"Richard W Collens" <rc**************@hemmingway.com> wrote:
Just wondering if there is any real need to convert an application from 2000
or XP to 2003, if the application is not going to grow or change. Ive had a
couple people ask about it (converting to 2003) but I can't see a reason
they should other than their IT manager want's to buy new stuff.
Been working in A2003 and I really like the smart tags Access pops up on the controls
For example I added some &s to some unassociated labels. Access promptly tells me
they're unassociated and gives me an option to associate the label to a control.
Nice.
Or if you've renamed fields in the tables the controls based on the old names are
obviously incorrect. Now a little triangle appears in the corner. Again nice.
I created a report and I see a little flag in that little grey box in the upper left
hand corner of the report. I click on it and see a "Common Report Error" "Report
width is greater than page width" with a bunch of options.
Someone spent some time on these little touches.
I'm working in A2003. But the users will be given an A2000 MDE. So long as I use
no new features I should be fine with that.
Very nice. I can see how this would help the newbie/itinerant Access users.
I also see lots of flags for the label controls in the headers. They're a bit of a
pain but they are also easily ignored.
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at
http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm