Connecting Tech Pros Worldwide Help | Site Map

Pplain english xml resource to solve: use -x <extension> ?

Baldoni
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
#1: Mar 16 '06

It's been years since putting together a page. This line in my HTML:
<link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="net4801style.css">

gives this problem (via weblint HTML checker):
attribute 'TYPE' for <link> is extended markup (use -x <extension> to do
this).

Where might be found a resource for simple folk explaining how to best
correct this?

Many thanks.

Joseph Kesselman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
#2: Mar 16 '06

re: Pplain english xml resource to solve: use -x <extension> ?


HTML is not XML. Try an HTML newsgroup.

--
Joe Kesselman / Beware the fury of a patient man. -- John Dryden
Baldoni
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
#3: Mar 16 '06

re: Pplain english xml resource to solve: use -x <extension> ?


Joseph Kesselman wrote:[color=blue]
> HTML is not XML. Try an HTML newsgroup.
>[/color]

Sorry. I thought the bit about: "is extended markup (use -x <extension>
to do this)" implied extended markup language. My mistake.
Peter Flynn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
#4: Mar 16 '06

re: Pplain english xml resource to solve: use -x <extension> ?


Baldoni wrote:[color=blue]
> Joseph Kesselman wrote:[color=green]
>> HTML is not XML. Try an HTML newsgroup.
>>[/color]
>
> Sorry. I thought the bit about: "is extended markup (use -x <extension>
> to do this)" implied extended markup language. My mistake.[/color]

Extended but not Extensible :-)

But in any event there's nothing wrong with your link element.
I've never heard of "extended markup" but I suspect you'll get
better results from using a real HTML parser with the right DTD
than from anything else.

///Peter
--
XML FAQ: http://xml.silmaril.ie/
Baldoni
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
#5: Mar 16 '06

re: Pplain english xml resource to solve: use -x <extension> ?


Peter Flynn wrote:[color=blue]
> Baldoni wrote:[/color]
[color=blue][color=green]
>> Sorry. I thought the bit about: "is extended markup (use -x
>> <extension> to do this)" implied extended markup language. My mistake.[/color]
>
>
> Extended but not Extensible :-)
>
> But in any event there's nothing wrong with your link element.
> I've never heard of "extended markup" but I suspect you'll get
> better results from using a real HTML parser with the right DTD
> than from anything else.[/color]

Ahh. Many thanks!
Closed Thread