473,320 Members | 1,707 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,320 software developers and data experts.

Latest Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll?

Greetings,

I'm using a relatively old release of Visual Studio .NET and am
running into a compatability problem with one of my ASP .NET websites.
From what I've gathered from support of the other products involved, I
need to compile my site using Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll 7:0:5000:0 but
it seems I am only using 7:0:3300:0. How would I update this library?
Unfortunately, upgrading to a newer Visual Studio is not an option at
this point. I've been searching the MSDN website but with little luck.
I tried downloading and installing .NET Framework Version 2.0
Redistributable Package Beta 1 (x86) from the MSDN website, but Visual
Studio still seems to be using 7:0:3300:0 when it compiles. Any ideas?
David P. Donahue
dd******@ccs.neu.edu
Nov 18 '05 #1
7 1874
The visual studio version doesn't matter.

I'm assuming that is a .NET 1.0 version right there.. if so you might want
to try upgrading to .NET 1.0 SP3

-CJ

"David P. Donahue" <dd******@ccs.neu.edu> wrote in message
news:%2****************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Greetings,

I'm using a relatively old release of Visual Studio .NET and am
running into a compatability problem with one of my ASP .NET websites.
From what I've gathered from support of the other products involved, I
need to compile my site using Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll 7:0:5000:0 but
it seems I am only using 7:0:3300:0. How would I update this library?
Unfortunately, upgrading to a newer Visual Studio is not an option at
this point. I've been searching the MSDN website but with little luck.
I tried downloading and installing .NET Framework Version 2.0
Redistributable Package Beta 1 (x86) from the MSDN website, but Visual
Studio still seems to be using 7:0:3300:0 when it compiles. Any ideas?
David P. Donahue
dd******@ccs.neu.edu

Nov 18 '05 #2
I just did a bunch of Windows Updating and was sure to include the .NET
Framework service packs. However, when I go to Help/About in Visual
Studio, it still says "Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 Version 1.0.3705"
and, of course, the original problem persists.

Do I need to do something in Visual Studio to tell it to use the newly
installed framework? There are currently 3 versions in
"c:\windows\microsoft.net\framework" which are 1.0.3705, 1.1.4322, and
2.0.40607.
David P. Donahue
dd******@ccs.neu.edu

CJ Taylor wrote:
The visual studio version doesn't matter.

I'm assuming that is a .NET 1.0 version right there.. if so you might want
to try upgrading to .NET 1.0 SP3

-CJ

"David P. Donahue" <dd******@ccs.neu.edu> wrote in message
news:%2****************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Greetings,

I'm using a relatively old release of Visual Studio .NET and am
running into a compatability problem with one of my ASP .NET websites.
From what I've gathered from support of the other products involved, I
need to compile my site using Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll 7:0:5000:0 but
it seems I am only using 7:0:3300:0. How would I update this library?
Unfortunately, upgrading to a newer Visual Studio is not an option at
this point. I've been searching the MSDN website but with little luck.
I tried downloading and installing .NET Framework Version 2.0
Redistributable Package Beta 1 (x86) from the MSDN website, but Visual
Studio still seems to be using 7:0:3300:0 when it compiles. Any ideas?
David P. Donahue
dd******@ccs.neu.edu


Nov 18 '05 #3
Installing the SP3 for NET 1.0 (or SP1 for NET1.1) will not change the
version number.

Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll 7:0:5000:0 is part of (NET Framework 1.1 aka
v1.1.4322). Hence, you need Visual Studio 2003 to compile with it. If you
don't have VS NET 2003, you can try using the command prompt if you are up
to the challenge :^)

C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322\vbc.e xe

AFAIK: VS.NET 2003 can be forced to compile to 1.0, but VS.NET 2002 cannot
be forced to compile to 1.1

Installing the Beta of Framework 2 on your development PC may not have been
a wise move...

HTH,
Greg
"David P. Donahue" <dd******@ccs.neu.edu> wrote in message
news:e$**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
I just did a bunch of Windows Updating and was sure to include the .NET
Framework service packs. However, when I go to Help/About in Visual
Studio, it still says "Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 Version 1.0.3705" and,
of course, the original problem persists.

Do I need to do something in Visual Studio to tell it to use the newly
installed framework? There are currently 3 versions in
"c:\windows\microsoft.net\framework" which are 1.0.3705, 1.1.4322, and
2.0.40607.
David P. Donahue
dd******@ccs.neu.edu

CJ Taylor wrote:
The visual studio version doesn't matter.

I'm assuming that is a .NET 1.0 version right there.. if so you might
want
to try upgrading to .NET 1.0 SP3

-CJ

"David P. Donahue" <dd******@ccs.neu.edu> wrote in message
news:%2****************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Greetings,

I'm using a relatively old release of Visual Studio .NET and am
running into a compatability problem with one of my ASP .NET websites.
From what I've gathered from support of the other products involved, I
need to compile my site using Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll 7:0:5000:0 but
it seems I am only using 7:0:3300:0. How would I update this library?
Unfortunately, upgrading to a newer Visual Studio is not an option at
this point. I've been searching the MSDN website but with little luck.
I tried downloading and installing .NET Framework Version 2.0
Redistributable Package Beta 1 (x86) from the MSDN website, but Visual
Studio still seems to be using 7:0:3300:0 when it compiles. Any ideas?
David P. Donahue
dd******@ccs.neu.edu



Nov 18 '05 #4
> Installing the SP3 for NET 1.0 (or SP1 for NET1.1) will not change the
version number.

Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll 7:0:5000:0 is part of (NET Framework 1.1 aka
v1.1.4322). Hence, you need Visual Studio 2003 to compile with it. If you
don't have VS NET 2003, you can try using the command prompt if you are up
to the challenge :^)
Command-line compilation wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. Is
there a tutorial somewhere on the "proper" way of compiling a web
application via the command line?
C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322\vbc.e xe

AFAIK: VS.NET 2003 can be forced to compile to 1.0, but VS.NET 2002 cannot
be forced to compile to 1.1

Installing the Beta of Framework 2 on your development PC may not have been
a wise move...
No worries, this machine is destined to be blown away and re-installed
once I get the rest of my infrastructure up and running. For now I'm
just using it to test things and make sure they work before I do the
serious development.
HTH,
Greg
"David P. Donahue" <dd******@ccs.neu.edu> wrote in message
news:e$**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
I just did a bunch of Windows Updating and was sure to include the .NET
Framework service packs. However, when I go to Help/About in Visual
Studio, it still says "Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 Version 1.0.3705" and,
of course, the original problem persists.

Do I need to do something in Visual Studio to tell it to use the newly
installed framework? There are currently 3 versions in
"c:\windows\microsoft.net\framework" which are 1.0.3705, 1.1.4322, and
2.0.40607.
David P. Donahue
dd******@ccs.neu.edu

CJ Taylor wrote:

The visual studio version doesn't matter.

I'm assuming that is a .NET 1.0 version right there.. if so you might
want
to try upgrading to .NET 1.0 SP3

-CJ

"David P. Donahue" <dd******@ccs.neu.edu> wrote in message
news:%2****************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl. ..
Greetings,

I'm using a relatively old release of Visual Studio .NET and am
running into a compatability problem with one of my ASP .NET websites.
From what I've gathered from support of the other products involved, I
need to compile my site using Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll 7:0:5000:0 but
it seems I am only using 7:0:3300:0. How would I update this library?
Unfortunately, upgrading to a newer Visual Studio is not an option at
this point. I've been searching the MSDN website but with little luck.
I tried downloading and installing .NET Framework Version 2.0
Redistributable Package Beta 1 (x86) from the MSDN website, but Visual
Studio still seems to be using 7:0:3300:0 when it compiles. Any ideas?
David P. Donahue
dd******@ccs.neu.edu

Nov 18 '05 #5
I've not tried command line compilation myself, perhaps somebody else could
give you some pointers there.

Would the free WebMatrix help in this situation?

http://www.asp.net/webmatrix/default...dex=4&tabId=46

Greg
"David P. Donahue" <dd******@ccs.neu.edu> wrote in message
news:e3**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Installing the SP3 for NET 1.0 (or SP1 for NET1.1) will not change the
version number.

Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll 7:0:5000:0 is part of (NET Framework 1.1 aka
v1.1.4322). Hence, you need Visual Studio 2003 to compile with it. If
you don't have VS NET 2003, you can try using the command prompt if you
are up to the challenge :^)


Command-line compilation wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. Is
there a tutorial somewhere on the "proper" way of compiling a web
application via the command line?
C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322\vbc.e xe

AFAIK: VS.NET 2003 can be forced to compile to 1.0, but VS.NET 2002
cannot be forced to compile to 1.1

Installing the Beta of Framework 2 on your development PC may not have
been a wise move...


No worries, this machine is destined to be blown away and re-installed
once I get the rest of my infrastructure up and running. For now I'm just
using it to test things and make sure they work before I do the serious
development.
HTH,
Greg
"David P. Donahue" <dd******@ccs.neu.edu> wrote in message
news:e$**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
I just did a bunch of Windows Updating and was sure to include the .NET
Framework service packs. However, when I go to Help/About in Visual
Studio, it still says "Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 Version 1.0.3705"
and, of course, the original problem persists.

Do I need to do something in Visual Studio to tell it to use the newly
installed framework? There are currently 3 versions in
"c:\windows\microsoft.net\framework" which are 1.0.3705, 1.1.4322, and
2.0.40607.
David P. Donahue
dd******@ccs.neu.edu

CJ Taylor wrote:
The visual studio version doesn't matter.

I'm assuming that is a .NET 1.0 version right there.. if so you might
want
to try upgrading to .NET 1.0 SP3

-CJ

"David P. Donahue" <dd******@ccs.neu.edu> wrote in message
news:%2****************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl.. .
>Greetings,
>
> I'm using a relatively old release of Visual Studio .NET and am
>running into a compatability problem with one of my ASP .NET websites.
>From what I've gathered from support of the other products involved, I
>need to compile my site using Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll 7:0:5000:0 but
>it seems I am only using 7:0:3300:0. How would I update this library?
>Unfortunately, upgrading to a newer Visual Studio is not an option at
>this point. I've been searching the MSDN website but with little luck.
> I tried downloading and installing .NET Framework Version 2.0
>Redistributable Package Beta 1 (x86) from the MSDN website, but Visual
>Studio still seems to be using 7:0:3300:0 when it compiles. Any ideas?
>
>
>David P. Donahue
>dd******@ccs.neu.edu

Nov 18 '05 #6
Certainly worth testing, thanks :)
David P. Donahue
dd******@ccs.neu.edu

Greg Burns wrote:
I've not tried command line compilation myself, perhaps somebody else could
give you some pointers there.

Would the free WebMatrix help in this situation?

http://www.asp.net/webmatrix/default...dex=4&tabId=46

Greg
"David P. Donahue" <dd******@ccs.neu.edu> wrote in message
news:e3**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Installing the SP3 for NET 1.0 (or SP1 for NET1.1) will not change the
version number.

Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll 7:0:5000:0 is part of (NET Framework 1.1 aka
v1.1.4322). Hence, you need Visual Studio 2003 to compile with it. If
you don't have VS NET 2003, you can try using the command prompt if you
are up to the challenge :^)


Command-line compilation wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. Is
there a tutorial somewhere on the "proper" way of compiling a web
application via the command line?

C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322\vb c.exe

AFAIK: VS.NET 2003 can be forced to compile to 1.0, but VS.NET 2002
cannot be forced to compile to 1.1

Installing the Beta of Framework 2 on your development PC may not have
been a wise move...


No worries, this machine is destined to be blown away and re-installed
once I get the rest of my infrastructure up and running. For now I'm just
using it to test things and make sure they work before I do the serious
development.

HTH,
Greg
"David P. Donahue" <dd******@ccs.neu.edu> wrote in message
news:e$**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
I just did a bunch of Windows Updating and was sure to include the .NET
Framework service packs. However, when I go to Help/About in Visual
Studio, it still says "Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 Version 1.0.3705"
and, of course, the original problem persists.

Do I need to do something in Visual Studio to tell it to use the newly
installed framework? There are currently 3 versions in
"c:\windows\microsoft.net\framework" which are 1.0.3705, 1.1.4322, and
2.0.40607.
David P. Donahue
dd******@ccs.neu.edu

CJ Taylor wrote:

>The visual studio version doesn't matter.
>
>I'm assuming that is a .NET 1.0 version right there.. if so you might
>want
>to try upgrading to .NET 1.0 SP3
>
>-CJ
>
>"David P. Donahue" <dd******@ccs.neu.edu> wrote in message
>news:%2****************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl. ..
>
>
>
>>Greetings,
>>
>> I'm using a relatively old release of Visual Studio .NET and am
>>running into a compatability problem with one of my ASP .NET websites.
>
>>From what I've gathered from support of the other products involved, I
>
>>need to compile my site using Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll 7:0:5000:0 but
>>it seems I am only using 7:0:3300:0. How would I update this library?
>>Unfortunately, upgrading to a newer Visual Studio is not an option at
>>this point. I've been searching the MSDN website but with little luck.
>>I tried downloading and installing .NET Framework Version 2.0
>>Redistributable Package Beta 1 (x86) from the MSDN website, but Visual
>>Studio still seems to be using 7:0:3300:0 when it compiles. Any ideas?
>>
>>
>>David P. Donahue
>>dd******@ccs.neu.edu
>
>


Nov 18 '05 #7
Hmm. I'm having trouble finding a way with this WebMatrix program to
compile my project. It seems to want to run things in its own web
server or in the local IIS, not just compile the site and let me put it
somewhere else. Am I missing something?
David P. Donahue wrote:
Certainly worth testing, thanks :)
David P. Donahue
dd******@ccs.neu.edu

Greg Burns wrote:
I've not tried command line compilation myself, perhaps somebody else
could give you some pointers there.

Would the free WebMatrix help in this situation?

http://www.asp.net/webmatrix/default...dex=4&tabId=46

Greg
"David P. Donahue" <dd******@ccs.neu.edu> wrote in message
news:e3**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Installing the SP3 for NET 1.0 (or SP1 for NET1.1) will not change
the version number.

Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll 7:0:5000:0 is part of (NET Framework 1.1
aka v1.1.4322). Hence, you need Visual Studio 2003 to compile with
it. If you don't have VS NET 2003, you can try using the command
prompt if you are up to the challenge :^)
Command-line compilation wouldn't be the worst thing in the world.
Is there a tutorial somewhere on the "proper" way of compiling a web
application via the command line?
C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322\vbc.e xe

AFAIK: VS.NET 2003 can be forced to compile to 1.0, but VS.NET 2002
cannot be forced to compile to 1.1

Installing the Beta of Framework 2 on your development PC may not
have been a wise move...
No worries, this machine is destined to be blown away and
re-installed once I get the rest of my infrastructure up and
running. For now I'm just using it to test things and make sure they
work before I do the serious development.
HTH,
Greg
"David P. Donahue" <dd******@ccs.neu.edu> wrote in message
news:e$**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> I just did a bunch of Windows Updating and was sure to include the
> .NET Framework service packs. However, when I go to Help/About in
> Visual Studio, it still says "Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 Version
> 1.0.3705" and, of course, the original problem persists.
>
> Do I need to do something in Visual Studio to tell it to use the
> newly installed framework? There are currently 3 versions in
> "c:\windows\microsoft.net\framework" which are 1.0.3705, 1.1.4322,
> and 2.0.40607.
>
>
> David P. Donahue
> dd******@ccs.neu.edu
>
>
>
> CJ Taylor wrote:
>
>
>
>> The visual studio version doesn't matter.
>>
>> I'm assuming that is a .NET 1.0 version right there.. if so you
>> might want
>> to try upgrading to .NET 1.0 SP3
>>
>> -CJ
>>
>> "David P. Donahue" <dd******@ccs.neu.edu> wrote in message
>> news:%2****************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>
>>
>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> I'm using a relatively old release of Visual Studio .NET and am
>>> running into a compatability problem with one of my ASP .NET
>>> websites.
>>
>>
>>> From what I've gathered from support of the other products
>>> involved, I
>>
>>
>>> need to compile my site using Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll
>>> 7:0:5000:0 but
>>> it seems I am only using 7:0:3300:0. How would I update this
>>> library?
>>> Unfortunately, upgrading to a newer Visual Studio is not an
>>> option at
>>> this point. I've been searching the MSDN website but with little
>>> luck.
>>> I tried downloading and installing .NET Framework Version 2.0
>>> Redistributable Package Beta 1 (x86) from the MSDN website, but
>>> Visual
>>> Studio still seems to be using 7:0:3300:0 when it compiles. Any
>>> ideas?
>>>
>>>
>>> David P. Donahue
>>> dd******@ccs.neu.edu
>>
>>
>>


Nov 18 '05 #8

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

2
by: darrel | last post by:
I've built a control. At the top of my control, I have this: Imports Microsoft.VisualBasic Then, later, I call a function like this: DateTime.Now.Year.ToString() This works fine on my...
15
by: Phill. W | last post by:
Is anyone writing VB.Net (2003) code /without/ referencing the Microsoft.VisualBasic namespace(?), regardless of whether its Import'ed or not? The Powers That Be here are trying to introduce a...
14
by: frostalicious | last post by:
Used VB.NET (on my client PC) to convert VB6 executable to .NET executable. Placed the .exe file on a network drive on my server. From client, ran .NET Wizards "Trust an Assembly" to make the...
2
by: Steve | last post by:
Having only recently migrated across from VB6 to VB.NET I'm still unsure whether or not I should be making (heavy) use of the Microsoft.VisualBasic namespace in new applications. I've read a lot...
8
by: Dave | last post by:
I'm trying to import Microsoft.VisualBasic to use the IsNumeric function in my C# code but all I see is: Microsoft.VisualBasic.VBCodeProvider while using Intellisense... From samples shouldn't...
1
by: Tom Kearney | last post by:
Hi - I'm trying to use "Microsoft.VisualBasic.Logging.FileLogTraceListener" from a set of C# aspx web pages, but I can't seem to use: <%@ Import Namespace="Microsoft.VisualBasic.Logging" %> I...
4
by: Rainer Queck | last post by:
Hello NG, are there any limitations to be considered, if I make use of objects in the Microsoft.VisualBasic namespace? Regards Rainer Queck
16
by: cj | last post by:
I am under the impression they are obsolete methods included for backward compatibility. For instance is using filedatetime("c:\myfile.txt") still the accepted way of getting the date...
6
by: =?Utf-8?B?R3JlZw==?= | last post by:
I have two questions with regards to the LEFT function. I ran into a problem with the LEFT function today. I knew it was a valid Function, but when I tried to use it, it was getting interpreted...
0
by: DolphinDB | last post by:
Tired of spending countless mintues downsampling your data? Look no further! In this article, you’ll learn how to efficiently downsample 6.48 billion high-frequency records to 61 million...
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
0
by: Vimpel783 | last post by:
Hello! Guys, I found this code on the Internet, but I need to modify it a little. It works well, the problem is this: Data is sent from only one cell, in this case B5, but it is necessary that data...
0
by: jfyes | last post by:
As a hardware engineer, after seeing that CEIWEI recently released a new tool for Modbus RTU Over TCP/UDP filtering and monitoring, I actively went to its official website to take a look. It turned...
0
by: ArrayDB | last post by:
The error message I've encountered is; ERROR:root:Error generating model response: exception: access violation writing 0x0000000000005140, which seems to be indicative of an access violation...
1
by: CloudSolutions | last post by:
Introduction: For many beginners and individual users, requiring a credit card and email registration may pose a barrier when starting to use cloud servers. However, some cloud server providers now...
1
by: Defcon1945 | last post by:
I'm trying to learn Python using Pycharm but import shutil doesn't work
0
by: af34tf | last post by:
Hi Guys, I have a domain whose name is BytesLimited.com, and I want to sell it. Does anyone know about platforms that allow me to list my domain in auction for free. Thank you
0
by: Faith0G | last post by:
I am starting a new it consulting business and it's been a while since I setup a new website. Is wordpress still the best web based software for hosting a 5 page website? The webpages will be...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.