On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:10:05 -0600, ATS
<affordable_turnkey_solutions@comcast.net> wrote:
[snip]
[color=blue]
> [...] (
http://www.democratsforum.com) [...][/color]
You should seriously consider:
1) Dropping frames. They're evil
(<URL:http://www.google.com/search?q=%22frames+%2A+evil%22>).
2) Validating your HTML (<URL:http://validator.w3.org/>).
[color=blue]
> I'm currently showing or hiding a text area and the problem is there is
> a large space at the top of the page that is empty.[/color]
Use "display: none" not "visibility: hidden".
[snip]
[color=blue]
> IIRC, "Div" is an IE creature[/color]
No. DIVs are standard HTML elements and have been since HTML 3.2[1] (1997).
[color=blue]
> and "Layers" is the Netscape equivalent.[/color]
The LAYER element was only supported in NN4, I believe. Certainly, no
versions since then have used it.
[color=blue]
> I wanted this to avoid complications (thus using the more universal
> "Span" [...][/color]
The SPAN element is completely different from both of these. For a start,
it's an inline element, whilst the other two are block-level. See
<URL:http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#h-7.5.4>.
[color=blue]
> I was thinking of having the existing code reveal/hide areas (span? div?
> layers?) that would include the text that also includes HTML code and be
> positions so it was at the top of the page.[/color]
As you seem to have server-side support, why not use it to include the
text and remove your reliance upon client-side scripting?
[color=blue]
> (BTW, is my Outlook goofy or is it normal that this message keep
> disappearing behind the message window?)[/color]
I wouldn't know. I don't use Outlook.
Mike
[1] A DIV element is also used in the HTML 2.0 Specification (1995), but
it's not present in the DTD. I'm not quite sure what's going on there.
We're now on HTML 4.01 (1999), by the way.
--
Michael Winter
Replace ".invalid" with ".uk" to reply by e-mail.