"Geoff Berrow" <bl@ckdog.co.uk.the.cat> wrote in message
news:m56movsv2spp7bdum0kepjq4ci4fo5p3dr@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> I noticed that Message-ID: <AKDib.10162$kA.2373515@wards.force9.net>
> from Nel contained the following:
>[color=green]
> >The confirmation email contained a verification link like
> >
http://www.fuelprotest.com?cvote.php...c397392909edf2
> >(example link - this one won't work)[/color]
>
> Have you tried making it a full link ie http:// etc? And isn't that uid
> a bit over the top? If that's a random selection of letters and numbers
> there are probably more combinations there than there are atoms in the
> universe.[/color]
I must admit I haven't tried using the full
http://. The long uid is just
a hash of some key data. Always security concious.
[color=blue][color=green]
> >However some users had problems with the link working. The email was[/color][/color]
just[color=blue][color=green]
> >plain text using mail().
> >
> >I have now changed it to MIME 1.0 and text/html.[/color]
> Huh? Why?[/color]
I read in a newsgroup that hotmail didn't get along too well with some links
in plain text. Whereas I can add a <a href> tag in html saying CLICK HERE.
[color=blue]
> Also the email field is too small. Supposing I mistyped my email
> address? It would be nice to see it all. And I was slightly annoyed
> that there was only one way to vote.[/color]
Good point about the size of the field and really it should say "sign here"
really as it's not a vote as such, but that is historical.
[color=blue]
> But I haven't received any mail yet anyway, unless my filters are
> stopping it for some reason.[/color]
Have you had the email yet?
Nel
[color=blue]
>
>
>
> --
> Geoff Berrow
> It's only Usenet, no one dies.
> My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
> Simple RFDs
http://www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker/[/color]