On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:36:06 -0600, "Andrew Faust" <afaust@aradymeDOTcom> wrote:
¤
¤ "Aaron Smith" <thespirit-1-@smithcentral.net> wrote in message
¤ news:H3LXc.7884$FV3.6779@newssvr17.news.prodigy.co m...
¤ > Our company is trying to decide to go .Net or not and which
¤ > language to use if we do. I have been doing a lot of research
¤ > on .Net and VB.Net. I used to be a VB 6 developer till I
¤ > started to work here, so all along I have been promoting VB.
¤
¤ Don't assume that your skills in VB6 will translate in to skills
¤ in VB.NET. Other than the name
¤ and some of the control structures, there are absolutely no
¤ similarities.
You sound like a disgruntled "Classic VB" developer. ;-)
While there are differences, partly due to the language being .NETitified, to state that there are
no similarities is spreading disinformation.
¤
¤ I'd say go with C#. I know serveral experienced VB6 programmers
¤ who started with
¤ VB.NET first, and after they started working with C# decided they
¤ couldn't stand VB.NET.
¤
¤ C# is just an elegant language, and it's easy to write clean code
¤ with.
¤
Not sure what makes it elegant. Certainly not the braces or other syntactical anomalies such as
semi-colons, case sensitivity, missing mnemonic keywords, goofy looking operators, etc. etc.
There's nothing specific to C# that enables you to write clean code.
Paul ~~~
pclement@ameritech.net
Microsoft MVP (Visual Basic)