Say I develop an application that has an SQL Server 2000 back end with
ASP.NET front end. All the business logic is in the aspx pages. I want to
sell this as a package that some one can install on their server or even
desktop (replace SQL Server with MSDE). I don't want people reverse
engineering the logic inside of the aspx pages. Is there a way to prevent
this?
Also, I could probably put most all of the logic inside of a VB.NET EXE.
There would still need to be some logic in the aspx pages so I can't
completely get away from it. Any suggestions on a good method for this?
Thanks,
Brett
21  3489 
How about putting the business logic in the compiled code behind ? Or better
in a library called by code behind or aspx ?
then you can use one of several JIT obfuscator to make reverse engeneering
harder.
The whole point of aspx is that it is compiled "at first call".
"Brett" <no@spam.com> a écrit dans le message de news: eA*************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Say I develop an application that has an SQL Server 2000 back end with
ASP.NET front end. All the business logic is in the aspx pages. I want
to sell this as a package that some one can install on their server or
even desktop (replace SQL Server with MSDE). I don't want people reverse
engineering the logic inside of the aspx pages. Is there a way to prevent
this?
Also, I could probably put most all of the logic inside of a VB.NET EXE.
There would still need to be some logic in the aspx pages so I can't
completely get away from it. Any suggestions on a good method for this?
Thanks,
Brett
Hi Brett,
If the logic is in the codebehind, you can obfuscate it with a tool like
this: http://www.aspose.com/Products/Aspos.../Overview.html
I'm not aware of a tool that does the same for logic that is in .aspx files.
Of course if you can wait until the .NET 2.0 beta....
Ken
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:eA*************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Say I develop an application that has an SQL Server 2000 back end with
ASP.NET front end. All the business logic is in the aspx pages. I want
to sell this as a package that some one can install on their server or
even desktop (replace SQL Server with MSDE). I don't want people reverse
engineering the logic inside of the aspx pages. Is there a way to prevent
this?
Also, I could probably put most all of the logic inside of a VB.NET EXE.
There would still need to be some logic in the aspx pages so I can't
completely get away from it. Any suggestions on a good method for this?
Thanks,
Brett
I'm new to ASP.NET. What are the file extensions that the compiled code
behind is stored in? Are you referring to ASP.NET or VB.NET code when you
say compiled?
When you say library, are you referring to say a VB.NET DLL that the aspx
pages create an object for?
Can you elaborate on this a little more: "then you can use one of several
JIT obfuscator to make reverse engeneering harder." Would this have any
performance hit?
Thanks,
Brett
"Michel de Becdelièvre" <m_*****@msn.com> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... How about putting the business logic in the compiled code behind ? Or
better in a library called by code behind or aspx ?
then you can use one of several JIT obfuscator to make reverse engeneering
harder.
The whole point of aspx is that it is compiled "at first call".
"Brett" <no@spam.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
eA*************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Say I develop an application that has an SQL Server 2000 back end with
ASP.NET front end. All the business logic is in the aspx pages. I want
to sell this as a package that some one can install on their server or
even desktop (replace SQL Server with MSDE). I don't want people reverse
engineering the logic inside of the aspx pages. Is there a way to
prevent this?
Also, I could probably put most all of the logic inside of a VB.NET EXE.
There would still need to be some logic in the aspx pages so I can't
completely get away from it. Any suggestions on a good method for this?
Thanks,
Brett
Thanks. That's pretty neat. Have you used that program?
What will .NET 2.0 offer in this way? Also, when will it be released?
It will probably be a while until I will upgrade to .NET 2.0 since the first
version will probably be a little rough around the edges.
Brett
"Ken Cox [Microsoft MVP]" <BA************@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:%2***************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... Hi Brett,
If the logic is in the codebehind, you can obfuscate it with a tool like
this:
http://www.aspose.com/Products/Aspos.../Overview.html
I'm not aware of a tool that does the same for logic that is in .aspx
files. Of course if you can wait until the .NET 2.0 beta....
Ken
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:eA*************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Say I develop an application that has an SQL Server 2000 back end with
ASP.NET front end. All the business logic is in the aspx pages. I want
to sell this as a package that some one can install on their server or
even desktop (replace SQL Server with MSDE). I don't want people reverse
engineering the logic inside of the aspx pages. Is there a way to
prevent this?
Also, I could probably put most all of the logic inside of a VB.NET EXE.
There would still need to be some logic in the aspx pages so I can't
completely get away from it. Any suggestions on a good method for this?
Thanks,
Brett
I see what the obfuscators do now: http://www.devdirect.com/ALL/OBFUSCA...PCAT_2014.aspx. Do you have a
preference for one? Possibly free?
Thanks,
Brett
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:OW**************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... I'm new to ASP.NET. What are the file extensions that the compiled code
behind is stored in? Are you referring to ASP.NET or VB.NET code when you
say compiled?
When you say library, are you referring to say a VB.NET DLL that the aspx
pages create an object for?
Can you elaborate on this a little more: "then you can use one of several
JIT obfuscator to make reverse engeneering harder." Would this have any
performance hit?
Thanks,
Brett
"Michel de Becdelièvre" <m_*****@msn.com> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... How about putting the business logic in the compiled code behind ? Or
better in a library called by code behind or aspx ?
then you can use one of several JIT obfuscator to make reverse
engeneering harder.
The whole point of aspx is that it is compiled "at first call".
"Brett" <no@spam.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
eA*************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Say I develop an application that has an SQL Server 2000 back end with
ASP.NET front end. All the business logic is in the aspx pages. I want
to sell this as a package that some one can install on their server or
even desktop (replace SQL Server with MSDE). I don't want people
reverse engineering the logic inside of the aspx pages. Is there a way
to prevent this?
Also, I could probably put most all of the logic inside of a VB.NET EXE.
There would still need to be some logic in the aspx pages so I can't
completely get away from it. Any suggestions on a good method for this?
Thanks,
Brett
Hi Brett,
Check the details here on compilation in ASP.NET 2.0: http://msdn.microsoft.com/asp.net/wh...ternals_topic3
As for the release, my guess is late fall for the final release. I'm
guessing September 25th for the beta 2 which should include a "Go Live"
option.
Ken
Microsoft MVP [ASP.NET]
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:uv**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... Thanks. That's pretty neat. Have you used that program?
What will .NET 2.0 offer in this way? Also, when will it be released?
It will probably be a while until I will upgrade to .NET 2.0 since the
first version will probably be a little rough around the edges.
re: I'm guessing September 25th for the beta 2
That seems rather far away...
Juan T. Llibre
ASP.NET MVP
http://asp.net.do/foros/
Foros de ASP.NET en Español
Ven, y hablemos de ASP.NET...
======================
"Ken Cox [Microsoft MVP]" <BA************@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Hi Brett,
Check the details here on compilation in ASP.NET 2.0:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/asp.net/wh...ternals_topic3
As for the release, my guess is late fall for the final release. I'm
guessing September 25th for the beta 2 which should include a "Go Live"
option.
Ken
Microsoft MVP [ASP.NET]
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:uv**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... Thanks. That's pretty neat. Have you used that program?
What will .NET 2.0 offer in this way? Also, when will it be released?
It will probably be a while until I will upgrade to .NET 2.0 since the
first version will probably be a little rough around the edges.
Oops. I meant April 25th. <grin>
"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:uz**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... re:I'm guessing September 25th for the beta 2
That seems rather far away...
Oops. I mean to guess April 25th for beta 2. My guess for the final release
is late fall.
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:uv**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... Thanks. That's pretty neat. Have you used that program?
What will .NET 2.0 offer in this way? Also, when will it be released?
In ASP.NET 2.0 you'll be able to compile your ASPX files directly into the
DLL, so that should solve your problem.
It's rumored beta 2 will will be out later this month.
--
I hope this helps,
Steve C. Orr, MCSD, MVP http://SteveOrr.net
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:eA*************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Say I develop an application that has an SQL Server 2000 back end with
ASP.NET front end. All the business logic is in the aspx pages. I want
to sell this as a package that some one can install on their server or
even desktop (replace SQL Server with MSDE). I don't want people reverse
engineering the logic inside of the aspx pages. Is there a way to prevent
this?
Also, I could probably put most all of the logic inside of a VB.NET EXE.
There would still need to be some logic in the aspx pages so I can't
completely get away from it. Any suggestions on a good method for this?
Thanks,
Brett
Will it be worth it to upgrade to 2.0 beta? I think it is risky but there
isn't any other way to compile the aspx files into DLLs.
Will I need to change any code to work with 2.0 beta?
thanks,
Brett
"Ken Cox [Microsoft MVP]" <BA************@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Hi Brett,
Check the details here on compilation in ASP.NET 2.0:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/asp.net/wh...ternals_topic3
As for the release, my guess is late fall for the final release. I'm
guessing September 25th for the beta 2 which should include a "Go Live"
option.
Ken
Microsoft MVP [ASP.NET]
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:uv**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... Thanks. That's pretty neat. Have you used that program?
What will .NET 2.0 offer in this way? Also, when will it be released?
It will probably be a while until I will upgrade to .NET 2.0 since the
first version will probably be a little rough around the edges.
The code should work with the 2.0 beta given that backwards compatibility
was a priority.
The problem is that you'll need to have the beta on the server and then
upgrade/rebuild for the release. I'd wait a few more days to check on the
stability of the 2.0 beta.
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:eM**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Will it be worth it to upgrade to 2.0 beta? I think it is risky but there
isn't any other way to compile the aspx files into DLLs.
Will I need to change any code to work with 2.0 beta?
thanks,
Brett
"Ken Cox [Microsoft MVP]" <BA************@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Hi Brett,
Check the details here on compilation in ASP.NET 2.0:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/asp.net/wh...ternals_topic3
As for the release, my guess is late fall for the final release. I'm
guessing September 25th for the beta 2 which should include a "Go Live"
option.
Ken
Microsoft MVP [ASP.NET]
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:uv**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... Thanks. That's pretty neat. Have you used that program?
What will .NET 2.0 offer in this way? Also, when will it be released?
It will probably be a while until I will upgrade to .NET 2.0 since the
first version will probably be a little rough around the edges.
Will people running my ASP.NET app also need 2.0? That will be an issue as
most will want to stay with a more stable 1.1.
Brett
"Ken Cox [Microsoft MVP]" <BA************@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:%2***************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... The code should work with the 2.0 beta given that backwards compatibility
was a priority.
The problem is that you'll need to have the beta on the server and then
upgrade/rebuild for the release. I'd wait a few more days to check on the
stability of the 2.0 beta.
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:eM**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Will it be worth it to upgrade to 2.0 beta? I think it is risky but
there isn't any other way to compile the aspx files into DLLs.
Will I need to change any code to work with 2.0 beta?
thanks,
Brett
"Ken Cox [Microsoft MVP]" <BA************@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Hi Brett,
Check the details here on compilation in ASP.NET 2.0:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/asp.net/wh...ternals_topic3
As for the release, my guess is late fall for the final release. I'm
guessing September 25th for the beta 2 which should include a "Go Live"
option.
Ken
Microsoft MVP [ASP.NET]
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:uv**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
Thanks. That's pretty neat. Have you used that program?
What will .NET 2.0 offer in this way? Also, when will it be released?
It will probably be a while until I will upgrade to .NET 2.0 since the
first version will probably be a little rough around the edges.
No. They'll only need a browser.
( If you're talking about web applications... )
For Windows apps, they'd need the 2.0 framework, too.
Juan T. Llibre
ASP.NET MVP http://asp.net.do/foros/
Foros de ASP.NET en Español
Ven, y hablemos de ASP.NET...
======================
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:uO**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... Will people running my ASP.NET app also need 2.0? That will be an issue
as most will want to stay with a more stable 1.1.
Brett
"Ken Cox [Microsoft MVP]" <BA************@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:%2***************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... The code should work with the 2.0 beta given that backwards compatibility
was a priority.
The problem is that you'll need to have the beta on the server and then
upgrade/rebuild for the release. I'd wait a few more days to check on the
stability of the 2.0 beta.
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:eM**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Will it be worth it to upgrade to 2.0 beta? I think it is risky but
there isn't any other way to compile the aspx files into DLLs.
Will I need to change any code to work with 2.0 beta?
thanks,
Brett
"Ken Cox [Microsoft MVP]" <BA************@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Hi Brett,
Check the details here on compilation in ASP.NET 2.0:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/asp.net/wh...ternals_topic3
As for the release, my guess is late fall for the final release. I'm
guessing September 25th for the beta 2 which should include a "Go Live"
option.
Ken
Microsoft MVP [ASP.NET]
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:uv**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Thanks. That's pretty neat. Have you used that program?
>
> What will .NET 2.0 offer in this way? Also, when will it be released?
>
> It will probably be a while until I will upgrade to .NET 2.0 since the
> first version will probably be a little rough around the edges.
>
I'm referring to some one installing the ASP.NET app on their Win Server.
If I developed it in 2.0, seems as though they would need 2.0 to run it
correct?
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:uO**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... Will people running my ASP.NET app also need 2.0? That will be an issue
as most will want to stay with a more stable 1.1.
Brett
"Ken Cox [Microsoft MVP]" <BA************@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:%2***************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... The code should work with the 2.0 beta given that backwards compatibility
was a priority.
The problem is that you'll need to have the beta on the server and then
upgrade/rebuild for the release. I'd wait a few more days to check on the
stability of the 2.0 beta.
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:eM**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Will it be worth it to upgrade to 2.0 beta? I think it is risky but
there isn't any other way to compile the aspx files into DLLs.
Will I need to change any code to work with 2.0 beta?
thanks,
Brett
"Ken Cox [Microsoft MVP]" <BA************@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Hi Brett,
Check the details here on compilation in ASP.NET 2.0:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/asp.net/wh...ternals_topic3
As for the release, my guess is late fall for the final release. I'm
guessing September 25th for the beta 2 which should include a "Go Live"
option.
Ken
Microsoft MVP [ASP.NET]
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:uv**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Thanks. That's pretty neat. Have you used that program?
>
> What will .NET 2.0 offer in this way? Also, when will it be released?
>
> It will probably be a while until I will upgrade to .NET 2.0 since the
> first version will probably be a little rough around the edges.
>
In that case, yes, they'll need to have the 2.0 Framework installed.
Juan T. Llibre
ASP.NET MVP http://asp.net.do/foros/
Foros de ASP.NET en Español
Ven, y hablemos de ASP.NET...
======================
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:Ob**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... I'm referring to some one installing the ASP.NET app on their Win Server.
If I developed it in 2.0, seems as though they would need 2.0 to run it
correct?
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:uO**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... Will people running my ASP.NET app also need 2.0? That will be an issue
as most will want to stay with a more stable 1.1.
Brett
"Ken Cox [Microsoft MVP]" <BA************@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:%2***************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... The code should work with the 2.0 beta given that backwards
compatibility was a priority.
The problem is that you'll need to have the beta on the server and then
upgrade/rebuild for the release. I'd wait a few more days to check on
the stability of the 2.0 beta.
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:eM**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Will it be worth it to upgrade to 2.0 beta? I think it is risky but
there isn't any other way to compile the aspx files into DLLs.
Will I need to change any code to work with 2.0 beta?
thanks,
Brett
"Ken Cox [Microsoft MVP]" <BA************@sympatico.ca> wrote in
message news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hi Brett,
>
> Check the details here on compilation in ASP.NET 2.0:
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/asp.net/wh...ternals_topic3
>
> As for the release, my guess is late fall for the final release. I'm
> guessing September 25th for the beta 2 which should include a "Go
> Live" option.
>
> Ken
> Microsoft MVP [ASP.NET]
>
> "Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
> news:uv**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> Thanks. That's pretty neat. Have you used that program?
>>
>> What will .NET 2.0 offer in this way? Also, when will it be
>> released?
>>
>> It will probably be a while until I will upgrade to .NET 2.0 since
>> the first version will probably be a little rough around the edges.
>>
>
The Web server will need to run the same build of 2.0 that you compiled
with. That's where things get messy since it will be a beta and some people
shy away from installing betas.
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:uO**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... Will people running my ASP.NET app also need 2.0? That will be an issue
as most will want to stay with a more stable 1.1.
Where exactly is the download link for the program below?
"Ken Cox [Microsoft MVP]" <BA************@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:%2***************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... Hi Brett,
If the logic is in the codebehind, you can obfuscate it with a tool like
this:
http://www.aspose.com/Products/Aspos.../Overview.html
I'm not aware of a tool that does the same for logic that is in .aspx
files. Of course if you can wait until the .NET 2.0 beta....
Ken
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:eA*************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... Say I develop an application that has an SQL Server 2000 back end with
ASP.NET front end. All the business logic is in the aspx pages. I want
to sell this as a package that some one can install on their server or
even desktop (replace SQL Server with MSDE). I don't want people reverse
engineering the logic inside of the aspx pages. Is there a way to
prevent this?
Also, I could probably put most all of the logic inside of a VB.NET EXE.
There would still need to be some logic in the aspx pages so I can't
completely get away from it. Any suggestions on a good method for this?
Thanks,
Brett
Never used one so far. So I have no opinion.
"Brett" <no@spam.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
%2***************@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... I see what the obfuscators do now:
http://www.devdirect.com/ALL/OBFUSCA...PCAT_2014.aspx. Do you have a
preference for one? Possibly free?
Thanks,
Brett
"Brett" <no@spam.com> wrote in message
news:OW**************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... I'm new to ASP.NET. What are the file extensions that the compiled code
behind is stored in? Are you referring to ASP.NET or VB.NET code when
you say compiled?
When you say library, are you referring to say a VB.NET DLL that the aspx
pages create an object for?
Can you elaborate on this a little more: "then you can use one of several
JIT obfuscator to make reverse engeneering harder." Would this have any
performance hit?
Thanks,
Brett
Hey! The product seems to have disappeared from their line-up!
Send them an email to see if it is still available?
"Brett" <no@spam.net> wrote in message
news:u8**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... Where exactly is the download link for the program below?
Hey! The product seems to have disappeared from their line-up!
Send them an email to see if it is still available?
"Brett" <no@spam.net> wrote in message
news:u8**************@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... Where exactly is the download link for the program below? This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: wqhdebian |
last post by:
As far as I know,when encrypt or decrypt ,a key must first be got,and
the key is first generate by a tool or from SecurityRandom,that means
I can not generate the same key with the same input.Does...
|
by: TJS |
last post by:
how can I encrypt the querystring values for a HyperLinkColumn ?
in example below I would like to encrypt value for field1
======================================================...
|
by: VB Programmer |
last post by:
I have an ASP login page. Once logged in, I get redirected to an ASPX page.
According to alot of people sharing session variables is difficult between
ASP and ASPX page so I was thinking about...
|
by: Jean Christophe Avard |
last post by:
Hi! I am designing an application wich comes with image file. These images
are copyrighted and they have to be accessible only from within the
application. At first, I tought I was going to store...
|
by: DazedAndConfused |
last post by:
Can you encrpt a serialized object?
Or am I trying to do something that just doesn't work that way?
I am trying to encrypt a serialized object. I can read and write the object
to a file...
|
by: Islamegy® |
last post by:
I give up.. I tried everything to encrypt querystring and decrypt it back
but this never success.. i use RSA encryption. I always get excption when
Convert fromBase64String so i tried...
|
by: tomtown.net |
last post by:
Hello
I'm using the File.Encrypt method (.net 2.0) to encrypt files and
folders (mark for encryption) on a local disk (XP SP2, 3DES, .net 2.0).
Unfortunatelly I get an exception when trying to...
|
by: dusiapapa |
last post by:
Hello, all!
I'm faced with next problem.
I have ASP.NET page which takes url-parameters from ColdFusion site.
These parameters are encrypted with ColdFusion Encrypt function and I
can not...
|
by: Aneesh P |
last post by:
Hi All,
I need to encrypt some fields esp password key values in configuration
file while installting the application using .Net installer project
and decrypt those values from my...
|
by: rockdale |
last post by:
I followed this article,
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/zhhddkxy.aspx
My command is:
aspnet_regiis -pe "connectionStrings" -app "/myWebSiteName" -site
711831 -prov...
|
by: taylorcarr |
last post by:
A Canon printer is a smart device known for being advanced, efficient, and reliable. It is designed for home, office, and hybrid workspace use and can also be used for a variety of purposes. However,...
|
by: Charles Arthur |
last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
|
by: aa123db |
last post by:
Variable and constants
Use var or let for variables and const fror constants.
Var foo ='bar';
Let foo ='bar';const baz ='bar';
Functions
function $name$ ($parameters$) {
}
...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
If we have dozens or hundreds of excel to import into the database, if we use the excel import function provided by database editors such as navicat, it will be extremely tedious and time-consuming...
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
| |
