They may start a chain of popup Browser windows that will take over your
machine. And, too, appropriate weight to give what's said in anonymized
posts is probably "none at all".
It appears our Resident Troll has embarked on another campaign to try to
destroy the usefulness of this newsgroup. He didn't succeed when he tried
before, and he won't succeed this time -- but he will try as hard as he can
to make himself a pain in the tender places.
Larry Linson 28 1519
Larry Linson wrote: They may start a chain of popup Browser windows that will take over your machine. And, too, appropriate weight to give what's said in anonymized posts is probably "none at all".
It appears our Resident Troll has embarked on another campaign to try to destroy the usefulness of this newsgroup. He didn't succeed when he tried before, and he won't succeed this time -- but he will try as hard as he can to make himself a pain in the tender places.
Larry Linson
Larry, do you have a quick link to some info on how to block posts from
anonymizers? David Fenton mentioned he was doing that but I wouldn't have a
clue. Would this block posts for all the newsgroups one subscribes to or
can it be configured? I'm using OE and I am painfully aware of how limited
it is when dealing with spam, but it remains my preferred email and news
client.
"Deano" <de*********@hotmail.com> wrote: Larry, do you have a quick link to some info on how to block posts from anonymizers? David Fenton mentioned he was doing that
David posted the following: "I only see these addresses once, they get killfiled,
and, unless Don directly follows up one of my posts, I never see it again. "
So he just puts every email address which Don is using in his killfile. For example
"an**@anon.itys.net". How you do that in OE I have no idea.
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
"Tony Toews" <tt****@telusplanet.net> wrote in message
news:d6********************************@4ax.com... "Deano" <de*********@hotmail.com> wrote:
Larry, do you have a quick link to some info on how to block posts from anonymizers? David Fenton mentioned he was doing that David posted the following: "I only see these addresses once, they get
killfiled, and, unless Don directly follows up one of my posts, I never see it again.
" So he just puts every email address which Don is using in his killfile.
For example "an**@anon.itys.net". How you do that in OE I have no idea.
Tools : Message Rules : News & follow the prompts.
TC
Tony,
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 00:32:50 GMT, Tony Toews <tt****@telusplanet.net>
wrote in comp.databases.ms-access: David posted the following: "I only see these addresses once, they get killfiled, and, unless Don directly follows up one of my posts, I never see it again. "
So he just puts every email address which Don is using in his killfile. For example "an**@anon.itys.net".
Not that hard at all. You don't need to do it by email addresses,
otherwise it'd be a major pain (because some anonymizers generate
random sender ids). Just have a look at all the header fields, and
find something that is usable there. You'll often find something that
is clearly helpful to use for the message rules (like the anonymizer's
host name), and voila, the posts are gone. Just make sure that
whatever you're picking up is not going to eliminate more messages
than you intend. Often it makes sense to test for two items instead
of just one.
I don't know about OE, but most packages let you specify which header
fields you want to look in, and what types and combinations of things
you wish to use as markers.
Peter Miller
__________________________________________________ __________
PK Solutions -- Data Recovery for Microsoft Access/Jet/SQL
Free quotes, Guaranteed lowest prices and best results www.pksolutions.com 1.866.FILE.FIX 1.760.476.9051
Peter Miller <pm*****@pksolutions.com> wrote: Not that hard at all. You don't need to do it by email addresses, otherwise it'd be a major pain (because some anonymizers generate random sender ids). Just have a look at all the header fields, and find something that is usable there. You'll often find something that is clearly helpful to use for the message rules (like the anonymizer's host name), and voila, the posts are gone. Just make sure that whatever you're picking up is not going to eliminate more messages than you intend. Often it makes sense to test for two items instead of just one.
I don't know about OE, but most packages let you specify which header fields you want to look in, and what types and combinations of things you wish to use as markers.
Agent allows you some freedom with email headers but not with newsgroup headers.
AFAIK it only allows you to check the subject or author.
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 01:55:55 GMT, Tony Toews <tt****@telusplanet.net>
wrote:
Not so. For example I have this Usenet filter in Agent:
from: lemuria.org
It keeps tabs on one of Don's remailers.
-Tom. Peter Miller <pm*****@pksolutions.com> wrote:
Not that hard at all. You don't need to do it by email addresses, otherwise it'd be a major pain (because some anonymizers generate random sender ids). Just have a look at all the header fields, and find something that is usable there. You'll often find something that is clearly helpful to use for the message rules (like the anonymizer's host name), and voila, the posts are gone. Just make sure that whatever you're picking up is not going to eliminate more messages than you intend. Often it makes sense to test for two items instead of just one.
I don't know about OE, but most packages let you specify which header fields you want to look in, and what types and combinations of things you wish to use as markers.
Agent allows you some freedom with email headers but not with newsgroup headers. AFAIK it only allows you to check the subject or author.
Tony
Tom van Stiphout <to*****@no.spam.cox.net> wrote: Not so. For example I have this Usenet filter in Agent: from: lemuria.org
Oh? Well, then my excuse is that Agent's help isn't very good. <smile>
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
Tony,
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 01:55:55 GMT, Tony Toews <tt****@telusplanet.net>
wrote in comp.databases.ms-access: Agent allows you some freedom with email headers but not with newsgroup headers. AFAIK it only allows you to check the subject or author.
Tom's right, but more to the point, Agent allows a lot more
customization than the user interface implies. Make sure you have a
recent version of Agent, then look at the syntax for rule definitions.
You can do a hell of a lot with it.
Peter Miller
__________________________________________________ __________
PK Solutions -- Data Recovery for Microsoft Access/Jet/SQL
Free quotes, Guaranteed lowest prices and best results www.pksolutions.com 1.866.FILE.FIX 1.760.476.9051
"Deano" wrote Larry, do you have a quick link to some info on how to block posts from anonymizers?
You can't prevent such posts from getting into the newsgroup, to keep new
users from being assailed or misled by them, but you can use OE's Tools |
MessageRules to set rules that keep _you_ from having to see them. Others
have discussed this, already, in detail. Once you set a rule for News,
unless the newsgroup is part of the rule, it will block posts from that
source to all newsgroups.
An alternative is that if you complain to the anonymizing services, almost
all, if not all, of them will give you a method so that they will block your
e-mail as a destination. That will prevent your personally getting nasty
e-mails from anyone through that service. Your rules can block both mail and
news, by the way.
But, in the past, several anonymizers have themselves blocked this newsgroup
as a destination. That may have contributed to the winding down of the last
assault our Resident Troll made a couple of years or so ago. Each of the
anonymized posts that I have looked at have, in their header (visible by
right-clicking on the message header in OE and choosing properties) an
address (sometimes two, if both an anonymizer and a mail-to-news service
were involved) to which you can complain. Be sure to copy the headers, then
paste them in before the quoted message you forward, and include a polite
request that the anonymizers block comp.databases.ms-access as a destination
because no repressive government is going to retaliate for someone asking or
answering questions about database software. Then thank them. In time,
enough requests may convince them to do so.
Larry Linson
With OE you'll need to filter email and usenet through a program
that actually sits between OE and the server.
I use junkblaster, which you can check out at http://www.nero-online.org/lastmeasure
In article <bX*****************@wards.force9.net>
"Deano" <de*********@hotmail.com> wrote: Larry Linson wrote: They may start a chain of popup Browser windows that will take over your machine. And, too, appropriate weight to give what's said in anonymized posts is probably "none at all".
It appears our Resident Troll has embarked on another campaign to try to destroy the usefulness of this newsgroup. He didn't succeed when he tried before, and he won't succeed this time -- but he will try as hard as he can to make himself a pain in the tender places.
Larry Linson
Larry, do you have a quick link to some info on how to block posts from anonymizers? David Fenton mentioned he was doing that but I wouldn't have a clue. Would this block posts for all the newsgroups one subscribes to or can it be configured? I'm using OE and I am painfully aware of how limited it is when dealing with spam, but it remains my preferred email and news client.
-=-
This message was posted via two or more anonymous remailing services. An****************@See.Comment.Header (U N Me) wrote: With OE you'll need to filter email and usenet through a program that actually sits between OE and the server.
I use junkblaster, which you can check out at
Do NOT click on the above URL.
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
Peter Miller <pm*****@pksolutions.com> wrote: Agent allows you some freedom with email headers but not with newsgroup headers. AFAIK it only allows you to check the subject or author.
Tom's right, but more to the point, Agent allows a lot more customization than the user interface implies. Make sure you have a recent version of Agent, then look at the syntax for rule definitions. You can do a hell of a lot with it.
Agent 1.93, which I have installed, is as recent as they get. 2.0 is currently in
beta.
Thanks, Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm An****************@See.Comment.Header (Drew Spelton) wrote: Larry, you can still use OE and enhance the filtering through a middleman filter program that sits between OE and the server. Check out it this site, which discusses several methods of blocking the fucking trolls.
Do NOT click on the above URL.
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
"Tony Toews" <tt****@telusplanet.net> wrote in message
news:rg********************************@4ax.com... An****************@See.Comment.Header (Drew Spelton) wrote:
Larry, you can still use OE and enhance the filtering through a middleman filter program that sits between OE and the server. Check out it this site, which discusses several methods of blocking the fucking trolls.
Do NOT click on the above URL.
What are you talking about? There is no "above URL."
"Tony Toews" <tt****@telusplanet.net> wrote in message
news:8b********************************@4ax.com... An****************@See.Comment.Header (U N Me) wrote:
With OE you'll need to filter email and usenet through a program that actually sits between OE and the server.
I use junkblaster, which you can check out at
Do NOT click on the above URL.
What are you talking about? There is no "above URL."
"Tony Toews" <tt****@telusplanet.net> wrote in message
news:dj********************************@4ax.com... Peter Miller <pm*****@pksolutions.com> wrote:
Agent allows you some freedom with email headers but not with newsgroup
headers.AFAIK it only allows you to check the subject or author. Tom's right, but more to the point, Agent allows a lot more customization than the user interface implies. Make sure you have a recent version of Agent, then look at the syntax for rule definitions. You can do a hell of a lot with it.
Agent 1.93, which I have installed, is as recent as they get. 2.0 is
currently in beta.
Thanks, Tony --
Do NOT click on the above URL.
Tony Toews wrote: An****************@See.Comment.Header (Drew Spelton) wrote:
Larry, you can still use OE and enhance the filtering through a middleman filter program that sits between OE and the server. Check out it this site, which discusses several methods of blocking the fucking trolls.
Do NOT click on the above URL.
Tony
Yes, I've cottoned on to this guy's patterns - what a saddo.
He meant the URL from the post ABOVE his ... but - and trust me on this -
don't click on it.
--
Scott McDaniel
CS Computer Software
Visual Basic - Access - Sql Server - ASP
"Beth L." <Be*********@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:45********************@vnet-inc.com... "Tony Toews" <tt****@telusplanet.net> wrote in message news:8b********************************@4ax.com... An****************@See.Comment.Header (U N Me) wrote:
With OE you'll need to filter email and usenet through a program that actually sits between OE and the server.
I use junkblaster, which you can check out at
Do NOT click on the above URL.
What are you talking about? There is no "above URL."
"Scott McDaniel" <sc***@no.spam.thedatabaseplace.net> wrote in message
news:Qc********************@comcast.com... He meant the URL from the post ABOVE his ... but - and trust me on this - don't click on it.
Oh. Tony's an idiot. I get it!
(Say, how do *you* know not to click on it?)
"RMD" wrote Do NOT click on the above URL.
And, why not? It wasn't posted anonymously, and Tony's http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm site is full of good, useful Access
information and links that are helpful to Access people.
To assure yourself that this one wasn't posted anonymously, right-click, and
select Properties.
Larry Linson
"Beth L." <Be*********@hotmail.com> wrote Oh. Tony's an idiot. I get it!
No, Tony's very intelligent, helps people with their Access problems, and
warns people so they can avoid newsgroup problems; the vicious one surely
acts like a Don P Mellon, using stupid hotmail pseudonyms such as this and
anonymized posts to mislead people to a chain of nasty porn popups.
"Larry Linson" <bo*****@localhost.not> wrote in message
news:H8*****************@nwrddc03.gnilink.net... They may start a chain of popup Browser windows that will take over your machine. And, too, appropriate weight to give what's said in anonymized posts is probably "none at all".
It appears our Resident Troll has embarked on another campaign to try to destroy the usefulness of this newsgroup. He didn't succeed when he tried before, and he won't succeed this time -- but he will try as hard as he
can to make himself a pain in the tender places.
Larry Linson
larry. is all capitals ok now or is still stupid?
tuk
"Deano" <de*********@hotmail.com> wrote: Yes, I've cottoned on to this guy's patterns - what a saddo.
You have but there are always new visitors who haven't.
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm
"Beth L." <Be*********@hotmail.com> wrote: Oh. Tony's an idiot. I get it!
<chuckle>
Tony
--
Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
read the entire thread of messages.
Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at http://www.granite.ab.ca/accsmstr.htm bo*****@localhost.not (Larry Linson) wrote in
<H8*****************@nwrddc03.gnilink.net>: They may start a chain of popup Browser windows that will take over your machine.
Well, Mozilla allows you to suppress popups in general.
If you insist on using IE (I certainly wouldn't recommend it), you
can get the Google Toolbar, which will allow you to suppress popups
in IE.
--
David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc bo*****@localhost.not (Larry Linson) wrote in
<8I******************@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>: But, in the past, several anonymizers have themselves blocked this newsgroup as a destination. That may have contributed to the winding down of the last assault our Resident Troll made a couple of years or so ago. Each of the anonymized posts that I have looked at have, in their header (visible by right-clicking on the message header in OE and choosing properties) an address (sometimes two, if both an anonymizer and a mail-to-news service were involved) to which you can complain. Be sure to copy the headers, then paste them in before the quoted message you forward, and include a polite request that the anonymizers block comp.databases.ms-access as a destination because no repressive government is going to retaliate for someone asking or answering questions about database software. Then thank them. In time, enough requests may convince them to do so.
I would wager that the fake FAQs, the borderline slanderous posts
and the filthy URLs being posted would be more likely to get the
anonymizers to block CDMA than any other kind of content. When Don
had his previous childish fit a year ago, most of the "kills" were
for materials that were unquivocally inappropriate, not just the
annoying stuff. As the target of some of Don's attacks, I don't
have the credibility that 3rd-party complainers would have, I
think.
--
David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
Busted again, Don.
"Franz Helmut" <An****************@See.Comment.Header> wrote
Avant Browser is also very good. I can recommend this one http://www.avantbrowser.com
Arno R
"David W. Fenton" <dX********@bway.net.invalid> schreef in bericht
news:94***************************@24.168.128.86.. . bo*****@localhost.not (Larry Linson) wrote in <H8*****************@nwrddc03.gnilink.net>:
They may start a chain of popup Browser windows that will take over your machine.
Well, Mozilla allows you to suppress popups in general.
If you insist on using IE (I certainly wouldn't recommend it), you can get the Google Toolbar, which will allow you to suppress popups in IE.
-- David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Philip Herlihy |
last post by:
I've been trying to create a simple vertical navigation bar, using (as
recommended) an unordered list (UL) of hyperlinks. I'd like to have a hover
effect, so I have to style the links themselves....
|
by: MasterTracker |
last post by:
Do not click on any links in this newsgroup without rubber gloves!
|
by: IAmIronMan |
last post by:
This individual is stealing other peoples code and
claiming it as his own. The proof is when I asked him to
explain his code he would not.
For proof view these threads in dotnet.languages.vb
...
|
by: Charles Arthur |
last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
If we have dozens or hundreds of excel to import into the database, if we use the excel import function provided by database editors such as navicat, it will be extremely tedious and time-consuming...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
| |