I don't think that's truly the case. Because all the .Net languages compile
down to IL, there isactually very little performance difference. The tests
I've seen only show baout a 1 to 2% difference between various languages. C#
was just the new boy written for .Net and may be a little faster in some
things since it is not a re-write of an existing language. Basically though,
if a language's ability to compile down to IL is better than another, it
will be faster.Third-party .Net enabled languages may be right on par with
the default ones, or perhaps a tad slower if their compilers don't compile
to IL as efficiently. I remember reading that large parts of ASP.Net, if not
all parts, were actually written in C#, but that doesn't mean that C# code
runs better for ASP.Net than VB.Net and my performance tests haven't shown
that.
Hope this helps,
Mark Fitzpatrick
Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
"Paul M" <mi******@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Om**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Can somebody please give me some coding examples in how C# written
applications perform better than VB.NEt applications?
I've read that .NET is written primarily for C# language and performance
is meant to be better for it.
thanks,
P.