Connecting Tech Pros Worldwide Help | Site Map

any performance diffrence btw MC++2003 & 2005

Guest
 
Posts: n/a
#1: Nov 17 '05
is there any performance diffrence between MC++ 2003 ,other .NET languages
and MC++ 2005 (cause of an optimization) ???


Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
#2: Nov 17 '05

re: any performance diffrence btw MC++2003 & 2005


sadun wrote:[color=blue]
> is there any performance diffrence between MC++ 2003 ,other .NET
> languages and MC++ 2005 (cause of an optimization) ???[/color]

Probably. But it's too early to tell - we're still a year away from RTM for
VS.NET 2005 and the 2.0 framework - and performance tuning work frequently
is saved for the end of the development cycle.

I'd speculate that it's unlikely that 2005 languages will be dramatically
faster, but I know, for example, that in native (not managed) C++, the
compiler does have significant new optimization technology that can result
in gains of 30% (10% is more typical).

-cd


Guest
 
Posts: n/a
#3: Nov 17 '05

re: any performance diffrence btw MC++2003 & 2005


thanks for help.

by native you mean without /clr parameter which produces binary
executable...


Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
#4: Nov 17 '05

re: any performance diffrence btw MC++2003 & 2005


sadun wrote:[color=blue]
> thanks for help.
>
> by native you mean without /clr parameter[/color]

correct.

-cd


Closed Thread