Re: Browser survey

Matt Probert wrote:

Quote:

>Web page authors have lots of rights. They can also insist on only
>writing the text of their page in Mala, but I should tentatively
>suggest that English might have a wider potential audience?

Indeed. The web page author can get away with deciding to use
a few non-standard fleemishes and the reader will still be able
to gloork the meaning from the context, but there ix a limit;
If too many ot the vleeps are changed, it becomes harder and
qixer to fllf what the wethcz is blorping, and evenually izs
is bkb longer possible to ghilred frok at wifx. Dnighth?
Ngfipht yk ur! Uvq the hhvd or hnnngh. Blorgk? Blorgk!
Blorgkity-blorgk!!!!

--
Guy Macon
<http://www.GuyMacon.com/>

Guy Macon schreef:

Quote:

Matt Probert wrote:
>

Quote:

>Web page authors have lots of rights. They can also insist on only
>writing the text of their page in Mala, but I should tentatively
>suggest that English might have a wider potential audience?

>
Indeed. The web page author can get away with deciding to use
a few non-standard fleemishes and the reader will still be able
to gloork the meaning from the context, but there ix a limit;
If too many ot the vleeps are changed, it becomes harder and
qixer to fllf what the wethcz is blorping, and evenually izs
is bkb longer possible to ghilred frok at wifx. Dnighth?
Ngfipht yk ur! Uvq the hhvd or hnnngh. Blorgk? Blorgk!
Blorgkity-blorgk!!!!
>
>

LOL!

I totally second that after reading through this huge thread.
Thanks for a good laugh, Matt! ;-)

Have a nice weekend!

Regards,
Erwin Moller

Erwin Moller schreef:

Quote:

>
Guy Macon schreef:

Quote:

>Matt Probert wrote:
>>

Quote:

>>Web page authors have lots of rights. They can also insist on only
>>writing the text of their page in Mala, but I should tentatively
>>suggest that English might have a wider potential audience?

>>
>Indeed. The web page author can get away with deciding to use a few
>non-standard fleemishes and the reader will still be able
>to gloork the meaning from the context, but there ix a limit;
>If too many ot the vleeps are changed, it becomes harder and qixer to
>fllf what the wethcz is blorping, and evenually izs is bkb longer
>possible to ghilred frok at wifx. Dnighth? Ngfipht yk ur! Uvq the
>hhvd or hnnngh. Blorgk? Blorgk! Blorgkity-blorgk!!!!
>>
>>

>
>
LOL!
>
I totally second that after reading through this huge thread.
Thanks for a good laugh, Matt! ;-)

Oops, I mean Guy of course!

Quote:

>
Have a nice weekend!
>
Regards,
Erwin Moller

Erwin Moller wrote:

Quote:

>
>Guy Macon <http://www.GuyMacon.com/schreef:
>

Quote:

>Matt Probert wrote:
>>

Quote:

>>Web page authors have lots of rights. They can also insist on only
>>writing the text of their page in Mala, but I should tentatively
>>suggest that English might have a wider potential audience?

>>
>Indeed. The web page author can get away with deciding to use
>a few non-standard fleemishes and the reader will still be able
>to gloork the meaning from the context, but there ix a limit;
>If too many ot the vleeps are changed, it becomes harder and
>qixer to fllf what the wethcz is blorping, and evenually izs
>is bkb longer possible to ghilred frok at wifx. Dnighth?
>Ngfipht yk ur! Uvq the hhvd or hnnngh. Blorgk? Blorgk!
>Blorgkity-blorgk!!!!

>
>LOL!
>
>I totally second that after reading through this huge thread.
>Thanks for a good laugh, Matt! ;-)

You just complemented Matt Probert for something that was
written by Guy Macon.

--
Guy Macon
<http://www.GuyMacon.com/>

Erwin Moller wrote:

Quote:

>Oops, I mean Guy of course!

Note to self: Next time, read entire thread before replying. :)

--
Guy Macon
<http://www.GuyMacon.com/>

On Jul 4, 3:22*pm, Guy Macon <http://www.GuyMacon.com/wrote:

Quote:

You just complemented Matt Probert for something that was
written by Guy Macon.

<singer artist="Carly-Simon">
Your so vain... you probably think this thread is about you....
</singer>

On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:37:44 -0700, Travis Newbury wrote:

Quote:

Your so vain... you probably think this thread is about you....

You're.

Erwin Moller
<Since_humans_read_this_I_am_spammed_too_much@spam yourself.comwrote:

Quote:

>
>Erwin Moller schreef:

Quote:

>>
>Guy Macon schreef:

Quote:

>>Matt Probert wrote:
>>>
>>>Web page authors have lots of rights. They can also insist on only
>>>writing the text of their page in Mala, but I should tentatively
>>>suggest that English might have a wider potential audience?
>>>
>>Indeed. The web page author can get away with deciding to use a few
>>non-standard fleemishes and the reader will still be able
>>to gloork the meaning from the context, but there ix a limit;
>>If too many ot the vleeps are changed, it becomes harder and qixer to
>>fllf what the wethcz is blorping, and evenually izs is bkb longer
>>possible to ghilred frok at wifx. Dnighth? Ngfipht yk ur! Uvq the
>>hhvd or hnnngh. Blorgk? Blorgk! Blorgkity-blorgk!!!!
>>>
>>>

>>
>>
>LOL!
>>
>I totally second that after reading through this huge thread.
>Thanks for a good laugh, Matt! ;-)

>
>Oops, I mean Guy of course!
>

Its a team game, and team effort.

Matt

--
The Probert Encyclopaedia
http://www.probertencyclopaedia.com

"Guy Macon" <http://www.GuyMacon.com/wrote ...

Quote:

You just complemented Matt Probert for something that was
written by Guy Macon.

And that's a serious error.

Guy Macon schreef:

Quote:

Erwin Moller wrote:
>

Quote:

>Oops, I mean Guy of course!

>
Note to self: Next time, read entire thread before replying. :)
>

Hi Guy (<-- I did it right this time!),

Keeping up with this thread takes a lot of time (I quited my daytime job
to keep up with it), so I completely understand your error. ;-)

Regards,
Erwin Moller

Re: Browser survey

re: Re: Browser survey

re: Re: Browser survey

re: Re: Browser survey

re: Re: Browser survey

re: Re: Browser survey

re: Re: Browser survey

re: Re: Browser survey

re: Re: Browser survey

re: Re: Browser survey

Similar HTML / CSS bytes

/bytes/development

/bytes/it

/bytes/about