003 project with
VS.NET 2005 and it should convert the project. Once you've done that
(and sorted any problems) then you can precompile with
aspnet_compiler.exe or the Build->Publish menu pick in VS.NET. If
your ASP.NET 1.x app didn't use VS.NET to compile, then you can just
deploy it as-is and let the demand compile take care of things, or
again run aspnet_compiler.exe to precompile.
-Brock
DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/ballen
I am porting a website to ASP.net 2.0. Temporarily I compile with
Visual Studio 2003 and deploying to ASP.net 2.0. How do I compile my
website under ASP.Net 2.0? I know it can compile each page as I
touch it. During the beta there used to be something like
mywebsite.com/compile.??? that you could run. Does it still exist?
So are you saying this is an area that changed between v1.x and v2.0?
-Brock
DevelopMentor http://staff.develop.com/ballen Brock,
The autopost back feature in ASP.Net 1.1 doesn't seem to be compatible
with
Firefox. The problem seems to arise when you have a user control:
http://www.hardwarehank.com/search/default.aspx?t=cat
I had to implement my own autopostback in order to support Firefox
Arne
"Brock Allen" wrote:
So if you don't want to do a conversion at the source code level,
then I'd suggest just moving the code to a ASP.NET 2.0 app and let it
run (so no recompile). ASP.NET 2.0 is supposed to be 100% backwards
compat with ASP.NET 1.x, but the problems you might run into is if
you're using a framework API that's specifically not backwards
compatible in 2.0. These APIs are covered in the list of breaking
changes from .NET 1.1 to 2.0.
As for the IDs and how they are generated in the client, as long as
you don't hard code the IDs in your client side javascript you're ok.
You shouldn't have done that in 1.x anyway... the ClientID property
was there in 1.x for that purpose.
-Brock
DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/ballen Brock Allen,
No I don't want to convert my project to VS 2005 this week. That
will
come
later. First I would like to know if I have any issues with ASP.Net
2.0. I
have issues with user controls. The name and ID that ASP.Net returns
to the
browser has changed from 1.1 to 2.0. Sometimes I need to access
these
names
directly with javascript and sometimes I need these name at the
server.
Arne
"Brock Allen" wrote:
ASP.NET 1.x app shouldn't need to be recompiled -- in theory it
should run fine under a 2.0 configuration. If you need/want to
recompile and you use VS.NET, then open your VS.NET 2003 project
with VS.NET 2005 and it should convert the project. Once you've
done that (and sorted any problems) then you can precompile with
aspnet_compiler.exe or the Build->Publish menu pick in VS.NET. If
your ASP.NET 1.x app didn't use VS.NET to compile, then you can
just deploy it as-is and let the demand compile take care of
things, or again run aspnet_compiler.exe to precompile.
-Brock
DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/ballen
> I am porting a website to ASP.net 2.0. Temporarily I compile with
> Visual Studio 2003 and deploying to ASP.net 2.0. How do I compile
> my website under ASP.Net 2.0? I know it can compile each page as I
> touch it. During the beta there used to be something like
> mywebsite.com/compile.??? that you could run. Does it still exist?
>
Yes,
The clienID has changed. There is no longer an underscore starting the
prefix of a control in a user control. Maybe it is more Firefox friendly.
"Brock Allen" wrote: So are you saying this is an area that changed between v1.x and v2.0?
-Brock
DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/ballen
Brock,
The autopost back feature in ASP.Net 1.1 doesn't seem to be compatible
with
Firefox. The problem seems to arise when you have a user control:
http://www.hardwarehank.com/search/default.aspx?t=cat
I had to implement my own autopostback in order to support Firefox
Arne
"Brock Allen" wrote:
So if you don't want to do a conversion at the source code level,
then I'd suggest just moving the code to a ASP.NET 2.0 app and let it
run (so no recompile). ASP.NET 2.0 is supposed to be 100% backwards
compat with ASP.NET 1.x, but the problems you might run into is if
you're using a framework API that's specifically not backwards
compatible in 2.0. These APIs are covered in the list of breaking
changes from .NET 1.1 to 2.0.
As for the IDs and how they are generated in the client, as long as
you don't hard code the IDs in your client side javascript you're ok.
You shouldn't have done that in 1.x anyway... the ClientID property
was there in 1.x for that purpose.
-Brock
DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/ballen
Brock Allen,
No I don't want to convert my project to VS 2005 this week. That
will
come
later. First I would like to know if I have any issues with ASP.Net
2.0. I
have issues with user controls. The name and ID that ASP.Net returns
to the
browser has changed from 1.1 to 2.0. Sometimes I need to access
these
names
directly with javascript and sometimes I need these name at the
server.
Arne
"Brock Allen" wrote:
> ASP.NET 1.x app shouldn't need to be recompiled -- in theory it
> should run fine under a 2.0 configuration. If you need/want to
> recompile and you use VS.NET, then open your VS.NET 2003 project
> with VS.NET 2005 and it should convert the project. Once you've
> done that (and sorted any problems) then you can precompile with
> aspnet_compiler.exe or the Build->Publish menu pick in VS.NET. If
> your ASP.NET 1.x app didn't use VS.NET to compile, then you can
> just deploy it as-is and let the demand compile take care of
> things, or again run aspnet_compiler.exe to precompile.
>
> -Brock
> DevelopMentor
> http://staff.develop.com/ballen
>> I am porting a website to ASP.net 2.0. Temporarily I compile with
>> Visual Studio 2003 and deploying to ASP.net 2.0. How do I compile
>> my website under ASP.Net 2.0? I know it can compile each page as I
>> touch it. During the beta there used to be something like
>> mywebsite.com/compile.??? that you could run. Does it still exist?
>>
Ah, I see what you're getting at. Well, that was well known in v1.x to be
something that could change in future releases, so hard coding the ID in
your javascript was improper design in v1.x. That's why there was a ClientID
property in v1.x.
But point taken. I agree that not all apps will just magically work in v2.0
if they were working on v1.x. Anyone would certainly need to do thorough
testing before moving their app live under v2.0.
-Brock
DevelopMentor http://staff.develop.com/ballen Yes,
The clienID has changed. There is no longer an underscore starting
the
prefix of a control in a user control. Maybe it is more Firefox
friendly.
"Brock Allen" wrote:
So are you saying this is an area that changed between v1.x and v2.0?
-Brock
DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/ballen Brock,
The autopost back feature in ASP.Net 1.1 doesn't seem to be
compatible
with
Firefox. The problem seems to arise when you have a user control:
http://www.hardwarehank.com/search/default.aspx?t=cat
I had to implement my own autopostback in order to support Firefox
Arne
"Brock Allen" wrote:
So if you don't want to do a conversion at the source code level,
then I'd suggest just moving the code to a ASP.NET 2.0 app and let
it run (so no recompile). ASP.NET 2.0 is supposed to be 100%
backwards compat with ASP.NET 1.x, but the problems you might run
into is if you're using a framework API that's specifically not
backwards compatible in 2.0. These APIs are covered in the list of
breaking changes from .NET 1.1 to 2.0.
As for the IDs and how they are generated in the client, as long as
you don't hard code the IDs in your client side javascript you're
ok. You shouldn't have done that in 1.x anyway... the ClientID
property was there in 1.x for that purpose.
-Brock
DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/ballen
> Brock Allen,
> No I don't want to convert my project to VS 2005 this week. That
> will
> come
> later. First I would like to know if I have any issues with
> ASP.Net
> 2.0. I
> have issues with user controls. The name and ID that ASP.Net
> returns
> to the
> browser has changed from 1.1 to 2.0. Sometimes I need to access
> these
> names
> directly with javascript and sometimes I need these name at the
> server.
> Arne
> "Brock Allen" wrote:
>> ASP.NET 1.x app shouldn't need to be recompiled -- in theory it
>> should run fine under a 2.0 configuration. If you need/want to
>> recompile and you use VS.NET, then open your VS.NET 2003 project
>> with VS.NET 2005 and it should convert the project. Once you've
>> done that (and sorted any problems) then you can precompile with
>> aspnet_compiler.exe or the Build->Publish menu pick in VS.NET. If
>> your ASP.NET 1.x app didn't use VS.NET to compile, then you can
>> just deploy it as-is and let the demand compile take care of
>> things, or again run aspnet_compiler.exe to precompile.
>>
>> -Brock
>> DevelopMentor
>> http://staff.develop.com/ballen
>>> I am porting a website to ASP.net 2.0. Temporarily I compile
>>> with Visual Studio 2003 and deploying to ASP.net 2.0. How do I
>>> compile my website under ASP.Net 2.0? I know it can compile each
>>> page as I touch it. During the beta there used to be something
>>> like mywebsite.com/compile.??? that you could run. Does it still
>>> exist?
>>> This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: janeaustine50 |
last post by:
Python's InteractiveInterpreter uses the built-in compile function.
According to the ref. manual, it doesn't seem to concern about the
encoding of the source string.
When I hand in an unicode...
|
by: Carmine Cairo |
last post by:
Hi,
I'm working on a project and today I've note a little problem during the
compile fase.
Here a little piece of code:
// 1st version
welldone = 0;
size = p->getSize();
backbone = new...
|
by: Brice Prunier |
last post by:
Here under 4 schemas i'm working with ( it may be long: sorry...)
The context is the following :
Resident.xsd imports Person.xsd and includes Common.xsd ( anonimous schema:
no TargetNamespace )...
|
by: Chris LaJoie |
last post by:
Our company has been developing a program in C# for some time now, and we
haven't had any problems with it, but just last night something cropped up
that has me, and everyone else, stumped.
I...
|
by: Thomas Connolly |
last post by:
I have 2 pages referencing the same codebehind file in my
project. Originally the pages referenced separate code
behind files. Once I changed the reference to the same
file, everything worked...
|
by: steve yee |
last post by:
i want to detect if the compile is 32 bits or 64 bits in the source
code itself. so different code are compiled respectively. how to do
this?
|
by: desktop |
last post by:
I have read that using templates makes types know at compile time and
using inheritance the types are first decided at runtime. The use of
pointers and casts also indicates that the types will...
|
by: brianrpsgt1 |
last post by:
Newbie here....
I have been able to successful pull info from a MySQL DB, get the
results and output them in an HTML format using Cheetah to the screen
using IDLE. I am doing this on a Windows...
|
by: NvrBst |
last post by:
Right now I have C99 code in .c extensions.
I compile it in VSC++ and it complains about a lot of errors.
I change the extensions to .cpp and compile in VSC++ and it succeeds.
Is there a way...
|
by: Ed Leafe |
last post by:
I've noticed an odd behavior with compile() and code that does not
contain a trailing newline: if the last line is a comment inside of
any block, a syntax error is thrown, but if the last line is a...
|
by: Charles Arthur |
last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
If we have dozens or hundreds of excel to import into the database, if we use the excel import function provided by database editors such as navicat, it will be extremely tedious and time-consuming...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
| |
