473,396 Members | 1,707 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,396 software developers and data experts.

Do i loose the power of asp.net if i use a custom extension (not .aspx) with IHttpHandlerFactory

I want to use my custom url extension instead of .aspx. I can achieve this
by writing a custom handler that implements the IHttpHandlerFactory.
In the GetHandler method of the IHttpHandlerFactory i want to construct a
Page class instance and load my other controls to it and return the page
instance.
This is what .net framework does. There is a small difference what i am
thinking and the .net framework has done. .Net Framework calls the
PageParser.GetCompiledPageInstance() methot to take the page from the cached
content. In my implemention, instance of the Page class is created and it is
returned.

Ex:

PageHandlerFactory
public virtual IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string
requestType, string url, string path)
{
InternalSecurityPermissions.UnmanagedCode.Assert() ;
return PageParser.GetCompiledPageInstanceInternal(url, path, context);
}

<add verb="*" path="*.umut" type="MyOwnHandlerFactory"/>
MyOwnHandlerFactory
public virtual IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string
requestType, string url, string path)
{
Page page = new Page

page.Controls.Add ( new System.Web.UI.LiteralControl
("<html><head></head><body>");
System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm form = new
System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm ()
form.Name = "Form1";
form.Method = "Post";
page.Controls.Add (form);
Control c1 = page.LoadControl (ABC.ascx);
form.Controls.Add (c1);
page.Controls.Add ( new System.Web.UI.LiteralControl ("</body><html>");
return page.
}

I have described what the .net framework does and the one in my mind. I am
still using the framework but only i have different extension.
As a summary:

1) Do i loose the cache functionality of the PageParser. (May be it is
not necessary because i am only parsing UserControls with page.LoadControl)
2) Can i use everthing that asp.net supports like Session, ViewState
etc?
Nov 19 '05 #1
3 1516
Why go to all that work? Just register in web.config your custom handler
and map it onto the existing ASPX handler:

<configuration>
<system.web>
<httpHandlers>
<add verb="*" path="*.umut" type="System.Web.UI.PageHandlerFactory"/>
</httpHandlers>
</system.web>
</configuration>

-Brock
DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/ballen
I want to use my custom url extension instead of .aspx. I can achieve
this
by writing a custom handler that implements the IHttpHandlerFactory.
In the GetHandler method of the IHttpHandlerFactory i want to
construct a
Page class instance and load my other controls to it and return the
page
instance.
This is what .net framework does. There is a small difference what i
am
thinking and the .net framework has done. .Net Framework calls the
PageParser.GetCompiledPageInstance() methot to take the page from the
cached
content. In my implemention, instance of the Page class is created and
it is
returned.
Ex:

PageHandlerFactory
public virtual IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string
requestType, string url, string path)
{
InternalSecurityPermissions.UnmanagedCode.Assert() ;
return PageParser.GetCompiledPageInstanceInternal(url, path,
context);
}
<add verb="*" path="*.umut" type="MyOwnHandlerFactory"/>
MyOwnHandlerFactory
public virtual IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string
requestType, string url, string path)
{
Page page = new Page
page.Controls.Add ( new System.Web.UI.LiteralControl
("<html><head></head><body>");
System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm form = new
System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm ()
form.Name = "Form1";
form.Method = "Post";
page.Controls.Add (form);
Control c1 = page.LoadControl (ABC.ascx);
form.Controls.Add (c1);
page.Controls.Add ( new System.Web.UI.LiteralControl
("</body><html>");
return page.
}
I have described what the .net framework does and the one in my mind.
I am
still using the framework but only i have different extension.
As a summary:
1) Do i loose the cache functionality of the PageParser. (May be
it is
not necessary because i am only parsing UserControls with
page.LoadControl)
2) Can i use everthing that asp.net supports like Session,
ViewState
etc?


Nov 19 '05 #2
That's entirely correct.

I'd also map the extension in the Application's "Configuration"
section in the "Virtual Directory" tab of the IIS MMC.

If using ASP.NET 2.0, he'd also need to add:

<compilation>
<buildProviders>
<add extension=".umut" appliesTo="Web" type="System.Web.Compilation.PageBuildProvider" />
</buildProviders>
</compilation>


Juan T. Llibre
ASP.NET MVP
http://asp.net.do/foros/
Foros de ASP.NET en Español
Ven, y hablemos de ASP.NET...
======================

"Brock Allen" <ba****@NOSPAMdevelop.com> wrote in message news:87**********************@msnews.microsoft.com ...
Why go to all that work? Just register in web.config your custom handler
and map it onto the existing ASPX handler:

<configuration>
<system.web>
<httpHandlers>
<add verb="*" path="*.umut" type="System.Web.UI.PageHandlerFactory"/>
</httpHandlers>
</system.web>
</configuration>

-Brock
DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/ballen



I want to use my custom url extension instead of .aspx. I can achieve
this
by writing a custom handler that implements the IHttpHandlerFactory.
In the GetHandler method of the IHttpHandlerFactory i want to
construct a
Page class instance and load my other controls to it and return the
page
instance.
This is what .net framework does. There is a small difference what i
am
thinking and the .net framework has done. .Net Framework calls the
PageParser.GetCompiledPageInstance() methot to take the page from the
cached
content. In my implemention, instance of the Page class is created and
it is
returned.
Ex:

PageHandlerFactory
public virtual IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string
requestType, string url, string path)
{
InternalSecurityPermissions.UnmanagedCode.Assert() ;
return PageParser.GetCompiledPageInstanceInternal(url, path,
context);
}
<add verb="*" path="*.umut" type="MyOwnHandlerFactory"/>
MyOwnHandlerFactory
public virtual IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string
requestType, string url, string path)
{
Page page = new Page
page.Controls.Add ( new System.Web.UI.LiteralControl
("<html><head></head><body>");
System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm form = new
System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm ()
form.Name = "Form1";
form.Method = "Post";
page.Controls.Add (form);
Control c1 = page.LoadControl (ABC.ascx);
form.Controls.Add (c1);
page.Controls.Add ( new System.Web.UI.LiteralControl
("</body><html>");
return page.
}
I have described what the .net framework does and the one in my mind.
I am
still using the framework but only i have different extension.
As a summary:
1) Do i loose the cache functionality of the PageParser. (May be
it is
not necessary because i am only parsing UserControls with
page.LoadControl)
2) Can i use everthing that asp.net supports like Session,
ViewState
etc?



Nov 19 '05 #3
I know that, but i dont want lots of .aspx files. I am developing a control.
Instead of it, my consumers use .ascx user controls.
That is why i am tring to create Page instance on the fly.

"Brock Allen" <ba****@NOSPAMdevelop.com> wrote in message
news:87**********************@msnews.microsoft.com ...
Why go to all that work? Just register in web.config your custom handler
and map it onto the existing ASPX handler:

<configuration>
<system.web>
<httpHandlers>
<add verb="*" path="*.umut" type="System.Web.UI.PageHandlerFactory"/>
</httpHandlers>
</system.web>
</configuration>

-Brock
DevelopMentor
http://staff.develop.com/ballen
I want to use my custom url extension instead of .aspx. I can achieve
this
by writing a custom handler that implements the IHttpHandlerFactory.
In the GetHandler method of the IHttpHandlerFactory i want to
construct a
Page class instance and load my other controls to it and return the
page
instance.
This is what .net framework does. There is a small difference what i
am
thinking and the .net framework has done. .Net Framework calls the
PageParser.GetCompiledPageInstance() methot to take the page from the
cached
content. In my implemention, instance of the Page class is created and
it is
returned.
Ex:

PageHandlerFactory
public virtual IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string
requestType, string url, string path)
{
InternalSecurityPermissions.UnmanagedCode.Assert() ;
return PageParser.GetCompiledPageInstanceInternal(url, path,
context);
}
<add verb="*" path="*.umut" type="MyOwnHandlerFactory"/>
MyOwnHandlerFactory
public virtual IHttpHandler GetHandler(HttpContext context, string
requestType, string url, string path)
{
Page page = new Page
page.Controls.Add ( new System.Web.UI.LiteralControl
("<html><head></head><body>");
System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm form = new
System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlForm ()
form.Name = "Form1";
form.Method = "Post";
page.Controls.Add (form);
Control c1 = page.LoadControl (ABC.ascx);
form.Controls.Add (c1);
page.Controls.Add ( new System.Web.UI.LiteralControl
("</body><html>");
return page.
}
I have described what the .net framework does and the one in my mind.
I am
still using the framework but only i have different extension.
As a summary:
1) Do i loose the cache functionality of the PageParser. (May be
it is
not necessary because i am only parsing UserControls with
page.LoadControl)
2) Can i use everthing that asp.net supports like Session,
ViewState
etc?


Nov 19 '05 #4

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

4
by: Jon Spivey | last post by:
Hi, I've set up a custom error like this <customErrors mode="On" defaultRedirect="ErrorPage.aspx"> <error statusCode="404" redirect="error404.aspx" /> </customErrors> So requests for...
1
by: Laurie Dvorak | last post by:
I'm working on converting a website that currently is all static HTML pages to ASP.NET. Since people may have some of the HTML pages bookmarked, I want to give them a meaningful error message...
5
by: bryan | last post by:
If I understand correctly, I can write a custom handler for a given extension (say .abcd files) by writing a class that implements the IHttpHandler interface and then registering it in my web...
1
by: Mutley | last post by:
Hi, I have written an HttpHandler to process page requests for a custom file extension. The handler gets called as expected and after searching the web for examples I have used a method called...
0
by: Charles Arthur | last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
0
by: emmanuelkatto | last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud. Please let me know. Thanks! Emmanuel
1
by: nemocccc | last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID: 1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration. 2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
0
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
0
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
0
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.