From:

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...0f97a90?hl=en&
Errata:

19 solar years = 2939.6018 days should be

19 solar years = 6939.6018 days

Easter Function explanation Part II

Terms:

luna XIV - the 14th day of the first lunar month of spring, also called

the 'Paschal term' because Easter is the Sunday after it.

feria - day of the week on which any given date falls, expressed either

by its name or by a number: 1 = Sunday

bissextile - Roman name for the leap day in a leap year the 'twice

sixth' denoting the repetition of the 'sixth day before the Kalends of

March', 24 February.

millésime - the number of the year in an era

indiction - a 15-year cycle devised in the later Roman empire for

taxation purposes, and long maintained as a dating formula

Golden Number - the number indicating the place of the year in the

decemnovenal cycle as used by the Western Church, found by adding 1 to

the year AD and dividing the sum by 19; the remainder is the GN, or if

there is no remainder, the GN is 19

epact - Age of the moon on a given day of the solar year, especially in

Easter computus that on 1 January, 22 March, or 31 December

concurrent - number related to how many days from the Paschal term

until Easter Sunday

Sunday Letter - method using letters that replaced the use of

concurrents

All quotes are from the Oxford Companion to the Year by Bonnie

Blackburn and Leofranc Holford-Strevens. The authors have obviously

made ancient and modern calendar systems a lifelong pursuit. Also,

Leofranc's understanding of many ancient, Middle Age and modern

languages is phenomenal and inspiring. I also sense from the authors'

comments that there is a scattering of people throughout the globe that

share his obsession. First I'll give their explanation of Gauss'

formula:

pp 864 - 865

"

Readers with a facility for mental arithmetic may prefer to find Easter

by a formula derived from the celebrated mathematician Carl Friedrich

Gauss (1777-1855), directed at determining first the number of days by

which luna XV (not luna XIV) falls later than its earliest possible

date, 22 March, and then the number of days from luna XV to Sunday;

when both are 0, Easter falls on 22 March. Let year AD be Y; take the

remainder of Y to 19, 4, and 7 respectively:

a is congruent to Y mod 19

b is congruent to Y mod 4

c is congruent to Y mod 7

For the Julian canlendar put:

d is congruent to 19a + 15 (mod 30)

e is congruent to 2b + 4c + 6d + 6 (mod 7)

Easter = 22 + d + e March, or d + e - 9 April

As always, things are not so simple in the Gregorian calendar. Put

S = [Y / 100] (i.e., divide by 100 and ignore the remainder)

s = [(S - 17) / 25] (=0 down to 4299)

M is congruent to 15 + S - [S / 4] - [(S - s) /3] (mod 30)

d is congruent to 19a + M (mod 30)

except that:

if M = 0, 3, 6, 8, 11, 14, 17, 19, 22, 25, 27, and 19a + M (mod 30) =

29, d = 28.

if M = 2, 5, 10, 13, 16, 21, 24, 29, and 19a + M (mod 30) = 29, d = 27.

N is congruent to S - 3 - [S / 4] (mod 7)

e is congruent to 2b + 4c + 6d + N (mod 7)

Then, as before,

Easter = 22 + d + e March, or d + e - 9 April

Century M N

1500-1699 22 2

1700-99 23 3

1800-99 23 4

1900-2099 24 5

2100-99 24 6

2200-99 25 0

2300-99 26 1

2400-99 25 1

"

pp 801-802

"

METONIC CYCLES The mean length of the synodic month or lunation, from

new moon to new moon, is 29.53059 days; the traditional approximation

of 29 1/2 days, taken over by the Christian computists, entails an

alternation of 30-day 'full' months and 29-day 'hollow' months. On

this footing, 12 months amount to 354 days, 11 days fewer than the

calendar year of 365 days; the deficit is made up by adding extra

'embolismic' months of 30 days at various points in a cycle designed to

correlate the lunar with the solar year. In accordance with a

tradition that Jews, Greeks, and early Romans had kept their calendar

in touch with the sun by intercalating three months in every eight

years, the earliest Easter computus was based on the eight-year cycle

or oktaeteris, which inserted an embolism in years 3, 6 and 8; but a

more accurate device is the 19-year cycle or enneakaidekaeteris, known

as the Metonic cycle after the Athenian astronomer Meton (fl. 432 BC)

based on the near-equivalence of 235 synodic months = 6939.68865 days

and 19 tropical years = 6939.6018 days. Depending on the

starting-point, embolisms will occur at three- and two-year intervals,

combining into subcycles of eight years (intercalated 3, 3, 2) and

eleven (intercalated 3, 3, 3, 2); these are known respectively as the

ogdoad and the hendecad, terms of no practical use, but often flaunted

by computists.

....

SOLAR YEARS Since the common year contains 365 is congruent to 1 mod 7

days, in any two consecutive common years any given date will fall one

feria later in the second than the first; since leap year contains 366

is congruent to 2 mod 7 days the difference will be two feriae if leap

day intervenes. It is therefore possible, knowing the feria of a given

date in a particular year, to finds its feria in any subsequent year by

adding one day for each year elapsed and one day for each leap year;

that is to say, dividing the number of years by 4, ignoring the

remainder, and adding the quotient to the dividend. In an era reckoned

by current years, as is normal outside India, the feria of the first

day in any year can be determined by the ferial formula Y + [Y / 4] + P

(mod 7); add to the year of the era its quarter, ignoring fractions,

and a parameter corresponding to the feria of the day preceding the

first day of the era (since 1 will be added for year 1), and take the

remainder to 7. However, in the Julian calendar the ferial cycle of 7

days and the bissextile cycle of 4 years have a combined periodicity of

28 years, known as the solar cycle; one may therefore apply the ferial

formula not to the millésime of the year, but to its place in the

solar cycle of the calendar in question, except for the Western

calendar, in which this method dispenses with the parameter 9 required

on p. 811.

PASCHAL CYCLES The 19- and 28- year cycles combine to form a 532-year

sequence, devised by Annianus in the early fifth century and stumbled

into a few decades later by Victorius of Aquitaine, variously known as

a 'Great Cycle', a 'Great Year', a 'Paschal cycle', alpha (because in

Greek the numerical value of the constituent letters is 532), and in

Russian as a 'Great Indiction'. In the Julian calendar, though not the

Gregorian, Easter in any year falls on the same date as it did 532 or

1064 years previously.

"

pp 817-818

"

When Pope Gregory XIII changed the style in 1582, he did not change the

definition of Easter, which remained the Sunday after the 14th lune on

or next after 21 March, but advanced 21 March nominal by 10 days to the

natural day previously called the 11th, with provision for further

transference to the 10th, the 9th, the 8th, and so forth. As a result,

14th lunes that had hitherto preceded 21 March now followed it, and

constituted Paschal terms. The 532-year cycle therefore needed to be

replaced; the opportunity was also taken to compensate for the excess

in the true synodic month. Moreover, since the Golden Numbers could no

longer be written against the new moons in the calendar unless a new

calendar were prepared from century to century, they were confined to

the ancillary function of indicating the epact, which became once more

the basis of the computus; its seat was moved from 22 March to 31

December in the previous year, so that Gregorian epact e corresponds to

pre-Dionysian E - 1.

In each century (defined for this purpose as running from 00 to 99) the

19 Golden Numbers, still equivalent to Y + 1 (mod 7) [I believe the

author meant mod 19], correspond to 19 different epacts, increasing by

11 with a saltus at the end of the cycle; but the epacts change from

century to century (see Table 7). Every time an intercalation is

suppressed, the epact is reduced by one; for ease of reckoning, the

reduction, known as the 'solar correction', is made with effect from 1

January instead of 25 February. However, to compensate (a little too

much) for the excess of the true synodic month over 29.5 days, the

epact is increased eight times in 2500 years; this 'lunar correction'

is made seven times after 300 years and the eighth after 400. Only in

centennial leap years does it actually increase the epact; otherwise it

cancels the solar correction, as when it was first made in 1800, which

was deemed the last in a 2500-year cycle. Of the future corrections,

due every 300 years up to and including 3900 but not again till 4300,

only those of 2400 and 3600 will actually augment the epact; in all

other cases (2100, 2700, 3000, 3300, 3900, 4300) the solar correction

will be cancelled. Hence in years divisible by 400 the epact rises if

there is a lunar correction and otherwise remains the same; in other

centennial years it remains the same if there is a lunar correction and

otherwise diminishes by 1.

Each set of epacts is set out in a line with an index-letter, also used

in the Roman Martyrology (See App. E). The epacts from 15 October 1582

to 31 December 1599 stand on line D; thereafter the lines are:

1600 D (no correction)

1700 C (solar correction only)

1800 C (solar correction cancelled by lunar)

1900 B (solar correction only)

2000 B (no correction)

2100 B (solar correction cancelled by lunar)

2200 A (solar correction only)

2300 u (solar correction only)

2400 A (lunar correction only)

Hence the epacts of 1900 will remain in force down to 2199.

"

pp. 809-810

"

Dionysius' first year, 532, was exactly divisible without remainder.

Now since 248 = 13 x 19 + 1, this year was the first of a new cycle;

since 532 = 28 x 19 without remainder, the place of a year AD is found

by adding 1, dividing by 19, and taking the remainder (treating 0 as

19). This was later known in the West as the Golden Number, in which

'Golden' means 'especially important', as in Golden Rule and Golden

Section;

....

The concurrent is found by the ferial formula with parameter 4;

....

Thus to find the date of Easter in 729:

719 _ 1 = 730 = 19 x 38 + 8 therefore Golden Nubmer = 8 therefore epact

= 17

or 729 = 19 x 38 + 7; 7 x 11 = 77; 77 = 30 x 2 + 17 therefore epact =

17

"

p. 811

"

Concurrents recur in a solar cycle of 28 years, after which years must

repeat in respect both of intercalation and the feria of 1 January. In

order that the first four years of the cycle should have concurrents 1,

2, 3, and 4, a new cycle was taken to begin in 9 BC; AD 1 is solar

cycle 10, and the cyclical place of any year is found by adding 9 and

dividing by 28; the ferial formula may then be applied without the

addition of a parameter. Thus 729 + 9 = 738 = 28 x 26 + 10; [10 / 4] =

2; 10 + 2 = 12 is congruent to 4 mod 7, therefore concurrent = 5. In

the later Middle Ages the concurrent was discarded in favour of the

Sunday Letter;

"

BTW, the Golden Number for 2005 is 11 (p. 876). England adoped the

Gregorian calendar in 1752. In spite of the epact being referred to as

e, the e in Gauss' formula has almost nothing to do with the epact.

For the Julian part of Gauss' solution, 'a' is related to the where the

year is in the 19 year Metonic cycle. 'b' and 'c' are related to the

28 year solar cycle formed by leap years every four years and the seven

possible days. 'd' is approximately the number of days after the

equinox when the moon becomes full. 'e' is the number of days after

that day until Easter Sunday. The 19a + 15 (mod 30) is related to the

fact that the epact retreats by 11 days each year. -11 is congruent to

19 mod 30. The 15 gets you from the new moon to approximately the full

moon. I discovered what the mod 30 was for when I did an astronomical

calculation of Easter using the continuous values. Using the

continuous values, the epact moved about within a 29.53059 day window.

Gauss wisely started 0 as the day following the equinox. So the window

actually goes from 0 to about 28.5 and taking a number mod 30 gives you

from 0 to 29. There is nearly half day difference between the

continuous value and the integer value which I assume is moved forward

from the start of the equinox. It also handles the problem of the

epact in relation to the equinox apparently backing up by 11.25 in

non-leap years (365.25 - 354) in relation to the sun. The good news is

that if the Weekday function is kept up to date (say until 8914 AD),

once you have 'd' you can calculate the Sunday on or after that day.

The variable M is related to the lunar correction necessary to keep in

line with the equinox. The variable N is related to the solar

correction above and beyond the normal four year leap year cycle. A

key fact is that, unlike so many methods in the past, just about

everyone agrees with Gauss' solution. So my proposed Easter function,

awaiting some final verification involving having a function implement

the full Gauss solution and comparing the values of the two for about

the next 6000 years is:

Public Function IsEaster(dtTestDate As Date) As Boolean

Dim M As Integer

Dim d As Integer

Dim y As Integer

Dim DT As Date

Dim S1 As Integer 'S

Dim S2 As Integer 's

IsEaster2 = False

If Month(dtTestDate) < 3 Or Month(dtTestDate) > 4 Then Exit Function

If Month(dtTestDate) = 3 And Day(dtTestDate) < 22 Then Exit Function

If Month(dtTestDate) = 4 And Day(dtTestDate) > 25 Then Exit Function

y = Year(dtTestDate)

S1 = y \ 100

S2 = (S1 - 17) \ 25

M = (15 + S1 - S1 \ 4 - (S1 - S2) \ 3) Mod 30

d = (19 * (y Mod 19) + M) Mod 30

Select Case d

Case 29:

Select Case M

Case 0, 3, 6, 8, 11, 14, 17, 19, 22, 25, 27:

d = 28

Case 2, 5, 10, 13, 16, 21, 24, 29:

d = 27

End Select

End Select

DT = DateAdd("d", d, DateSerial(y, 3, 22))

DT = DT + (8 - WeekDay(DT)) Mod 7

If Month(dtTestDate) = Month(DT) And Day(dtTestDate) = Day(DT) Then

IsEaster = True

End Function

James A. Fortune

These [Easter and the dependent feasts and fasts] are reckoned

according to a Metonic cycle that for 528 years out of 532 yields the

normal Julian Easter, but in the remaining four causes Easter to be

kept on 13 April instead of the 6th. These 'false Easters' have been a

subject for discord between the Armenians and the 'Greeks and

Georgians' - p. 740

It would be sadly ironic if the dispute and resulting bad feelings over

when to hold a religious holiday played any part in what happened to

the Armenians in Turkey not too many years later.