C2955: Where's the difference?

Hi,

I'm using VC++ 2008. This is the code:

namespace TestNamespace
{
generic <class T>
ref class C1
{
};

ref class C2
{
private:
List<TestNamespace::C1^>^ var1;
List<C1^>^ var2; //C2955
};
};

Why does declaration of var1 work whereas var2 produces C2955? I don't see
the difference because "TestNamespace::" is optional in this case. Do I miss
something again?

Armin

Armin Zingler wrote:

Quote:

Hi,
>
I'm using VC++ 2008. This is the code:
>
namespace TestNamespace
{
generic <class T>
ref class C1
{
};
>
ref class C2
{
private:
List<TestNamespace::C1^>^ var1;
List<C1^>^ var2; //C2955
};
};
>
Why does declaration of var1 work whereas var2 produces C2955? I don't see
the difference because "TestNamespace::" is optional in this case. Do I
miss
something again?

Armin:

Good question. But they both work if you supply the type for the generic.

--
David Wilkinson
Visual C++ MVP

C2955: Where's the difference?

re: C2955: Where's the difference?

Similar .NET Framework bytes

/bytes/development

/bytes/it

/bytes/about