473,405 Members | 2,300 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,405 software developers and data experts.

'current custom error settings for application prevent details of application error from being viewed. '

Hi everyone

I'm having an issue with one of our applications. I'm getting the
following error when attempting to log in to the site:

Server Error in 'xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Application.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Runtime Error
Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current
custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the
application error from being viewed.

Details: To enable the details of this specific error message to be
viewable on the local server machine, please create a <customErrors>
tag within a "web.config" configuration file located in the root
directory of the current web application. This <customErrors> tag
should then have its "mode" attribute set to "RemoteOnly". To enable
the details to be viewable on remote machines, please set "mode" to
"Off".
<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->

<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="RemoteOnly"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
Notes: The current error page you are seeing can be replaced by a
custom error page by modifying the "defaultRedirect" attribute of the
application's <customErrors> configuration tag to point to a custom
error page URL.
<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->

<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="On" defaultRedirect="mycustompage.htm"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The customErrors setting appears to make no difference, whether it's
the one on the machine.config file (.NET FWK 1.0) or the one on the
application's web.config file, or both, or any of the combinations
I've tried. The error stays the same

As I mention the current .NET version on the system is 1.0, however by
mistake I first installed (and uninstalled) the newer 1.1 version.

The machine is a W2K domain controller and the user I'm logging in to
the application with has been granted admin rights. The ProcessModel
line on the machine.config file is set to 'SYSTEM', and security on
IIS is set to Basic for the application. 'Impersonate' is set to True.

I checked the application mappings part of the Configuration dialog
for the application and the Microsoft .NET Framework entries are
pointing to the proper (installed) version.

I'm really not sure what else to check and I really need to get this
going. I'll appreciate any and all help you could give me.

Thanks in advance, regards

Damián
Nov 18 '05 #1
3 4875
Hi Damian,

The fact that a change in the web.config does not illicit a change in
behavior means that we aren't successfully parsing the configuration file.
We aren't getting that far.

The easiest way to figure out what's going on would be to create a simple
inline ASP.NET page and place it in the folder for the default Web site.
(If there is a web.config there, rename it first to web.config.old or
something.) Here's a sample file you can use. Just paste this into an
empty file and save it as test.aspx:

<%@ Page Language="C#" %>
<script runat="server">

private void Page_Load(object sender, System.EventArgs e) {
lblWho.Text = "ASP.NET running as : " +
System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity.GetCurre nt().Name;
}

</script>
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
<form runat="server">
<asp:Label id="lblWho" runat="server">Label</asp:Label>
</form>
</body>
</html>
Jim Cheshire, MCSE, MCSD [MSFT]
ASP.NET Developer Support

This post is provided "as-is" and confers no rights.
--------------------
From: gr*****@yahoo.com (Damian)
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
Subject: 'current custom error settings for application prevent details of application error from being viewed. 'Date: 30 Dec 2003 07:54:47 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 68
Message-ID: <c2**************************@posting.google.com >
NNTP-Posting-Host: 200.80.152.107
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1072799687 32106 127.0.0.1 (30 Dec 2003 15:54:47 GMT)X-Complaints-To: gr**********@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:54:47 +0000 (UTC)
Path: cpmsftngxa07.phx.gbl!cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTN GXA05.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08
..phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fj
serv.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!postnews1.google.com !not-for-mailXref: cpmsftngxa07.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:198864
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet

Hi everyone

I'm having an issue with one of our applications. I'm getting the
following error when attempting to log in to the site:

Server Error in 'xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Application.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----
Runtime Error
Description: An application error occurred on the server. The current
custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the
application error from being viewed.

Details: To enable the details of this specific error message to be
viewable on the local server machine, please create a <customErrors>
tag within a "web.config" configuration file located in the root
directory of the current web application. This <customErrors> tag
should then have its "mode" attribute set to "RemoteOnly". To enable
the details to be viewable on remote machines, please set "mode" to
"Off".
<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->

<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="RemoteOnly"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
Notes: The current error page you are seeing can be replaced by a
custom error page by modifying the "defaultRedirect" attribute of the
application's <customErrors> configuration tag to point to a custom
error page URL.
<!-- Web.Config Configuration File -->

<configuration>
<system.web>
<customErrors mode="On" defaultRedirect="mycustompage.htm"/>
</system.web>
</configuration>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The customErrors setting appears to make no difference, whether it's
the one on the machine.config file (.NET FWK 1.0) or the one on the
application's web.config file, or both, or any of the combinations
I've tried. The error stays the same

As I mention the current .NET version on the system is 1.0, however by
mistake I first installed (and uninstalled) the newer 1.1 version.

The machine is a W2K domain controller and the user I'm logging in to
the application with has been granted admin rights. The ProcessModel
line on the machine.config file is set to 'SYSTEM', and security on
IIS is set to Basic for the application. 'Impersonate' is set to True.

I checked the application mappings part of the Configuration dialog
for the application and the Microsoft .NET Framework entries are
pointing to the proper (installed) version.

I'm really not sure what else to check and I really need to get this
going. I'll appreciate any and all help you could give me.

Thanks in advance, regards

Damián


Nov 18 '05 #2
As another possible way to diagnose web.config problems, trying running
the web site though VS.NET using the Start without Debugging (Ctrl-F5)
option. That causes the errors associated with web.config to be
displayed (within the restrictions of remote debugging, of course).

HTH

Bruce Johnson
http://www.ObjectSharp.com/Bruce

*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
Nov 18 '05 #3
Bruce,

That's not going to help here. We shouldn't be attempting to attach a
debugger anyway. In this scenario, the user is simply browsing to the
ASP.NET application. If there is something wrong with the ASP.NET worker
process running the app and the app domain loading, you will get this
error. It really isn't related to the web.config file. There's an problem
somewhere else.

Jim Cheshire, MCSE, MCSD [MSFT]
Microsoft Developer Support
ASP.NET
ja******@online.microsoft.com

This post is provided as-is with no warranties and confers no rights.

--------------------
From: BruceJohnson <Br***@ObjectSharp.removethis.com>
References: <Ho*************@cpmsftngxa07.phx.gbl>
X-Newsreader: AspNNTP 1.50 (ActionJackson.com)
Subject: RE: 'current custom error settings for application prevent details of application error from being viewed. 'Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <ep**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:50:05 -0800
NNTP-Posting-Host: actionjackson133.dsl.frii.net 216.17.147.133
Lines: 1
Path: cpmsftngxa07.phx.gbl!cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!cpmsftng xa09.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.
phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gblXref: cpmsftngxa07.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:198912
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet

As another possible way to diagnose web.config problems, trying running
the web site though VS.NET using the Start without Debugging (Ctrl-F5)
option. That causes the errors associated with web.config to be
displayed (within the restrictions of remote debugging, of course).

HTH

Bruce Johnson
http://www.ObjectSharp.com/Bruce

*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!


Nov 18 '05 #4

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

7
by: Todd Beaulieu | last post by:
Hello, I'm using the configuration block to store user settings in the app.config file. As this exe will reside on a network drive, I can't have users trying to update the master app.config...
5
by: VinnieT | last post by:
I have a load balanced system that consists of 3 production servers. There are about 20 different applications that are used on these boxes. One of my applications in particular is used more than...
2
by: James Coe | last post by:
ARGH! Any ideas why this might be happening? The code I'm using comes straight from the example in the VB.NET Help System. All I did was tweak the name= stuff to match my application. Server...
4
by: Matthew Louden | last post by:
My ASP.NET application runs ok locally, but after I upload all the files to IIS in Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition, and no longer works. This has the following error messages: Configuration...
2
by: Matt | last post by:
Hello all, The app we are working on uses custom errors extensively to provide friendly error pages to users whilst logging the actual exceptions behind the scenes. However.... We are now...
2
by: menkaur | last post by:
I tried to generate asp Application project( I’m using VS .Net 2003). After I did ,following errors occurred (runtime):...
5
by: Graham | last post by:
I have created a custom MembershipProvider called "LassieMembershipProvider" that derives from "MembershipProvider". This providor is located in a Businesslogic layer dll called...
1
by: serge calderara | last post by:
dear all, i am a bit confused on the way custom error are handling and occurs. First of all I have understand that customer error is used to defined more user friendly message to my end user and...
7
by: fniles | last post by:
I am using VB.Net 2003 and MS Access (connecting using OleDBConnection). I read using DataAdapter and DataSet, not DataReader. When many people try to access the database at the same time, I get...
0
by: Charles Arthur | last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
0
by: emmanuelkatto | last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud. Please let me know. Thanks! Emmanuel
0
BarryA
by: BarryA | last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
1
by: nemocccc | last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID: 1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration. 2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
0
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
0
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
0
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
0
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.