473,405 Members | 2,272 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,405 software developers and data experts.

Theoretical definition for the number of unique values?


Hi Everyone,
Here is a theoretical, and definition question for you.
In databases, we have:
Relation
a table with columns and rows
Attribute
a named column/field of a relation
Domain
a set of allowable values for one or more attributes

Tuple
a row of a relation
Degree
the number of attributes a relation contains
Number of fields in a table
Cardinality
the number of tuples/rows a relation contains


But!

What is the definition for the number of unique values in a field?

So, if you have 100 rows in a table, and the field is
the gender field, with only values of: M, F.
The result is 2 unique values.
What do we call this concept?
"the number of unique values in a column?"

Is there one?
Thanks a lot!

Apr 12 '07 #1
8 2044
sq*************@yahoo.com wrote:
In databases, we have:

Relation
a table with columns and rows

Attribute
a named column/field of a relation

Domain
a set of allowable values for one or more attributes

Tuple
a row of a relation

Degree
the number of attributes a relation contains
Number of fields in a table

Cardinality
the number of tuples/rows a relation contains

But!

What is the definition for the number of unique values in a field?

So, if you have 100 rows in a table, and the field is
the gender field, with only values of: M, F.
The result is 2 unique values.

What do we call this concept?
"the number of unique values in a column?"

Is there one?
Using your definitions, it'd probably be "the cardinality of the
domain."
Larry Coon
University of California
Apr 12 '07 #2
On Apr 12, 11:47 am, sqlservernew...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,

Here is a theoretical, and definition question for you.

In databases, we have:

Relation
a table with columns and rows

Attribute
a named column/field of a relation

Domain
a set of allowable values for one or more attributes

Tuple
a row of a relation

Degree
the number of attributes a relation contains
Number of fields in a table

Cardinality
the number of tuples/rows a relation contains

But!

What is the definition for the number of unique values in a field?

So, if you have 100 rows in a table, and the field is
the gender field, with only values of: M, F.
The result is 2 unique values.

What do we call this concept?
"the number of unique values in a column?"

Is there one?

Thanks a lot!
distinct values

For a column or set of columns which together an index is created from
you can think of it as distinct keys

Apr 12 '07 #3
sq*************@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Here is a theoretical, and definition question for you.
In databases, we have:
Relation
a table with columns and rows
Attribute
a named column/field of a relation
Domain
a set of allowable values for one or more attributes

Tuple
a row of a relation
Degree
the number of attributes a relation contains
Number of fields in a table
Cardinality
the number of tuples/rows a relation contains


But!

What is the definition for the number of unique values in a field?

So, if you have 100 rows in a table, and the field is
the gender field, with only values of: M, F.
The result is 2 unique values.
What do we call this concept?
"the number of unique values in a column?"

Is there one?
Thanks a lot!
(Column) Cardinality = number of distinct column/attribute values.
Table Cardinality = number of rows in a table.

--
Jeroen
Apr 12 '07 #4
In article <46*********************@news.xs4all.nl>,
us****@No.Spam.Please.invalid says...
sq*************@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Here is a theoretical, and definition question for you.
In databases, we have:
Relation
a table with columns and rows
Attribute
a named column/field of a relation
Domain
a set of allowable values for one or more attributes

Tuple
a row of a relation
Degree
the number of attributes a relation contains
Number of fields in a table
Cardinality
the number of tuples/rows a relation contains


But!

What is the definition for the number of unique values in a field?

So, if you have 100 rows in a table, and the field is
the gender field, with only values of: M, F.
The result is 2 unique values.
What do we call this concept?
"the number of unique values in a column?"

Is there one?
Thanks a lot!

(Column) Cardinality = number of distinct column/attribute values.
Table Cardinality = number of rows in a table.
Shouldn't that be *distinct* (non-duplicate) rows in the table?
--
Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the
newsgroups if possible).
Apr 12 '07 #5
On Apr 12, 4:14 pm, David Kerber
<ns_dkerber@ns_WarrenRogersAssociates.comwrote:
In article <461e877b$0$328$e4fe5...@news.xs4all.nl>,
use...@No.Spam.Please.invalid says...
sqlservernew...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Here is a theoretical, and definition question for you.
In databases, we have:
Relation
a table with columns and rows
Attribute
a named column/field of a relation
Domain
a set of allowable values for one or more attributes
Tuple
a row of a relation
Degree
the number of attributes a relation contains
Number of fields in a table
Cardinality
the number of tuples/rows a relation contains
But!
What is the definition for the number of unique values in a field?
So, if you have 100 rows in a table, and the field is
the gender field, with only values of: M, F.
The result is 2 unique values.
What do we call this concept?
"the number of unique values in a column?"
Is there one?
Thanks a lot!
(Column) Cardinality = number of distinct column/attribute values.
Table Cardinality = number of rows in a table.

Shouldn't that be *distinct* (non-duplicate) rows in the table?
I believe that one of the cardinal rules (pun intended) of RDBMS
theory is that a table can never have duplicate rows.
--
Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the
newsgroups if possible).

Apr 12 '07 #6
Here is a theoretical, and definition question for you.
In databases, we have:
Relation
a table with columns and rows
Attribute
a named column/field of a relation
Domain
a set of allowable values for one or more attributes
Tuple
a row of a relation
Degree
the number of attributes a relation contains
Number of fields in a table
Cardinality
the number of tuples/rows a relation contains
But!
What is the definition for the number of unique values in a field?
So, if you have 100 rows in a table, and the field is
the gender field, with only values of: M, F.
The result is 2 unique values.
What do we call this concept?
"the number of unique values in a column?"
Is there one?
Thanks a lot!
(Column) Cardinality = number of distinct column/attribute values.
Table Cardinality = number of rows in a table.
Shouldn't that be *distinct* (non-duplicate) rows in the table?

I believe that one of the cardinal rules (pun intended) of RDBMS
theory is that a table can never have duplicate rows.
True. There's no point in having duplicate rows, cause you can't tell
which one you're handling :-)

--
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - development tool for MySQL, and more!
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
My thoughts:
http://blog.upscene.com/martijn/
Database development questions? Check the forum!
http://www.databasedevelopmentforum.com
Apr 13 '07 #7
In article <46***********************@dreader14.news.xs4all.n l>,
m.******@upscene.removethis.com says...
>
Here is a theoretical, and definition question for you.
>
In databases, we have:
>
Relation
a table with columns and rows
>
Attribute
a named column/field of a relation
>
Domain
a set of allowable values for one or more attributes
>
Tuple
a row of a relation
>
Degree
the number of attributes a relation contains
Number of fields in a table
>
Cardinality
the number of tuples/rows a relation contains
>
But!
>
What is the definition for the number of unique values in a field?
>
So, if you have 100 rows in a table, and the field is
the gender field, with only values of: M, F.
The result is 2 unique values.
>
What do we call this concept?
"the number of unique values in a column?"
>
Is there one?
>
Thanks a lot!
>
(Column) Cardinality = number of distinct column/attribute values.
Table Cardinality = number of rows in a table.
>
Shouldn't that be *distinct* (non-duplicate) rows in the table?
I believe that one of the cardinal rules (pun intended) of RDBMS
theory is that a table can never have duplicate rows.

True. There's no point in having duplicate rows, cause you can't tell
which one you're handling :-)
True, but are you telling me you've never had it happen accidentally??
--
Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the
newsgroups if possible).
Apr 13 '07 #8
David Kerber wrote:
>True. There's no point in having duplicate rows, cause you can't tell
which one you're handling :-)

True, but are you telling me you've never had it happen accidentally??
Assuming the database is being used as more than an electronic form
of Excel or 3x5 cards ... no. Primary key constraints were invented
for a reason. Like seat belts they are most useful when used.
--
Daniel A. Morgan
University of Washington
da******@x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Puget Sound Oracle Users Group
www.psoug.org
Apr 13 '07 #9

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

11
by: sqlservernewbie | last post by:
Hi Everyone, Here is a theoretical, and definition question for you. In databases, we have: Relation a table with columns and rows
0
by: emmanuelkatto | last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud. Please let me know. Thanks! Emmanuel
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID: 1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration. 2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
0
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
0
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
0
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
0
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM). In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.