Hello Emby,
It doesn't answer your question.. but an interesting tid-bit: It seems that
under Vista ALL dlls will be dynamicly rebased by the OS (with some exceptions
and some ability to manage the exception list).
-Boo
[color=blue]
> Thanks Jessie,
>
> Rico has lots of interesting stuff there, but I didn't see anything
> about setting .NET DLL bas addresses.
>
> Cheers
>
> "Jesse Houwing" <jesse.houwing@------.nl> wrote in message
> news:OGts2YHkGHA.3848@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>[color=green]
>> Emby wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> I was wondering if anyone specifies a base loading address for .NET
>>> Libraries (DLL projects). This can be done on the Advanced Compiler
>>> Settings dialog, accessed from the Compile page of Project
>>> properties in VB.NET 2005 projects.
>>>
>>> The default is &H11000000, so if you have several DLLs loading, they
>>> will all try to load at that address. The first may succeed, but all
>>> others will fail, and, as I understand it, the loader will have to
>>> rebase the dll on-the-fly (at least that's how it used to work ;-)
>>>
>>> The down side is a slower load (no app needs that), and
>>> traditionally, it can also be harder to debug in the event of a
>>> crash. Also, is there the equivalent of a "map file" for .NET apps?
>>> Or is that obsolete with the event of JIT compilation?
>>>
>>> I really don't know how much of this "old experience" applies to
>>> .NET apps - can anyone straighten me out?
>>>[/color]
>> Rico Mariani seems to be the expert on this topic. You can find his
>> blog here:
>>
>>
http://blogs.msdn.com/RicoM/
>>
>> He has done quite a few posts on similar subjects so you might be
>> able to get what you want from there.
>>
>> Jesse Houwing
>>[/color][/color]
