473,405 Members | 2,187 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,405 software developers and data experts.

FE/BE and Citrix

OK guys I am in need of some assistance here. I have a standard FE/BE
database set up here. ABout 10-20 users have the FE installed on
tehir machines all linked to the common BE on the server. All
standard stuff. The network people are setting up some new
restrictions on the LAN and as a result they want to do the
following. I am not sure what the data risks are if any and how to
ensure that what they plan to do is 'safe'. They want to puit the FE
and BE on the server. Then use Citrix for each user to run the common
FE. Can y'all shed some light on this and give me any feedback as to
what concerns you might have if you were presented with this as the
current plan of attack?
Thanks,
DB

Jul 31 '07 #1
6 1730

"DavidB" <je***@yahoo.comschreef in bericht news:11*********************@e16g2000pri.googlegro ups.com...
OK guys I am in need of some assistance here. I have a standard FE/BE
database set up here. ABout 10-20 users have the FE installed on
tehir machines all linked to the common BE on the server. All
standard stuff. The network people are setting up some new
restrictions on the LAN and as a result they want to do the
following. I am not sure what the data risks are if any and how to
ensure that what they plan to do is 'safe'. They want to puit the FE
and BE on the server. Then use Citrix for each user to run the common
FE. Can y'all shed some light on this and give me any feedback as to
what concerns you might have if you were presented with this as the
current plan of attack?
Thanks,
DB
Looks like a bad idea, especially the 'use Citrix for each user to run the common FE' part.
Using Citrix is possible, but also with Citrix each user should have his/hers own FE.

The concern is corruption of course, but also if you are using temptables in the FE you will get *very* concerned....

So you will need about 10-20 FE's on that Citrix server (e.g. each in the user homedir).
Most networking guys don't like that. You will need to convince them.
A Google search on the topic will give you lots of information.

Arno R

Arno R
Jul 31 '07 #2
On Jul 31, 12:01 pm, "Arno R" <arracomn_o_s_p_...@planet.nlwrote:
"DavidB" <je...@yahoo.comschreef in berichtnews:11*********************@e16g2000pri.go oglegroups.com...
OK guys I am in need of some assistance here. I have a standard FE/BE
database set up here. ABout 10-20 users have the FE installed on
tehir machines all linked to the common BE on the server. All
standard stuff. The network people are setting up some new
restrictions on the LAN and as a result they want to do the
following. I am not sure what the data risks are if any and how to
ensure that what they plan to do is 'safe'. They want to puit the FE
and BE on the server. Then use Citrix for each user to run the common
FE. Can y'all shed some light on this and give me any feedback as to
what concerns you might have if you were presented with this as the
current plan of attack?
Thanks,
DB

Looks like a bad idea, especially the 'use Citrix for each user to run the common FE' part.
Using Citrix is possible, but also with Citrix each user should have his/hers own FE.

The concern is corruption of course, but also if you are using temptables in the FE you will get *very* concerned....

So you will need about 10-20 FE's on that Citrix server (e.g. each in the user homedir).
Most networking guys don't like that. You will need to convince them.
A Google search on the topic will give you lots of information.

Arno R

Arno R
So the fact that this is running with the citrix piece in the puzzle
changes nothing about the common concerns of using a shared FE?

Can you give me few sites that discuss the issue of data corruption in
this sort of set up please?

Jul 31 '07 #3

"DavidB" <je***@yahoo.comschreef in bericht news:11*********************@e9g2000prf.googlegrou ps.com...
On Jul 31, 12:01 pm, "Arno R" <arracomn_o_s_p_...@planet.nlwrote:
>"DavidB" <je...@yahoo.comschreef in berichtnews:11*********************@e16g2000pri.go oglegroups.com...
OK guys I am in need of some assistance here. I have a standard FE/BE
database set up here. ABout 10-20 users have the FE installed on
tehir machines all linked to the common BE on the server. All
standard stuff. The network people are setting up some new
restrictions on the LAN and as a result they want to do the
following. I am not sure what the data risks are if any and how to
ensure that what they plan to do is 'safe'. They want to puit the FE
and BE on the server. Then use Citrix for each user to run the common
FE. Can y'all shed some light on this and give me any feedback as to
what concerns you might have if you were presented with this as the
current plan of attack?
Thanks,
DB

Looks like a bad idea, especially the 'use Citrix for each user to run the common FE' part.
Using Citrix is possible, but also with Citrix each user should have his/hers own FE.

The concern is corruption of course, but also if you are using temptables in the FE you will get *very* concerned....

So you will need about 10-20 FE's on that Citrix server (e.g. each in the user homedir).
Most networking guys don't like that. You will need to convince them.
A Google search on the topic will give you lots of information.

Arno R

Arno R
So the fact that this is running with the citrix piece in the puzzle
changes nothing about the common concerns of using a shared FE?
Changes nothing indeed. Don't use a shared FE in a multi-user environment
Can you give me few sites that discuss the issue of data corruption in
this sort of set up please?
I don't know of sites about this, but it has been discussed very often here.
Please do the searching yourself...

Arno R
Jul 31 '07 #4

"DavidB" <je***@yahoo.comwrote in message
news:11*********************@e16g2000pri.googlegro ups.com...
OK guys I am in need of some assistance here. I have a standard FE/BE
database set up here. ABout 10-20 users have the FE installed on
tehir machines all linked to the common BE on the server. All
standard stuff. The network people are setting up some new
restrictions on the LAN and as a result they want to do the
following. I am not sure what the data risks are if any and how to
ensure that what they plan to do is 'safe'. They want to puit the FE
and BE on the server. Then use Citrix for each user to run the common
FE. Can y'all shed some light on this and give me any feedback as to
what concerns you might have if you were presented with this as the
current plan of attack?
Thanks,
DB
The network people are under the mistaken assumption that the FE is loaded
for each user like a EXE. It does not, Access load each part of the FE as
needed keeping the MDB file open. Any unexpected shutdown of one of the
shared FEs can cause corruption. Temp tables in the FE will be shared by all
users. The issues are the same for Citrix / Terminal server as on a
workstation. They should follow or at least consider Microsoft's
recommendations just like they would when setting up other network
application.
Jul 31 '07 #5
DavidB <je***@yahoo.comwrote:
>So the fact that this is running with the citrix piece in the puzzle
changes nothing about the common concerns of using a shared FE?
Correct.
>Can you give me few sites that discuss the issue of data corruption in
this sort of set up please?
My random thoughts on Microsoft Access, Terminal Server and/or Citrix
http://www.granite.ab.ca/access/terminalserver.htm

Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
Tony's Microsoft Access Blog - http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/
Jul 31 '07 #6
On Jul 31, 6:41 pm, "Tony Toews [MVP]" <tto...@telusplanet.netwrote:
DavidB <je...@yahoo.comwrote:
So the fact that this is running with the citrix piece in the puzzle
changes nothing about the common concerns of using a shared FE?

Correct.
Can you give me few sites that discuss the issue of data corruption in
this sort of set up please?

My random thoughts on Microsoft Access, Terminal Server and/or Citrixhttp://www.granite.ab.ca/access/terminalserver.htm

Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems athttp://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
Tony's Microsoft Access Blog -http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/
Thank you all for the input. I think this is ammunition enough that I
can now convince the powers that be to not go down the path they are
currently discussing.

Aug 1 '07 #7

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

0
by: James Ng | last post by:
I have posted this to the Citrix Developers' forum and have not heard anything yet. So I'd like to see if any other Java developers have experience this problem with their Java application in a...
12
by: Corey Burnett | last post by:
I have a client that has a split database (front-end/back-end). They are also using Access security - MDW file. The front end MDE file, the back end MDB file, and the MDW file are all located on...
7
by: Rob | last post by:
I am an Access developer and have done many Access databases in the standard Front-end on the workstations, backend on the server (over a LAN) but have never worked with Access over Citrix, though...
33
by: DFS | last post by:
An application I wrote has been deployed on Citrix, and the Citrix admin tells me all users run the same .mde file. There aren't a lot of concurrent users, but even 2 could be cause for concern. ...
7
by: SK | last post by:
Hi, Would appreciate if anyone could help me on this. Basically my client having few branches across state. And they used Citrix in which to connect to the server side for accessing application...
5
by: Art | last post by:
Hi, We have some applications that run on a Citrix server. I would like to run one of them, a reporting app, from within a VB.net application. If I log into the Citrix server with remote...
7
by: Paul | last post by:
I have a VB.NET form with a DataGrid. When I toggle to Excel (for example) and then back to my application the repaint of the DataGrid is really slow. You can see the repainting happening. When...
0
by: roneon | last post by:
This is the problem that the topic starter posted: "we installed Oracle-Client 8.1.7 on a server with Windows 2000 Terminal-Services and Citrix Metaframe Xp. The Forms-Applications we ...
4
by: Peter | last post by:
I have the following code which works fine in IE6 and IE7 and FireFox, but when I run IE6 on Citrix I get "The page cannot be displayed" in the iframe. We don't have IE7 on Citrix so I can't try...
12
by: =?Utf-8?B?QXJ0?= | last post by:
Hi, I'm putting together an application in vb.net. I will ultimately need people to be able to run it from home (Normally we're in one office). I can store it on a file server, but this raises...
0
by: Charles Arthur | last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
0
by: emmanuelkatto | last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud. Please let me know. Thanks! Emmanuel
1
by: nemocccc | last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
1
by: Sonnysonu | last post by:
This is the data of csv file 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length. suppose the i have to...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID: 1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration. 2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
0
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
0
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
0
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.