IE and Geocities | |
Hi there,
I have this template from Andreas that I'd like to use in Yahoo!
Geocities.
You can view it here: http://www.geocities.com/rafael_minuesa/andreas/
and this is the original: http://andreasviklund.com/templates/andreas03/
It displays correctly in all browsers except in IE, where the right
column:
#sidebar{
width:153px;
float:right;
margin-top:5px;
font-size:0.9em;
line-height:1.3em;
}
displays incorrectly.
In the original css I had to change #sidebar from width:155px; to
width:153px; because the menu was being displaced to the bottom in
IE,
It has something to do with some code added by the Geocities server,
because on its own (and by that I mean locally viewed or uploaded to a
"clean" server) it displays correctly in all browsers.
Access keys don't work in IE either, but that's a different issue.
Any ideas?
Thanks | | | | re: IE and Geocities
Fistro <rafaminu@gmail.comwrites: <snip> Quote:
It has something to do with some code added by the Geocities server,
because on its own (and by that I mean locally viewed or uploaded to a
"clean" server) it displays correctly in all browsers.
The server is adding elements in front of the DOCTYPE. The DOCTYPE is
designed to put all browsers in "standards" rather than "quirks" mode
but any text at all before it changes this behaviour.
--
Ben. | | | | re: IE and Geocities
On Sep 11, 4:02*pm, Ben Bacarisse <ben.use...@bsb.me.ukwrote: Quote:
Fistro <rafam...@gmail.comwrites: Quote:
I have this template from Andreas that I'd like to use in Yahoo!
Geocities.
> > <snip> Quote:
It has something to do with some code added by the Geocities server,
because on its own (and by that I mean locally viewed or uploaded to a
"clean" server) it displays correctly in all browsers.
>
The server is adding elements in front of the DOCTYPE. *The DOCTYPE is
designed to put all browsers in "standards" rather than "quirks" mode
but any text at all before it changes this behaviour.
This is the code being added:
<script language="JavaScript">var PUpage="76001548"; var
PUprop="geocities"; </script>
<script language="JavaScript" src="http://www.geocities.com/js_source/
pu5geo.js"></script>
<script language="JavaScript"var thGetOv="http://
themis.geocities.yahoo.com/themis/h.php"; var thCanURL="http://
us.geocities.com/rafael_minuesa/index.html"; var thSpaceId="76001548";
var thIP="149.254.192.216"; var thTs="1221142198"; var
thCs="eca143e1e19d7668d191423109654f94";</script>
<noscript><link rel="stylesheet" href="http://
themis.geocities.yahoo.com/jsoff.css?
thIP=149.254.192.216&thTs=1221142198"></noscript>
<script language="JavaScript" src="http://us.geocities.com/js_source/
geovck08.js"></script>
Any workarounds that you may know of?
Thank you. | | | | re: IE and Geocities
Fistro <rafaminu@gmail.comwrites: Quote:
On Sep 11, 4:02*pm, Ben Bacarisse <ben.use...@bsb.me.ukwrote: Quote:
>>
>The server is adding elements in front of the DOCTYPE. *The DOCTYPE is
>designed to put all browsers in "standards" rather than "quirks" mode
>but any text at all before it changes this behaviour.
>
This is the code being added:
It doesn't matter *what* gets added. What part of "any text at all" is
not clear to you? Quote:
Any workarounds that you may know of?
Host your pages somewhere that doesn't f**k them up.
sherm--
--
My blog: http://shermspace.blogspot.com
Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net | | | | re: IE and Geocities
On 11 sep, 18:29, Sherm Pendley <spamt...@dot-app.orgwrote: Quote:
Fistro <rafam...@gmail.comwrites: Quote:
On Sep 11, 4:02*pm, Ben Bacarisse <ben.use...@bsb.me.ukwrote:
> Quote: Quote:
The server is adding elements in front of the DOCTYPE. *The DOCTYPE is
designed to put all browsers in "standards" rather than "quirks" mode
but any text at all before it changes this behaviour.
> Quote:
This is the code being added:
>
It doesn't matter *what* gets added. What part of "any text at all" is
not clear to you?
It DOES matter *what* gets added, you buffoon. That's the whole
point.
I have already said that: "It has something to do with some code added
by the Geocities server"
What part of that sentence specifically you fail to understand?
I knew that sooner or later some smart-alec would show up. I was
hoping that it'd be later, but no luck. Quote: Quote:
Any workarounds that you may know of?
>
Host your pages somewhere that doesn't f**k them up.
Bravo sherm,
Thankyou sherm,
Freak off sherm. | | | | re: IE and Geocities
Fistro <rafaminu@gmail.comwrites: Quote:
On 11 sep, 18:29, Sherm Pendley <spamt...@dot-app.orgwrote: Quote:
>Fistro <rafam...@gmail.comwrites: Quote:
On Sep 11, 4:02*pm, Ben Bacarisse <ben.use...@bsb.me.ukwrote:
>> Quote:
>The server is adding elements in front of the DOCTYPE. *The DOCTYPE is
>designed to put all browsers in "standards" rather than "quirks" mode
>but any text at all before it changes this behaviour.
>> Quote:
This is the code being added:
>>
>It doesn't matter *what* gets added. What part of "any text at all" is
>not clear to you?
>
It DOES matter *what* gets added, you buffoon.
Shouting and calling me names won't change facts.
Your layout problem is caused by quirks mode. Quirks mode is triggered
when any text at all appears above the DOCTYPE, so that the DOCTYPE is
no longer on the first line of the document.
What part of "any text at all" is so hard to understand? It's not what
gets added that causes problems, it's where it gets added. Geocities
could add an empty comment at the top, and it would have precisely the
same effect as what they're adding now. Anything at all that pushes
your DOCTYPE down off the first line will have that effect. Quote: Quote:
>Host your pages somewhere that doesn't f**k them up.
Bravo sherm,
Thankyou sherm,
You're welcome. Happy to help!
sherm--
--
My blog: http://shermspace.blogspot.com
Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net | | | | re: IE and Geocities
Fistro wrote: Quote:
On 11 sep, 18:29, Sherm Pendley <spamt...@dot-app.orgwrote: Quote:
>Fistro <rafam...@gmail.comwrites: Quote:
>>On Sep 11, 4:02 pm, Ben Bacarisse <ben.use...@bsb.me.ukwrote:
>>>The server is adding elements in front of the DOCTYPE. The DOCTYPE is
>>>designed to put all browsers in "standards" rather than "quirks" mode
>>>but any text at all before it changes this behaviour.
>>This is the code being added:
>It doesn't matter *what* gets added. What part of "any text at all" is
>not clear to you?
It DOES matter *what* gets added, you buffoon. That's the whole
point.
I have already said that: "It has something to do with some code added
by the Geocities server"
What part of that sentence specifically you fail to understand?
I knew that sooner or later some smart-alec would show up. I was
hoping that it'd be later, but no luck.
> Quote: Quote:
>>Any workarounds that you may know of?
>Host your pages somewhere that doesn't f**k them up.
Bravo sherm,
Thankyou sherm,
Freak off sherm.
Well Sherm advice although not the most tactful was spot-on. If the
server, like Geocities inserts anything before the DOCTYPE is going to
be problematic for IE. It is best to find another server that DOES NOT
inject stuff into your pages. There are options out there, and some free
ones as well. Google is your friend, http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search
ad free free web hosting - Google Search
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com | | | | re: IE and Geocities
On Sep 11, 7:18 pm, Sherm Pendley <spamt...@dot-app.orgwrote: Quote:
Fistro <rafam...@gmail.comwrites: Quote:
On 11 sep, 18:29, Sherm Pendley <spamt...@dot-app.orgwrote: Quote:
Fistro <rafam...@gmail.comwrites:
On Sep 11, 4:02 pm, Ben Bacarisse <ben.use...@bsb.me.ukwrote:
> Quote: Quote:
The server is adding elements in front of the DOCTYPE. The DOCTYPE is
designed to put all browsers in "standards" rather than "quirks" mode
but any text at all before it changes this behaviour.
> Quote: Quote:
This is the code being added:
> Quote: Quote:
It doesn't matter *what* gets added. What part of "any text at all" is
not clear to you?
> Quote:
It DOES matter *what* gets added, you buffoon.
>
Shouting and calling me names won't change facts.
>
Your layout problem is caused by quirks mode. Quirks mode is triggered
when any text at all appears above the DOCTYPE, so that the DOCTYPE is
no longer on the first line of the document.
>
What part of "any text at all" is so hard to understand? It's not what
gets added that causes problems, it's where it gets added. Geocities
could add an empty comment at the top, and it would have precisely the
same effect as what they're adding now. Anything at all that pushes
your DOCTYPE down off the first line will have that effect.
So, in other words, you have no idea of what is being added neither of
any workarounds .
That's fine, just say so, or better yet, don't say anything.
I don't either, you see, that's why I'm asking. | | | | re: IE and Geocities
Fistro <rafaminu@gmail.comwrites: Quote:
On Sep 11, 7:18 pm, Sherm Pendley <spamt...@dot-app.orgwrote: Quote:
>Fistro <rafam...@gmail.comwrites: Quote:
On 11 sep, 18:29, Sherm Pendley <spamt...@dot-app.orgwrote:
>Fistro <rafam...@gmail.comwrites:
On Sep 11, 4:02 pm, Ben Bacarisse <ben.use...@bsb.me.ukwrote:
>> Quote:
>The server is adding elements in front of the DOCTYPE. The DOCTYPE is
>designed to put all browsers in "standards" rather than "quirks" mode
>but any text at all before it changes this behaviour.
>> Quote:
This is the code being added:
>> Quote:
>It doesn't matter *what* gets added. What part of "any text at all" is
>not clear to you?
>> Quote:
It DOES matter *what* gets added, you buffoon.
>>
>Shouting and calling me names won't change facts.
>>
>Your layout problem is caused by quirks mode. Quirks mode is triggered
>when any text at all appears above the DOCTYPE, so that the DOCTYPE is
>no longer on the first line of the document.
>>
>What part of "any text at all" is so hard to understand? It's not what
>gets added that causes problems, it's where it gets added. Geocities
>could add an empty comment at the top, and it would have precisely the
>same effect as what they're adding now. Anything at all that pushes
>your DOCTYPE down off the first line will have that effect.
>
So, in other words, you have no idea of what is being added neither of
any workarounds .
I know that it doesn't matter what gets added above the DOCTYPE. Any
text that's added above it will trigger quirks mode. Quote:
That's fine, just say so, or better yet, don't say anything.
If you don't want help, why did you ask for it? Quote:
I don't either, you see, that's why I'm asking.
If you don't know what's going on, then you have no logical basis to
assert that someone else's advice about it is incorrect. It's pretty
obvious at this point that you don't actually want help - you're just
here to pick a fight. So, into the killfile you go... *plonk*
sherm--
--
My blog: http://shermspace.blogspot.com
Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net | | | | re: IE and Geocities
On Sep 11, 2:39*pm, Fistro <rafam...@gmail.comwrote: Quote:
On Sep 11, 7:18 pm, Sherm Pendley <spamt...@dot-app.orgwrote:
>
>
> Quote:
Fistro <rafam...@gmail.comwrites: Quote:
On 11 sep, 18:29, Sherm Pendley <spamt...@dot-app.orgwrote:
>Fistro <rafam...@gmail.comwrites:
On Sep 11, 4:02 pm, Ben Bacarisse <ben.use...@bsb.me.ukwrote:
> Quote: Quote:
>The server is adding elements in front of the DOCTYPE. *The DOCTYPE is
>designed to put all browsers in "standards" rather than "quirks" mode
>but any text at all before it changes this behaviour.
> Quote: Quote:
This is the code being added:
> Quote: Quote:
>It doesn't matter *what* gets added. What part of "any text at all" is
>not clear to you?
> Quote: Quote:
It DOES matter **what* gets added, you buffoon.
> Quote:
Shouting and calling me names won't change facts.
> Quote:
Your layout problem is caused by quirks mode. Quirks mode is triggered
when any text at all appears above the DOCTYPE, so that the DOCTYPE is
no longer on the first line of the document.
> Quote:
What part of "any text at all" is so hard to understand? It's not what
gets added that causes problems, it's where it gets added. Geocities
could add an empty comment at the top, and it would have precisely the
same effect as what they're adding now. Anything at all that pushes
your DOCTYPE down off the first line will have that effect.
>
So, in other words, you have no idea of what is being added neither of
any workarounds .
That's fine, just say so, or better yet, don't say anything.
I don't either, you see, that's why I'm asking.
And the answers has been provided. There ARE no workarounds. This is
what these guys are trying to explain to you. Doesn't matter WHAT is
being added, the fact that ANYTHING AT ALL is added before the doctype
will foul it up. Since you have no control over Geocities dumping on
your code, there is no workaround so long as you host on Geocities. | | | | re: IE and Geocities
Hey Fistro.
Sherm just put you in his kill file. That's good. It means, if he
really did it, that your future questions here should get more civil
replies. Quote:
>If you don't know what's going on, then you have no logical basis to
>assert that someone else's advice about it is incorrect. It's pretty
>obvious at this point that you don't actually want help - you're just
>here to pick a fight. So, into the killfile you go... *plonk*
>
>sherm--
| | | | re: IE and Geocities
[top-posting fixed]
On 2008-09-11, Jack wrote: Quote: Quote:
>>If you don't know what's going on, then you have no logical basis to
>>assert that someone else's advice about it is incorrect. It's pretty
>>obvious at this point that you don't actually want help - you're just
>>here to pick a fight. So, into the killfile you go... *plonk*
Hey Fistro.
>
Sherm just put you in his kill file. That's good. It means, if he
really did it, that your future questions here should get more civil
replies.
The answers *may* be more civil, but they will not be any more
accurate.
--
Chris F.A. Johnson <http://cfaj.freeshell.org>
================================================== =================
Author:
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress) | | | | re: IE and Geocities
In article <m1abeeioa2.fsf@dot-app.org>,
Sherm Pendley <spamtrap@dot-app.orgwrote: Quote:
Fistro <rafaminu@gmail.comwrites:
> Quote:
On Sep 11, 4:02*pm, Ben Bacarisse <ben.use...@bsb.me.ukwrote: Quote:
>
The server is adding elements in front of the DOCTYPE. *The DOCTYPE is
designed to put all browsers in "standards" rather than "quirks" mode
but any text at all before it changes this behaviour.
This is the code being added:
>
It doesn't matter *what* gets added. What part of "any text at all" is
not clear to you?
>
I regularly add things like
<?php $thisPage="name"; ?>
So maybe there is more to understanding "any text at all" than might
seem.
--
dorayme | | | | re: IE and Geocities
In article <f53jc4998jrfddkalh4fm8nm24tm9do8oj@4ax.com>,
Jack<Sorry@cantdothat.comwrote: Quote:
Hey Fistro.
>
Sherm just put you in his kill file. That's good. It means, if he
really did it, that your future questions here should get more civil
replies.
Hardly, there are a quite a few lined up in waiting to mug newcomers.
And besides, Sherm is actually just a softie in disguise, his killfile
is hopeless and his plonking works for about 3 secs.
I have been in some of the best kfs in the world and I can assure you
there are some very bad and mean ones and it takes a sort of Mandela or
Bird Man of Alcatraz (Burt Lancaster) type like me to make the best out
of them to cope.
--
dorayme | | | | re: IE and Geocities
On Sep 11, 9:40*pm, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@central.netwrote: Quote:
Fistro wrote: Quote:
I know is problematic, but since it renders perfectly in Firefox and
ALL the major browsers, I was hoping that maybe some of you would be
some kind as to provide with a lead in THAT direction?
>
If you trigger quirks mode then cross-browser consistency is doomed
because the browser then work in legacy mode, and "legacy" means
different things to each browser.
Then, one solution to the issue of cross-browser compatibility would
be to create multiple style sheets for multiple browsers, then using
JavaScript code to return the version and type of browser the web
visitor is using.
In fact I only need another style sheet specific for IE
Correct? Just asking ... | | | | re: IE and Geocities
Fistro wrote: Quote:
On Sep 11, 9:40 pm, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@central.netwrote: Quote:
>Fistro wrote: Quote:
>>I know is problematic, but since it renders perfectly in Firefox and
>>ALL the major browsers, I was hoping that maybe some of you would be
>>some kind as to provide with a lead in THAT direction?
>If you trigger quirks mode then cross-browser consistency is doomed
>because the browser then work in legacy mode, and "legacy" means
>different things to each browser.
>
Then, one solution to the issue of cross-browser compatibility would
be to create multiple style sheets for multiple browsers, then using
JavaScript code to return the version and type of browser the web
visitor is using.
In fact I only need another style sheet specific for IE
>
Correct? Just asking ...
And when JavaScript is disabled, or the browser is posing as IE, as some
folks with Opera use to do...
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com | | | | re: IE and Geocities
dorayme wrote: Quote:
In article <m1abeeioa2.fsf@dot-app.org>,
Sherm Pendley <spamtrap@dot-app.orgwrote:
> Quote:
>Fistro <rafaminu@gmail.comwrites:
>> Quote:
>>On Sep 11, 4:02 pm, Ben Bacarisse <ben.use...@bsb.me.ukwrote:
>>>The server is adding elements in front of the DOCTYPE. The DOCTYPE is
>>>designed to put all browsers in "standards" rather than "quirks" mode
>>>but any text at all before it changes this behaviour.
>>This is the code being added:
>It doesn't matter *what* gets added. What part of "any text at all" is
>not clear to you?
>>
>
I regularly add things like
>
<?php $thisPage="name"; ?>
But that does not send that text to the browser, as with any
*server-side* code. Quote:
>
So maybe there is more to understanding "any text at all" than might
seem.
So to more finely define it, any text sent from the server to the
browser before the DOCTYPE will cause problems...
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com | | | | re: IE and Geocities
On Sep 12, 12:27*am, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@central.netwrote: Quote:
Fistro wrote: Quote:
On Sep 11, 9:40 pm, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@central.netwrote: Quote:
Fistro wrote:
>I know is problematic, but since it renders perfectly in Firefox and
>ALL the major browsers, I was hoping that maybe some of you would be
>some kind as to provide with a lead in THAT direction?
If you trigger quirks mode then cross-browser consistency is doomed
because the browser then work in legacy mode, and "legacy" means
different things to each browser.
> Quote:
Then, one solution to the issue of cross-browser compatibility would
be to create multiple style sheets for multiple browsers, then using
JavaScript code to return the version and type of browser the web
visitor is using.
In fact I only need another style sheet specific for IE
> Quote:
Correct? Just asking ...
>
And when JavaScript is disabled, or the browser is posing as IE, as some
* folks with Opera use to do...
I'll take that risk.
Not many people disable JavaScript in IE, anyway and the percentage of
those posing as IE with Opera are insignificant and I'm sure they'll
understand
How about about Conditional Comments? | | | | re: IE and Geocities
Fistro <rafaminu@gmail.comwrites: Quote:
On Sep 11, 9:40Â*pm, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@central.netwrote: Quote:
>Fistro wrote: Quote:
I know is problematic, but since it renders perfectly in Firefox and
ALL the major browsers, I was hoping that maybe some of you would be
some kind as to provide with a lead in THAT direction?
>>
>If you trigger quirks mode then cross-browser consistency is doomed
>because the browser then work in legacy mode, and "legacy" means
>different things to each browser.
>
Then, one solution to the issue of cross-browser compatibility would
be to create multiple style sheets for multiple browsers, then using
JavaScript code to return the version and type of browser the web
visitor is using.
In fact I only need another style sheet specific for IE
>
Correct? Just asking ...
Hmm... There are lots of problems with "browser sniffing" as such
detection is called. If you simply must have a separate style sheet
for IE I would suggest you use MS's conditional comments.
But is this really a option? I presume you are using an off the peg
layout because you are not familiar with CSS. Fixing a layout for IE
quirks mode is not trivial (there is no spec as far as I know, you
just have to know all the ins and outs).
Are you sure you can not get Geocities to stop adding stuff to your
page? Maybe you can configure the service to put the extra stuff
where it belongs.
[1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537512.aspx
--
Ben. | | | | re: IE and Geocities
On Sep 12, 1:05*am, Ben Bacarisse <ben.use...@bsb.me.ukwrote: Quote:
Fistro <rafam...@gmail.comwrites: Quote:
On Sep 11, 9:40*pm, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@central.netwrote: Quote:
Fistro wrote:
I know is problematic, but since it renders perfectly in Firefox and
ALL the major browsers, I was hoping that maybe some of you would be
some kind as to provide with a lead in THAT direction?
> Quote: Quote:
If you trigger quirks mode then cross-browser consistency is doomed
because the browser then work in legacy mode, and "legacy" means
different things to each browser.
> Quote:
Then, one solution to the issue of cross-browser compatibility would
be to create multiple style sheets for multiple browsers, then using
JavaScript code to return the version and type of browser the web
visitor is using.
In fact I only need another style sheet specific for IE
> Quote:
Correct? Just asking ...
>
Hmm... *There are lots of problems with "browser sniffing" as such
detection is called. *If you simply must have a separate style sheet
for IE I would suggest you use MS's conditional comments.
>
But is this really a option? *I presume you are using an off the peg
layout because you are not familiar with CSS. *Fixing a layout for IE
quirks mode is not trivial (there is no spec as far as I know, you
just have to know all the ins and outs).
>
Are you sure you can not get Geocities to stop adding stuff to your
page? *Maybe you can configure the service to put the extra stuff
where it belongs.
>
[1]http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms537512.aspx
I just been reading through that article, thank you.
You're right, fixing a layout for IE quirks mode is an ordeal, but it
is a new challenge that will enrich my knowledge and will be obsolete
by the time I have mastered it.
Believe it or not I work with CSS all the time, but I do it mostly
with pre-made templates that I have to adapt to different major
browsers (IE 6+). All it takes is going through the style sheet and
fix a few known issues.
This time is different because it looks like I have to correct just
about every other issue, but it's ok, I'll do it, and I'll hate
Microsoft just a little bit more ... | | | | re: IE and Geocities
In article <88e2$48c9a8db$40cba7c6$20887@NAXS.COM>,
"Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@central.netwrote: Quote:
dorayme wrote: Quote:
In article <m1abeeioa2.fsf@dot-app.org>,
Sherm Pendley <spamtrap@dot-app.orgwrote: Quote:
Fistro <rafaminu@gmail.comwrites:
>
>On Sep 11, 4:02 pm, Ben Bacarisse <ben.use...@bsb.me.ukwrote:
>>The server is adding elements in front of the DOCTYPE. The DOCTYPE is
>>designed to put all browsers in "standards" rather than "quirks" mode
>>but any text at all before it changes this behaviour.
>This is the code being added:
It doesn't matter *what* gets added. What part of "any text at all" is
not clear to you?
>
I regularly add things like
<?php $thisPage="name"; ?>
>
But that does not send that text to the browser, as with any
*server-side* code. I know.
Just trying to take the heat off poor old Fistro. I regard my
intervention as like waving some red rag at some bulls in a ring so a
defenceless human quarry op gets time to jump fence before horrible
bloody goring... Quote: Quote:
So maybe there is more to understanding "any text at all" than might
seem.
>
So to more finely define it, any text sent from the server to the
browser before the DOCTYPE will cause problems...
You are a clever little bull ...
To the OP, do you know you can get some pretty good free hosting without
all this nonsense by the hosters that you are experiencing?
--
dorayme | | | | re: IE and Geocities
dorayme wrote: Quote:
To the OP, do you know you can get some pretty good free hosting without
all this nonsense by the hosters that you are experiencing?
>
Already gave him the tip. Didn't seem to be too receptive, I guess he'd
rather keep flogging it to see if he can get IE to fall in line.
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com | | | | re: IE and Geocities
On Sep 12, 3:22 am, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@central.netwrote: Quote:
dorayme wrote: Quote:
To the OP, do you know you can get some pretty good free hosting without
all this nonsense by the hosters that you are experiencing?
>
Already gave him the tip. Didn't seem to be too receptive, I guess he'd
rather keep flogging it to see if he can get IE to fall in line.
I have already made IE fall in line. Still a few things to tune up,
but I got it.
I must apologize to Bacarise for my reaction and thank him and
everyone else for their comments, specially those who provide me with
an insight into the problem.
I know it's not excuse, but I have never encountered this problem
before and I just couldn't believe that on top of all the
inconsistencies that IE has, there was another one that will force me
to start all over again. It is true, I refused to be beaten by some
"quirks mode" imposed upon me by those brainless twits at Microsoft.
Add to that that I have recently replaced my laptop with one running
Vista, and perhaps you can sympathize with my degree of frustration
and amazement at the heights of human stupidity.
But at the end, I have found a workaround and I thank you immensely
for pointing me to the right direction.
I've also found this article very helpful, that explains the way
browsers have been observed to behave when in Quirks Mode: http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/quirks-mode.html
Cheers | | | | re: IE and Geocities
Fistro wrote: Quote:
On Sep 12, 3:22 am, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@central.netwrote: Quote:
>dorayme wrote: Quote:
>>To the OP, do you know you can get some pretty good free hosting without
>>all this nonsense by the hosters that you are experiencing?
>Already gave him the tip. Didn't seem to be too receptive, I guess he'd
>rather keep flogging it to see if he can get IE to fall in line.
>
I have already made IE fall in line. Still a few things to tune up,
but I got it.
>
I must apologize to Bacarise for my reaction and thank him and
everyone else for their comments, specially those who provide me with
an insight into the problem.
>
I know it's not excuse, but I have never encountered this problem
before and I just couldn't believe that on top of all the
inconsistencies that IE has, there was another one that will force me
to start all over again. It is true, I refused to be beaten by some
"quirks mode" imposed upon me by those brainless twits at Microsoft.
Of course you realize you have compounded your problem by trying to use
XHTML what MSIE has a problem to begin with. IE behaves better, even
when it is in quirks mode, with HTML then when it parses XHTML as tag soup.
Do you have any specific reason for using XHTML other than "because it's
advanced"?
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com | | | | re: IE and Geocities
On Sep 12, 3:34*pm, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@central.netwrote: Quote:
Fistro wrote: Quote:
On Sep 12, 3:22 am, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@central.netwrote: Quote:
dorayme wrote:
>To the OP, do you know you can get some pretty good free hosting without
>all this nonsense by the hosters that you are experiencing?
Already gave him the tip. Didn't seem to be too receptive, I guess he'd
rather keep flogging it to see if he can get IE to fall in line.
> Quote:
I have already made IE fall in line. Still a few things to tune up,
but I got it.
> Quote:
I must apologize to Bacarise for my reaction and thank him and
everyone else for their comments, specially those who provide me with
an insight into the problem.
> Quote:
I know it's not excuse, but I have never encountered this problem
before and I just couldn't believe that on top of all the
inconsistencies that IE has, there was another one that will force me
to start all over again. It is true, I refused to be beaten by some
"quirks mode" imposed upon me by those brainless twits at Microsoft.
>
Of course you realize you have compounded your problem by trying to use
XHTML what MSIE has a problem to begin with. IE behaves better, even
when it is in quirks mode, with HTML then when it parses XHTML as tag soup.
>
Do you have any specific reason for using XHTML other than "because it's
advanced"?
Nope, no reason.
It just sounds better, HTML sounds so ninetiesh ...
Enough attention devoted to IE, anyway, let them get their act
together, the design renders well in all versions of IE now and that's
what I was trying to do.
As a final thought to this thread I want to point out how the CSS-
related bugs in IE can be so extremely frustrating to the point of
turning a simple project into an unending nightmare.
Please, make the Internet a better place and use Firefox or any other
CSS standards compliant browser. http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox...11&aid=4414569
You can also complain by letter to MS HQ and representatives. Don't
try to email them , it won't work, and you'll get blacklisted.
Thank you | | | | re: IE and Geocities
Fistro wrote: Quote: Quote:
>Do you have any specific reason for using XHTML other than "because it's
>advanced"?
>
Nope, no reason.
It just sounds better, HTML sounds so ninetiesh ...
Well, Jukka would be quickly note: 'a mark of cluelessness'
Trying XHTML, (and I mean 'trying' because your attempt is not valid
XHTML) is not helping your situation. Do a little Googling and you will
discover that XHTML does not have a real future at this point and HTML
is far from dead. If you abandoned your attempt at XHTML and used HTML
you will find that IE will cooperate will little effort on your part.
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com | | | | re: IE and Geocities
On Sep 12, 6:54*pm, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@central.netwrote: Quote:
Fistro wrote: Quote: Quote:
Do you have any specific reason for using XHTML other than "because it's
advanced"?
> Quote:
Nope, no reason.
It just sounds better, HTML sounds so ninetiesh ...
>
Well, Jukka would be quickly note: 'a mark of cluelessness'
>
Trying XHTML, (and I mean 'trying' because your attempt is not valid
XHTML) is not helping your situation. Do a little Googling and you will
discover that XHTML does not have a real future at this point and HTML
is far from dead. If you abandoned your attempt at XHTML and used HTML
you will find that IE will cooperate will little effort on your part.
I'm not going to make anymore changes as of now (well, just one
more ...), but thanks for the lead again, I've read a good article on
XHTML myths here: http://boulderjams.wordpress.com/200...yths-and-more/ | | | | re: IE and Geocities
On 12 Sep, 16:34, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@central.netwrote: Quote:
Fistro wrote: Quote:
On Sep 12, 3:22 am, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@central.netwrote: Quote:
dorayme wrote:
>To the OP, do you know you can get some pretty good free hosting without
>all this nonsense by the hosters that you are experiencing?
Already gave him the tip. Didn't seem to be too receptive, I guess he'd
rather keep flogging it to see if he can get IE to fall in line.
> Quote:
I have already made IE fall in line. Still a few things to tune up,
but I got it.
> Quote:
I must apologize to Bacarise for my reaction and thank him and
everyone else for their comments, specially those who provide me with
an insight into the problem.
> Quote:
I know it's not excuse, but I have never encountered this problem
before and I just couldn't believe that on top of all the
inconsistencies that IE has, there was another one that will force me
to start all over again. It is true, I refused to be beaten by some
"quirks mode" imposed upon me by those brainless twits at Microsoft.
>
Of course you realize you have compounded your problem by trying to use
XHTML what MSIE has a problem to begin with. IE behaves better, even
when it is in quirks mode, with HTML then when it parses XHTML as tag soup.
How does IE behave better when it parsers HTML as a tag soup, instead
of XHTML as an HTML tag soup? I wouldn't be suprised, but do you have
a
reference or something?
I suspect they just search for the word 'html' inside the DOCTYPE
declaration, and then treat XHTML as any other HTML tag soup. Their
own blogg says they are going to 'continue to read XHTML when served
as “text/html”, presuming it follows the HTML compatibility
recommendations'. http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/09/15/467901.aspx
--
"I made the decision to not try to support the MIME type in IE7 simply
because I personally want XHTML to be successful in the long run."
- Chris Wilson | | | | re: IE and Geocities
On Sep 12, 11:17*pm, "Roy A." <royarnes...@gmail.comwrote: Quote:
On 12 Sep, 16:34, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@central.netwrote:
>
>
> Quote:
Fistro wrote: Quote:
On Sep 12, 3:22 am, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@central.netwrote:
>dorayme wrote:
>>To the OP, do you know you can get some pretty good free hosting without
>>all this nonsense by the hosters that you are experiencing?
>Already gave him the tip. Didn't seem to be too receptive, I guess he'd
>rather keep flogging it to see if he can get IE to fall in line.
> Quote: Quote:
I have already made IE fall in line. Still a few things to tune up,
but I got it.
> Quote: Quote:
I must apologize to Bacarise for my reaction and thank him and
everyone else for their comments, specially those who provide me with
an insight into the problem.
> Quote: Quote:
I know it's not excuse, but I have never encountered this problem
before and I just couldn't believe that on top of all the
inconsistencies that IE has, there was another one that will force me
to start all over again. It is true, I refused to be beaten by some
"quirks mode" imposed upon me by those brainless twits at Microsoft.
> Quote:
Of course you realize you have compounded your problem by trying to use
XHTML what MSIE has a problem to begin with. IE behaves better, even
when it is in quirks mode, with HTML then when it parses XHTML as tag soup.
>
How does IE behave better when it parsers HTML as a tag soup, instead
of XHTML as an HTML tag soup? I wouldn't be suprised, but do you have
a
reference or something?
>
I suspect they just search for the word 'html' inside the DOCTYPE
declaration, and then treat XHTML as any other HTML tag soup. Their
own blogg says they are going to 'continue to read XHTML when served
as “text/html”, presuming it follows the HTML compatibility
recommendations'.
> http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/09/15/467901.aspx Gosh, just by reading that blog I get sick in the stomach.
Here's an excerpt:
"Hello everyone!
One of the features we improved in IE8 is the ‘new tab’ page, which is
the page you see by default when you click the New Tab button on the
Tab row, or if you hit CTRL+T (the keyboard shortcut that does the
same thing). We’re the Program Managers for this page and would like
to walk you through the history and evolution of this feature to what
it is today in IE8 Beta 2.
When IE7 was released in 2006, many users did not know what tabs were,
so our new tab page didn’t really do anything except say “I’m a tab”
and offer a link to help content for folks who were interested in
learning more. Now it’s 2008, and web users are even more
sophisticated and tab-enabled browsers are ubiquitous, so we decided
that it was time to start making the new tab page more useful than
just saying “I’m here."
How about that, people? one of the "features" they improved in IE8 is
the ‘new tab’ page ... Are these people working hard or what?
But no plans for supporting the “application/xml+xhtml” MIME type in
IE7 simply because they want XHTML to be successful.
I think I gonna throw up ... | | | | re: IE and Geocities
On 13 Sep, 03:46, "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4...@central.netwrote: Quote:
Roy A. wrote: Quote:
How does IE behave better when it parsers HTML as a tag soup, instead
of XHTML as an HTML tag soup? I wouldn't be suprised, but do you have
a
reference or something?
>
See for yourself copy and paste these two examples. Same content with a
comment line before DOCTYPE, just one is in HTML format the other in XHTML
>
For Firefox and other *both* will announce that they are in strict mode,
but IE, any IE [don't know about IE8b], will be *strict mode* for HTML
but *quirks mode* for XHTML.
>
I rest my case...
>
As HTML:
------start cut------
<!-- comment before that triggers quirks mode in XHTML -->
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
[...] Quote:
<!-- comment before that triggers quirks mode in XHTML -->
<!DOCTYPE html
PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html>
Sorry. Both snippets shows "Page is in Quirks Mode" with the comment,
and "Page is in Strict Mode" without the comment.
But, that was not the issue. You said:
"IE behaves better, even when it is in quirks mode, with HTML then
when it parses XHTML as tag soup."
Well, the alert box is the same, either HTML 4.01 is parsed as html,
or XHTML 1.0 is parsed as html. |  | | | | /bytes/about
We are a network of experts and professionals in IT and software development that help one another with answers to tough questions and share insights.
Get the best answers to your questions from over 226,471 network members.
|