468,136 Members | 1,435 Online
Bytes | Developer Community
New Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Post your question to a community of 468,136 developers. It's quick & easy.

Do i loose the power of asp.net if i use a custom extension (not .aspx) with IHttpHandlerFactory

I want to use my custom url extension instead of .aspx. I can achieve this
by writing a custom handler that implements the IHttpHandlerFactory.
In the GetHandler method of the IHttpHandlerFactory i want to construct a
Page class instance and load my other controls to it and return the page
instance.
This is what .net framework does. There is a small difference what i am
thinking and the .net framework has done. .Net Framework calls the
PageParser.GetCompiledPageInstance() methot to take the page from the cached
content. In my implemention, instance of the Page class is created and it is
returned.

Ex:

PageHandlerFactory
public virtual IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string
requestType, string url, string path)
{
InternalSecurityPermissions.UnmanagedCode.Assert() ;
return PageParser.GetCompiledPageInstanceInternal(url, path, context);
}

<add verb="*" path="*.umut" type="MyOwnHandlerFactory"/>
MyOwnHandlerFactory
public virtual IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string
requestType, string url, string path)
{
Page page = new Page

page.Controls.Add ( new System.Web.UI.LiteralControl
("<html><head></head><body>");
System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm form = new
System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm ()
form.Name = "Form1";
form.Method = "Post";
page.Controls.Add (form);
Control c1 = page.LoadControl (ABC.ascx);
form.Controls.Add (c1);
page.Controls.Add ( new System.Web.UI.LiteralControl ("</body><html>");
return page.
}

I have described what the .net framework does and the one in my mind. I am
still using the framework but only i have different extension.
As a summary:

1) Do i loose the cache functionality of the PageParser. (May be it is
not necessary because i am only parsing UserControls with page.LoadControl)
2) Can i use everthing that asp.net supports like Session, ViewState
etc?
Nov 19 '05 #1
3 1384
Why go to all that work? Just register in web.config your custom handler
and map it onto the existing ASPX handler:

<configuration>
<system.web>
<httpHandlers>
<add verb="*" path="*.umut" type="System.Web.UI.PageHandlerFactory"/>
</httpHandlers>
</system.web>
</configuration>

-Brock
DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/ballen
I want to use my custom url extension instead of .aspx. I can achieve
this
by writing a custom handler that implements the IHttpHandlerFactory.
In the GetHandler method of the IHttpHandlerFactory i want to
construct a
Page class instance and load my other controls to it and return the
page
instance.
This is what .net framework does. There is a small difference what i
am
thinking and the .net framework has done. .Net Framework calls the
PageParser.GetCompiledPageInstance() methot to take the page from the
cached
content. In my implemention, instance of the Page class is created and
it is
returned.
Ex:

PageHandlerFactory
public virtual IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string
requestType, string url, string path)
{
InternalSecurityPermissions.UnmanagedCode.Assert() ;
return PageParser.GetCompiledPageInstanceInternal(url, path,
context);
}
<add verb="*" path="*.umut" type="MyOwnHandlerFactory"/>
MyOwnHandlerFactory
public virtual IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string
requestType, string url, string path)
{
Page page = new Page
page.Controls.Add ( new System.Web.UI.LiteralControl
("<html><head></head><body>");
System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm form = new
System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm ()
form.Name = "Form1";
form.Method = "Post";
page.Controls.Add (form);
Control c1 = page.LoadControl (ABC.ascx);
form.Controls.Add (c1);
page.Controls.Add ( new System.Web.UI.LiteralControl
("</body><html>");
return page.
}
I have described what the .net framework does and the one in my mind.
I am
still using the framework but only i have different extension.
As a summary:
1) Do i loose the cache functionality of the PageParser. (May be
it is
not necessary because i am only parsing UserControls with
page.LoadControl)
2) Can i use everthing that asp.net supports like Session,
ViewState
etc?


Nov 19 '05 #2
That's entirely correct.

I'd also map the extension in the Application's "Configuration"
section in the "Virtual Directory" tab of the IIS MMC.

If using ASP.NET 2.0, he'd also need to add:

<compilation>
<buildProviders>
<add extension=".umut" appliesTo="Web" type="System.Web.Compilation.PageBuildProvider" />
</buildProviders>
</compilation>


Juan T. Llibre
ASP.NET MVP
http://asp.net.do/foros/
Foros de ASP.NET en Español
Ven, y hablemos de ASP.NET...
======================

"Brock Allen" <ba****@NOSPAMdevelop.com> wrote in message news:87**********************@msnews.microsoft.com ...
Why go to all that work? Just register in web.config your custom handler
and map it onto the existing ASPX handler:

<configuration>
<system.web>
<httpHandlers>
<add verb="*" path="*.umut" type="System.Web.UI.PageHandlerFactory"/>
</httpHandlers>
</system.web>
</configuration>

-Brock
DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/ballen



I want to use my custom url extension instead of .aspx. I can achieve
this
by writing a custom handler that implements the IHttpHandlerFactory.
In the GetHandler method of the IHttpHandlerFactory i want to
construct a
Page class instance and load my other controls to it and return the
page
instance.
This is what .net framework does. There is a small difference what i
am
thinking and the .net framework has done. .Net Framework calls the
PageParser.GetCompiledPageInstance() methot to take the page from the
cached
content. In my implemention, instance of the Page class is created and
it is
returned.
Ex:

PageHandlerFactory
public virtual IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string
requestType, string url, string path)
{
InternalSecurityPermissions.UnmanagedCode.Assert() ;
return PageParser.GetCompiledPageInstanceInternal(url, path,
context);
}
<add verb="*" path="*.umut" type="MyOwnHandlerFactory"/>
MyOwnHandlerFactory
public virtual IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string
requestType, string url, string path)
{
Page page = new Page
page.Controls.Add ( new System.Web.UI.LiteralControl
("<html><head></head><body>");
System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm form = new
System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm ()
form.Name = "Form1";
form.Method = "Post";
page.Controls.Add (form);
Control c1 = page.LoadControl (ABC.ascx);
form.Controls.Add (c1);
page.Controls.Add ( new System.Web.UI.LiteralControl
("</body><html>");
return page.
}
I have described what the .net framework does and the one in my mind.
I am
still using the framework but only i have different extension.
As a summary:
1) Do i loose the cache functionality of the PageParser. (May be
it is
not necessary because i am only parsing UserControls with
page.LoadControl)
2) Can i use everthing that asp.net supports like Session,
ViewState
etc?



Nov 19 '05 #3
I know that, but i dont want lots of .aspx files. I am developing a control.
Instead of it, my consumers use .ascx user controls.
That is why i am tring to create Page instance on the fly.

"Brock Allen" <ba****@NOSPAMdevelop.com> wrote in message
news:87**********************@msnews.microsoft.com ...
Why go to all that work? Just register in web.config your custom handler
and map it onto the existing ASPX handler:

<configuration>
<system.web>
<httpHandlers>
<add verb="*" path="*.umut" type="System.Web.UI.PageHandlerFactory"/>
</httpHandlers>
</system.web>
</configuration>

-Brock
DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/ballen
I want to use my custom url extension instead of .aspx. I can achieve
this
by writing a custom handler that implements the IHttpHandlerFactory.
In the GetHandler method of the IHttpHandlerFactory i want to
construct a
Page class instance and load my other controls to it and return the
page
instance.
This is what .net framework does. There is a small difference what i
am
thinking and the .net framework has done. .Net Framework calls the
PageParser.GetCompiledPageInstance() methot to take the page from the
cached
content. In my implemention, instance of the Page class is created and
it is
returned.
Ex:

PageHandlerFactory
public virtual IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string
requestType, string url, string path)
{
InternalSecurityPermissions.UnmanagedCode.Assert() ;
return PageParser.GetCompiledPageInstanceInternal(url, path,
context);
}
<add verb="*" path="*.umut" type="MyOwnHandlerFactory"/>
MyOwnHandlerFactory
public virtual IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string
requestType, string url, string path)
{
Page page = new Page
page.Controls.Add ( new System.Web.UI.LiteralControl
("<html><head></head><body>");
System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm form = new
System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm ()
form.Name = "Form1";
form.Method = "Post";
page.Controls.Add (form);
Control c1 = page.LoadControl (ABC.ascx);
form.Controls.Add (c1);
page.Controls.Add ( new System.Web.UI.LiteralControl
("</body><html>");
return page.
}
I have described what the .net framework does and the one in my mind.
I am
still using the framework but only i have different extension.
As a summary:
1) Do i loose the cache functionality of the PageParser. (May be
it is
not necessary because i am only parsing UserControls with
page.LoadControl)
2) Can i use everthing that asp.net supports like Session,
ViewState
etc?


Nov 19 '05 #4

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.