I posted the following yesterday and got no response
and did some testing simplifying the circumstances
and it appears that deepcopy fails when the object
to be copied contains a reference to a Canvas Object.
Perhaps any Tkinter object, didn't get that far.
The problem arises because I have a geometry tutorial
with a progression of drawings and want the students to
be able to go "back". Creating "snapshots" of points
in time in the tutorial makes a clean and elegant solution
possible. Other solutions I am trying to come up with are
very messy.
It is frustrating to think that in a language like python
there might be things which you can't make a copy of.
That is bizarre enough to wonder about a deep flaw or
hopefully I'm just doing something very wrong.
Any ideas appreciated.
phil wrote: I wrote the following to prove to myself that deepcopy would copy an entire dictionary which contains an instance of a class to one key of another dictionary. Note that after copying adict to ndict['x'] I delete adict. Then ndict['x'] contains a good copy of adict. works great.
class aclass: def __init__(s): s.anint = 123 aninstance = aclass() adict = {} adict['y'] = aninstance
ndict = {} ndict['x'] = copy.deepcopy(adict) del adict print ndict print ndict['x']['y'] print ndict['x']['y'].anint # this line prints 123 print
Then in the following code when I try to deepcopy s.glob.objs I get following error Note that s.glob.objs is a dictionary and I am attempting to copy to a key of s.save, another dict, just like above. ?????????? s.glob.objs may have several keys, the data for each will be instance of classes like line and circle. Those instances will have tkinter canvas objects in them.
class Graph: def __init__(s): class DummyClass: pass s.glob = DummyClass() s.glob.objs = {} .. # here add some instance of objects like .. # circles and lines to s.glob.objs # instantiate dialog s.DI = dialog(s.glob)
class dialog: def __init__(s,glob): s.glob = glob s.save = {}
def proc(s): cur = someint s.save[cur] = copy.deepcopy(s.glob.objs)
Exception in Tkinter callback Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/lib-tk/Tkinter.py", line 1345, in __call__ return self.func(*args) File "/home/phil/geo/g.py", line 303, in enter else:s.proc() File "/home/phil/geo/g.py", line 245, in proc s.save[cur][k] = copy.deepcopy(s.glob.objs[k][0]) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/copy.py", line 179, in deepcopy y = copier(x, memo) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/copy.py", line 307, in _deepcopy_inst state = deepcopy(state, memo) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/copy.py", line 179, in deepcopy y = copier(x, memo) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/copy.py", line 270, in _deepcopy_dict y[deepcopy(key, memo)] = deepcopy(value, memo) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/copy.py", line 179, in deepcopy y = copier(x, memo) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/copy.py", line 307, in _deepcopy_inst state = deepcopy(state, memo) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/copy.py", line 179, in deepcopy y = copier(x, memo) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/copy.py", line 270, in _deepcopy_dict y[deepcopy(key, memo)] = deepcopy(value, memo) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/copy.py", line 206, in deepcopy y = _reconstruct(x, rv, 1, memo) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/copy.py", line 338, in _reconstruct y = callable(*args) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.3/copy_reg.py", line 92, in __newobj__ return cls.__new__(cls, *args) TypeError: function() takes at least 2 arguments (0 given)
6 3086
phil wrote: It is frustrating to think that in a language like python there might be things which you can't make a copy of. That is bizarre enough to wonder about a deep flaw or hopefully I'm just doing something very wrong.
To be honest, it doesn't really surprise me that you cannot copy Tkinter
objects. If you could make a copy of an object which is displayed on the
screen I would expect that copying would create another object on the
screen, and that probably isn't what you want. Other uncopyable objects
include files, stack frames and so on.
The deepcopy protocol does allow you to specify how complicated objects
should be copied. Try defining __deepcopy__() in your objects to just copy
the reference to the Canvas object instead of the object itself. The deepcopy protocol does allow you to specify how complicated objects should be copied. Try defining __deepcopy__() in your objects to just copy the reference to the Canvas object instead of the object itself.
I can't figure out from the docs what __deepcopy__ is or how it
works.
I have about 25 classes of drawn objects. for instance
class linefromslope creates an instance of class line.
One of my "ugly solutions" involves a class prop: within each class,
put properties like slope and midpoint within the self.prop instance
and making a copy of that.
Would __deepcopy__ facilitate this?
Or am I assuming too much: is __deepcopy__ just a method
I invent to do what I want?
phil wrote: The deepcopy protocol does allow you to specify how complicated objects should be copied. Try defining __deepcopy__() in your objects to just copy the reference to the Canvas object instead of the object itself. I can't figure out from the docs what __deepcopy__ is or how it
works. I have about 25 classes of drawn objects. for instance class linefromslope creates an instance of class line. One of my "ugly solutions" involves a class prop: within each class, put properties like slope and midpoint within the self.prop instance and making a copy of that. Would __deepcopy__ facilitate this? Or am I assuming too much: is __deepcopy__ just a method I invent to do what I want?
The docs say:
In order for a class to define its own copy implementation, it can define special methods __copy__() and __deepcopy__(). The former is called to implement the shallow copy operation; no additional arguments are passed. The latter is called to implement the deep copy operation; it is passed one argument, the memo dictionary. If the __deepcopy__() implementation needs to make a deep copy of a component, it should call the deepcopy() function with the component as first argument and the memo dictionary as second argument.
__deepcopy__ is a method which overrides the default way to make a deepcopy
of an object.
So, if you have a class with attributes a, b, and c, and you want to ensure
that deepcopy copies a and b, but doesn't copy c, I guess you could do
something like: class MyClass:
_dontcopy = ('c',) # Tuple of attributes which must not be copied
def __deepcopy__(self, memo):
clone = copy.copy(self) # Make a shallow copy
for name, value in vars(self).iteritems():
if name not in self._dontcopy:
setattr(clone, name, copy.deepcopy(value, memo))
return clone
class Copyable(object):
def __new__(cls, *args):
print "created new copyable"
return object.__new__(cls, *args)
m = MyClass() m.a = Copyable()
created new copyable m.b = Copyable()
created new copyable m.c = Copyable()
created new copyable clone = copy.deepcopy(m)
created new copyable
created new copyable m.a is clone.a
False m.c is clone.c
True
As you can see, the deepcopy only creates deep copies of 2 of the 3
attributes, 'c' is simply copied across as a shallow copy.
and if you subclass MyClass you can modify the _dontcopy value to add
additional attributes which must not be copied.
phil wrote: I posted the following yesterday and got no response
When you don't get as much of a response as you expected, you might
consider the advice here: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Pointing you here is only meant to be helpful. If you don't feel the
advice applies to you, feel free to ignore it, but you clearly haven't
been getting the results from this forum that you expected.
--
Michael Hoffman
> but you clearly haven't been getting the results from this forum that you expected.
Yes I have, this is a wonderful forum.
I was just providing more info due to more testing.
Thanks, I used some of your methods and believe it is now
working.
I also did a lot of experiments, which I've needed to do,
investigating when references vs values are passed and
returned. Not as obvious as I thought.
Duncan Booth wrote: phil wrote:
The deepcopy protocol does allow you to specify how complicated objects should be copied. Try defining __deepcopy__() in your objects to just copy the reference to the Canvas object instead of the object itself.
I can't figure out from the docs what __deepcopy__ is or how it
works. I have about 25 classes of drawn objects. for instance class linefromslope creates an instance of class line. One of my "ugly solutions" involves a class prop: within each class, put properties like slope and midpoint within the self.prop instance and making a copy of that. Would __deepcopy__ facilitate this? Or am I assuming too much: is __deepcopy__ just a method I invent to do what I want?
The docs say:
In order for a class to define its own copy implementation, it can define special methods __copy__() and __deepcopy__(). The former is called to implement the shallow copy operation; no additional arguments are passed. The latter is called to implement the deep copy operation; it is passed one argument, the memo dictionary. If the __deepcopy__() implementation needs to make a deep copy of a component, it should call the deepcopy() function with the component as first argument and the memo dictionary as second argument.
__deepcopy__ is a method which overrides the default way to make a deepcopy of an object.
So, if you have a class with attributes a, b, and c, and you want to ensure that deepcopy copies a and b, but doesn't copy c, I guess you could do something like:
class MyClass: _dontcopy = ('c',) # Tuple of attributes which must not be copied
def __deepcopy__(self, memo): clone = copy.copy(self) # Make a shallow copy for name, value in vars(self).iteritems(): if name not in self._dontcopy: setattr(clone, name, copy.deepcopy(value, memo)) return clone
class Copyable(object): def __new__(cls, *args): print "created new copyable" return object.__new__(cls, *args)
m = MyClass() m.a = Copyable() created new copyable m.b = Copyable() created new copyable m.c = Copyable() created new copyable clone = copy.deepcopy(m) created new copyable created new copyable m.a is clone.a False m.c is clone.c
True
As you can see, the deepcopy only creates deep copies of 2 of the 3 attributes, 'c' is simply copied across as a shallow copy.
and if you subclass MyClass you can modify the _dontcopy value to add additional attributes which must not be copied. This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: OKB (not okblacke) |
last post by:
I've noticed some peculiar behavior from copy.deepcopy: if you pass
it a method or function object, it raises a TypeError somewhere in
copy_reg saying "function() takes at least 2 arguments (0...
|
by: Dan Perl |
last post by:
Here is some code to illustrate a problem that I have:
import copy
class myc:
def __init__(self):
self.myf=file('bar.txt',"w")
def foo(self):
self.myf.write('hello world!') # it's going...
|
by: ‘5ÛHH575-UAZWKVVP-7H2H48V3 |
last post by:
(see end of message for example code)
When an instance has a dynamically assigned instance method, deepcopy
throws a TypeError with the message "TypeError: instancemethod
expected at least 2...
|
by: Alexander Zatvornitskiy |
last post by:
Hello!
I have trouble with copy/deepcopy. It seems, I just don't understand something.
Please explain where things goes wrong and how to do it the right way.
I have one class:
class...
|
by: phil |
last post by:
I wrote the following to prove to myself that
deepcopy would copy an entire dictionary
which contains an instance of a class to
one key of another dictionary.
Note that after copying adict to...
|
by: Joshua Ginsberg |
last post by:
Howdy --
I have a class that has an attribute that is a dictionary that contains
an object that has a kword argument that is a lambda. Confused yet?
Simplified example:
import copy
class...
|
by: none |
last post by:
I have a very complex data structure which is basically a class object
containing (sometimes many) other class objects, function references,
ints, floats, etc. The man for the copy module states...
|
by: Stef Mientki |
last post by:
hello,
I'm trying to build a simple functional simulator for JAL (a Pascal-like language for PICs).
My first action is to translate the JAL code into Python code.
The reason for this approach is...
|
by: Wouter DW |
last post by:
I read the article on http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.2/descrintro/#metaclasses
and started using autoprop.
But now I have a problem I can't seem to solve myself.
class autoprop(type):...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
ExcelToDatabase: batch import excel into database automatically...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM).
In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
|
by: jfyes |
last post by:
As a hardware engineer, after seeing that CEIWEI recently released a new tool for Modbus RTU Over TCP/UDP filtering and monitoring, I actively went to its official website to take a look. It turned...
|
by: ArrayDB |
last post by:
The error message I've encountered is; ERROR:root:Error generating model response: exception: access violation writing 0x0000000000005140, which seems to be indicative of an access violation...
|
by: PapaRatzi |
last post by:
Hello,
I am teaching myself MS Access forms design and Visual Basic. I've created a table to capture a list of Top 30 singles and forms to capture new entries. The final step is a form (unbound)...
|
by: CloudSolutions |
last post by:
Introduction:
For many beginners and individual users, requiring a credit card and email registration may pose a barrier when starting to use cloud servers. However, some cloud server providers now...
|
by: Defcon1945 |
last post by:
I'm trying to learn Python using Pycharm but import shutil doesn't work
|
by: af34tf |
last post by:
Hi Guys, I have a domain whose name is BytesLimited.com, and I want to sell it. Does anyone know about platforms that allow me to list my domain in auction for free. Thank you
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 3 Apr 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome former...
| | |