Hi...
I've come across some weird bug with Response.Cookies. Or maybe it will be
called "by design" but for the life of me I can't figure out what purpose it
would serve. If you're setting a cookie (say Response.Cookies ("TEST")) and
you have a query string variable &test=x or &Test=x and you get
Request.QueryString to parse the query string, the cookie that gets dropped
matches the case of the query string, not what your code says. In other
words even though the code says Response.Cookies ("TEST"), it drops
Response.Cookies ("test") instead.
Anyone have any idea what's going on here? There's an example below. Try
it with http://127.0.0.1/cookieTest.asp?test=x and without the query string
variable.
<%@Language=Jscript Enablesessionstate=false%>
<% var exp = new Date();
exp.setTime(exp.getTime() + (2 * 365 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000))
var expDate = (exp.getUTCMonth()+1) + "/" + exp.getUTCDate() + "/" +
exp.getUTCFullYear()
var x = Request.QueryString ("dummy");
Response.Cookies("TEST") = "This is a test";
Response.Cookies("TEST").Expires = expDate;
%>
Thanks
_mark 6 2926
2 problems.
Your question does not make any sense to me.
Your example page does not display anything.
Please restate the problem as clearly as possible with examples of the what
you expect to see that you are not seeing happen.
If possible, provide a sample page that displays the difference.
--
Mark Schupp
Head of Development
Integrity eLearning www.ielearning.com
"Mark" <mm******@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:19**********************************@microsof t.com... Hi...
I've come across some weird bug with Response.Cookies. Or maybe it will
be called "by design" but for the life of me I can't figure out what purpose
it would serve. If you're setting a cookie (say Response.Cookies ("TEST"))
and you have a query string variable &test=x or &Test=x and you get Request.QueryString to parse the query string, the cookie that gets
dropped matches the case of the query string, not what your code says. In other words even though the code says Response.Cookies ("TEST"), it drops Response.Cookies ("test") instead.
Anyone have any idea what's going on here? There's an example below. Try it with http://127.0.0.1/cookieTest.asp?test=x and without the query
string variable.
<%@Language=Jscript Enablesessionstate=false%> <% var exp = new Date(); exp.setTime(exp.getTime() + (2 * 365 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000)) var expDate = (exp.getUTCMonth()+1) + "/" + exp.getUTCDate() + "/" + exp.getUTCFullYear()
var x = Request.QueryString ("dummy"); Response.Cookies("TEST") = "This is a test"; Response.Cookies("TEST").Expires = expDate; %>
Thanks _mark
Sorry... The point is to look at the cookie-setting that is done in the
response. Adding a lot of code to dump out the current cookie state I
thought would gum up the example.
The main point is that given the code below, one would expect *always* to see
Set-Cookie: TEST=This+is+a+test; expires=Wed, 28-Feb-2007 05:00:00 GMT; path=/
as a header response for this page, since the name and case of the cookie is
a hard-coded literal value in the code. The bug in IIS is that if you have,
say, &test=x on your query string, IIS returns
Set-Cookie: test=This+is+a+test; expires=Wed, 28-Feb-2007 05:00:00 GMT; path=/
as the cookie setting (notice the case difference).
This is a problem because when you look for Request.Cookies on subsequent
page views, those *are* case sensative, so the fact that you're not setting
the cookie you think you are can cause a lot of problems.
The response header case-insensativity problem only seems to occur
a) when there a querystring variable exists with some other representation
of the name and
b) when the code uses Request.QueryString ("var") to get the Request object
to parse the query string. Note that you don't even have to be looking for
the variable (sort of) sharing the cookie name; anything to get Request to
parse the query string into a collection.
If you leave &test=x off of the url or if you take out the
var x = Request.QueryString ("dummy");
line, you get the first, correct cookie header as a response.
Thanks
_mark
"Mark Schupp" wrote: 2 problems.
Your question does not make any sense to me. Your example page does not display anything.
Please restate the problem as clearly as possible with examples of the what you expect to see that you are not seeing happen.
If possible, provide a sample page that displays the difference.
-- Mark Schupp Head of Development Integrity eLearning www.ielearning.com
"Mark" <mm******@nospam.nospam> wrote in message news:19**********************************@microsof t.com... Hi...
I've come across some weird bug with Response.Cookies. Or maybe it will be called "by design" but for the life of me I can't figure out what purpose it would serve. If you're setting a cookie (say Response.Cookies ("TEST")) and you have a query string variable &test=x or &Test=x and you get Request.QueryString to parse the query string, the cookie that gets dropped matches the case of the query string, not what your code says. In other words even though the code says Response.Cookies ("TEST"), it drops Response.Cookies ("test") instead.
Anyone have any idea what's going on here? There's an example below. Try it with http://127.0.0.1/cookieTest.asp?test=x and without the query string variable.
<%@Language=Jscript Enablesessionstate=false%> <% var exp = new Date(); exp.setTime(exp.getTime() + (2 * 365 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000)) var expDate = (exp.getUTCMonth()+1) + "/" + exp.getUTCDate() + "/" + exp.getUTCFullYear()
var x = Request.QueryString ("dummy"); Response.Cookies("TEST") = "This is a test"; Response.Cookies("TEST").Expires = expDate; %>
Thanks _mark
possibly I am missing something (I'm not all that knowledgable about
cookies) but the cookie collection does not appear to be case-sensitive.
Running the below code gives the same value for "TEST" as for "test" on the
second request (all cookies were deleted first).
%@Language=Jscript Enablesessionstate=false%>
<% var exp = new Date();
exp.setTime(exp.getTime() + (2 * 365 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000))
var expDate = (exp.getUTCMonth()+1) + "/" + exp.getUTCDate() + "/" +
exp.getUTCFullYear()
Response.Write( "TEST cookie:" + Request.Cookies("TEST") + "<br>" );
Response.Write( "test cookie:" + Request.Cookies("test") + "<br>" );
var x = Request.QueryString ("dummy");
Response.Cookies("TEST") = "This is a test";
Response.Cookies("TEST").Expires = expDate;
%>
--
Mark Schupp
Head of Development
Integrity eLearning www.ielearning.com
"Mark" <mm******@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:C1**********************************@microsof t.com... Sorry... The point is to look at the cookie-setting that is done in the response. Adding a lot of code to dump out the current cookie state I thought would gum up the example.
The main point is that given the code below, one would expect *always* to
see Set-Cookie: TEST=This+is+a+test; expires=Wed, 28-Feb-2007 05:00:00 GMT;
path=/ as a header response for this page, since the name and case of the cookie
is a hard-coded literal value in the code. The bug in IIS is that if you
have, say, &test=x on your query string, IIS returns
Set-Cookie: test=This+is+a+test; expires=Wed, 28-Feb-2007 05:00:00 GMT;
path=/ as the cookie setting (notice the case difference).
This is a problem because when you look for Request.Cookies on subsequent page views, those *are* case sensative, so the fact that you're not
setting the cookie you think you are can cause a lot of problems.
The response header case-insensativity problem only seems to occur a) when there a querystring variable exists with some other representation of the name and b) when the code uses Request.QueryString ("var") to get the Request
object to parse the query string. Note that you don't even have to be looking
for the variable (sort of) sharing the cookie name; anything to get Request to parse the query string into a collection.
If you leave &test=x off of the url or if you take out the var x = Request.QueryString ("dummy"); line, you get the first, correct cookie header as a response.
Thanks _mark
"Mark Schupp" wrote:
2 problems.
Your question does not make any sense to me. Your example page does not display anything.
Please restate the problem as clearly as possible with examples of the
what you expect to see that you are not seeing happen.
If possible, provide a sample page that displays the difference.
-- Mark Schupp Head of Development Integrity eLearning www.ielearning.com
"Mark" <mm******@nospam.nospam> wrote in message news:19**********************************@microsof t.com... Hi...
I've come across some weird bug with Response.Cookies. Or maybe it
will be called "by design" but for the life of me I can't figure out what
purpose it would serve. If you're setting a cookie (say Response.Cookies
("TEST")) and you have a query string variable &test=x or &Test=x and you get Request.QueryString to parse the query string, the cookie that gets dropped matches the case of the query string, not what your code says. In
other words even though the code says Response.Cookies ("TEST"), it drops Response.Cookies ("test") instead.
Anyone have any idea what's going on here? There's an example below.
Try it with http://127.0.0.1/cookieTest.asp?test=x and without the query string variable.
<%@Language=Jscript Enablesessionstate=false%> <% var exp = new Date(); exp.setTime(exp.getTime() + (2 * 365 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000)) var expDate = (exp.getUTCMonth()+1) + "/" + exp.getUTCDate() + "/" + exp.getUTCFullYear()
var x = Request.QueryString ("dummy"); Response.Cookies("TEST") = "This is a test"; Response.Cookies("TEST").Expires = expDate; %>
Thanks _mark
Hi Mark...
Okay, now this is getting a little weird. After seeing your post, I went to www.w3c.org and read sections of rfc2965 about cookies, and it does say in
there that the names of the cookies are case-insensitive, so the fact that
IIS behaves inconsistently could be argued as not a bug, but then the bug
just moves to IE, which is treating the cookie names as case-*sensitive*.
I.e. If I get the first reported problem to happen (the name of the cookie
switches case), from then on, IE will pass up *both* versions of the cookie
and the upper case one seems to trump the lower case one when you go to look
for it. In other words, you can never find that lower case cookie in ASP
even though IE is sending both back up.
Further muddying the waters is that your modification (referencing
Request.Cookies("TEST")) seems to undo whatever state in IIS gets the state
mixed up in the first place. If you're watching the headers returned from
the page with your modifications, the cookies in question *don't* switch case
on their names anymore. If you comment out those lines and just watch the
headers, IIS is messing with the case.
I made another small mod on your mod so that now it will set the cookie with
the querystring value, if any. Otherwise it sets it with the time of day.
Adding this on below. So in summary, it seems like IIS has a small bug that
MS might try to explain away as "acceptible inconsistency" and IE has a bug
in that it doesn't manage cookies of similar names properly.
<%@Language=Jscript Enablesessionstate=false%>
<% var exp = new Date();
exp.setTime(exp.getTime() + (2 * 365 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000))
var expDate = (exp.getUTCMonth()+1) + "/" + exp.getUTCDate() + "/" +
exp.getUTCFullYear()
//Response.Write( "TEST cookie:" + Request.Cookies("TEST") + "<br>" );
//Response.Write( "test cookie:" + Request.Cookies("test") + "<br>" );
var x = Request.QueryString ("test");
if (String (x) == "undefined") x = (new Date()).toString();
Response.Cookies("TEST") = x;
Response.Cookies("TEST").Expires = expDate;
%>
Thanks
-mark
"Mark Schupp" wrote: possibly I am missing something (I'm not all that knowledgable about cookies) but the cookie collection does not appear to be case-sensitive.
Running the below code gives the same value for "TEST" as for "test" on the second request (all cookies were deleted first).
%@Language=Jscript Enablesessionstate=false%> <% var exp = new Date(); exp.setTime(exp.getTime() + (2 * 365 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000)) var expDate = (exp.getUTCMonth()+1) + "/" + exp.getUTCDate() + "/" + exp.getUTCFullYear()
Response.Write( "TEST cookie:" + Request.Cookies("TEST") + "<br>" ); Response.Write( "test cookie:" + Request.Cookies("test") + "<br>" );
var x = Request.QueryString ("dummy"); Response.Cookies("TEST") = "This is a test"; Response.Cookies("TEST").Expires = expDate; %>
-- Mark Schupp Head of Development Integrity eLearning www.ielearning.com
"Mark" <mm******@nospam.nospam> wrote in message news:C1**********************************@microsof t.com... Sorry... The point is to look at the cookie-setting that is done in the response. Adding a lot of code to dump out the current cookie state I thought would gum up the example.
The main point is that given the code below, one would expect *always* to see Set-Cookie: TEST=This+is+a+test; expires=Wed, 28-Feb-2007 05:00:00 GMT;
path=/ as a header response for this page, since the name and case of the cookie
is a hard-coded literal value in the code. The bug in IIS is that if you have, say, &test=x on your query string, IIS returns
Set-Cookie: test=This+is+a+test; expires=Wed, 28-Feb-2007 05:00:00 GMT; path=/ as the cookie setting (notice the case difference).
This is a problem because when you look for Request.Cookies on subsequent page views, those *are* case sensative, so the fact that you're not
setting the cookie you think you are can cause a lot of problems.
The response header case-insensativity problem only seems to occur a) when there a querystring variable exists with some other representation of the name and b) when the code uses Request.QueryString ("var") to get the Request object to parse the query string. Note that you don't even have to be looking for the variable (sort of) sharing the cookie name; anything to get Request to parse the query string into a collection.
If you leave &test=x off of the url or if you take out the var x = Request.QueryString ("dummy"); line, you get the first, correct cookie header as a response.
Thanks _mark
"Mark Schupp" wrote:
2 problems.
Your question does not make any sense to me. Your example page does not display anything.
Please restate the problem as clearly as possible with examples of the what you expect to see that you are not seeing happen.
If possible, provide a sample page that displays the difference.
-- Mark Schupp Head of Development Integrity eLearning www.ielearning.com
"Mark" <mm******@nospam.nospam> wrote in message news:19**********************************@microsof t.com... > Hi... > > I've come across some weird bug with Response.Cookies. Or maybe it will be > called "by design" but for the life of me I can't figure out what purpose it > would serve. If you're setting a cookie (say Response.Cookies ("TEST")) and > you have a query string variable &test=x or &Test=x and you get > Request.QueryString to parse the query string, the cookie that gets dropped > matches the case of the query string, not what your code says. In other > words even though the code says Response.Cookies ("TEST"), it drops > Response.Cookies ("test") instead. > > Anyone have any idea what's going on here? There's an example below. Try > it with http://127.0.0.1/cookieTest.asp?test=x and without the query string > variable. > > <%@Language=Jscript Enablesessionstate=false%> > <% var exp = new Date(); > exp.setTime(exp.getTime() + (2 * 365 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000)) > var expDate = (exp.getUTCMonth()+1) + "/" + exp.getUTCDate() + "/" + > exp.getUTCFullYear() > > var x = Request.QueryString ("dummy"); > Response.Cookies("TEST") = "This is a test"; > Response.Cookies("TEST").Expires = expDate; > %> > > Thanks > _mark
Can you post a simple page that demonstrates the problem on the IE side?
--
Mark Schupp
Head of Development
Integrity eLearning www.ielearning.com
"Mark" <mm******@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:E0**********************************@microsof t.com... Hi Mark...
Okay, now this is getting a little weird. After seeing your post, I went
to www.w3c.org and read sections of rfc2965 about cookies, and it does say in there that the names of the cookies are case-insensitive, so the fact that IIS behaves inconsistently could be argued as not a bug, but then the bug just moves to IE, which is treating the cookie names as case-*sensitive*.
I.e. If I get the first reported problem to happen (the name of the cookie switches case), from then on, IE will pass up *both* versions of the
cookie and the upper case one seems to trump the lower case one when you go to
look for it. In other words, you can never find that lower case cookie in ASP even though IE is sending both back up.
Further muddying the waters is that your modification (referencing Request.Cookies("TEST")) seems to undo whatever state in IIS gets the
state mixed up in the first place. If you're watching the headers returned from the page with your modifications, the cookies in question *don't* switch
case on their names anymore. If you comment out those lines and just watch the headers, IIS is messing with the case.
I made another small mod on your mod so that now it will set the cookie
with the querystring value, if any. Otherwise it sets it with the time of day. Adding this on below. So in summary, it seems like IIS has a small bug
that MS might try to explain away as "acceptible inconsistency" and IE has a
bug in that it doesn't manage cookies of similar names properly.
<%@Language=Jscript Enablesessionstate=false%> <% var exp = new Date(); exp.setTime(exp.getTime() + (2 * 365 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000)) var expDate = (exp.getUTCMonth()+1) + "/" + exp.getUTCDate() + "/" + exp.getUTCFullYear()
//Response.Write( "TEST cookie:" + Request.Cookies("TEST") + "<br>" ); //Response.Write( "test cookie:" + Request.Cookies("test") + "<br>" );
var x = Request.QueryString ("test"); if (String (x) == "undefined") x = (new Date()).toString(); Response.Cookies("TEST") = x; Response.Cookies("TEST").Expires = expDate; %>
Thanks -mark
"Mark Schupp" wrote:
possibly I am missing something (I'm not all that knowledgable about cookies) but the cookie collection does not appear to be case-sensitive.
Running the below code gives the same value for "TEST" as for "test" on
the second request (all cookies were deleted first).
%@Language=Jscript Enablesessionstate=false%> <% var exp = new Date(); exp.setTime(exp.getTime() + (2 * 365 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000)) var expDate = (exp.getUTCMonth()+1) + "/" + exp.getUTCDate() + "/" + exp.getUTCFullYear()
Response.Write( "TEST cookie:" + Request.Cookies("TEST") + "<br>" ); Response.Write( "test cookie:" + Request.Cookies("test") + "<br>" );
var x = Request.QueryString ("dummy"); Response.Cookies("TEST") = "This is a test"; Response.Cookies("TEST").Expires = expDate; %>
-- Mark Schupp Head of Development Integrity eLearning www.ielearning.com
"Mark" <mm******@nospam.nospam> wrote in message news:C1**********************************@microsof t.com... Sorry... The point is to look at the cookie-setting that is done in
the response. Adding a lot of code to dump out the current cookie state I thought would gum up the example.
The main point is that given the code below, one would expect *always*
to see Set-Cookie: TEST=This+is+a+test; expires=Wed, 28-Feb-2007 05:00:00
GMT; path=/ as a header response for this page, since the name and case of the
cookie is a hard-coded literal value in the code. The bug in IIS is that if you have, say, &test=x on your query string, IIS returns
Set-Cookie: test=This+is+a+test; expires=Wed, 28-Feb-2007 05:00:00
GMT; path=/ as the cookie setting (notice the case difference).
This is a problem because when you look for Request.Cookies on
subsequent page views, those *are* case sensative, so the fact that you're not setting the cookie you think you are can cause a lot of problems.
The response header case-insensativity problem only seems to occur a) when there a querystring variable exists with some other
representation of the name and b) when the code uses Request.QueryString ("var") to get the Request object to parse the query string. Note that you don't even have to be
looking for the variable (sort of) sharing the cookie name; anything to get
Request to parse the query string into a collection.
If you leave &test=x off of the url or if you take out the var x = Request.QueryString ("dummy"); line, you get the first, correct cookie header as a response.
Thanks _mark
"Mark Schupp" wrote:
> 2 problems. > > Your question does not make any sense to me. > Your example page does not display anything. > > Please restate the problem as clearly as possible with examples of
the what > you expect to see that you are not seeing happen. > > If possible, provide a sample page that displays the difference. > > -- > Mark Schupp > Head of Development > Integrity eLearning > www.ielearning.com > > > "Mark" <mm******@nospam.nospam> wrote in message > news:19**********************************@microsof t.com... > > Hi... > > > > I've come across some weird bug with Response.Cookies. Or maybe
it will > be > > called "by design" but for the life of me I can't figure out what purpose > it > > would serve. If you're setting a cookie (say Response.Cookies ("TEST")) > and > > you have a query string variable &test=x or &Test=x and you get > > Request.QueryString to parse the query string, the cookie that
gets > dropped > > matches the case of the query string, not what your code says. In other > > words even though the code says Response.Cookies ("TEST"), it
drops > > Response.Cookies ("test") instead. > > > > Anyone have any idea what's going on here? There's an example
below. Try > > it with http://127.0.0.1/cookieTest.asp?test=x and without the
query > string > > variable. > > > > <%@Language=Jscript Enablesessionstate=false%> > > <% var exp = new Date(); > > exp.setTime(exp.getTime() + (2 * 365 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000)) > > var expDate = (exp.getUTCMonth()+1) + "/" + exp.getUTCDate() + "/"
+ > > exp.getUTCFullYear() > > > > var x = Request.QueryString ("dummy"); > > Response.Cookies("TEST") = "This is a test"; > > Response.Cookies("TEST").Expires = expDate; > > %> > > > > Thanks > > _mark > > >
Hi Mark...
Generally, I've been using proxytrace to watch the headers going back and
forth, demonstrating the problem. Otherwise, you could look at the cookies
files on your IE side to see it.
If you set a cookie "TEST" and a cookie "test" for the same host/ie instance
pair, you'll see that on the IE side, it's treating them case-sensitively -
i.e. you get two different cookies with two different values. If you go back
to that host, IE will present both cookies to IIS. As your example
demonstrated, IIS is treating the names case-insensitively (upper trumps
lower).
The nub is that either cookie names are supposed to be case-insensitive or
they're not. IIS is being pretty loose about case-sensitivity but it could
be argued the standard lets them be. IE is being strictly case sensitive in
the management of the cookies, which interacts with IIS in strange ways.
I'm writing it up and submitting it to the MS bug-report line now
(unfortunately our msdn subscription is in the process of being renewed, or I
just would have called them up).
Thanks
-mark
"Mark Schupp" wrote: Can you post a simple page that demonstrates the problem on the IE side?
-- Mark Schupp Head of Development Integrity eLearning www.ielearning.com
"Mark" <mm******@nospam.nospam> wrote in message news:E0**********************************@microsof t.com... Hi Mark...
Okay, now this is getting a little weird. After seeing your post, I went to www.w3c.org and read sections of rfc2965 about cookies, and it does say in there that the names of the cookies are case-insensitive, so the fact that IIS behaves inconsistently could be argued as not a bug, but then the bug just moves to IE, which is treating the cookie names as case-*sensitive*.
I.e. If I get the first reported problem to happen (the name of the cookie switches case), from then on, IE will pass up *both* versions of the cookie and the upper case one seems to trump the lower case one when you go to look for it. In other words, you can never find that lower case cookie in ASP even though IE is sending both back up.
Further muddying the waters is that your modification (referencing Request.Cookies("TEST")) seems to undo whatever state in IIS gets the state mixed up in the first place. If you're watching the headers returned from the page with your modifications, the cookies in question *don't* switch case on their names anymore. If you comment out those lines and just watch the headers, IIS is messing with the case.
I made another small mod on your mod so that now it will set the cookie with the querystring value, if any. Otherwise it sets it with the time of day. Adding this on below. So in summary, it seems like IIS has a small bug that MS might try to explain away as "acceptible inconsistency" and IE has a bug in that it doesn't manage cookies of similar names properly.
<%@Language=Jscript Enablesessionstate=false%> <% var exp = new Date(); exp.setTime(exp.getTime() + (2 * 365 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000)) var expDate = (exp.getUTCMonth()+1) + "/" + exp.getUTCDate() + "/" + exp.getUTCFullYear()
//Response.Write( "TEST cookie:" + Request.Cookies("TEST") + "<br>" ); //Response.Write( "test cookie:" + Request.Cookies("test") + "<br>" );
var x = Request.QueryString ("test"); if (String (x) == "undefined") x = (new Date()).toString(); Response.Cookies("TEST") = x; Response.Cookies("TEST").Expires = expDate; %>
Thanks -mark
"Mark Schupp" wrote:
possibly I am missing something (I'm not all that knowledgable about cookies) but the cookie collection does not appear to be case-sensitive.
Running the below code gives the same value for "TEST" as for "test" on the second request (all cookies were deleted first).
%@Language=Jscript Enablesessionstate=false%> <% var exp = new Date(); exp.setTime(exp.getTime() + (2 * 365 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000)) var expDate = (exp.getUTCMonth()+1) + "/" + exp.getUTCDate() + "/" + exp.getUTCFullYear()
Response.Write( "TEST cookie:" + Request.Cookies("TEST") + "<br>" ); Response.Write( "test cookie:" + Request.Cookies("test") + "<br>" );
var x = Request.QueryString ("dummy"); Response.Cookies("TEST") = "This is a test"; Response.Cookies("TEST").Expires = expDate; %>
-- Mark Schupp Head of Development Integrity eLearning www.ielearning.com
"Mark" <mm******@nospam.nospam> wrote in message news:C1**********************************@microsof t.com... > Sorry... The point is to look at the cookie-setting that is done in the > response. Adding a lot of code to dump out the current cookie state I > thought would gum up the example. > > The main point is that given the code below, one would expect *always* to see > > Set-Cookie: TEST=This+is+a+test; expires=Wed, 28-Feb-2007 05:00:00 GMT; path=/ > > as a header response for this page, since the name and case of the cookie is > a hard-coded literal value in the code. The bug in IIS is that if you have, > say, &test=x on your query string, IIS returns > > Set-Cookie: test=This+is+a+test; expires=Wed, 28-Feb-2007 05:00:00 GMT; path=/ > > as the cookie setting (notice the case difference). > > This is a problem because when you look for Request.Cookies on subsequent > page views, those *are* case sensative, so the fact that you're not setting > the cookie you think you are can cause a lot of problems. > > The response header case-insensativity problem only seems to occur > a) when there a querystring variable exists with some other representation > of the name and > b) when the code uses Request.QueryString ("var") to get the Request object > to parse the query string. Note that you don't even have to be looking for > the variable (sort of) sharing the cookie name; anything to get Request to > parse the query string into a collection. > > If you leave &test=x off of the url or if you take out the > var x = Request.QueryString ("dummy"); > line, you get the first, correct cookie header as a response. > > Thanks > _mark > > > "Mark Schupp" wrote: > > > 2 problems. > > > > Your question does not make any sense to me. > > Your example page does not display anything. > > > > Please restate the problem as clearly as possible with examples of the what > > you expect to see that you are not seeing happen. > > > > If possible, provide a sample page that displays the difference. > > > > -- > > Mark Schupp > > Head of Development > > Integrity eLearning > > www.ielearning.com > > > > > > "Mark" <mm******@nospam.nospam> wrote in message > > news:19**********************************@microsof t.com... > > > Hi... > > > > > > I've come across some weird bug with Response.Cookies. Or maybe it will > > be > > > called "by design" but for the life of me I can't figure out what purpose > > it > > > would serve. If you're setting a cookie (say Response.Cookies ("TEST")) > > and > > > you have a query string variable &test=x or &Test=x and you get > > > Request.QueryString to parse the query string, the cookie that gets > > dropped > > > matches the case of the query string, not what your code says. In other > > > words even though the code says Response.Cookies ("TEST"), it drops > > > Response.Cookies ("test") instead. > > > > > > Anyone have any idea what's going on here? There's an example below. Try > > > it with http://127.0.0.1/cookieTest.asp?test=x and without the query > > string > > > variable. > > > > > > <%@Language=Jscript Enablesessionstate=false%> > > > <% var exp = new Date(); > > > exp.setTime(exp.getTime() + (2 * 365 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000)) > > > var expDate = (exp.getUTCMonth()+1) + "/" + exp.getUTCDate() + "/" + > > > exp.getUTCFullYear() > > > > > > var x = Request.QueryString ("dummy"); > > > Response.Cookies("TEST") = "This is a test"; > > > Response.Cookies("TEST").Expires = expDate; > > > %> > > > > > > Thanks > > > _mark > > > > > > This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Glen |
last post by:
Hi,
I am looking for a way to delete (expire) all the cookies that we've
ever written to the user's machine. I have found several scripts,...
|
by: Scott |
last post by:
I would like to have my ASPX page call a function intended to make
changes the the current Page.Response.Cookies. I had thought that to
allow the...
|
by: Sam |
last post by:
I have some issues with HTTP Headers and I was hoping for
some pointers or references to good articles.
Here is the problem.
I have 6 .aspx...
|
by: Earl Teigrob |
last post by:
When I write inline code on a aspx page using Page.Response.Cookies() to read a cookie, everything works fine, as in the following code.
Dim x As...
|
by: tomer |
last post by:
Clear DayHello,
I have implemented a download manger in .NET that overrides Internet
Explorer's bult-in download manager.
I using...
|
by: Alex Nitulescu |
last post by:
I have the following very simple colde (while learning about cookies and
session state):
Private Sub cmdAddCookie_Click(ByVal sender As...
|
by: Kevin Blount |
last post by:
Background:
My script is designed to only allow the downloading of a file if a
cookie exists to say that someone is logged into my companies site....
|
by: mike.biang |
last post by:
I have an ASP page that is using an XMLHTTP object to request various
pages from my server. I keep a single session throughout the XMLHTTP...
|
by: _Who |
last post by:
Given Request.Cookies and Response.Cookies in asp.net is there any reason to
ever use javascript or any other method to use cookies?
Thanks
|
by: Naresh1 |
last post by:
What is WebLogic Admin Training?
WebLogic Admin Training is a specialized program designed to equip individuals with the skills and knowledge...
|
by: jalbright99669 |
last post by:
Am having a bit of a time with URL Rewrite. I need to incorporate http to https redirect with a reverse proxy. I have the URL Rewrite rules made...
|
by: Matthew3360 |
last post by:
Hi there. I have been struggling to find out how to use a variable as my location in my header redirect function.
Here is my code.
...
|
by: Matthew3360 |
last post by:
Hi, I have a python app that i want to be able to get variables from a php page on my webserver. My python app is on my computer. How would I make it...
|
by: AndyPSV |
last post by:
HOW CAN I CREATE AN AI with an .executable file that would suck all files in the folder and on my computerHOW CAN I CREATE AN AI with an .executable...
|
by: Arjunsri |
last post by:
I have a Redshift database that I need to use as an import data source. I have configured the DSN connection using the server, port, database, and...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello Folks,
I am trying to hook up a CPU which I designed using SystemC to I/O pins on an FPGA.
My problem (spelled failure) is with the...
|
by: BLUEPANDA |
last post by:
At BluePanda Dev, we're passionate about building high-quality software and sharing our knowledge with the community. That's why we've created a SaaS...
|
by: Rahul1995seven |
last post by:
Introduction:
In the realm of programming languages, Python has emerged as a powerhouse. With its simplicity, versatility, and robustness, Python...
| |