how to find out if an object is a class? | | |
Pardon me for most likely a dummy question but how do I find out if an
object is a class?
I need something like that:
def foo(self, obj):
if (obj is a class):
some stuff
| | | | re: how to find out if an object is a class?
Dnia Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:36:37 -0700 (PDT), szczepiq napisa³(a): Quote:
Pardon me for most likely a dummy question but how do I find out if an
object is a class?
Use types.ClassType: .... pass
.... Quote: Quote: Quote:
>>import types
>>isinstance(Q, types.ClassType)
>>True
--
Regards,
Wojtek Walczak, http://www.stud.umk.pl/~wojtekwa/ | | | | re: how to find out if an object is a class?
Wojtek Walczak wrote: Quote:
Dnia Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:36:37 -0700 (PDT), szczepiq napisa�(a): Quote:
>Pardon me for most likely a dummy question but how do I find out if an
>object is a class?
>
>
Use types.ClassType:
> ... pass
... Quote: Quote:
>>>import types
>>>isinstance(Q, types.ClassType)
>>>True
That is only true and only works for 2.x old-style classes and not for
2.x new-style classes and all 3.0 classes, for which isinstance(Q,type)
is True. .... <type 'classobj'> Quote: Quote: Quote:
>>class new(object): pass
.... <type 'type'> | | | | re: how to find out if an object is a class?
On Aug 7, 8:56*pm, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.eduwrote: Quote:
Wojtek Walczak wrote: Quote:
Dnia Thu, 7 Aug 2008 14:36:37 -0700 (PDT), szczepiq napisa (a): Quote:
Pardon me for most likely a dummy question but how do I find out if an
object is a class?
> Quote:
Use types.ClassType:
> Quote: ... * *pass
... Quote:
>>import types
>>isinstance(Q, types.ClassType)
>>True
>
That is only true and only works for 2.x old-style classes and not for
2.x new-style classes and all 3.0 classes, for which isinstance(Q,type)
is True.
isinstance(Q,type) is also true for built in types and C extension
types, which may or may not be what the OP wants.
The most accurate way I can think of to check for a class defined in
Python is to test the type's tp_flags field for Py_TPFLAGS_HEAPTYPE
bit, but I don't know of any simple way to check for it from Python.
It's still possible for it to fail since someone could create heap
types in C though I'd expect that's very rare.
Carl Banks | | | | re: how to find out if an object is a class?
Carl Banks wrote: Quote:
On Aug 7, 8:56 pm, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.eduwrote:
Quote: Quote:
>That is only true and only works for 2.x old-style classes and not for
>2.x new-style classes and all 3.0 classes, for which isinstance(Q,type)
>is True.
>
isinstance(Q,type) is also true for built in types and C extension
types
That is rather the point of new and improved classes -- that the
implementation language of a class be pretty much irrelevant from the
user api viewpoint ;-) | | | | re: how to find out if an object is a class?
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: Quote:
I recently had the reverse case that a (stupidly implemented) extension module
required a callback function and I wanted to pass a function wrapped in a
wrapper object. That failed, because it specifically checked for the argument
being a function, not just a callable object. I had to pull quite a number of
tricks to reimplement the wrapper class as a function (thank god, it's Python!).
You really only needed one trick:
def functionize(callable):
return lambda *args, **kwargs: callable(*args, **kwargs)
:)
-Miles | | | | re: how to find out if an object is a class?
szczepiq wrote: Quote:
Pardon me for most likely a dummy question but how do I find out if an
object is a class?
For God's sake don't reinvent the wheel! The 'inspect' module (part of
the Python standard library) has a functions isclass(). It does the
proper tests for new style and old style classes.
import inspect
inspect.isclass(something)
Christian | | | | re: how to find out if an object is a class?
Miles wrote: Quote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: Quote:
>I recently had the reverse case that a (stupidly implemented) extension module
>required a callback function and I wanted to pass a function wrapped in a
>wrapper object. That failed, because it specifically checked for the argument
>being a function, not just a callable object. I had to pull quite a number of
>tricks to reimplement the wrapper class as a function (thank god, it's Python!).
>
You really only needed one trick:
>
def functionize(callable):
return lambda *args, **kwargs: callable(*args, **kwargs)
Congratulations, you found the trivial case.
Stefan | | | | re: how to find out if an object is a class?
On Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:38:14 +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote: Quote:
Miles wrote: Quote:
>On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: Quote:
>>I recently had the reverse case that a (stupidly implemented)
>>extension module required a callback function and I wanted to pass a
>>function wrapped in a wrapper object. That failed, because it
>>specifically checked for the argument being a function, not just a
>>callable object. I had to pull quite a number of tricks to reimplement
>>the wrapper class as a function (thank god, it's Python!).
>>
>You really only needed one trick:
>>
>def functionize(callable):
> return lambda *args, **kwargs: callable(*args, **kwargs)
>
Congratulations, you found the trivial case.
What other cases are there? It takes any callable, and returns a function
that calls the callable. What else do you need? This is not a rhetorical
question.
The above works as expected for classes and methods: Quote: Quote: Quote:
>>x = functionize(float)
>>type(x)
<type 'function'> 123.0 Quote: Quote: Quote:
>>L = [1,2,3]
>>y = functionize(L.append)
>>y(44)
>>L
[1, 2, 3, 44]
It even works for recursive functions: .... if n <= 1: return 1
.... else: return n*fact(n-1)
.... Quote: Quote: Quote:
>>z = functionize(fact)
>>z(5)
120
I haven't tested it on classmethods, staticmethods, or instances with a
__call__ method, but I see no reason why it wouldn't work with them. What
am I missing?
--
Steven | | | | re: how to find out if an object is a class?
Steven D'Aprano wrote: Quote:
On Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:38:14 +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote: Quote:
>Miles wrote: Quote:
>>On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>>I recently had the reverse case that a (stupidly implemented)
>>>extension module required a callback function and I wanted to pass a
>>>function wrapped in a wrapper object. That failed, because it
>>>specifically checked for the argument being a function, not just a
>>>callable object. I had to pull quite a number of tricks to reimplement
>>>the wrapper class as a function (thank god, it's Python!).
>>You really only needed one trick:
>>>
>>def functionize(callable):
>> return lambda *args, **kwargs: callable(*args, **kwargs)
>Congratulations, you found the trivial case.
>
What other cases are there? It takes any callable, and returns a function
that calls the callable. What else do you need? [...] What am I missing?
The words "stupidly implemented" above? :)
I have to set the callback in more than one place and (believe it or not) the
library behaves (slightly) different when you pass different callbacks. The
right way to use the above approach would be to wrap the callback right before
passing it into the library - which I can't do, as that would give me a
different function object each time. Also, most of the time I actually pass a
function, except in one case where I need a wrapper for an existing function.
So the solution I chose was to change the original wrapper class itself
instead of re-wrapping it, so that I get the expected object right away.
As usual, it's all about the details.
Stefan |  |
| | |  /bytes/about
We are a network of experts and professionals in IT and software development that help one another with answers to tough questions and share insights.
Get the best answers to your questions from over 226,531 network members.
|
