On 5 Aug 2005 19:12:05 -0700, "lauren quantrell"
<la*************@hotmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for that clarification. I fortunately got to this message
before I finished responding to your OP :-)
I still like the "bitch about the 'best viewed with' resolution, and
offer two choices: Adjust_Resolution, and Exit.
Sometimes people like John can be helped with a larger monitor. I've
worked with an organization with one scary user (I would not want to
meet her in traffic) who was at 640*480 on a 21" monitor, which was
all she could work with with her vision. The organization accommodated
her as much as possible, which I think is a good thing. Forcing her to
go to 1024 would mean a VERY large monitor or she would have to quit
her job...
-Tom.
Before I spark the ire of the community at large (is Larry online?) let
me revise my poorly prepared question (for which I have already
uncovered a solution)...
User John Backwards works in a mid-size company where he has been told
repeatedly that the minimum resolution for an enterprise level
application is 1024 x768. The application was developed for that spec
at a fairly large cost to the company and 1000+ users in many countries
over LAN/WAN/VPN connections use the application successfully. But poor
John Backwards calls tech support and puts in trouble tickets when, at
800 x 600 resolution, he can't see the bottom of certain forms or click
certain links.
Since poor John Backwards seems imune from termination, there seems to
be two solutions:
1.) force the screen to 1024 and maybe he (and a few of his cousins)
won't notice
2.) detect the 800 x 600 resolution and display a nasty message that
stays on his screen for maybe ten minutes explaining why he shouldn't
call tech support anymore when he can't perform certain actions.
There are probably other solutions but these two seem best for the
present mood.
lq