Hi folks,
I am working on a routine that will select a sample of parcels from a table. Each parcel belongs to a census tract, and depending on which tract, a certain calculation is applied. The trick is that the math is only to be performed on a random sample of parcels within each tract, and the size of the sample varies for each tract. Therefore, I define a recordset with a variable where the size of the sample is a value in an array populated from another table, perform the action, and then loop back to redefine the recordset. I get a subscript out of range error, so that smells a bit like an array issue, but it is my sql string that is highlighted, down in line 44. I have option base 1 in the declarations section. Can anyone see the practical, or for that matter conceptual problem with passing a value to define how many records are requested in the sequel query? - Sub cycletest()
-
-
Dim rstarray As ADODB.Recordset
-
Set rstarray = New ADODB.Recordset
-
Dim rst As ADODB.Recordset
-
Set rst = New ADODB.Recordset
-
Dim strsqlarray As String
-
Dim strsql As String
-
Dim singleunitsadd(176, 2)
-
Dim i As Integer
-
Dim j As Integer
-
Dim k As Integer
-
- '1. Populate array
-
strsqlarray = "SELECT comparison.tractnumber as tractnumber, comparison.d1 AS diff " & _
-
"FROM comparison; "
-
-
rstarray.ActiveConnection = CurrentProject.Connection
-
rstarray.CursorType = adOpenDynamic
-
rstarray.LockType = adLockOptimistic
-
-
'open table to be used in array
-
rstarray.Open strsqlarray
-
-
'populate first column
-
For i = 1 To 176
-
rstarray.MoveFirst
-
singleunitsadd(i, 1) = rstarray!diff
-
rstarray.MoveNext
-
Debug.Print singleunitsadd(i, 1)
-
Next
-
rstarray.MoveFirst
-
'populate second column
-
For j = 1 To 176
-
singleunitsadd(j, 2) = rstarray!tractnumber
-
rstarray.MoveNext
-
Debug.Print singleunitsadd(j, 2)
-
Next
-
rstarray.Close
-
Set rstarray = Nothing
-
-
- '2. Get recordset to be updated--to be looped as a function of l
-
strsql = "SELECT TOP " & singleunitsadd(k, 1) & " MAPBLKLOT, c1, RESUNITS, parcelcounter, " & _
-
"tractcounter, tractid " & _
-
"FROM luse01 " & _
-
"ORDER BY parcelcounter;"
-
-
rst.ActiveConnection = CurrentProject.Connection
-
rst.CursorType = adOpenDynamic
-
rst.LockType = adLockOptimistic
-
-
'iterate one time for each tract and assign a number to all parcels in tract
-
-
For k = 1 To 176
-
rst.Open strsql
-
rst.MoveFirst
-
Do Until rst.EOF
-
'rst!parcelcounter = lngcounter
-
rst!c1 = 1
-
rst.Update
-
rst.MoveNext
-
Debug.Print rst!MAPBLKLOT & _
-
"; " & rst!tractcounter & "; " & rst!tractid & "; " & rst!c1
-
On Error GoTo ErrorHandler
-
rst.Close
-
Set rst = Nothing
-
-
Loop
-
Next k
-
-
-
ErrorHandlerExit:
-
Exit Sub
-
ErrorHandler:
-
If Err = 3021 Then ' no current record
-
Resume Next
-
Else
-
MsgBox "Error No: " & Err.Number & "; Description: " & Err.Description
-
Resume ErrorHandlerExit
-
End If
-
-
End Sub
10 2389
You are trying to use an Array (singleunitsadd(dim1, dim2)) within the context of an SQL Statement that is derived from a Table not listed in the FROM Clause. I don't even think that this approach is possible, but even if it were, the Subscript out of range Error would be generated because of singleunitsadd(k, 1). From what I can see, k is not initialized up to this point and thus would contain the value of 0. The problem is that Option Base 1 has been explicitly stated so the Array Element at singleunitsadd(0, 1) makes no sense. Hope this helps. BTW, this seems to be a very unorthodox way to populate a Multidimensional Array, it is customarily done within nested For...Next constructs.
You are trying to use an Array (singleunitsadd(dim1, dim2)) within the context of an SQL Statement that is derived from a Table not listed in the FROM Clause. I don't even think that this approach is possible, but even if it were, the Subscript out of range Error would be generated because of singleunitsadd(k, 1). From what I can see, k is not initialized up to this point and thus would contain the value of 0. The problem is that Option Base 1 has been explicitly stated so the Array Element at singleunitsadd(0, 1) makes no sense. Hope this helps. BTW, this seems to be a very unorthodox way to populate a Multidimensional Array, it is customarily done within nested For...Next constructs.
I think the table you want a reference to is listed in line 16? At any rate, I eliminated the base 1 declaration and assumed 0 as the start, and the Subscript out of range Error is no more. Now I get " Error No. 91: Description; Object variable or With block variable not set". This does not come up as a runtime error, but rather as a text box without the debug option. Since I don't declare any objects, I don't see what the problem is. Any ideas?
I think the table you want a reference to is listed in line 16? At any rate, I eliminated the base 1 declaration and assumed 0 as the start, and the Subscript out of range Error is no more. Now I get "Error No. 91: Description; Object variable or With block variable not set". This does not come up as a runtime error, but rather as a text box without the debug option. Since I don't declare any objects, I don't see what the problem is. Any ideas?
I think I found out the problem.. I was looping the definition of a recordset, each time creating a new recordset for a new class (as based on a variable in the table) and performing calculations on that class. However, I closed and set the recordset object to nothing, so when the loop ran the next time, I got" Error No. 91: Description; Object variable or With block variable not set". Now at the end of the loop I don't set the recordset object to nothing, BUT I do close it.(the reason I re-populate the recordset each each class loop rather than using a filter method is that I want to select only a random subset of each class; hence I pass a variable to the sql statement determing exactly how many top records to return. I don't think I can specify the number of rows with the filter method)
I think the table you want a reference to is listed in line 16? At any rate, I eliminated the base 1 declaration and assumed 0 as the start, and the Subscript out of range Error is no more. Now I get "Error No. 91: Description; Object variable or With block variable not set". This does not come up as a runtime error, but rather as a text box without the debug option. Since I don't declare any objects, I don't see what the problem is. Any ideas?
Conceptually I see you building the SQL string as you have done for the recordset in much the same was as we build any other string 'criteria' clauses of SQL statements are prime examples built on the fly.
You are setting the TOP predicate based on your array value of k.......... problem with that is you need to keep tabs on your subscript range boundaries as Dez points out that 'k' was uninitialised at the first run in which results in an incomplete predicate 'a top blank space' in your built string
You might might want to look at the efficiency of continually opening and closing recordsets in a loop set against the performance gains of raw SQL 'Update' statements performed as a single batch. This is merely my observation from a design perspective, it might benchmark its worth...particularly if you have large datasets?
As for you object variable problem look at your line 67 you are deinitialising its reference so it has nothing to work with on the next return in the FOR loop.
Other than I have your code working here with option base 1
Jim
Conceptually I see you building the SQL string as you have done for the recordset in much the same was as we build any other string 'criteria' clauses of SQL statements are prime examples built on the fly.
You are setting the TOP predicate based on your array value of k.......... problem with that is you need to keep tabs on your subscript range boundaries as Dez points out that 'k' was uninitialised at the first run in which results in an incomplete predicate 'a top blank space' in your built string
You might might want to look at the efficiency of continually opening and closing recordsets in a loop set against the performance gains of raw SQL 'Update' statements performed as a single batch. This is merely my observation from a design perspective, it might benchmark its worth...particularly if you have large datasets?
As for you object variable problem look at your line 67 you are deinitialising its reference so it has nothing to work with on the next return in the FOR loop.
Other than I have your code working here with option base 1
Jim
Jim,
Efficiency is a concern, but I don't know any other way to select a subset using the TOP predicate besides re-creating the recordset. I don't think I can filter using TOP. Besides, if the recordset is defined from the onset, the traffic is limited to those x records, no?
Jim,
Efficiency is a concern, but I don't know any other way to select a subset using the TOP predicate besides re-creating the recordset. I don't think I can filter using TOP. Besides, if the recordset is defined from the onset, the traffic is limited to those x records, no?
Why can't you generate a Random Number to represent the number of Records to return from each Class?
Jim,
Efficiency is a concern, but I don't know any other way to select a subset using the TOP predicate besides re-creating the recordset. I don't think I can filter using TOP. Besides, if the recordset is defined from the onset, the traffic is limited to those x records, no?
Limited too yes, but in the scripts case the rst is being opened, traversed and closed presumably an arbitary test figure of 176 times. To SQL UPDATE on a WHERE clause seems to me to be a more efficient method?. I don't wish to sound purist or boringly critical as we all do things our own way anyway :)) -
-
For k = 1 To 176
-
rst.Open strsql
-
rst.MoveFirst
-
Do Until rst.EOF
-
'rst!parcelcounter = lngcounter
-
rst!c1 = 1
-
rst.Update
-
rst.MoveNext
-
Debug.Print rst!MAPBLKLOT & _
-
"; " & rst!tractcounter & "; " & rst!tractid & "; " & rst!c1
-
On Error GoTo ErrorHandler
-
rst.Close
-
Loop
-
Next k
-
Regards
Jim
Limited too yes, but in the scripts case the rst is being opened, traversed and closed presumably an arbitary test figure of 176 times. To SQL UPDATE on a WHERE clause seems to me to be a more efficient method?. I don't wish to sound purist or boringly critical as we all do things our own way anyway :)) -
-
For k = 1 To 176
-
rst.Open strsql
-
rst.MoveFirst
-
Do Until rst.EOF
-
'rst!parcelcounter = lngcounter
-
rst!c1 = 1
-
rst.Update
-
rst.MoveNext
-
Debug.Print rst!MAPBLKLOT & _
-
"; " & rst!tractcounter & "; " & rst!tractid & "; " & rst!c1
-
On Error GoTo ErrorHandler
-
rst.Close
-
Loop
-
Next k
-
Regards
Jim
I would love to just run an update query, the reason that doesn't seem to work in this case is that the number of records to update in each class depends on a value in another table determining how large the subset of each class will be updated. Now I have the problem that I wrap the recordset definition into a for k = 1 to 175...next expression where the k is used twice in the SQL string: first to filter only a given subset of records (stored in an array in the early part of the function) and second, to filter using WHERE. The problem, then, is that I can see in the immediate window that it actually does cycle through the K's (see below, second to last column), but judging from the recordset returned, it is the same every time. I am at my wit's end here; the fact that I can pass the constant in the query seems to me a proof of concept, but the execution doesn't do it for me. - Sub cycletest()
-
-
Dim rstarray As ADODB.Recordset
-
Set rstarray = New ADODB.Recordset
-
Dim rst As ADODB.Recordset
-
Set rst = New ADODB.Recordset
-
Dim strsqlarray As String
-
Dim strsql As String
-
Dim singleunitsadd(175)
-
Dim i As Integer
-
Dim j As Integer
-
Dim k As Integer
-
-
'1. Populate array
-
strsqlarray = "SELECT comparison.tractnumber as tractnumber, comparison.d1 AS diff " & _
-
"FROM comparison " & _
-
"ORDER BY tractnumber; "
-
rstarray.ActiveConnection = CurrentProject.Connection
-
rstarray.CursorType = adOpenStatic
-
rstarray.LockType = adLockOptimistic
-
-
'open table to be used in array
-
rstarray.Open strsqlarray
-
Debug.Print rstarray.RecordCount
-
-
'i = j = k = 1
-
' populate first column
-
For i = 0 To 175
-
'rstarray.MoveFirst makes it go back to the first number every time..BAD!!
-
singleunitsadd(i) = rstarray!diff
-
rstarray.MoveNext
-
'Debug.Print singleunitsadd(i)
-
Next
-
'rstarray.MoveFirst
-
'populate second column
-
' For j = 0 To 175
-
' singleunitsadd(j, 1) = rstarray!tractnumber
-
' rstarray.MoveNext
-
' Debug.Print singleunitsadd(j, 1)
-
' Next
-
rstarray.Close
-
Set rstarray = Nothing
-
-
'2. Get recordset to be updated--to be looped as a function of k
-
strsql = "SELECT TOP " & singleunitsadd(k) & " luse01.MAPBLKLOT, luse01.c1, luse01.RESUNITS, " & _
-
"luse01.parcelcounter, luse01.tractcounter, luse01.tractid " & _
-
"FROM luse01 " & _
-
"WHERE (((luse01.tractcounter)= " & singleunitsadd(k) & " )) " & _
-
"ORDER BY tractcounter, randomnumber;"
-
-
rst.ActiveConnection = CurrentProject.Connection
-
rst.CursorType = adOpenStatic
-
rst.LockType = adLockOptimistic
-
-
'iterate one time for each tract and assign a number to all parcels in tract
-
-
'On Error GoTo ErrorHandler
-
For k = 0 To 175
-
rst.Open strsql
-
'rst.Filter = "tractcounter = " & k
-
Debug.Print rst.RecordCount; k; singleunitsadd(k)
-
-
-
Do Until rst.EOF
-
'rst.MoveFirst
-
rst!c1 = 1
-
-
'rst.Update
-
Debug.Print rst!parcelcounter & "; " & rst!MAPBLKLOT & _
-
"; " & rst!tractid & ": " & rst!c1 & ": " & k & "; " & singleunitsadd(k)
-
rst.MoveNext
-
Loop
-
rst.Close
-
'Set rst = Nothing
-
Next k
-
'Debug.Print lngcounter&; " records processed"
-
rst.Close
-
Set rst = Nothing
-
-
End Sub
and the immediate window...the second to last number is the K integer I use in the for k=1 to 175 statement. - 176
-
39 0 39
-
107; ; 015500: 1: 0; 39
-
30; ; 015500: 1: 0; 39
-
35; ; 015500: 1: 0; 39
-
69; ; 015500: 1: 0; 39
-
99; ; 015500: 1: 0; 39
-
(lines omitted)
-
39 1 82
-
107; ; 015500: 1: 1; 82
-
30; ; 015500: 1: 1; 82
-
35; ; 015500: 1: 1; 82
-
69; ; 015500: 1: 1; 82
-
(lines omitted)
I would love to just run an update query, the reason that doesn't seem to work in this case is that the number of records to update in each class depends on a value in another table determining how large the subset of each class will be updated. Now I have the problem that I wrap the recordset definition into a for k = 1 to 175...next expression where the k is used twice in the SQL string: first to filter only a given subset of records (stored in an array in the early part of the function) and second, to filter using WHERE. The problem, then, is that I can see in the immediate window that it actually does cycle through the K's (see below, second to last column), but judging from the recordset returned, it is the same every time. I am at my wit's end here; the fact that I can pass the constant in the query seems to me a proof of concept, but the execution doesn't do it for me. - Sub cycletest()
-
-
Dim rstarray As ADODB.Recordset
-
Set rstarray = New ADODB.Recordset
-
Dim rst As ADODB.Recordset
-
Set rst = New ADODB.Recordset
-
Dim strsqlarray As String
-
Dim strsql As String
-
Dim singleunitsadd(175)
-
Dim i As Integer
-
Dim j As Integer
-
Dim k As Integer
-
-
'1. Populate array
-
strsqlarray = "SELECT comparison.tractnumber as tractnumber, comparison.d1 AS diff " & _
-
"FROM comparison " & _
-
"ORDER BY tractnumber; "
-
rstarray.ActiveConnection = CurrentProject.Connection
-
rstarray.CursorType = adOpenStatic
-
rstarray.LockType = adLockOptimistic
-
-
'open table to be used in array
-
rstarray.Open strsqlarray
-
Debug.Print rstarray.RecordCount
-
-
'i = j = k = 1
-
' populate first column
-
For i = 0 To 175
-
'rstarray.MoveFirst makes it go back to the first number every time..BAD!!
-
singleunitsadd(i) = rstarray!diff
-
rstarray.MoveNext
-
'Debug.Print singleunitsadd(i)
-
Next
-
'rstarray.MoveFirst
-
'populate second column
-
' For j = 0 To 175
-
' singleunitsadd(j, 1) = rstarray!tractnumber
-
' rstarray.MoveNext
-
' Debug.Print singleunitsadd(j, 1)
-
' Next
-
rstarray.Close
-
Set rstarray = Nothing
-
-
'2. Get recordset to be updated--to be looped as a function of k
-
strsql = "SELECT TOP " & singleunitsadd(k) & " luse01.MAPBLKLOT, luse01.c1, luse01.RESUNITS, " & _
-
"luse01.parcelcounter, luse01.tractcounter, luse01.tractid " & _
-
"FROM luse01 " & _
-
"WHERE (((luse01.tractcounter)= " & singleunitsadd(k) & " )) " & _
-
"ORDER BY tractcounter, randomnumber;"
-
-
rst.ActiveConnection = CurrentProject.Connection
-
rst.CursorType = adOpenStatic
-
rst.LockType = adLockOptimistic
-
-
'iterate one time for each tract and assign a number to all parcels in tract
-
-
'On Error GoTo ErrorHandler
-
For k = 0 To 175
-
rst.Open strsql
-
'rst.Filter = "tractcounter = " & k
-
Debug.Print rst.RecordCount; k; singleunitsadd(k)
-
-
-
Do Until rst.EOF
-
'rst.MoveFirst
-
rst!c1 = 1
-
-
'rst.Update
-
Debug.Print rst!parcelcounter & "; " & rst!MAPBLKLOT & _
-
"; " & rst!tractid & ": " & rst!c1 & ": " & k & "; " & singleunitsadd(k)
-
rst.MoveNext
-
Loop
-
rst.Close
-
'Set rst = Nothing
-
Next k
-
'Debug.Print lngcounter&; " records processed"
-
rst.Close
-
Set rst = Nothing
-
-
End Sub
and the immediate window...the second to last number is the K integer I use in the for k=1 to 175 statement. - 176
-
39 0 39
-
107; ; 015500: 1: 0; 39
-
30; ; 015500: 1: 0; 39
-
35; ; 015500: 1: 0; 39
-
69; ; 015500: 1: 0; 39
-
99; ; 015500: 1: 0; 39
-
(lines omitted)
-
39 1 82
-
107; ; 015500: 1: 1; 82
-
30; ; 015500: 1: 1; 82
-
35; ; 015500: 1: 1; 82
-
69; ; 015500: 1: 1; 82
-
(lines omitted)
Hi akselo,
Please check your PM,s
Jim :)
I would love to just run an update query, the reason that doesn't seem to work in this case is that the number of records to update in each class depends on a value in another table determining how large the subset of each class will be updated. Now I have the problem that I wrap the recordset definition into a for k = 1 to 175...next expression where the k is used twice in the SQL string: first to filter only a given subset of records (stored in an array in the early part of the function) and second, to filter using WHERE. The problem, then, is that I can see in the immediate window that it actually does cycle through the K's (see below, second to last column), but judging from the recordset returned, it is the same every time. I am at my wit's end here; the fact that I can pass the constant in the query seems to me a proof of concept, but the execution doesn't do it for me. - Sub cycletest()
-
-
Dim rstarray As ADODB.Recordset
-
Set rstarray = New ADODB.Recordset
-
Dim rst As ADODB.Recordset
-
Set rst = New ADODB.Recordset
-
Dim strsqlarray As String
-
Dim strsql As String
-
Dim singleunitsadd(175)
-
Dim i As Integer
-
Dim j As Integer
-
Dim k As Integer
-
-
'1. Populate array
-
strsqlarray = "SELECT comparison.tractnumber as tractnumber, comparison.d1 AS diff " & _
-
"FROM comparison " & _
-
"ORDER BY tractnumber; "
-
rstarray.ActiveConnection = CurrentProject.Connection
-
rstarray.CursorType = adOpenStatic
-
rstarray.LockType = adLockOptimistic
-
-
'open table to be used in array
-
rstarray.Open strsqlarray
-
Debug.Print rstarray.RecordCount
-
-
'i = j = k = 1
-
' populate first column
-
For i = 0 To 175
-
'rstarray.MoveFirst makes it go back to the first number every time..BAD!!
-
singleunitsadd(i) = rstarray!diff
-
rstarray.MoveNext
-
'Debug.Print singleunitsadd(i)
-
Next
-
'rstarray.MoveFirst
-
'populate second column
-
' For j = 0 To 175
-
' singleunitsadd(j, 1) = rstarray!tractnumber
-
' rstarray.MoveNext
-
' Debug.Print singleunitsadd(j, 1)
-
' Next
-
rstarray.Close
-
Set rstarray = Nothing
-
-
'2. Get recordset to be updated--to be looped as a function of k
-
strsql = "SELECT TOP " & singleunitsadd(k) & " luse01.MAPBLKLOT, luse01.c1, luse01.RESUNITS, " & _
-
"luse01.parcelcounter, luse01.tractcounter, luse01.tractid " & _
-
"FROM luse01 " & _
-
"WHERE (((luse01.tractcounter)= " & singleunitsadd(k) & " )) " & _
-
"ORDER BY tractcounter, randomnumber;"
-
-
rst.ActiveConnection = CurrentProject.Connection
-
rst.CursorType = adOpenStatic
-
rst.LockType = adLockOptimistic
-
-
'iterate one time for each tract and assign a number to all parcels in tract
-
-
'On Error GoTo ErrorHandler
-
For k = 0 To 175
-
rst.Open strsql
-
'rst.Filter = "tractcounter = " & k
-
Debug.Print rst.RecordCount; k; singleunitsadd(k)
-
-
-
Do Until rst.EOF
-
'rst.MoveFirst
-
rst!c1 = 1
-
-
'rst.Update
-
Debug.Print rst!parcelcounter & "; " & rst!MAPBLKLOT & _
-
"; " & rst!tractid & ": " & rst!c1 & ": " & k & "; " & singleunitsadd(k)
-
rst.MoveNext
-
Loop
-
rst.Close
-
'Set rst = Nothing
-
Next k
-
'Debug.Print lngcounter&; " records processed"
-
rst.Close
-
Set rst = Nothing
-
-
End Sub
and the immediate window...the second to last number is the K integer I use in the for k=1 to 175 statement. - 176
-
39 0 39
-
107; ; 015500: 1: 0; 39
-
30; ; 015500: 1: 0; 39
-
35; ; 015500: 1: 0; 39
-
69; ; 015500: 1: 0; 39
-
99; ; 015500: 1: 0; 39
-
(lines omitted)
-
39 1 82
-
107; ; 015500: 1: 1; 82
-
30; ; 015500: 1: 1; 82
-
35; ; 015500: 1: 1; 82
-
69; ; 015500: 1: 1; 82
-
(lines omitted)
Problem solved by moving strsql to after for K=1 to 176.
Sign in to post your reply or Sign up for a free account.
Similar topics
by: Rob Meade |
last post by:
Lo all,
Ok - this is what I was aiming to do, and then I thought - naahhh, that cant
be right!
query database
results to recordset
results to array using GetRows
update values in one column...
|
by: David |
last post by:
Hi,
I have a continuous form based on a query.
Lets say the form displays 6 records.
I also have a button against each record which sets a field to Y or N
for each record.
I am trying to...
|
by: ADezii |
last post by:
One question which pops up frequently here at TheScripts is: 'How do I retrieve data from a Recordset once I've created it?' One very efficient, and not that often used approach, is the GetRows()...
|
by: ADezii |
last post by:
Last Tip, we demonstrated the technique for retrieving data from a DAO Recordset, and placing it into a 2-dimensional Array using the GetRows() Method. This week, we will cover the same exact Method...
|
by: taylorcarr |
last post by:
A Canon printer is a smart device known for being advanced, efficient, and reliable. It is designed for home, office, and hybrid workspace use and can also be used for a variety of purposes. However,...
|
by: aa123db |
last post by:
Variable and constants
Use var or let for variables and const fror constants.
Var foo ='bar';
Let foo ='bar';const baz ='bar';
Functions
function $name$ ($parameters$) {
}
...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
|
by: nemocccc |
last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
| |