Hello,
I have a situation with MS Access 2000 in which I need to display report
data in spreadsheet orientation (much like a datasheet view for a form). If
you think of the report in terms of what a spreadsheet might show, the
column names will actually be dynamic, based on data from a SQL Server 2000
database. The row data will also come from the same database. So in this
case, I will have a main report and a subreport. I've already tried this
arrangement for the data I will be presenting, and I get the results I
expect. so everything seems to work okay. The main report displays a single
'row' of data that make up the column headings, and the sub report displays
many rows that make up the main records.
The thing I need to figure out is how to make the physical number of
displayed 'column names' in the main report and associated 'data fields' in
the sub report change based on the report data I need to show. Right now, I
just have static fields in the main and sub report to show the data, but not
all of the fields are populated between the variations of returned data.
The Record Source for the main report is a stored procedure that takes a
@TestShortName parameter. The Record Source for the subreport is also a
stored procedure. The query for the stored procedure of the sub report is
slightly different, but it still takes an @TestShortName parameter. This
@TestShortName parameter equates to the TestID of a Student Test for both
procedures. Each student test has a different number of questions. The main
report is designed to display a questionID (QID) based on the @TestShortName
parameter. So for an @TestShortName of 'SFM2' there would be QID's 1 through
10. But for an @TestShortName of 'HMLM', there would be seventeen total
QID's of A1 through B7. SFM2 would require that there be ten fields in the
main report to show all ten QID's, but HMLM would require that there be
seventeen fields in the main report. The sub report would require the
different number of fields between the two @TestShortName parameters, ten
for SFM2, and seventeen for HMLM. However, the sub report shows question
answers for a given @TestShortName, not QID's. So given different
@TestshortNames, the data returned would look like this:
@TestShortName = 'SFM2':
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10(QID's)
(studentID) (sName) C I I C I C C C I I (answers)
**********************************************
@TestShortName = 'HMLM'
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 (QID's)
(studID)(sName) C I I I C C C C I I C C C I C C C (answers)
I know that I'll need to have the report set up in Landscape to accomodate
the varying results in the main and sub reports, but how do I set up both
reports so that I only have the required number of main and sub report
fields as required by the @TestShortName parameter? It seems like there
should be some sort of Loop structure that could count the number of
distinct QID's given a particular @TestShortName, and then display each
value in a label or text box. Maybe the same for the sub report for question
answers.
The stored procedures are set up to create 75 fields for any @TestShortName.
If an @TestShortName in the main report results in only the first ten QID's
having values, then the other 65 QID's will be NULL. The same would hold
true for the child records in the sub report. So the Loop would have to
ignore NULL values for the main and sub report. Also, for a given
@TestShortName, there can also be NULL values for the first ten QID's, then
the remaining 65 QID's could have values. The child records in the sub
report would match this as well.
How can I set up my report so that I only show the fields I need in the main
and sub reports, and not show fields when they return NULL values, for any
given @TestShortName parameter?
Please let me know if you have any ideas on this.
Thanks for your help!
CSDunn 3 3672
Create the report with the maximum number of controls needed and in the
'Open' event procedure of the form set the Visible property of any redundant
controls to False and the ControlSource property to an empty string.
If you want to get really fancy, you could also adjust the Left and Width
properties of controls to make the used controls fill the space available.
If there are only two possibilities, though, you might be better off just
creating two reports. The amount of code required to re-use the one report
with different numbers of fields might be justified if there were a dozen
different possibilities, but I don't think it would be justified for just
two.
--
Brendan Reynolds
"CSDunn" <cd***@valverde.edu> wrote in message
news:80**************************@posting.google.c om... Hello, I have a situation with MS Access 2000 in which I need to display report data in spreadsheet orientation (much like a datasheet view for a form).
If you think of the report in terms of what a spreadsheet might show, the column names will actually be dynamic, based on data from a SQL Server
2000 database. The row data will also come from the same database. So in this case, I will have a main report and a subreport. I've already tried this arrangement for the data I will be presenting, and I get the results I expect. so everything seems to work okay. The main report displays a
single 'row' of data that make up the column headings, and the sub report
displays many rows that make up the main records.
The thing I need to figure out is how to make the physical number of displayed 'column names' in the main report and associated 'data fields'
in the sub report change based on the report data I need to show. Right now,
I just have static fields in the main and sub report to show the data, but
not all of the fields are populated between the variations of returned data.
The Record Source for the main report is a stored procedure that takes a @TestShortName parameter. The Record Source for the subreport is also a stored procedure. The query for the stored procedure of the sub report is slightly different, but it still takes an @TestShortName parameter. This @TestShortName parameter equates to the TestID of a Student Test for both procedures. Each student test has a different number of questions. The
main report is designed to display a questionID (QID) based on the
@TestShortName parameter. So for an @TestShortName of 'SFM2' there would be QID's 1
through 10. But for an @TestShortName of 'HMLM', there would be seventeen total QID's of A1 through B7. SFM2 would require that there be ten fields in the main report to show all ten QID's, but HMLM would require that there be seventeen fields in the main report. The sub report would require the different number of fields between the two @TestShortName parameters, ten for SFM2, and seventeen for HMLM. However, the sub report shows question answers for a given @TestShortName, not QID's. So given different @TestshortNames, the data returned would look like this:
@TestShortName = 'SFM2':
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10(QID's) (studentID) (sName) C I I C I C C C I I
(answers) ********************************************** @TestShortName = 'HMLM'
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
(QID's) (studID)(sName) C I I I C C C C I I C C C I C C C
(answers)
I know that I'll need to have the report set up in Landscape to accomodate the varying results in the main and sub reports, but how do I set up both reports so that I only have the required number of main and sub report fields as required by the @TestShortName parameter? It seems like there should be some sort of Loop structure that could count the number of distinct QID's given a particular @TestShortName, and then display each value in a label or text box. Maybe the same for the sub report for
question answers.
The stored procedures are set up to create 75 fields for any
@TestShortName. If an @TestShortName in the main report results in only the first ten
QID's having values, then the other 65 QID's will be NULL. The same would hold true for the child records in the sub report. So the Loop would have to ignore NULL values for the main and sub report. Also, for a given @TestShortName, there can also be NULL values for the first ten QID's,
then the remaining 65 QID's could have values. The child records in the sub report would match this as well.
How can I set up my report so that I only show the fields I need in the
main and sub reports, and not show fields when they return NULL values, for any given @TestShortName parameter?
Please let me know if you have any ideas on this.
Thanks for your help!
CSDunn
CS,
Here's some code to dynamically bind report controls at runtime. Not sure
if it will help you in your quest, but feel free:
Private Sub Report_Open(Cancel As Integer)
Set db = CurrentDb()
'LINE UP CONTROLS
For i = 1 To 10
Me("txt" & i).Left = Me("lbl" & i).Left
Me("txt" & i).Width = Me("lbl" & i).Width
Me("sumTxt" & i).Left = Me("lbl" & i).Left
Me("sumTxt" & i).Width = Me("lbl" & i).Width
Next i
'SINCE THE CROSS-TAB RESULTS AREN'T KNOWN UNTIL THE QUERY IS RUN
'BIND THE CONTROLS AND SET LABELS AT RUN TIME
'FIRST BLANK OUT ALL LABELS AND TOTALS
For i = 1 To 10
Me("lbl" & i).Caption = ""
Me("sumTxt" & i).Visible = False
Next i
'BIND CONTROLS IN CONTACT REASON ORDER NUM, AS ENTERED IN REFERENCE TABLE
j = 1
Set rs = db.OpenRecordset("Q_CONTACTS_HOTELS_XTAB")
Set rs1 = db.OpenRecordset("SELECT REASON_CODE AS Reason, ORDER_NUM FROM
T_REASON_LOOKUP ORDER BY ORDER_NUM;")
Do Until rs1.EOF
If j <= 10 Then
For i = 3 To rs.Fields.Count - 1
If rs(i).Name = rs1("Reason") Then
Me("lbl" & (j)).Caption = rs(i).Name
Me("txt" & (j)).ControlSource = rs(i).Name
Me("sumTxt" & j).Visible = True
j = j + 1
Exit For
End If
Next i
End If
rs1.MoveNext
Loop
rs1.Close
rs.Close
End Sub
"CSDunn" <cd***@valverde.edu> wrote in message
news:80**************************@posting.google.c om... Hello, I have a situation with MS Access 2000 in which I need to display report data in spreadsheet orientation (much like a datasheet view for a form).
If you think of the report in terms of what a spreadsheet might show, the column names will actually be dynamic, based on data from a SQL Server
2000 database. The row data will also come from the same database. So in this case, I will have a main report and a subreport. I've already tried this arrangement for the data I will be presenting, and I get the results I expect. so everything seems to work okay. The main report displays a
single 'row' of data that make up the column headings, and the sub report
displays many rows that make up the main records.
The thing I need to figure out is how to make the physical number of displayed 'column names' in the main report and associated 'data fields'
in the sub report change based on the report data I need to show. Right now,
I just have static fields in the main and sub report to show the data, but
not all of the fields are populated between the variations of returned data.
The Record Source for the main report is a stored procedure that takes a @TestShortName parameter. The Record Source for the subreport is also a stored procedure. The query for the stored procedure of the sub report is slightly different, but it still takes an @TestShortName parameter. This @TestShortName parameter equates to the TestID of a Student Test for both procedures. Each student test has a different number of questions. The
main report is designed to display a questionID (QID) based on the
@TestShortName parameter. So for an @TestShortName of 'SFM2' there would be QID's 1
through 10. But for an @TestShortName of 'HMLM', there would be seventeen total QID's of A1 through B7. SFM2 would require that there be ten fields in the main report to show all ten QID's, but HMLM would require that there be seventeen fields in the main report. The sub report would require the different number of fields between the two @TestShortName parameters, ten for SFM2, and seventeen for HMLM. However, the sub report shows question answers for a given @TestShortName, not QID's. So given different @TestshortNames, the data returned would look like this:
@TestShortName = 'SFM2':
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10(QID's) (studentID) (sName) C I I C I C C C I I
(answers) ********************************************** @TestShortName = 'HMLM'
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A10 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
(QID's) (studID)(sName) C I I I C C C C I I C C C I C C C
(answers)
I know that I'll need to have the report set up in Landscape to accomodate the varying results in the main and sub reports, but how do I set up both reports so that I only have the required number of main and sub report fields as required by the @TestShortName parameter? It seems like there should be some sort of Loop structure that could count the number of distinct QID's given a particular @TestShortName, and then display each value in a label or text box. Maybe the same for the sub report for
question answers.
The stored procedures are set up to create 75 fields for any
@TestShortName. If an @TestShortName in the main report results in only the first ten
QID's having values, then the other 65 QID's will be NULL. The same would hold true for the child records in the sub report. So the Loop would have to ignore NULL values for the main and sub report. Also, for a given @TestShortName, there can also be NULL values for the first ten QID's,
then the remaining 65 QID's could have values. The child records in the sub report would match this as well.
How can I set up my report so that I only show the fields I need in the
main and sub reports, and not show fields when they return NULL values, for any given @TestShortName parameter?
Please let me know if you have any ideas on this.
Thanks for your help!
CSDunn
Thanks for your help!
CSDunn
*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it! This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: puunda |
last post by:
Hi,
Hope I've posted to the right groups.
I'm trying create a Crystal Report for the first time using C# (novice
at that as well). The CR I can handel. What I want to do is to have a
whole...
|
by: Nathan Bloomfield |
last post by:
Does anyone know if there is any documentation which relates to Access2k + ?
or can anyone help adjust the code?
I am having trouble converting the DAO references.
TITLE :INF: How to...
|
by: CSDunn |
last post by:
Hello,
I have a format issue on an Access 2000 ADP report that I am going to
attempt to explain from a 'ten thousand foot view' :
I have an Access 2000 ADP report that has a SQL Server 2000...
|
by: mooseshoes |
last post by:
All:
I'm using Access 2000 on a Windows XP platform.
My goal is to use a form to gather user criteria which I will then parse
into a useable SQL string. At this point I would like to open one...
|
by: serge |
last post by:
How can I run a single SP by asking multiple sales question either
by using the logical operator AND for all the questions; or using
the logical operator OR for all the questions. So it's always...
|
by: deejayquai |
last post by:
Hi
I'm trying to produce a report based on a dynamic crosstab. Ultimately
i'd like the report to actually become a sub report within a student
end of year record of achievement. The dynamic...
|
by: Brad |
last post by:
Thanks for taking the time to read my question.
I have a table of data that has Date, Data and Category. I need to
show, in
a report, each Categories Data by Date. The Date has to be it's own...
|
by: creative1 |
last post by:
Here is how you create a complex data report that involves parent and child commands and you can update information at runtime. Its pretty straight forward to work with simple queries; however,...
|
by: ollyb303 |
last post by:
Hi,
I am trying to create a dynamic crosstab report which will display number of calls handled (I work for a call centre) per day grouped by supervisor.
I have one crosstab query (Query1) which...
|
by: Charles Arthur |
last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
|
by: nemocccc |
last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
| |