To "call" or not to "call"

[William Morris]

So, what's the prevailing opinion regarding the use of the "CALL" keyword?
I'm working with a third-party ASP application, adapting for our system, and
the CALL keyword is used everywhere. I've never used it, preferring instead
to just type the procedure name and parameters so:

myProcedure parm1, parm2

Any thoughts on

call myProcedure(parm1, parm2)

...?
--
William Morris
Product Development, Seritas LLC
Kansas City, Missouri

[Aaron Bertrand - MVP]

It's just different syntax and allows you to use parens around your
parameters, if you like that style. See http://www.aspfaq.com/2115

You can see the impact on ByRef/ByVal in http://www.aspfaq.com/2488

Neither is "better" IMHO, so I'm not sure what you're after.

--
Aaron Bertrand
SQL Server MVP
http://www.aspfaq.com/


"William Morris" <ne***************************@seamlyne.com> wrote in
message news:2h************@uni-berlin.de...

So, what's the prevailing opinion regarding the use of the "CALL" keyword?
I'm working with a third-party ASP application, adapting for our system, and the CALL keyword is used everywhere. I've never used it, preferring instead to just type the procedure name and parameters so:

myProcedure parm1, parm2

Any thoughts on

call myProcedure(parm1, parm2)

..?
--
William Morris
Product Development, Seritas LLC
Kansas City, Missouri

[William Morris]

"Aaron Bertrand - MVP" <aa***@TRASHaspfaq.com> wrote in message
news:en**************@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...

It's just different syntax and allows you to use parens around your
parameters, if you like that style. See http://www.aspfaq.com/2115

You can see the impact on ByRef/ByVal in http://www.aspfaq.com/2488

Neither is "better" IMHO, so I'm not sure what you're after.

--
Aaron Bertrand
SQL Server MVP
http://www.aspfaq.com/

Not really "after" anything much except opinions. Thanks, Aaron.
--
William Morris
Product Development, Seritas LLC
Kansas City, Missouri

[Aaron Bertrand - MVP]

> Not really "after" anything much except opinions. Thanks, Aaron.

Well, my point was that I don't know what you mean by "better"... faster,
more accurate, less code, more common...

[William Morris]

Hey hey hey...I didn't say "better." But, if I had to pose my question more
specifically, I guess I was asking what's more common. If there just
happened to be something about the way the parser handles it differently,
I'd accept that too, but it was really just a request for opinions.
"Aaron Bertrand - MVP" <aa***@TRASHaspfaq.com> wrote in message
news:uF**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

Not really "after" anything much except opinions. Thanks, Aaron.

Well, my point was that I don't know what you mean by "better"... faster,
more accurate, less code, more common...

[Ray at]

I always use Call subName. I like seeing Call, because it's much more
obvious as to what's going on than just seeing some random work sitting
there by itself. I also like to use parentheses.

Call theThing(arg1, arg2)

theThing arg1, arg2

The former looks much better imo.

Ray at work

"William Morris" <ne***************************@seamlyne.com> wrote in
message news:2h************@uni-berlin.de...

Hey hey hey...I didn't say "better." But, if I had to pose my question more specifically, I guess I was asking what's more common. If there just
happened to be something about the way the parser handles it differently,
I'd accept that too, but it was really just a request for opinions.
"Aaron Bertrand - MVP" <aa***@TRASHaspfaq.com> wrote in message
news:uF**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...

Not really "after" anything much except opinions. Thanks, Aaron.

Well, my point was that I don't know what you mean by "better"... faster, more accurate, less code, more common...

[Roland Hall]

"William Morris" wrote in message news:2h************@uni-berlin.de...
: So, what's the prevailing opinion regarding the use of the "CALL" keyword?
: I'm working with a third-party ASP application, adapting for our system,
and
: the CALL keyword is used everywhere. I've never used it, preferring
instead
: to just type the procedure name and parameters so:
:
: myProcedure parm1, parm2
:
: Any thoughts on
:
: call myProcedure(parm1, parm2)
:
: ..?

I never use call unless I'm on my cell phone or unless I'm replying in
response to a NG post where someone has it in their code.

--
Roland Hall
/* This information is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
without any warranty; without even the implied warranty of merchantability
or fitness for a particular purpose. */
Technet Script Center - http://www.microsoft.com/technet/scriptcenter/
WSH 5.6 Documentation - http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/list/webdev.asp
MSDN Library - http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp

[Dave Anderson]

William Morris wrote:

So, what's the prevailing opinion regarding the use of the "CALL"
keyword?

I don't know about prevailing opinions, but I personally prefer it. It
simply makes the code more readable, IMO.

Then again, I use correct capitalization and parentheses for logic when I
write VBScript, so I'm a bit of a kook.

FWIW, microsoft.public.scripting.vbscript might represent a better barometer
for this.
--
Dave Anderson

Unsolicited commercial email will be read at a cost of $500 per message. Use
of this email address implies consent to these terms. Please do not contact
me directly or ask me to contact you directly for assistance. If your
question is worth asking, it's worth posting.