larger radio/checkbox or mapping? | | |
I need bigger, easier to hit, checkboxes and radios. If that is not
possible, and it appears not, is there a way to map the inside of a
table cell to 'select'. Ideas? I suppose I could use images and
implement the behavior with js. I'm fishing here. Thank you for any
ideas. | | | | re: larger radio/checkbox or mapping?
oldyork90 wrote: Quote:
I need bigger, easier to hit, checkboxes and radios.
No, you don't. Quote:
If that is not possible, and it appears not, is there a way to map the
inside of a table cell to 'select'. Ideas?
<input type="checkbox" name="..." id="foo"><label for="foo">...</label> Quote:
I suppose I could use images and implement the behavior with js.
But you don't want to do that. Quote:
I'm fishing here. Thank you for any ideas.
You could have RTFFAQ, RTFM, and STFW before.
<http://jibbering.com/faq/>
PointedEars
--
var bugRiddenCrashPronePieceOfJunk = (
navigator.userAgent.indexOf('MSIE 5') != -1
&& navigator.userAgent.indexOf('Mac') != -1
) // Plone, register_function.js:16 | | | | re: larger radio/checkbox or mapping?
On Aug 26, 10:10 am, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedE...@web.de>
wrote: Quote:
oldyork90 wrote: Quote:
I need bigger, easier to hit, checkboxes and radios.
>
No, you don't.
Yes, I do.
Answer is use your own images. Thank you pointed one. | | | | re: larger radio/checkbox or mapping?
oldyork90 wrote: Quote:
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: Quote:
>oldyork90 wrote: Quote:
>>I need bigger, easier to hit, checkboxes and radios.
>No, you don't.
>
Yes, I do.
Hardly, given zoom effects. Quote:
Answer is use your own images.
That may be your answer, and IIUC it would be an unwise one. For you would
assume that such a pseudo-control would be accessible when it is not. Quote:
Thank you pointed one.
What for?
PointedEars
--
Anyone who slaps a 'this page is best viewed with Browser X' label on
a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web,
when you had very little chance of reading a document written on another
computer, another word processor, or another network. -- Tim Berners-Lee | | | | re: larger radio/checkbox or mapping?
On Aug 26, 10:52 am, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedE...@web.de>
wrote: Quote:
oldyork90 wrote: Quote:
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: Quote:
oldyork90 wrote:
>I need bigger, easier to hit, checkboxes and radios.
No, you don't.
> >
Hardly, given zoom effects.
Zoom is not the answer for all things. Proportion is one. Quote:
> Quote:
Answer is use your own images.
>
That may be your answer, and IIUC it would be an unwise one. For you would
assume that such a pseudo-control would be accessible when it is not.
> Quote:
Thank you pointed one.
>
What for?
>
PointedEars
--
Anyone who slaps a 'this page is best viewed with Browser X' label on
a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the Web,
when you had very little chance of reading a document written on another
computer, another word processor, or another network. -- Tim Berners-Lee
| | | | re: larger radio/checkbox or mapping?
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: Quote: Quote:
>Answer is use your own images.
>
That may be your answer, and IIUC it would be an unwise one.
Perhaps that's why this exact scenario is described in section 14.5.5 on
pages 271-275 of O'Reilly's "Javascript The Definitive Guide". I must
have missed the "Don't try this at home, folks".
--
Steve Swift http://www.swiftys.org.uk/swifty.html http://www.ringers.org.uk | | | | re: larger radio/checkbox or mapping?
oldyork90 wrote: Quote:
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: Quote:
>oldyork90 wrote: Quote:
>>Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>oldyork90 wrote:
>>>>I need bigger, easier to hit, checkboxes and radios.
>>>No, you don't.
>>Yes, I do.
>Hardly, given zoom effects.
>
Zoom is not the answer for all things. Proportion is one.
It would seem foolishness is inverse proportional to experience.
Please learn to quote.
PointedEars
--
Prototype.js was written by people who don't know javascript for people
who don't know javascript. People who don't know javascript are not
the best source of advice on designing systems that use javascript.
-- Richard Cornford, cljs, <f806at$ail$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk> | | | | re: larger radio/checkbox or mapping?
Is there an accessible option for a multi-state checkbox?
Beez | | | | re: larger radio/checkbox or mapping?
Beez wrote: Quote:
Is there an accessible option for a multi-state checkbox?
The answer depends on what states you are talking about.
PointedEars
--
Prototype.js was written by people who don't know javascript for people
who don't know javascript. People who don't know javascript are not
the best source of advice on designing systems that use javascript.
-- Richard Cornford, cljs, <f806at$ail$1$8300dec7@news.demon.co.uk> | | | | re: larger radio/checkbox or mapping?
PointedEars wrote: Quote:
The answer depends on what states you are talking about.
Touche. More appropriately, a tri-state. True, Partially True,
False.
Example scenario:
[ ] Folder
[ ] file2.ext
[ ] file3.ext
[ ] file4.ext
If one of the files are selected, Folder is partially selected
(Partially True).
[o] Folder
[x] file2.ext
[ ] file3.ext
[x] file4.ext
Beez | | | | re: larger radio/checkbox or mapping?
PointedEars wrote: Quote: Quote:
The answer depends on what states you are talking about.
>
Touche. *More appropriately, a tri-state. *True, Partially True,
False.
>
Example scenario:
>
[ ] Folder
* * [ ] file2.ext
* * [ ] file3.ext
* * [ ] file4.ext
>
If one of the files are selected, Folder is partially selected
(Partially True).
>
[o] Folder
* * [x] file2.ext
* * [ ] file3.ext
* * [x] file4.ext
Is there an accessible way to do this using javascript? | | | | re: larger radio/checkbox or mapping?
Beez wrote: Quote:
[...]
Is there an accessible way to do this using javascript?
A technical newsgroup like this is more like a think tank than a support
forum, so pressing the issue will hardly get you a better answer. Some
questions need more time to think about. And I/we do have a real life.
PointedEars
--
realism: HTML 4.01 Strict
evangelism: XHTML 1.0 Strict
madness: XHTML 1.1 as application/xhtml+xml
-- Bjoern Hoehrmann | | | | re: larger radio/checkbox or mapping?
In comp.lang.javascript message <65dee9ee-cd14-48a3-824d-f6493a3ad406@z6
6g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>, Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:58:05, Beez
<kbiesbrock@gmail.composted: Quote:
>Is there an accessible way to do this using javascript?
The following code, OK as is in IE & FF but not Opera, indicates that
there is. The image is clickable, can be resized by code, and could be
replaced by code. Therefore, what you want can be built from images.
<img src="graphics/fig-0.gif" name=IM onClick="alert(0)">
<button onClick="IM.width*=1.3">
<button onClick="IM.src='graphics/fig-8.gif'">
--
(c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05.
Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/- w. FAQish topics, links, acronyms
PAS EXE etc : <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/programs/- see 00index.htm
Dates - miscdate.htm moredate.htm js-dates.htm pas-time.htm critdate.htm etc. | | | | re: larger radio/checkbox or mapping?
PointedEars wrote: Quote:
A technical newsgroup like this is more like a think tank than a support
forum, so pressing the issue will hardly get you a better answer. *Some
questions need more time to think about. *And I/we do have a real life.
In no way did I suppose this ng was a "support forum" in its truest
application -- however, the act of helping others is, at some level,
"support".
My point in asking the question was certainly not to press the issue.
In other ngs, and one of mine in this, questions or responses go
unanswered and so this was more of a *nudge*. Understandably, you
have a life; as do I. Mine revolves around this single question (just
kidding).
Knowing somebody is thinking about this topic is fine, but how am I to
know that it didn't just get lost if nobody replies?
It seems response times in most other topics are quicker. In the
future I'll remember to be more patient. My sincere apologies. | | | | re: larger radio/checkbox or mapping?
oldyork90 wrote: Quote:
>I need bigger, easier to hit, checkboxes and radios. If that
is not possible, and it appears not,
<snip>
Is it not possible? Why/how does it appear not? What did you try, and
where did you try it? (And for that matter where and why do you need it,
as users with accessibility requirements may be satisfying their needs
by other means?) If you are wrong about this then the javascript
question may never arise.
Richard. | | | | re: larger radio/checkbox or mapping?
In comp.lang.javascript message <cebd688c-60e7-41cd-ba4f-158f87bb6d59@34
g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>, Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:27:38, Beez
<kbiesbrock@gmail.composted: Quote:
>PointedEars wrote: Quote:
>A technical newsgroup like this is more like a think tank than a support
>forum, so pressing the issue will hardly get you a better answer. *Some
>questions need more time to think about. *And I/we do have a real life.
>
>In no way did I suppose this ng was a "support forum" in its truest
>application -- however, the act of helping others is, at some level,
>"support".
<FAQENTRYNewcomers should ignore all that Thomas Lahn writes, except
where it deals only with coding in JavaScript. The latter is generally
correct in principle, though often containing error due to excessive
haste; but it will frequently be incomprehensible to the newcomer.
--
(c) John Stockton, nr London UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05 MIME.
Read 'The Story of Hien and the Chief Examiner' | | | | re: larger radio/checkbox or mapping?
Dr J R Stockton wrote on 29 aug 2008 in comp.lang.javascript : Quote:
<FAQENTRYNewcomers should ignore all that Thomas Lahn writes, except
where it deals only with coding in JavaScript. The latter is generally
correct in principle, though often containing error due to excessive
haste; but it will frequently be incomprehensible to the newcomer.
>
<FAQENTRY>
<FAQENTRY>s should be closed, as oldtimers should know.
</FAQENTRY>
--
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress) |  | Similar JavaScript / Ajax / DHTML bytes | | | /bytes/about
We are a network of experts and professionals in IT and software development that help one another with answers to tough questions and share insights.
Get the best answers to your questions from over 226,419 network members.
|