thank you. I thought it was correct but just wanted to make sure.
Patrick Hatcher
Macys.Com
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
10/08/04 11:34 AM
To
Patrick Hatcher <PHatcher@macys.com>
cc
pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject
Re: [GENERAL] Explain output question
Patrick Hatcher <PHatcher@macys.com> writes:[color=blue]
> Should I be concerned with the merge cond: Merge Cond:
> (("outer".masked_acct_id)::text = "inner"."?column5?")? I have no idea
> what column5 is or the same token the column6 shown later.[/color]
You should be able to figure that out by correlating the plan with the
original query. In this case the inner column is clearly
agg.masked_acct_id since there is nothing else that fed.masked_acct_id
would be joined to.
It's annoying that EXPLAIN isn't always able to deliver a reasonable
text representation of values that have bubbled up from a lower plan
level. I've so far not found a good fix, but it's on the to-think-about
list ...
regards, tom lane