Treefrog wrote:[color=blue]
> mariosp wrote:[color=green]
>> I would like to request more information for the installation and
>> configuration of Apache in windows 2003 and I would like to know which
>> is better IIS or apache in Windows 2003 Server[/color]
>
> I'd suggest that since IIS is written exclusively for Windows, and is
> able to take advantage of insider knowledge, IIS would be faster.
> However that is pure conjecture.
>
> Although, I'm willing to bet the other two replies aren't based on fact
> either ;o)
>
> It's perhaps worth benchmarking, although I'm fairly certain that the
> speed difference will be so slight as to not effect anything to a level
> that is worth being bothered about. Spending that time designing better
> code will improve performance far more than the difference between IIS
> and Apache.[/color]
Thus far, the only real problems I've had with IIS and PHP always trace
back to CGI/FastCGI. When I've used the ISAPI module, I've had
relatively few problems. Of course, all these servers were either devel
servers or low-traffic ones.
I've also had a lot of luck with apache on Windows installed as a
module. Again, relatively low traffic sites again (~3.5G/mo, 21K visits)
--
Justin Koivisto, ZCE -
justin@koivi.com http://koivi.com 
