VK said the following on 11/7/2006 5:46 AM:
Quote:
Quote:
>CSS issues covered in a javascript FAQ, and this from someone who is
>quick to proclaim things off-topic to clj. Interesting.
>
Run-time table scripting is irrelevant to c.l.j. ?
Go back and read what you posted:
<quote>
Quote:
<tr id='wc_Dagger' style='display: block;'>
That should be added into FAQ I think...
</quote>
No attribution, no explanation, just that snippet. Go read your own post
again. And then you go on to babble about how style="display: works in
some browsers or not. And my friend, that is a CSS implementation issue.
Quote:
Let me remind you the Chapter then:
Quote:
<quote>The proposed comp.lang.javascript will be open to discussion on
all
aspects of JavaScript, as it relates to HTML, Java, Perl, the World
Wide Web in general, and other related languages. The scope of
discussion will specifically exclude matters which are *solely*
related to Sun Microsystems, Inc.'s Java language, which should be
discussed in comp.lang.java.</quote>
If you read the charter, in depth, this group is open to discussion
about anything *but* Java. So, does that mean that my Bose stereo is
on-topic here? I guess if I were scripting it maybe. But, CSS issues
belong in ciwas', not clj's, FAQ.
Yet, in a thread on the very same day you proclaim that IE specific
scripting issues are "off-topic to clj". So which is it? Is CSS on topic
and JS off topic or is that just another display of your intelligence in
action?
<URL:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.javascript/browse_thread/thread/7846a0358ec64426/4c3331a2471ee471?lnk=gst&q=IE7+ActiveXObject+Randy +Webb&rnum=1#4c3331a2471ee471>
In case you forgot the thread where you were babbling about JScript
being off-topic here.
Quote:
An issue like:
<tr style="display:block"- why my table gets all crooked on the
standard-compliant browsers?
is indeed relevant to styling rather than to scripting.
You got it!
Quote:
At the same time:
trObject.style.display = 'block'; - why my table goes nuts on the
standard-compliant browsers?
definitely *is* in direct relevance to scripting
No, it is still a CSS issue.
Quote:
P.S. Constructive criticism is always welcome. Contre-productive bias
will be procecuted to the full extend of the freedom of speech. :-)
:-|
You can attempt to "prosecute me to the full extent" but I typically do
not have a battle of wits with unarmed people and you are grossly unarmed.
--
Randy
Chance Favors The Prepared Mind
comp.lang.javascript FAQ -
http://jibbering.com/faq
Javascript Best Practices -
http://www.JavascriptToolbox.com/bestpractices/