473,397 Members | 2,028 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,397 software developers and data experts.

ASP.Net Performance better with IIS 6.0 in IIS 5.0 isolation mode

We have an web application about to go live with a customer. The app is
ASP.Net 1.1 Framework with an Oracle DB backend. We have done performance
tests on a W2K (IIS 5.0) test web server at our site (database is running on
another server). We installed in the customer site for testing on their
servers (a far bigger web server running Windows 2K3 and IIS 6.0 with a far
bigger db server). To our amazement the overall performance of the system
running on their servers was way below what we had seen on our far smaller
servers.

We eventually traced the problem to the performance of our ASP.Net
application (rather than network/hardware or database performance). We
eventually found that the time between "Begin SaveViewstate" and "End
SaveViewState" for the same page running in IIS 5 and IIS 6 was different. In
IIS 5 this part of the trace accounted for approx 5% of the time in the trace
but in IIS 6 this part of the trace accounted for 60% of the time (test page
was exactly same with same data on each test).

In a desperate move we swapped IIS 6.0 to run in IIS 5.0 isolation mode.
Suddenly performance of all our pages on the new server improved from 70
Request/sec to 330 Requests/sec.

Our app is pure ASP.Net and does not use any COM components. IIS 6 on W2K
server was set up by our customer IT staff with default settings. It is an
Intranet app and the size of Viewstate on each version of IIS test was the
same and not terribly large).

Anyone have any ideas why this should be. Our app is now faster but we would
like to understand why???

Nov 19 '05 #1
2 1469
hmm, wierd. boxes are patched and up to date? running any funky stuff (stuff
that stinks) in code or on the machine that you would admit to?

--
Regards,
Alvin Bruney - ASP.NET MVP

[Shameless Author Plug]
The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET
Now available @ www.lulu.com/owc
"John McGuire" <John Mc*****@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:54**********************************@microsof t.com...
We have an web application about to go live with a customer. The app is
ASP.Net 1.1 Framework with an Oracle DB backend. We have done performance
tests on a W2K (IIS 5.0) test web server at our site (database is running
on
another server). We installed in the customer site for testing on their
servers (a far bigger web server running Windows 2K3 and IIS 6.0 with a
far
bigger db server). To our amazement the overall performance of the system
running on their servers was way below what we had seen on our far smaller
servers.

We eventually traced the problem to the performance of our ASP.Net
application (rather than network/hardware or database performance). We
eventually found that the time between "Begin SaveViewstate" and "End
SaveViewState" for the same page running in IIS 5 and IIS 6 was different.
In
IIS 5 this part of the trace accounted for approx 5% of the time in the
trace
but in IIS 6 this part of the trace accounted for 60% of the time (test
page
was exactly same with same data on each test).

In a desperate move we swapped IIS 6.0 to run in IIS 5.0 isolation mode.
Suddenly performance of all our pages on the new server improved from 70
Request/sec to 330 Requests/sec.

Our app is pure ASP.Net and does not use any COM components. IIS 6 on W2K
server was set up by our customer IT staff with default settings. It is an
Intranet app and the size of Viewstate on each version of IIS test was the
same and not terribly large).

Anyone have any ideas why this should be. Our app is now faster but we
would
like to understand why???

Nov 19 '05 #2
hmm, wierd. boxes are patched and up to date? running any funky stuff (stuff
that stinks) in code or on the machine that you would admit to?

--
Regards,
Alvin Bruney - ASP.NET MVP

[Shameless Author Plug]
The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET
Now available @ www.lulu.com/owc
"John McGuire" <John Mc*****@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:54**********************************@microsof t.com...
We have an web application about to go live with a customer. The app is
ASP.Net 1.1 Framework with an Oracle DB backend. We have done performance
tests on a W2K (IIS 5.0) test web server at our site (database is running
on
another server). We installed in the customer site for testing on their
servers (a far bigger web server running Windows 2K3 and IIS 6.0 with a
far
bigger db server). To our amazement the overall performance of the system
running on their servers was way below what we had seen on our far smaller
servers.

We eventually traced the problem to the performance of our ASP.Net
application (rather than network/hardware or database performance). We
eventually found that the time between "Begin SaveViewstate" and "End
SaveViewState" for the same page running in IIS 5 and IIS 6 was different.
In
IIS 5 this part of the trace accounted for approx 5% of the time in the
trace
but in IIS 6 this part of the trace accounted for 60% of the time (test
page
was exactly same with same data on each test).

In a desperate move we swapped IIS 6.0 to run in IIS 5.0 isolation mode.
Suddenly performance of all our pages on the new server improved from 70
Request/sec to 330 Requests/sec.

Our app is pure ASP.Net and does not use any COM components. IIS 6 on W2K
server was set up by our customer IT staff with default settings. It is an
Intranet app and the size of Viewstate on each version of IIS test was the
same and not terribly large).

Anyone have any ideas why this should be. Our app is now faster but we
would
like to understand why???

Nov 19 '05 #3

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

11
by: Markus Breuer | last post by:
I have a question about oracle commit and transactions. Following scenario: Process A performs a single sql-INSERT into a table and commits the transaction. Then he informs process B (ipc) to...
2
by: Mark | last post by:
Hi... We're looking at moving an ASP app from IIS 5 to IIS 6. In general things seem to be working okay, but there are some oddities around the edges. One of those unanticipated changes has to...
10
by: AC Slater | last post by:
I have 1 table (out of many) that has very poor performance when performing a select into on. The select statement is called multiple times. We've found each call to take almost 1 second... we...
14
by: Sean C. | last post by:
Helpful folks, Most of my previous experience with DB2 was on s390 mainframe systems and the optimizer on this platform always seemed very predictable and consistent. Since moving to a WinNT/UDB...
13
by: bjarne | last post by:
Willy Denoyette wrote; > ... it > was not the intention of StrousTrup to the achieve the level of efficiency > of C when he invented C++, ... Ahmmm. It was my aim to match the performance...
1
by: Jesper | last post by:
Im running Windows Server 2003 trying to get my ASP.NET applications to access the file system. My Web application needs to have write access to some folders in the virtual directory from which...
0
by: John McGuire | last post by:
We have an web application about to go live with a customer. The app is ASP.Net 1.1 Framework with an Oracle DB backend. We have done performance tests on a W2K (IIS 5.0) test web server at our...
4
by: tarscher | last post by:
Hi all, I have 2 questions regarding performance: 1) I'm building a monitoring system that has to store lots of sensor data that I 'll have to query from time to time. I have pressure and...
12
by: Ilyas | last post by:
Hi all I have an application which brings back 1000 records from a sql server database. Under the local asp.net development server provided with Visual Studio 2008, it takes about 1.8 seconds ...
0
by: Charles Arthur | last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
0
by: emmanuelkatto | last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud. Please let me know. Thanks! Emmanuel
0
BarryA
by: BarryA | last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID: 1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration. 2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
0
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
0
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
0
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.