Thanks man... I appreciate the fact that you included those links instead of
just telling me I was choosing poor design. I've got some stuff to chew on,
now. :)
"DU" <drunclear@hotWIPETHISmail.com> wrote in message
news:c7uove$c6t$1@news.eusc.inter.net...[color=blue]
> Matt Stanley wrote:
>[color=green]
> > I am trying to build a page that scales to fit the browser window[/color][/color]
regardless[color=blue][color=green]
> > of size or resolution. The navigation on the top of the page is framed[/color][/color]
in[color=blue][color=green]
> > dark red/brown using CSS with a background color specified in a custom[/color][/color]
class[color=blue][color=green]
> > tag.
> >
> > I only want those cells that are using this custom class to be 1 pixel[/color][/color]
wide.[color=blue][color=green]
> > In the code I did not specify the <td> width but instead inserted a
> > single-pixel, transparent GIF and specified the dimensions of that image[/color][/color]
as[color=blue][color=green]
> > 1 pixel wide by 10 pixels tall. For some unknown reason, however, the[/color][/color]
cells[color=blue][color=green]
> > that act as dividers between the navigation boxes are 4 pixels wide.
> >
> > Here's the URL to see what I mean:
> >
http://myweb.cableone.net/mstanley/w...lbr/index.html
> >
> > I know CSS would be a cleaner, more efficient way to position the[/color][/color]
elements[color=blue][color=green]
> > and control layout[/color]
>
> Right there. You said it.
>
> , but unfortunately I don't have the luxury of time to[color=green]
> > master those concepts before the project is due.[/color]
>
> Even if you don't use CSS, it seems to me that you need to learn how to
> use tables for non-tabular anyway. So why not learn what is the correct
> way to design a webpage the way you want it.
>
> For now I'm going to have[color=green]
> > to settle with using tables.
> >[/color]
>
> Are you actually saying that given a choice, you would choose an awkward
> design done fast than a robust, small size and interoperable design
> (with many more benefits) done with more time? If you chose the awkward
> design done fast, aren't you promising yourself to redo the design
> eventually? I think it's better to spend more time now and do the right
> thing than to start all over later again.
>[color=green]
> > How can I get this to work as intended? Please advise.
> >
> > TIA,
> >
> > Stanman
> >
> >[/color]
>
> Why tables for layout is stupid:
> problems defined, solutions offered
>
http://www.hotdesign.com/seybold/
>
> How do I design my site for any size browser?
>
http://allmyfaqs.com/faq.pl?AnySizeDesign
>
> CSS Layout Techniques
> Look Ma, No Tables.
>
http://glish.com/css/
>
> (W3C) Tableless layout HOWTO
>
http://www.w3.org/2002/03/csslayout-howto
>
> Liquid Web Design: Build it right and it will work no matter what the
> container.
>
http://www.digital-web.com/tutorials..._1999-10.shtml
>
> DU[/color]