On Sep 20, 5:16 pm, "rum...@hotmail.com" <rum...@hotmail.comwrote:
I wonder if zombies had followed you to upgrade from 97 to 2003
in the first place ?
On Sep 21, 6:26 am, "rquin...@sympatico.ca" <bob.quin...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I have no idea what "rummie" even means, but that's not unusual. He seldom
offers anything but snide comments, and frequently even those are
incomprehensible.
Access '97 was in my (and obviously his) opinion, the most stable
version of Ms-Access. He was implying "why downgrade from '97 to 2003)
Thanks to everyone for their responses.
My reason for upgrading is the inevitability of Vista. I had to jump
through a few hoops just to get Access 97 installed on Vista
(Business) and the first time I tried to connect to a backend MDB on a
network drive I had a problem. That didn't give me much confidence in
the Access 97/Vista combination, particularly since I'd read that
Vista breaks Outlook 97.
Have you (or anyone) used Access 97 successfully on Vista in a
networked environment with no compatiblity issues? (Maybe I should
start another thread with that question, eh?)