In message <87hcxnf7dr.fsf@mithril.chromatico.net>, Sun, 29 Oct 2006
10:50:56, Charlton Wilbur <cwilbur@mithril.chromatico.netwrites
Quote:
>Jim Land <RrrrFfffTttt(NO)@(SPAM)hotmail.comwrites:
>
Quote:
>Javascript on the user's browser is no good. Do it on the server, where
>the database is located.
>
>Javascript validation on the user's browser is excellent, because it
>can provide immediate feedback and prevent a trip to the server. It's
>just not an adequate substitute for server-side validation, because
>not everyone has Javascript turned on.
On the other hand, validation on the user's system may be the only
possibility, since processing may be confined to the user's machine -
we're not all running a business-transaction model.
At present, pages on my site send nothing back to the server. If the
user enters bad data, he should get bad results : sometimes I protect
the user against some types of error.
--
(c) John Stockton, Surrey, UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05 IE 6
<URL:http://www.jibbering.com/faq/>? JL/RC: FAQ of news:comp.lang.javascript
<URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-index.htmjscr maths, dates, sources.
<URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/TP/BP/Delphi/jscr/&c, FAQ items, links.