Jukka K. Korpela schreef:
Quote:
Scripsit Roderik:
>
Quote:
>This is a folluw-up from the html group
>
No it isn't. You started a new thread, apparently after you deciced to
post an excuse there, claiming that your posting was HTML related,
despite that having been disproved (by a reference to non-CSS rendering).
Well it is prob. both html and css related, although since the align
attribute is part of html it looked to be most safe to post in the html
group. Since so. didn't like it there I posted it here and noticed this
in advance not to get flamed about cross-posting or whatever.
Quote:
Quote:
>Please don't bother about the few javascript errors (non-CDATA) in the
>validator.
>
Nobody should bother with the problem before you do your homework as
explained in the previous discussion.
Why is that? If I don't want the page to be valid xhtml that is my
choice, and if you don't want to help me because of that that is your
choice, but please don't judge for everybody else. I usually tend to
make things valid however but it should be worth the effort. It will
take to many hours of work for now and I think the problem is not
related to that, most of it is valid and 6 errors are related to one
thing that is wrong. Since I can't edit the html directly it will be
time consuming to change such a thing.
Quote:
Please do not fix your forged From field before you have a clue. Thank
you in advance.
Well I have no clue, so I don't fix that then.