473,856 Members | 1,638 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

How to set for debug/release

When I tried debugging for the first time, I pop-up asked me if I wanted to set the project to enable debugging. Now I'm ready to release and can't find anyplace to set the build to 'release'. A pointer would be appreciated. Thanks.

Joe

Apr 2 '06 #1
10 1818
Right-click your solution in the solution explorer and select the Configuration Manager. You should also see a dropdown list with word Debug on your standard toolbar.

Eliyahu

"Joe Befumo" <jo*@befumo.com > wrote in message news:44******** **************@ news.newsdemon. com...
When I tried debugging for the first time, I pop-up asked me if I wanted to set the project to enable debugging. Now I'm ready to release and can't find anyplace to set the build to 'release'. A pointer would be appreciated. Thanks.

Joe

Apr 2 '06 #2
Eliyahu,

In VS 2003, that choice is available. In VS 2005, it's not.

Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Eliyahu Goldin" <re************ *@monarchmed.co m> wrote in message
news:O9******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P10.phx.gbl...
Right-click your solution in the solution explorer and select the Configuration Manager. You should
also see a dropdown list with word Debug on your standard toolbar.

Eliyahu

"Joe Befumo" <jo*@befumo.com > wrote in message news:44******** **************@ news.newsdemon. com...
When I tried debugging for the first time, I pop-up asked me if I wanted to set the project to
enable debugging. Now I'm ready to release and can't find anyplace to set the build to 'release'. A
pointer would be appreciated. Thanks.

Joe
Apr 2 '06 #3
I should have added that, in ASP.NET 2.0, the debug/erelease
choice is set via the web.config file for the application :

<compilation debug = "false">
or
<compilation debug = "true">

The default is "false".


Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ut******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP11.phx.gbl...
Eliyahu,

In VS 2003, that choice is available. In VS 2005, it's not.

Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Eliyahu Goldin" <re************ *@monarchmed.co m> wrote in message
news:O9******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P10.phx.gbl...
Right-click your solution in the solution explorer and select the Configuration Manager. You
should also see a dropdown list with word Debug on your standard toolbar.

Eliyahu

"Joe Befumo" <jo*@befumo.com > wrote in message
news:44******** **************@ news.newsdemon. com...
When I tried debugging for the first time, I pop-up asked me if I wanted to set the project to
enable debugging. Now I'm ready to release and can't find anyplace to set the build to 'release'.
A pointer would be appreciated. Thanks.

Joe

Apr 2 '06 #4
Juan,

In my VS2005 it is there. I have a Team Edition for Software Developers.

Eliyahu

"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ut******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP11.phx.gbl...
Eliyahu,

In VS 2003, that choice is available. In VS 2005, it's not.

Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Eliyahu Goldin" <re************ *@monarchmed.co m> wrote in message
news:O9******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P10.phx.gbl...
Right-click your solution in the solution explorer and select the
Configuration Manager. You should also see a dropdown list with word Debug
on your standard toolbar.

Eliyahu

"Joe Befumo" <jo*@befumo.com > wrote in message
news:44******** **************@ news.newsdemon. com...
When I tried debugging for the first time, I pop-up asked me if I wanted
to set the project to enable debugging. Now I'm ready to release and can't
find anyplace to set the build to 'release'. A pointer would be
appreciated. Thanks.

Joe

Apr 3 '06 #5
Juan,

The setting in web.config affects compiling .aspx files deployed on the
server. It doesn't affect assembly dlls produced in a development
environment and deployed to the server as binaries.

Eliyahu

"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ua******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP11.phx.gbl...
I should have added that, in ASP.NET 2.0, the debug/erelease
choice is set via the web.config file for the application :

<compilation debug = "false">
or
<compilation debug = "true">

The default is "false".


Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ut******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP11.phx.gbl...
Eliyahu,

In VS 2003, that choice is available. In VS 2005, it's not.

Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Eliyahu Goldin" <re************ *@monarchmed.co m> wrote in message
news:O9******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P10.phx.gbl...
Right-click your solution in the solution explorer and select the
Configuration Manager. You should also see a dropdown list with word
Debug on your standard toolbar.

Eliyahu

"Joe Befumo" <jo*@befumo.com > wrote in message
news:44******** **************@ news.newsdemon. com...
When I tried debugging for the first time, I pop-up asked me if I wanted
to set the project to enable debugging. Now I'm ready to release and
can't find anyplace to set the build to 'release'. A pointer would be
appreciated. Thanks.

Joe


Apr 3 '06 #6
I'm afraid not, Eliyahu.
Where did you read that it only applies to *.aspx files ?

See : http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/2fdbs127.aspx

That page explains that the *Build* configuration option which controls
whether the compilation will generate debugging information is moved
to web.config for VB.NET, C# and J#.

I don't see any exceptions there.

Additionally, that page makes clear that "If a project contains multiple configurations
(Debug compilation, Release compilation, and so on), conversion follows this logic:

If the project contains only Debug and Release configurations,
then the Debug configuration is converted to Visual Studio 2005."

That means that, since the default compilation mode is set to <compilation debug="false">
in the *Master web.config* in the CONFIG directory of the .Net Framework directory,
all you need to do to generate assemblies with debugging information is change the
web.config setting to <compilation debug="true">.

If you change that setting for one application (in its web.config), then only that application
will generate assemblies with debugging information.

If you change it at the master web.config level, all applications will generate debugging
information
( not advisable, as it will impact performace adversely ).

Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Eliyahu Goldin" <re************ *@monarchmed.co m> wrote in message
news:eF******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P15.phx.gbl...
Juan,

The setting in web.config affects compiling .aspx files deployed on the server. It doesn't affect
assembly dlls produced in a development environment and deployed to the server as binaries.

Eliyahu "Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ua******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP11.phx.gbl...
I should have added that, in ASP.NET 2.0, the debug/erelease
choice is set via the web.config file for the application :

<compilation debug = "false">
or
<compilation debug = "true">

The default is "false".


Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ut******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP11.phx.gbl...
Eliyahu,

In VS 2003, that choice is available. In VS 2005, it's not.

Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Eliyahu Goldin" <re************ *@monarchmed.co m> wrote in message
news:O9******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P10.phx.gbl...
Right-click your solution in the solution explorer and select the Configuration Manager. You
should also see a dropdown list with word Debug on your standard toolbar.

Eliyahu

"Joe Befumo" <jo*@befumo.com > wrote in message
news:44******** **************@ news.newsdemon. com...
When I tried debugging for the first time, I pop-up asked me if I wanted to set the project to
enable debugging. Now I'm ready to release and can't find anyplace to set the build to
'release'. A pointer would be appreciated. Thanks.

Joe




Apr 3 '06 #7
Juan,

A further research proved that you're right. What I wrote was correct for
1.1.

K.Scott Allen explains it nicely in
http://odetocode.com/Blogs/scott/arc...005/11/15.aspx

Always happy to learn,

Eliyahu

"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:%2******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP15.phx.gbl. ..
I'm afraid not, Eliyahu.
Where did you read that it only applies to *.aspx files ?

See : http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/2fdbs127.aspx

That page explains that the *Build* configuration option which controls
whether the compilation will generate debugging information is moved
to web.config for VB.NET, C# and J#.

I don't see any exceptions there.

Additionally, that page makes clear that "If a project contains multiple
configurations
(Debug compilation, Release compilation, and so on), conversion follows
this logic:

If the project contains only Debug and Release configurations,
then the Debug configuration is converted to Visual Studio 2005."

That means that, since the default compilation mode is set to <compilation
debug="false">
in the *Master web.config* in the CONFIG directory of the .Net Framework
directory,
all you need to do to generate assemblies with debugging information is
change the
web.config setting to <compilation debug="true">.

If you change that setting for one application (in its web.config), then
only that application
will generate assemblies with debugging information.

If you change it at the master web.config level, all applications will
generate debugging information
( not advisable, as it will impact performace adversely ).

Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Eliyahu Goldin" <re************ *@monarchmed.co m> wrote in message
news:eF******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P15.phx.gbl...
Juan,

The setting in web.config affects compiling .aspx files deployed on the
server. It doesn't affect
assembly dlls produced in a development environment and deployed to the
server as binaries.

Eliyahu

"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ua******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP11.phx.gbl...
I should have added that, in ASP.NET 2.0, the debug/erelease
choice is set via the web.config file for the application :

<compilation debug = "false">
or
<compilation debug = "true">

The default is "false".


Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ut******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP11.phx.gbl...
Eliyahu,

In VS 2003, that choice is available. In VS 2005, it's not.

Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Eliyahu Goldin" <re************ *@monarchmed.co m> wrote in message
news:O9******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P10.phx.gbl...
Right-click your solution in the solution explorer and select the
Configuration Manager. You
should also see a dropdown list with word Debug on your standard
toolbar.

Eliyahu

"Joe Befumo" <jo*@befumo.com > wrote in message
news:44******** **************@ news.newsdemon. com...
When I tried debugging for the first time, I pop-up asked me if I
wanted to set the project to
enable debugging. Now I'm ready to release and can't find anyplace to
set the build to
'release'. A pointer would be appreciated. Thanks.

Joe



Apr 3 '06 #8
That's a relief !

;-)

Thanks for the link. I didn't know Scott had written about it.
He wrote a masterful explanation, as usual.


Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Eliyahu Goldin" <re************ *@monarchmed.co m> wrote in message
news:OZ******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP12.phx.gbl...
Juan,

A further research proved that you're right. What I wrote was correct for 1.1.

K.Scott Allen explains it nicely in http://odetocode.com/Blogs/scott/arc...005/11/15.aspx

Always happy to learn,

Eliyahu

"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:%2******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP15.phx.gbl. ..
I'm afraid not, Eliyahu.
Where did you read that it only applies to *.aspx files ?

See : http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/2fdbs127.aspx

That page explains that the *Build* configuration option which controls
whether the compilation will generate debugging information is moved
to web.config for VB.NET, C# and J#.

I don't see any exceptions there.

Additionally, that page makes clear that "If a project contains multiple configurations
(Debug compilation, Release compilation, and so on), conversion follows this logic:

If the project contains only Debug and Release configurations,
then the Debug configuration is converted to Visual Studio 2005."

That means that, since the default compilation mode is set to <compilation debug="false">
in the *Master web.config* in the CONFIG directory of the .Net Framework directory,
all you need to do to generate assemblies with debugging information is change the
web.config setting to <compilation debug="true">.

If you change that setting for one application (in its web.config), then only that application
will generate assemblies with debugging information.

If you change it at the master web.config level, all applications will generate debugging
information
( not advisable, as it will impact performace adversely ).

Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Eliyahu Goldin" <re************ *@monarchmed.co m> wrote in message
news:eF******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P15.phx.gbl...
Juan,

The setting in web.config affects compiling .aspx files deployed on the server. It doesn't
affect
assembly dlls produced in a development environment and deployed to the server as binaries.

Eliyahu

"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ua******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP11.phx.gbl...
I should have added that, in ASP.NET 2.0, the debug/erelease
choice is set via the web.config file for the application :

<compilation debug = "false">
or
<compilation debug = "true">

The default is "false".


Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ut******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP11.phx.gbl...
> Eliyahu,
>
> In VS 2003, that choice is available. In VS 2005, it's not.
>
>
>
> Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
> aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
> asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
> foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
> =============== =============== =====
> "Eliyahu Goldin" <re************ *@monarchmed.co m> wrote in message
> news:O9******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P10.phx.gbl...
> Right-click your solution in the solution explorer and select the Configuration Manager. You
> should also see a dropdown list with word Debug on your standard toolbar.
>
> Eliyahu
>
> "Joe Befumo" <jo*@befumo.com > wrote in message
> news:44******** **************@ news.newsdemon. com...
> When I tried debugging for the first time, I pop-up asked me if I wanted to set the project
> to
> enable debugging. Now I'm ready to release and can't find anyplace to set the build to
> 'release'. A pointer would be appreciated. Thanks.
>
> Joe
>
>



Apr 3 '06 #9
I have a "Configurat ion Manager" menu item available in the
Standard Toolbar's "Build" menu, but it doesn't have "Release" in the dropdown.

It only has the "Debug" configuration available.

Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Eliyahu Goldin" <re************ *@monarchmed.co m> wrote in message
news:em******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl...
Solution Configuration is a part of the Standard toolbar. It could be hidden by default.

Eliyahu

"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:eW******** ******@tk2msftn gp13.phx.gbl...
re:
In my VS2005 it is there. I have a Team Edition for Software Developers.


Now you've really made me wonder.

That's the exact version I'm running, too, (see attached image) but I don't have
that choice available for web applications. It is there for desktop apps, though.


Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Eliyahu Goldin" <re************ *@monarchmed.co m> wrote in message
news:u%******** ********@TK2MSF TNGP15.phx.gbl. ..
Juan,

In my VS2005 it is there. I have a Team Edition for Software Developers.

Eliyahu

"Juan T. Llibre" <no***********@ nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ut******** ******@TK2MSFTN GP11.phx.gbl...
Eliyahu,

In VS 2003, that choice is available. In VS 2005, it's not.

Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
aspnetfaq.com : http://www.aspnetfaq.com/
asp.net faq : http://asp.net.do/faq/
foros de asp.net, en español : http://asp.net.do/foros/
=============== =============== =====
"Eliyahu Goldin" <re************ *@monarchmed.co m> wrote in message
news:O9******** *****@TK2MSFTNG P10.phx.gbl...
Right-click your solution in the solution explorer and select the
Configuration Manager. You should also see a dropdown list with word Debug
on your standard toolbar.

Eliyahu

"Joe Befumo" <jo*@befumo.com > wrote in message
news:44******** **************@ news.newsdemon. com...
When I tried debugging for the first time, I pop-up asked me if I wanted
to set the project to enable debugging. Now I'm ready to release and can't
find anyplace to set the build to 'release'. A pointer would be
appreciated. Thanks.

Joe



Apr 3 '06 #10

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

7
2920
by: Srinivasa Rao | last post by:
I have read in one article that when we compile the application in release mode, all the debug classes and properties will be automatically removed from the code. I tried to implement this thing by using the following code in Page_Load event handler. Private Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load Dim intcount As Integer intcount = 0 For intcount = 0 To 4
9
2006
by: dee | last post by:
Hi I'm about to upload my site and I have switched to release version. Is that enough or do I still need to disable <compilation defaultLanguage="vb" debug="true" /> the debug="true" in the .pdb file? Is the .pdb necessary for the release version? Thanks a bunch. Dara
3
2208
by: | last post by:
Since I need to dotfuscate my exe file anyway, does it make any difference if I use Debug or Release versions. Would a Debug version be easier to decompile/study/reverse engineer than a Release version, both having been dotfuscated by the standard dotfuscator of visual studio 2003 ? Tia
1
1997
by: Epetruk | last post by:
Hello, In VS2003, I used to have two solutions - a debug and release solution. Each solution had a webservice project and several other class library projects. The webservice project referenced all the other class library projects (i.e. so that it used the dll created when those other projects were built). The debug solution was configured so that all the projects in it had debug
2
2384
by: Epetruk | last post by:
Hello, I have a problem where an application I am working on throws an OutOfMemoryException when I run it in Release mode, whereas it doesn't do this when I am running in Debug. The application is developed using C++/Managed C++ and built using VS 2003 under .NET framework 1.1. In Debug, it uses of up to 600Mb of memory, whereas in Release it only gets
6
9148
by: Andrew Rowley | last post by:
I am having trouble getting debug and release builds to work properly with project references using C++ .NET and Visual Studio 2003. I created a test solution, with a basic Windows form C++ project. I then add a class library, and add a reference to this project in the first project. When I do a release build, I see the following in the output from the DLL compile: /OUT:"C:\Documents and Settings\Andrew\My Documents\Visual Studio
3
15526
by: Bob Johnson | last post by:
It is my understanding - and please correct me if I'm wrong - that when building a project in debug mode, I can deploy the .pdb file along with the ..exe and thereby have access to the specific line number of code that throws an exception. Specifically, I can have an error logging routine that, amongst other things parses the call stack and tells me the specific line of code that choked. It is also my understanding that if building in...
3
2004
by: TBass | last post by:
Hello, Is there a way to get Visual Studio 2003 look to one directory for debug version dlls when set to DEBUG and then to another directory where I store the release version of a dll when set to RELEASE? My current project uses about 8 dlls I've written in the past, but I don't want to keep re-compiling them for debug/release depending on whether I'm compiling the current project for debug/release.
2
2713
by: Dave Johansen | last post by:
I just converted a solution from Visual Studio 2003 to Visual Studio 2005 and the Debug mode seems to be running just fine, but the Release mode crashes on the following code: std::ifstream in("myfile.txt"); float value; in >value; //The crash happens here in the getloc() function The above code is actually from a library built in Debug mode that is linked into the Release build of the executable. Does anyone have any
3
3383
by: =?Utf-8?B?bG10dGFn?= | last post by:
We have developed a number of different applications (ASP.NET web site, Windows services, DLLs, Windows forms, etc.) in C# 2.0. We have developed and unit tested all these applications/components using Debug mode. Now we are ready to compile everything for release to production. However, we don’t know whether we should compile all the applications/components/assemblies using Release mode (or keep everything in Debug mode). We’ve...
0
9919
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look ! Part I. Meaning of...
1
10787
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
0
10390
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
0
9534
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own.... Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
1
7932
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new presenter, Adolph Dupré who will be discussing some powerful techniques for using class modules. He will explain when you may want to use classes instead of User Defined Types (UDT). For example, to manage the data in unbound forms. Adolph will...
0
7098
by: conductexam | last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one. At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image. Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
0
5960
by: adsilva | last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
1
4578
by: 6302768590 | last post by:
Hai team i want code for transfer the data from one system to another through IP address by using C# our system has to for every 5mins then we have to update the data what the data is updated we have to send another system
3
3203
bsmnconsultancy
by: bsmnconsultancy | last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.