I hope this isn't too confusing.
The following query runs pretty fast by itself, but when I want to use it in
a report (pasted below the query), it takes at least fifteen seconds to run!
Then I want to analyze the query in Excel and I have to do some manual
tweaking. I'd like to run this same query as a summary for the whole class
without having to manually do it in Excel, rather in an Access report, but
that gets even more complicated.
Here's the Access SQL:
SELECT students.studentID, courses.courseCode, groups.groupID,
activities.activityID, groups.groupWeight, groups.groupOrder,
activities.activityWeight, activities.activityOrder, studentScores.score,
students.[lname] & ", " & [fname] AS student,
[activities].[activityWeight]/DSum("activityweight","activities","groupID="
& [groups].[groupID]) AS ActivityPercentageWeight,
[groups].[groupWeight]/DSum("groupweight","groups","courseCode= '" &
[courses].[courseCode] & "'") AS GroupPercentageWeight,
[score]*[ActivityPercentageWeight]*[GroupPercentageWeight] AS
activityPoints, courses.courseDescription, activities.activityDescription
FROM students INNER JOIN (((courses INNER JOIN groups ON courses.courseCode
= groups.courseCode) INNER JOIN studentsInCourses ON courses.courseCode =
studentsInCourses.courseCode) INNER JOIN (activities INNER JOIN
studentScores ON activities.activityID = studentScores.activityID) ON
groups.groupID = activities.groupID) ON (students.studentID =
studentsInCourses.studentID) AND (students.studentID =
studentScores.studentID)
GROUP BY students.studentID, courses.courseCode, groups.groupID,
activities.activityID, groups.groupWeight, groups.groupOrder,
activities.activityWeight, activities.activityOrder, studentScores.score,
students.[lname] & ", " & [fname], courses.courseDescription,
activities.activityDescription;
I wonder how I could rewrite this to run faster? Or maybe the problem is
how the data is being retrieved in the report? Should I send the code
behind the report?
Here is an example of an actual student grade sheet (formatted for text, not
the actual formatting). It is based on a crosstab query called
qryStudentSummary (above).
Student Summary for: (NAME DELETED FOR PRIVACY)
45768 Course 2007 Spring English 1A MW 2 pm
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Group Participation Score Weight % Weight
Writing Center 0.0 1.0 50.00%
Discussion 75.0 1.0 50.00%
Group Weight: 10.0 total for group 3.75%
Group Critical Thinking Score Weight % Weight
Critical Thinking 0.0 1.0 100.00%
Group Weight: 5.0 total for group 0.00%
Group Essays Score Weight % Weight
Reflection 73.0 60.0 12.77%
Letter 10 Editor 75.0 35.0 7.45%
Scholarship 70.0 35.0 7.45%
Comparison 62.0 70.0 14.89%
Causal Analysis 75.0 80.0 17.02%
Definition 57.0 90.0 19.15%
Argument 75.0 100.0 21.28%
Group Weight: 30.0 total for group 20.70%
Group Research Score Weight % Weight
5 Power Figures 100.0 5.0 2.50%
Machiavelli Summary 100.0 5.0 2.50%
Proposal 100.0 5.0 2.50%
Annotated Bibliography 100.0 15.0 7.50%
Outline 87.0 10.0 5.00%
1st Draft 52.0 10.0 5.00%
2nd Draft 77.0 100.0 50.00%
3rd draft 0.0 50.0 25.00%
Group Weight: 15.0 total for group 9.07%
Group Exams Score Weight % Weight
Midterm 75.0 5.0 100.00%
Group Weight: 30.0 total for group 22.50%
(next page)
Student Summary for: (NAME DELETED FOR PRIVACY)
45768 Course 2007 Spring English 1A MW 2 pm
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Group In Class Work Score Weight % Weight
Cause/Effect Outline 100.0 1.0 4.55%
In-class Machiavelli 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Wooden 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Comparison introduction 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Cause/Effect Intro 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Rousseau 3 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Argument Proposal 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Definition Metaphor 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Definition Intro 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Rousseau 2 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Boys and Girls 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Rousseau 1 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Smith/Marx 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Smith/Marx essay 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Aristotle 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Gardner 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Self Evaluation 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Keynes/Galbraith/Reich 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Comparison Discussion 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Shipwreck 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Thoreau/King 50.0 1.0 4.55%
Eduction Discussion 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Group Weight: 10.0 total for group 6.59%
(next page)
Student Summary for: (NAME DELETED FOR PRIVACY)
45768 Course 2007 Spring English 1A MW 2 pm
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Course Average: 62.61%
Extra Credit 1.00%
Total 63.61% D
Although a letter grade of D is not considered failing, you must
earn a grade of C or better to pass to the next level. Please seek
help.
The letter grades work like this:
A = 92 or higher
B = 82-91
C = 72-81
D = 62-71
F = 61 or below 3 3572
See, if I include the group weights, group names, activity weights, and
activity names, it creates a bunch of extra rows. So I have to make an
extra step of plugging that data in manually in an Excel database, when I
would much rather create an Access report to do the same thing. It's hard
to format in text:
Each column: Group, Group weight, Activity, Activity Weight all above name.
Then beside each name within each column the score at the intersection.
first column below the first several rows:
Name:
Each column thereafter will be the scores.
If I weren't so close to this I would be confused. I get a little confused
just trying to explain the situation. I really do understand the problem.
I just don't know how to solve it. I'm in the middle of creating web pages
that will show the problem graphically with screen shots and code behind the
forms, etc.
"Richard Hollenbeck" <ri****************@verizon.netwrote in message
news:CCM9i.216$ng.19@trnddc07...
>I hope this isn't too confusing.
The following query runs pretty fast by itself, but when I want to use it
in a report (pasted below the query), it takes at least fifteen seconds to
run! Then I want to analyze the query in Excel and I have to do some
manual tweaking. I'd like to run this same query as a summary for the
whole class without having to manually do it in Excel, rather in an Access
report, but that gets even more complicated.
Here's the Access SQL:
SELECT students.studentID, courses.courseCode, groups.groupID,
activities.activityID, groups.groupWeight, groups.groupOrder,
activities.activityWeight, activities.activityOrder, studentScores.score,
students.[lname] & ", " & [fname] AS student,
[activities].[activityWeight]/DSum("activityweight","activities","groupID="
& [groups].[groupID]) AS ActivityPercentageWeight,
[groups].[groupWeight]/DSum("groupweight","groups","courseCode= '" &
[courses].[courseCode] & "'") AS GroupPercentageWeight,
[score]*[ActivityPercentageWeight]*[GroupPercentageWeight] AS
activityPoints, courses.courseDescription, activities.activityDescription
FROM students INNER JOIN (((courses INNER JOIN groups ON
courses.courseCode = groups.courseCode) INNER JOIN studentsInCourses ON
courses.courseCode = studentsInCourses.courseCode) INNER JOIN (activities
INNER JOIN studentScores ON activities.activityID =
studentScores.activityID) ON groups.groupID = activities.groupID) ON
(students.studentID = studentsInCourses.studentID) AND (students.studentID
= studentScores.studentID)
GROUP BY students.studentID, courses.courseCode, groups.groupID,
activities.activityID, groups.groupWeight, groups.groupOrder,
activities.activityWeight, activities.activityOrder, studentScores.score,
students.[lname] & ", " & [fname], courses.courseDescription,
activities.activityDescription;
I wonder how I could rewrite this to run faster? Or maybe the problem is
how the data is being retrieved in the report? Should I send the code
behind the report?
Here is an example of an actual student grade sheet (formatted for text,
not the actual formatting). It is based on a crosstab query called
qryStudentSummary (above).
Student Summary for: (NAME DELETED FOR PRIVACY)
45768 Course 2007 Spring English 1A MW 2 pm
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Group Participation Score Weight % Weight
Writing Center 0.0 1.0 50.00%
Discussion 75.0 1.0 50.00%
Group Weight: 10.0 total for group 3.75%
Group Critical Thinking Score Weight % Weight
Critical Thinking 0.0 1.0 100.00%
Group Weight: 5.0 total for group 0.00%
Group Essays Score Weight % Weight
Reflection 73.0 60.0 12.77%
Letter 10 Editor 75.0 35.0 7.45%
Scholarship 70.0 35.0 7.45%
Comparison 62.0 70.0 14.89%
Causal Analysis 75.0 80.0 17.02%
Definition 57.0 90.0 19.15%
Argument 75.0 100.0 21.28%
Group Weight: 30.0 total for group 20.70%
Group Research Score Weight % Weight
5 Power Figures 100.0 5.0 2.50%
Machiavelli Summary 100.0 5.0 2.50%
Proposal 100.0 5.0 2.50%
Annotated Bibliography 100.0 15.0 7.50%
Outline 87.0 10.0 5.00%
1st Draft 52.0 10.0 5.00%
2nd Draft 77.0 100.0 50.00%
3rd draft 0.0 50.0 25.00%
Group Weight: 15.0 total for group 9.07%
Group Exams Score Weight % Weight
Midterm 75.0 5.0 100.00%
Group Weight: 30.0 total for group 22.50%
(next page)
Student Summary for: (NAME DELETED FOR PRIVACY)
45768 Course 2007 Spring English 1A MW 2 pm
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Group In Class Work Score Weight % Weight
Cause/Effect Outline 100.0 1.0 4.55%
In-class Machiavelli 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Wooden 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Comparison introduction 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Cause/Effect Intro 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Rousseau 3 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Argument Proposal 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Definition Metaphor 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Definition Intro 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Rousseau 2 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Boys and Girls 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Rousseau 1 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Smith/Marx 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Smith/Marx essay 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Aristotle 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Gardner 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Self Evaluation 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Keynes/Galbraith/Reich 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Comparison Discussion 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Shipwreck 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Thoreau/King 50.0 1.0 4.55%
Eduction Discussion 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Group Weight: 10.0 total for group 6.59%
(next page)
Student Summary for: (NAME DELETED FOR PRIVACY)
45768 Course 2007 Spring English 1A MW 2 pm
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Course Average: 62.61%
Extra Credit 1.00%
Total 63.61% D
Although a letter grade of D is not considered failing, you must
earn a grade of C or better to pass to the next level. Please seek
help.
The letter grades work like this:
A = 92 or higher
B = 82-91
C = 72-81
D = 62-71
F = 61 or below
Actually a different query does a much better job but it doesn't include the
Activity and Group data. I can't use it for the grades sheet but it does
work for the spreadsheet. I just can't figure out how to get the Activity
and Group data into it without creating a bunch of extra rows:
PARAMETERS [Forms]![frmSelectCourse]![cboSelectCourse] Text ( 255 );
TRANSFORM Sum(studentScores.score) AS SumOfscore
SELECT studentsInCourses.courseCode, courses.courseDescription, [lName] & ",
" & [fName] & " " & [StudentNumber] AS Student
FROM students INNER JOIN (((courses INNER JOIN groups ON courses.courseCode
= groups.courseCode) INNER JOIN studentsInCourses ON courses.courseCode =
studentsInCourses.courseCode) INNER JOIN (activities INNER JOIN
studentScores ON activities.activityID = studentScores.activityID) ON
groups.groupID = activities.groupID) ON (students.studentID =
studentsInCourses.studentID) AND (students.studentID =
studentScores.studentID)
WHERE
(((studentsInCourses.courseCode)=[Forms]![frmSelectCourse]![cboSelectCourse]))
GROUP BY studentsInCourses.courseCode, courses.courseDescription, [lName] &
", " & [fName] & " " & [StudentNumber]
ORDER BY studentsInCourses.courseCode
PIVOT activities.activityDescription;
Group name and Group weight are both in a table called groups. Activity
name and Activity Weight are in a table called activities.
"Richard Hollenbeck" <ri****************@verizon.netwrote in message
news:CCM9i.216$ng.19@trnddc07...
>I hope this isn't too confusing.
The following query runs pretty fast by itself, but when I want to use it
in a report (pasted below the query), it takes at least fifteen seconds to
run! Then I want to analyze the query in Excel and I have to do some
manual tweaking. I'd like to run this same query as a summary for the
whole class without having to manually do it in Excel, rather in an Access
report, but that gets even more complicated.
Here's the Access SQL:
SELECT students.studentID, courses.courseCode, groups.groupID,
activities.activityID, groups.groupWeight, groups.groupOrder,
activities.activityWeight, activities.activityOrder, studentScores.score,
students.[lname] & ", " & [fname] AS student,
[activities].[activityWeight]/DSum("activityweight","activities","groupID="
& [groups].[groupID]) AS ActivityPercentageWeight,
[groups].[groupWeight]/DSum("groupweight","groups","courseCode= '" &
[courses].[courseCode] & "'") AS GroupPercentageWeight,
[score]*[ActivityPercentageWeight]*[GroupPercentageWeight] AS
activityPoints, courses.courseDescription, activities.activityDescription
FROM students INNER JOIN (((courses INNER JOIN groups ON
courses.courseCode = groups.courseCode) INNER JOIN studentsInCourses ON
courses.courseCode = studentsInCourses.courseCode) INNER JOIN (activities
INNER JOIN studentScores ON activities.activityID =
studentScores.activityID) ON groups.groupID = activities.groupID) ON
(students.studentID = studentsInCourses.studentID) AND (students.studentID
= studentScores.studentID)
GROUP BY students.studentID, courses.courseCode, groups.groupID,
activities.activityID, groups.groupWeight, groups.groupOrder,
activities.activityWeight, activities.activityOrder, studentScores.score,
students.[lname] & ", " & [fname], courses.courseDescription,
activities.activityDescription;
I wonder how I could rewrite this to run faster? Or maybe the problem is
how the data is being retrieved in the report? Should I send the code
behind the report?
Here is an example of an actual student grade sheet (formatted for text,
not the actual formatting). It is based on a crosstab query called
qryStudentSummary (above).
Student Summary for: (NAME DELETED FOR PRIVACY)
45768 Course 2007 Spring English 1A MW 2 pm
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Group Participation Score Weight % Weight
Writing Center 0.0 1.0 50.00%
Discussion 75.0 1.0 50.00%
Group Weight: 10.0 total for group 3.75%
Group Critical Thinking Score Weight % Weight
Critical Thinking 0.0 1.0 100.00%
Group Weight: 5.0 total for group 0.00%
Group Essays Score Weight % Weight
Reflection 73.0 60.0 12.77%
Letter 10 Editor 75.0 35.0 7.45%
Scholarship 70.0 35.0 7.45%
Comparison 62.0 70.0 14.89%
Causal Analysis 75.0 80.0 17.02%
Definition 57.0 90.0 19.15%
Argument 75.0 100.0 21.28%
Group Weight: 30.0 total for group 20.70%
Group Research Score Weight % Weight
5 Power Figures 100.0 5.0 2.50%
Machiavelli Summary 100.0 5.0 2.50%
Proposal 100.0 5.0 2.50%
Annotated Bibliography 100.0 15.0 7.50%
Outline 87.0 10.0 5.00%
1st Draft 52.0 10.0 5.00%
2nd Draft 77.0 100.0 50.00%
3rd draft 0.0 50.0 25.00%
Group Weight: 15.0 total for group 9.07%
Group Exams Score Weight % Weight
Midterm 75.0 5.0 100.00%
Group Weight: 30.0 total for group 22.50%
(next page)
Student Summary for: (NAME DELETED FOR PRIVACY)
45768 Course 2007 Spring English 1A MW 2 pm
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Group In Class Work Score Weight % Weight
Cause/Effect Outline 100.0 1.0 4.55%
In-class Machiavelli 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Wooden 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Comparison introduction 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Cause/Effect Intro 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Rousseau 3 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Argument Proposal 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Definition Metaphor 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Definition Intro 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Rousseau 2 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Boys and Girls 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Rousseau 1 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Smith/Marx 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Smith/Marx essay 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Aristotle 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Gardner 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Self Evaluation 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Keynes/Galbraith/Reich 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Comparison Discussion 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Shipwreck 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Thoreau/King 50.0 1.0 4.55%
Eduction Discussion 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Group Weight: 10.0 total for group 6.59%
(next page)
Student Summary for: (NAME DELETED FOR PRIVACY)
45768 Course 2007 Spring English 1A MW 2 pm
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Course Average: 62.61%
Extra Credit 1.00%
Total 63.61% D
Although a letter grade of D is not considered failing, you must
earn a grade of C or better to pass to the next level. Please seek
help.
The letter grades work like this:
A = 92 or higher
B = 82-91
C = 72-81
D = 62-71
F = 61 or below
Richard Hollenbeck wrote:
I hope this isn't too confusing.
The following query runs pretty fast by itself, but when I want to use it in
a report (pasted below the query), it takes at least fifteen seconds to run!
Then I want to analyze the query in Excel and I have to do some manual
tweaking. I'd like to run this same query as a summary for the whole class
without having to manually do it in Excel, rather in an Access report, but
that gets even more complicated.
Sometimes what I will do is create a couple of sub queries that
gets/rolls up specific data. IOW, I would take your query and break it
up. Then create a new query and add those queries and any other tables
still missing and run it.
>
Here's the Access SQL:
SELECT students.studentID, courses.courseCode, groups.groupID,
activities.activityID, groups.groupWeight, groups.groupOrder,
activities.activityWeight, activities.activityOrder, studentScores.score,
students.[lname] & ", " & [fname] AS student,
[activities].[activityWeight]/DSum("activityweight","activities","groupID="
& [groups].[groupID]) AS ActivityPercentageWeight,
[groups].[groupWeight]/DSum("groupweight","groups","courseCode= '" &
[courses].[courseCode] & "'") AS GroupPercentageWeight,
[score]*[ActivityPercentageWeight]*[GroupPercentageWeight] AS
activityPoints, courses.courseDescription, activities.activityDescription
FROM students INNER JOIN (((courses INNER JOIN groups ON courses.courseCode
= groups.courseCode) INNER JOIN studentsInCourses ON courses.courseCode =
studentsInCourses.courseCode) INNER JOIN (activities INNER JOIN
studentScores ON activities.activityID = studentScores.activityID) ON
groups.groupID = activities.groupID) ON (students.studentID =
studentsInCourses.studentID) AND (students.studentID =
studentScores.studentID)
GROUP BY students.studentID, courses.courseCode, groups.groupID,
activities.activityID, groups.groupWeight, groups.groupOrder,
activities.activityWeight, activities.activityOrder, studentScores.score,
students.[lname] & ", " & [fname], courses.courseDescription,
activities.activityDescription;
I wonder how I could rewrite this to run faster? Or maybe the problem is
how the data is being retrieved in the report? Should I send the code
behind the report?
Here is an example of an actual student grade sheet (formatted for text, not
the actual formatting). It is based on a crosstab query called
qryStudentSummary (above).
Student Summary for: (NAME DELETED FOR PRIVACY)
45768 Course 2007 Spring English 1A MW 2 pm
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Group Participation Score Weight % Weight
Writing Center 0.0 1.0 50.00%
Discussion 75.0 1.0 50.00%
Group Weight: 10.0 total for group 3.75%
Group Critical Thinking Score Weight % Weight
Critical Thinking 0.0 1.0 100.00%
Group Weight: 5.0 total for group 0.00%
Group Essays Score Weight % Weight
Reflection 73.0 60.0 12.77%
Letter 10 Editor 75.0 35.0 7.45%
Scholarship 70.0 35.0 7.45%
Comparison 62.0 70.0 14.89%
Causal Analysis 75.0 80.0 17.02%
Definition 57.0 90.0 19.15%
Argument 75.0 100.0 21.28%
Group Weight: 30.0 total for group 20.70%
Group Research Score Weight % Weight
5 Power Figures 100.0 5.0 2.50%
Machiavelli Summary 100.0 5.0 2.50%
Proposal 100.0 5.0 2.50%
Annotated Bibliography 100.0 15.0 7.50%
Outline 87.0 10.0 5.00%
1st Draft 52.0 10.0 5.00%
2nd Draft 77.0 100.0 50.00%
3rd draft 0.0 50.0 25.00%
Group Weight: 15.0 total for group 9.07%
Group Exams Score Weight % Weight
Midterm 75.0 5.0 100.00%
Group Weight: 30.0 total for group 22.50%
(next page)
Student Summary for: (NAME DELETED FOR PRIVACY)
45768 Course 2007 Spring English 1A MW 2 pm
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Group In Class Work Score Weight % Weight
Cause/Effect Outline 100.0 1.0 4.55%
In-class Machiavelli 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Wooden 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Comparison introduction 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Cause/Effect Intro 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Rousseau 3 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Argument Proposal 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Definition Metaphor 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Definition Intro 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Rousseau 2 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Boys and Girls 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Rousseau 1 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Smith/Marx 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Smith/Marx essay 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Aristotle 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Gardner 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Self Evaluation 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Keynes/Galbraith/Reich 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Comparison Discussion 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Shipwreck 0.0 1.0 4.55%
Thoreau/King 50.0 1.0 4.55%
Eduction Discussion 100.0 1.0 4.55%
Group Weight: 10.0 total for group 6.59%
(next page)
Student Summary for: (NAME DELETED FOR PRIVACY)
45768 Course 2007 Spring English 1A MW 2 pm
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Course Average: 62.61%
Extra Credit 1.00%
Total 63.61% D
Although a letter grade of D is not considered failing, you must
earn a grade of C or better to pass to the next level. Please seek
help.
The letter grades work like this:
A = 92 or higher
B = 82-91
C = 72-81
D = 62-71
F = 61 or below
This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Gary Wales |
last post by:
We have two main query types running against a table of some 2 million
rows and have gotten query response down to well under a second by
using the right indexes.
Problem is that we are running...
|
by: DJJ |
last post by:
I am using the MySQL ODBC 3.51 driver to link three relatively small MySQL
tables to a Microsoft Access 2003 database. I am finding that the data from
the MySQL tables takes a hell of a long time...
|
by: psql-mail |
last post by:
I am running a SELECT to get all tuples within a given date range. This
query is much slwoer than i expected - am i missing something?
I have a table 'meta' with a column 'in_date' of type...
|
by: Yonatan Goraly |
last post by:
I am in the process of adding PostgreSQL support for an application, in
addition to Oracle and MS SQL.
I am using PostgreSQL version 7.3.2, Red Hat 9.0 on Intel Pentium III board.
I have a...
|
by: cefrancke |
last post by:
Are there any ways to speed up a Cumulative sum in a query or perhaps
another faster way to have a cumulative sum column (call a vba
function?).
For example, I want to sum up all values under...
|
by: roiavidan |
last post by:
Hi,
I'm having a bit of a problem with a small application I wrote in C#,
which uses an Access database (mdb file) for storing financial data.
After looking for a similiar topic and failing to...
|
by: Andy_Khosravi |
last post by:
My problem:
I'm having trouble with a query taking much too long to run; a query
without any criteria evaluating only 650 records takes over 300 seconds
to run (over the network. On local drive...
|
by: Emin |
last post by:
Dear Experts,
I have a fairly simple query in which adding a where clause slows
things down by at least a factor of 100. The following is the slow
version of the query
...
|
by: Gilles Ganault |
last post by:
Hello
A friend of mine is running a LAMP (PHP, MySQL, Apache,
Debian) Web 2.0 site on a dedicated, hosted server with about 300
connected users when it's really busy.
The server is an Intel...
|
by: existential.philosophy |
last post by:
This is a new problem for me: I have some queries that open very
slowly in design view.
My benchmark query takes about 20 minutes to open in design view. That
same query takes about 20 minutes...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 7 Feb 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this month's session, the creator of the excellent VBE...
|
by: DolphinDB |
last post by:
The formulas of 101 quantitative trading alphas used by WorldQuant were presented in the paper 101 Formulaic Alphas. However, some formulas are complex, leading to challenges in calculation.
Take...
|
by: Aftab Ahmad |
last post by:
Hello Experts!
I have written a code in MS Access for a cmd called "WhatsApp Message" to open WhatsApp using that very code but the problem is that it gives a popup message everytime I clicked on...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
ExcelToDatabase: batch import excel into database automatically...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM).
In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM).
In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
|
by: Vimpel783 |
last post by:
Hello!
Guys, I found this code on the Internet, but I need to modify it a little. It works well, the problem is this: Data is sent from only one cell, in this case B5, but it is necessary that data...
|
by: ArrayDB |
last post by:
The error message I've encountered is; ERROR:root:Error generating model response: exception: access violation writing 0x0000000000005140, which seems to be indicative of an access violation...
|
by: PapaRatzi |
last post by:
Hello,
I am teaching myself MS Access forms design and Visual Basic. I've created a table to capture a list of Top 30 singles and forms to capture new entries. The final step is a form (unbound)...
| |