473,394 Members | 1,828 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,394 software developers and data experts.

Is Access 2003 slower than 97???

I am working on converting an Access 97 app to Access 2003. It appears
that the A2003 version runs much slower than the A97 version.
Everything from just opening Tables and Queries to running code (that
opens recordsets, in particular) is running very slow. Any hint as to
why, or are there settings that can be adjusted to improve spead?
Nov 12 '05 #1
3 2142
There are *many* factors that affect this: Name AutoCorrect, Subdatasheets,
and caching of network info to name a few.

Take a look at Tony Toew's "Access Performance FAQ" at:
http://www.granite.ab.ca/access/performancefaq.htm

--
Allen Browne - Microsoft MVP. Perth, Western Australia.
Tips for Access users - http://allenbrowne.com/tips.html
Reply to group, rather than allenbrowne at mvps dot org.

"jmev7" <jm***@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c7**************************@posting.google.c om...
I am working on converting an Access 97 app to Access 2003. It appears
that the A2003 version runs much slower than the A97 version.
Everything from just opening Tables and Queries to running code (that
opens recordsets, in particular) is running very slow. Any hint as to
why, or are there settings that can be adjusted to improve spead?

Nov 12 '05 #2
All that - and yes, all versions of Access newer than Access 97 are somewhat
slower than Access 97, regardless of settings, etc.

On Thu, 8 Apr 2004 00:33:36 +0800, "Allen Browne" <Al*********@SeeSig.Invalid>
wrote:
There are *many* factors that affect this: Name AutoCorrect, Subdatasheets,
and caching of network info to name a few.

Take a look at Tony Toew's "Access Performance FAQ" at:
http://www.granite.ab.ca/access/performancefaq.htm


Nov 12 '05 #3
Well, I agree with that, Steve. I stopped at Access 2000 and was
"satisfied" with it's performance. I just did not expect such a
decline at 2003. I do notice one interesting thing about the
performance: if I perform an action over and over several times (ie:
run the same query , or if I do a sort or filter by selection on any
column), the process does speed up. I can't remember if it stays fast
for the next session or not. I remember reading, years ago, that
Access will "fine tune" or optimize a query once it has been run and
saved. I wonder if there is any of that going on here.

Thanks for the feedback, one and all.
Steve Jorgensen <no****@nospam.nospam> wrote in message news:<7t********************************@4ax.com>. ..
All that - and yes, all versions of Access newer than Access 97 are somewhat
slower than Access 97, regardless of settings, etc.

On Thu, 8 Apr 2004 00:33:36 +0800, "Allen Browne" <Al*********@SeeSig.Invalid>
wrote:
There are *many* factors that affect this: Name AutoCorrect, Subdatasheets,
and caching of network info to name a few.

Take a look at Tony Toew's "Access Performance FAQ" at:
http://www.granite.ab.ca/access/performancefaq.htm

Nov 12 '05 #4

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

20
by: John | last post by:
Hi, I've recently upgraded from Access 97 to Access 2002 & the performance basically stinks. I have tried the following items listed below but it has only had a minor impact: 1) Upgraded Jet...
3
by: jmev7 | last post by:
I am working on converting an Access 97 app to Access 2003. It appears that the A2003 version runs much slower than the A97 version. Everything from just opening Tables and Queries to running code...
3
by: Stickleback | last post by:
Morning All I have been developing and deploying with Office 2000 for about 3 years, mainly Access based programs and although I have gotten used to it's quirks, I am starting to feel that I...
56
by: Raphi | last post by:
Hi, I've been using an Access application I wrote for an office with the front-end stored on all computers and the back-end on one of them serving as an Access file server. Now we're moving...
47
by: ship | last post by:
Hi We need some advice: We are thinking of upgrading our Access database from Access 2000 to Access 2004. How stable is MS Office 2003? (particularly Access 2003). We are just a small...
5
by: Michael | last post by:
i experience slower compile times with VC++ 2003 compared to VC+6.0. Anyone experiencing the same? Should that be expected? This ineed matters, when total compilation time is > 1h and you have to...
10
by: Lyle Fairfield | last post by:
II first noticed this phenomenon in Access 2003. Simply stated it is: The second loop is faster than the first loop. That is if we test: Not (a Or b) against (Not a) And (Not b) in a loop of...
20
by: TC | last post by:
I need an automated procedure to copy data from an Access table to a SQL Server table. Speed is important. What is the recommended technique? I can export the data from Access, copy it via FTP,...
6
by: Wayne | last post by:
Has anyone noticed that Access databases (2003) are much slower to load under Vista or is it just me? I have a dual boot machine (XP and Vista). Applications generally are a bit slower to load...
10
by: Arno R | last post by:
Hi all, So I bought a new laptop 10 days ago to test my apps with Vista. (home premium) Apparently Office 2007 is pre-installed. (a time limited but complete test version, no SP1) So I take the...
0
by: Charles Arthur | last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
0
by: ryjfgjl | last post by:
If we have dozens or hundreds of excel to import into the database, if we use the excel import function provided by database editors such as navicat, it will be extremely tedious and time-consuming...
0
by: emmanuelkatto | last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud. Please let me know. Thanks! Emmanuel
1
by: nemocccc | last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
1
by: Sonnysonu | last post by:
This is the data of csv file 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length. suppose the i have to...
0
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
0
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
0
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
0
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.