471,310 Members | 1,615 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post +

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 471,310 software developers and data experts.

The element 'compilation' has invalid child element 'compilers'.

I have a number of web projects converted from 1.1 to 2.0 in VS2005.

I am methodically seeing the error below:

The element 'compilation' has invalid child element 'compilers'. List of
possible elements expected: 'assemblies, buildProviders, codeSubDirectories,
expressionBuilders'.

Here's what the web config looks like. The error doesn't cause any issues
and according to the MSDN documentation this is valid. So why is VS2005
giving me this bogus error?

<configuration>
<system.web>
<httpRuntime maxRequestLength="8192"/>
<!-- DYNAMIC DEBUG COMPILATION
Set compilation debug="true" to insert debugging symbols (.pdb
information)
into the compiled page. Because this creates a larger file that
executes
more slowly, you should set this value to true only when debugging
and to
false at all other times. For more information, refer to the
documentation about
debugging ASP.NET files.
-->
<compilation defaultLanguage="vb" debug="true" batch="false">
<compilers>
<compiler language="vb" type="Microsoft.VisualBasic.VBCodeProvider,
System, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=B77A5C561934E089"
extension=".VB" compilerOptions="/define:Debug=True /define:Trace=True
/imports:Microsoft.VisualBasic,System,System.Collec tions,System.Configuration,System.Data,System.Draw ing,System.Web,System.Web.UI,System.Web.UI.HtmlCon trols,System.Web.UI.WebControls"/></compilers>
<assemblies>

etc, etc,
Nov 19 '05 #1
3 8420
In 2.0, the <compilers> section is found in machine.config,
so you don't need to place it in web.config.

Check out machine.config.comments in the .Net Framework\config dir.

The syntax has changed.
It's now in the <system.codedom> section.

See : http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/e4hwk57e.aspx


Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"Robert" <ro*****@noemail.nospam> wrote in message
news:99**********************************@microsof t.com...
I have a number of web projects converted from 1.1 to 2.0 in VS2005.

I am methodically seeing the error below:

The element 'compilation' has invalid child element 'compilers'. List of
possible elements expected: 'assemblies, buildProviders, codeSubDirectories,
expressionBuilders'.

Here's what the web config looks like. The error doesn't cause any issues
and according to the MSDN documentation this is valid. So why is VS2005
giving me this bogus error?

<configuration>
<system.web>
<httpRuntime maxRequestLength="8192"/>
<!-- DYNAMIC DEBUG COMPILATION
Set compilation debug="true" to insert debugging symbols (.pdb
information)
into the compiled page. Because this creates a larger file that
executes
more slowly, you should set this value to true only when debugging
and to
false at all other times. For more information, refer to the
documentation about
debugging ASP.NET files.
-->
<compilation defaultLanguage="vb" debug="true" batch="false">
<compilers>
<compiler language="vb" type="Microsoft.VisualBasic.VBCodeProvider,
System, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=B77A5C561934E089"
extension=".VB" compilerOptions="/define:Debug=True /define:Trace=True
/imports:Microsoft.VisualBasic,System,System.Collec tions,System.Configuration,System.Data,System.Draw ing,System.Web,System.Web.UI,System.Web.UI.HtmlCon trols,System.Web.UI.WebControls"/></compilers>
<assemblies>

etc, etc,

Nov 19 '05 #2
Thanks for the response.

I removed it entirely from web.config as it is apparently unnecessary.

Guess I wish the migration wizard could of either 1) removed it for me or 2)
flagged it as a todo with an explanation.

Thx.
R-

"Juan T. Llibre" wrote:
In 2.0, the <compilers> section is found in machine.config,
so you don't need to place it in web.config.

Check out machine.config.comments in the .Net Framework\config dir.

The syntax has changed.
It's now in the <system.codedom> section.

See : http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/e4hwk57e.aspx


Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
Foros de ASP.NET en Español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
======================================
"Robert" <ro*****@noemail.nospam> wrote in message
news:99**********************************@microsof t.com...
I have a number of web projects converted from 1.1 to 2.0 in VS2005.

I am methodically seeing the error below:

The element 'compilation' has invalid child element 'compilers'. List of
possible elements expected: 'assemblies, buildProviders, codeSubDirectories,
expressionBuilders'.

Here's what the web config looks like. The error doesn't cause any issues
and according to the MSDN documentation this is valid. So why is VS2005
giving me this bogus error?

<configuration>
<system.web>
<httpRuntime maxRequestLength="8192"/>
<!-- DYNAMIC DEBUG COMPILATION
Set compilation debug="true" to insert debugging symbols (.pdb
information)
into the compiled page. Because this creates a larger file that
executes
more slowly, you should set this value to true only when debugging
and to
false at all other times. For more information, refer to the
documentation about
debugging ASP.NET files.
-->
<compilation defaultLanguage="vb" debug="true" batch="false">
<compilers>
<compiler language="vb" type="Microsoft.VisualBasic.VBCodeProvider,
System, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=B77A5C561934E089"
extension=".VB" compilerOptions="/define:Debug=True /define:Trace=True
/imports:Microsoft.VisualBasic,System,System.Collec tions,System.Configuration,System.Data,System.Draw ing,System.Web,System.Web.UI,System.Web.UI.HtmlCon trols,System.Web.UI.WebControls"/></compilers>
<assemblies>

etc, etc,


Nov 19 '05 #3
Hi Robert,

Yes, what a pity that the migration wizard was not able to automatically
correct this, maybe it is due to the <system.codedom> is outside the
<system.web> that beyond the migration checking. Anyway, the error message
make some sense, also thanks for Juan's informative suggestion.

Thanks,

Steven Cheng
Microsoft Online Support

Get Secure! www.microsoft.com/security
(This posting is provided "AS IS", with no warranties, and confers no
rights.)

--------------------
| Thread-Topic: The element 'compilation' has invalid child element
'compilers
| thread-index: AcXpe7dhGIAffoz4SzOtjdSjQDOyUA==
| X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 67.180.214.235
| From: =?Utf-8?B?Um9iZXJ0?= <ro*****@noemail.nospam>
| References: <99**********************************@microsoft.co m>
<ew**************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>
| Subject: Re: The element 'compilation' has invalid child element
'compilers
| Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:30:01 -0800
| Lines: 72
| Message-ID: <0A**********************************@microsoft.co m>
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain;
| charset="Utf-8"
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| Importance: normal
| Priority: normal
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
| NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
| Path: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFT NGXA03.phx.gbl
| Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA02.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:358118
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
|
| Thanks for the response.
|
| I removed it entirely from web.config as it is apparently unnecessary.
|
| Guess I wish the migration wizard could of either 1) removed it for me or
2)
| flagged it as a todo with an explanation.
|
| Thx.
| R-
|
| "Juan T. Llibre" wrote:
|
| > In 2.0, the <compilers> section is found in machine.config,
| > so you don't need to place it in web.config.
| >
| > Check out machine.config.comments in the .Net Framework\config dir.
| >
| > The syntax has changed.
| > It's now in the <system.codedom> section.
| >
| > See : http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/e4hwk57e.aspx
| >
| >
| >
| >
| > Juan T. Llibre, ASP.NET MVP
| > ASP.NET FAQ : http://asp.net.do/faq/
| > ASPNETFAQ.COM : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
| > Foros de ASP.NET en Español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
| > ======================================
| > "Robert" <ro*****@noemail.nospam> wrote in message
| > news:99**********************************@microsof t.com...
| > >I have a number of web projects converted from 1.1 to 2.0 in VS2005.
| > >
| > > I am methodically seeing the error below:
| > >
| > > The element 'compilation' has invalid child element 'compilers'.
List of
| > > possible elements expected: 'assemblies, buildProviders,
codeSubDirectories,
| > > expressionBuilders'.
| > >
| > > Here's what the web config looks like. The error doesn't cause any
issues
| > > and according to the MSDN documentation this is valid. So why is
VS2005
| > > giving me this bogus error?
| > >
| > > <configuration>
| > > <system.web>
| > > <httpRuntime maxRequestLength="8192"/>
| > > <!-- DYNAMIC DEBUG COMPILATION
| > > Set compilation debug="true" to insert debugging symbols
(.pdb
| > > information)
| > > into the compiled page. Because this creates a larger file
that
| > > executes
| > > more slowly, you should set this value to true only when
debugging
| > > and to
| > > false at all other times. For more information, refer to the
| > > documentation about
| > > debugging ASP.NET files.
| > > -->
| > > <compilation defaultLanguage="vb" debug="true" batch="false">
| > > <compilers>
| > > <compiler language="vb" type="Microsoft.VisualBasic.VBCodeProvider,
| > > System, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=B77A5C561934E089"
| > > extension=".VB" compilerOptions="/define:Debug=True /define:Trace=True
| > >
/imports:Microsoft.VisualBasic,System,System.Collec tions,System.Configuratio
n,System.Data,System.Drawing,System.Web,System.Web .UI,System.Web.UI.HtmlCont
rols,System.Web.UI.WebControls"/></compilers>
| > > <assemblies>
| > >
| > > etc, etc,
| > >
| > >
| >
| >
| >
|

Nov 19 '05 #4

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.

Similar topics

3 posts views Thread by Christopher Benson-Manica | last post: by
3 posts views Thread by derek.google | last post: by
1 post views Thread by Mark Spencer | last post: by
1 post views Thread by John Bailo | last post: by
13 posts views Thread by Alex | last post: by
reply views Thread by rosydwin | last post: by

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.